Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantas' Flights To LHR  
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9169 posts, RR: 15
Posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 12181 times:

Will HKG-LHR and BKK-LHR as well as AKL-LAX resume some day? Seems that Qantas has downsized quite a bit.

With the new Dubai deal, will ALL LHR flights go through DXB? Any via Singapore still?

FRA will be gone right? Sad to see LHR being the ONLY European destination they have. They had CDG, FCO etc.

34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinefiscal From Australia, joined Oct 2009, 330 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 12070 times:

This has been discussed before, at some length, but I think the consensus was that the ME link will enhance their ability to send people on to their favored destination.

Singapore will still be linked via codeshare partners.

The aviation industry being what it is, is moving more to alliances, so that you can still get some revenue, rather then none.


User currently offlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3213 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 11943 times:

Quoting United Airline (Thread starter):
Will HKG-LHR and BKK-LHR as well as AKL-LAX resume some day? Seems that Qantas has downsized quite a bit.

In the past, these routes carried a lot of traffic that previously connected in London. MEL-HKG for example was replacing BA's old SIN-MEL-LHR flight, giving PAX another option and departure time. I took that flight plenty of times because I liked its late night departure, and in J sat next to people going to Paris, Madrid etc. The very last time I took it I too was headed to spain. However the gulf carriers now allow you to go so much deeper into europe than before, and also give me that late departure time I wanted. It's just not competitive the way it was once to force everybody to stop at LHR like it or not.

I can't see the BKK/HKG LHR flights back in a hurry, if anything they'd probably be replaced with more flights to DXB or an onward flight from DXB, say to some place where EK can't get more traffic rights etc. I'd also expect more Australia-DXB flights to come online in the future. the UAE side of bilateral traffic rights is closed to maxed out, but the Australian side has heaps of room to grow. If you were to see a new flight to LHR via somewhere else you'd have a better chance of India, with significant growth in that market. The only thing is last time I checked Indians generally didn't have the highest opinions of Australians so they may not be too keen on an Aussie version of what 'service' should look like.


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9169 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 11818 times:

I can't believe QF is dumping SIN-LHR. Geeeeez

User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8451 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 11561 times:

Quoting United Airline (Thread starter):
FRA will be gone right? Sad to see LHR being the ONLY European destination they have. They had CDG, FCO etc.

Well you can blame the French of them dumping CDG.

Quoting United Airline (Reply 3):
I can't believe QF is dumping SIN-LHR. Geeeeez

What's so great about SIN-LHR? QF can serve its customers to Europe better using EK out of DXB then it can from SIN


User currently offlinegemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5664 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 11481 times:

Quoting United Airline (Reply 3):
I can't believe QF is dumping SIN-LHR.

Historically it is very sad, since QF and partner IA/BOAC/BA have served the route in some form or other since 1934, BUT we must be realistic these days and EK and the DXB hub is much better positioned for QF needs today.

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlinetheobcman From UK - England, joined Nov 2010, 141 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 10718 times:

Can I just clarify : PAX wishing to fly SYD-LHR will be routed to DXB on QF metal (A388 ?) and then transferred to EK metal for DXB-LHR ? is that correct ?

User currently offlinefcogafa From United Kingdom, joined May 2008, 801 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 10543 times:

No, the Qantas flights/aircraft will still continue to LHR and vice versa, just that DXB replaces SIN as the transit point.

User currently offlinevaus77w From Australia, joined Aug 2011, 143 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 10347 times:

Quoting United Airline (Thread starter):
Will HKG-LHR and BKK-LHR as well as AKL-LAX resume some day? Seems that Qantas has downsized quite a bit.

First 2 very unlikely with the EK partnership. Maybe they will resume AKL-LAX if there is sufficient demand, could be a good fit for the 787s.

Quoting United Airline (Thread starter):
With the new Dubai deal, will ALL LHR flights go through DXB? Any via Singapore still?

All eventually through DXB.

Quoting United Airline (Thread starter):
FRA will be gone right? Sad to see LHR being the ONLY European destination they have. They had CDG, FCO etc.

I thin it's just too expensive to fly these very long routes to multiple ports and that's why the flights to CDG, FCO and soon FRA have been/will be dropped (most airlines won't drop profitable routes). The only feasible method of such long haul flying from Australia to Europe is via hubs.


User currently offlineflylonghaul From Australia, joined Feb 2010, 146 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 9855 times:

Quoting vaus77w (Reply 8):
I thin it's just too expensive to fly these very long routes to multiple ports and that's why the flights to CDG, FCO and soon FRA have been/will be dropped (most airlines won't drop profitable routes). The only feasible method of such long haul flying from Australia to Europe is via hubs.

It has been stated in the past that there is sufficient traffic for a dedicated flight to CDG, but the bilateral agreements stand in the way, only allowing 3 x weekly flights.
It's a shame, I would love to see QF operating a flight to CDG.



Flying for Pleasure
User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8374 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 9671 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting theobcman (Reply 6):
Can I just clarify : PAX wishing to fly SYD-LHR will be routed to DXB on QF metal (A388 ?) and then transferred to EK metal for DXB-LHR ? is that correct ?

Wrong, Qantas is still flying two A380's to LHR arriving at the same time they used to arrive when Singapore was the stop. Qantas passengers will fly from Dubai to othe European destinations on Emirates planes.


User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3254 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 8695 times:

They still do arrive from SIN, DXB launches in the spring. Bear in mind they had four flights a day until recently, QANTAS in London is only going one way IMHO. I suspect pride may mean a single daily QF A388 is used going forward but the stop in DXB favours EK more than QF.

User currently offlinetheobcman From UK - England, joined Nov 2010, 141 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 8564 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 10):

Thank you Sir - understood.


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9169 posts, RR: 15
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 7660 times:

When will SIN-LHR end?

Quoting Bill142 (Reply 4):
Well you can blame the French of them dumping CDG.

Why?


User currently offlineCiC From Germany, joined Jun 2010, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 7580 times:

In my opinion is the decision for QF to drop FRA a mistake - EK is fighting hardly to get an approval for a fifth or even more German destinations, and now they have a chance-
they could use the traffic rights of QF to operate 4 daily or more to FRA, and they can drop FRA in favor of another 4th destination... or maybe the rights of QF would allow to fly to another destination than FRA, I don't know...


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8374 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6293 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting United Airline (Reply 13):
When will SIN-LHR end?
Quoting United Airline (Reply 13):
Why?

Currently QF has 2 A380's to LHR stopping in Singapore, at the end of March when the Emirates deal starts those two flights will stop in Dubai. BA and Qantas are stopping their UK to Australia JV which has been around for 15 years because the Middle East ha 3 airlines which 20 years ago didn't exist. Qatar, Etihad and Emirates have changed everything from the Atlantic to the pacific.


User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 6088 times:

Quoting United Airline (Reply 13):
Quoting Bill142 (Reply 4):
Well you can blame the French of them dumping CDG.

Why?

The Australia-France bilateral limited QF to three flights per week if I recall. QF really wanted to be able to operate a daily flight, like it does with FRA, to be more competitive against AF and SQ.

This is potentially where the deal with EK could pay-off in a few years, once QF starts taking 787s for longhaul itself, because the theory is that it could look at exploiting fifth freedom rights to Europe via DXB to help EK gain access to markets it's currently restricted in. This was why there was some surprise amonst some ANet members when it was announced that FRA would end rather than be switched to operate via DXB too.



Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlinerutankrd From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 2995 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5909 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting FlyCaledonian (Reply 16):
This is potentially where the deal with EK could pay-off in a few years, once QF starts taking 787s for longhaul itself, because the theory is that it could look at exploiting fifth freedom rights to Europe via DXB to help EK gain access to markets it's currently restricted in. This was why there was some surprise amonst some ANet members when it was announced that FRA would end rather than be switched to operate via DXB too.

More 788 will change the world drivel !

The QF 788 is for South East Asia it won't be coming to Europe imo !


User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3254 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5769 times:

Bang on rutankrd! They said the B767 would do the same, great aircraft, but the case is overstated!

User currently offlinespud757 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 339 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5531 times:

With the BA/QF JV ending, will we see BA doing similar via DOH when QR join OW?
What about MH; a hub for BA to work with MH into Australia?


User currently offlineTempestDriver From Australia, joined Nov 2010, 19 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5431 times:

Quoting United Airline (Thread starter):
Seems that Qantas has downsized quite a bit.

Qantas has not downsized at all; they have slowed their expansion and moved assets to different markets. Within the last month they took on one new A330 and will add more in the future. Next year 8 x 738-838s will be added to the fleet. 787-9s will begin being added next year, initially allocated to Jetstar but later Qantas will begin to get them as well.


User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3254 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5222 times:

I think we can be clear they have downsized to europe?

User currently offlinerutankrd From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 2995 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5006 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TempestDriver (Reply 20):
787-9s will begin being added next year, initially allocated to Jetstar but later Qantas will begin to get them as well
Quoting TempestDriver (Reply 20):
787-9s will begin being added next year, initially allocated to Jetstar but later Qantas will begin to get them as well

Don't think so the 789 test plane is even under construction yet !
At the current rate the A359 will be airborne and under test and ready for delivery before the 789 !

Anyway Qantas has canx/deferred their 789 order indefinitely.

Jetstar are getting the 15 788s for South East Asia as previously stated.

QF International have without doubt certainly downsized.

[Edited 2012-12-10 15:15:29]

User currently offlinekoruman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4688 times:

Quoting Bill142 (Reply 4):
QF can serve its customers to Europe better using EK out of DXB then it can from SIN

That's half-correct.

Emirates offers a better route network at both ends than Qantas previously did, granted.

But Singapore would have been a much more economical transit point due to:

1) The sector length is half as long from Sydney, meaning that the fuel burn is less than 50% of what it is to Dubai, where the airline has to carry more fuel for the near-ULH sector.

2) Singapore has a far larger premium travel sector to London than Dubai does, in fact I'm not even sure that Qantas has UAE-UK traffic rights.

There are benefits to the new EK partnership. But there are also the costs associated with operating a 12,000 km sector.


User currently offlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3213 posts, RR: 10
Reply 24, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 4475 times:

Quoting koruman (Reply 23):
Singapore has a far larger premium travel sector to London than Dubai does, in fact I'm not even sure that Qantas has UAE-UK traffic rights.

They do, basically DXB grants just about everybody full 5th freedom and beyond rights as part of the negotiations. It was done that way very early in the piece before anybody had any idea what they had envisioned EK to become.

As far as the costs are concerned though, I guess the is also the revenue part. QF would get a larger chuck of the pie too, for operating the longer flight surely?


User currently offlinegemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5664 posts, RR: 6
Reply 25, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 4639 times:

Quoting koruman (Reply 23):
1) The sector length is half as long from Sydney, meaning that the fuel burn is less than 50% of what it is to Dubai, where the airline has to carry more fuel for the near-ULH sector.

Half Right, as far as you go! BUT SYD-DXB is almost the same distance as SIN-LHR, 6500nm v 5879nm and SYD-SIN is almost the same distance DXB-LHR, 3395nm v 2972nm. All the shift to DXB will do is turn the sectors around from shorter/longer to longer/shorter ex Australia, the fuel burn will be near enough identical, allowing for the greater distance via DXB 9473nm v 9274nm via SIN. [All distances Great Circle, not airways]

Quoting koruman (Reply 23):
2) Singapore has a far larger premium travel sector to London than Dubai does, in fact I'm not even sure that Qantas has UAE-UK traffic rights.

QF has full traffic right from DXB, as does every airline that wants them, DXB is an open port. All Australia/Europe bi laterals permit stops in the middle east with full 5th freedom traffic rights. QF traditionally used BAH but it was not specifically specified in any treaty that I know about.
About the premium travel sector, you could be right, but that is only one factor. Got a source for the SIN premium sector being larger? And DXB growth rates to LHR?

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlineqf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 2987 posts, RR: 2
Reply 26, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 4395 times:

Quoting TempestDriver (Reply 20):
Qantas has not downsized at all; they have slowed their expansion and moved assets to different markets. Within the last month they took on one new A330 and will add more in the future. Next year 8 x 738-838s will be added to the fleet. 787-9s will begin being added next year, initially allocated to Jetstar but later Qantas will begin to get them as well.

You must be thinking of QF in the alternate universe where there was no GFC and the company had never been privatised...

The A332 taken a few weeks ago is a domestic aircraft, and will help to replace the 7 767s being retired starting this month. There are no further A330s on order.

The 788s are headed to JQ.

The earliest that QF will get 789s is 2016, and that is assuming there is no further delay in the programme/QF manages to turn international around. At this stage, QF is expected to get the 789s, not JQ.


User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 3
Reply 27, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3692 times:

Quoting rutankrd (Reply 17):
More 788 will change the world drivel !

The QF 788 is for South East Asia it won't be coming to Europe imo !

Did I say the 788s? I'm fully aware as to where the 788s are going. I was talking in a few years time, when QF International could be in a position to expand, when the world economy will hopefully be on an upturn and when QF/EK are in a position to look at developing their 10-year relationship at a point where they will be 3/4 years into it. If the QF/EK is all about QF operating 2xDaily A380s into DXB and onto LHR for the next 10 years then QF International is pretty much dead and buried.



Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlinerutankrd From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 2995 posts, RR: 7
Reply 28, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3470 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting FlyCaledonian (Reply 27):
Did I say the 788s? I'm fully aware as to where the 788s are going. I was talking in a few years time, when QF International could be in a position to expand, when the world economy will hopefully be on an upturn and when QF/EK are in a position to look at developing their 10-year relationship at a point where they will be 3/4 years into it. If the QF/EK is all about QF operating 2xDaily A380s into DXB and onto LHR for the next 10 years then QF International is pretty much dead and buried.

Still unsubstantiated drivel !

The reality for QF and the Jetstar group is South East Asia (Japan/China/Korea and Vietnam) - that's where they will make money on both SLF and Box decks.

That said i think you may talking of QF operating say Perth - DXB and Brisbane- DXB as feeders - agreed this is probable in the not to distant future.

These QF flights still won't go on to Europe through. Europe on a Kangaroo beyond LHR is effectively dead


User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 3
Reply 29, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3294 times:

Quoting rutankrd (Reply 28):
Europe on a Kangaroo beyond LHR is effectively dead

At present yes. But if bilaterals permit, and EK is restricted in certain markets, QF could operate additional flights beyond DXB, this is potentially where QF could offer something to EK.



Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlinekoruman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 30, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3258 times:

Quoting rutankrd (Reply 28):
The reality for QF and the Jetstar group is South East Asia (Japan/China/Korea and Vietnam) - that's where they will make money on both SLF and Box decks.

How do you work that out?

Japan's economy has been stagnant for years, and Jetstar is reduced to low-yield inbound package tourism from Japan.

Jetstar Pacific is a basket-case controlled by a SkyTeam member.

I've debunked the myth of China and especially Shanghai's economic size on the current NZ Aviation Thread.


User currently offlineflylonghaul From Australia, joined Feb 2010, 146 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3199 times:

What are the possibilities that the agreement with France will change to allow the additional flights? Does anybody know if this is even remotely likely, or is it just a dream?
I'm guessing the later, but would be happy to be told otherwise.
Flights to CDG could possibly be the only other European port that QF mainline could turn a profit.
The flight could operate from BNE or PER via DXB similar to the setup now at SIN with QF 5/6 etc



Flying for Pleasure
User currently offlinerutankrd From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 2995 posts, RR: 7
Reply 32, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3171 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting FlyCaledonian (Reply 29):
At present yes. But if bilaterals permit, and EK is restricted in certain markets, QF could operate additional flights beyond DXB, this is potentially where QF could offer something to EK.

UK unlimited EK access , France expanding on EK (and as pointed out QF are limited by the France/Australia bilateral) , Amsterdam EK looking at going 2 daily Scandinavia - EK targeting.

Only significant market where EK is currently tied is Germany , oh and that's just where QF is leaving isn't it ?

Are you going to say Berlin perhaps well that's more to do with Oneworld speculation rather than the EK codeshare pack.

Personally i don't see Berlin the city is too far east and questions remain about AB continuance within Oneworld alliance


So where exactly ?

Europe- Australia requires too much in resources (3-5 aircraft per route with backup for a single daily flight pair).

Same number of aircraft could be deployed on several SE Asia runs more profitably
(This mirrors the BA high utilisation trans-Atlantic day return experience in many ways)

ULH -fuel tanking is expensive and only set to get more so in future.

All those costs and risks are removed from the QF balance sheet from now on, yet they remain able to get their ticketed passengers one stop to a multitude of European cities via DXB and for some of the smaller markets two stop via LHR and their Oneworld partner BA.

You can even go the wrong way via LAX or DFW and onto LHR one stop with partners BA and AA !

QF have now successfully covered almost all the bases with limited risk and financial exposure to themselves.

Again Australia has far more trade with those South East countries previously stated and will have into the future , Oh and even the USA than with Europe.

The landscape for the Kangaroo has changed for good.


User currently offlinerutankrd From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 2995 posts, RR: 7
Reply 33, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3163 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting koruman (Reply 30):
How do you work that out?

Japan's economy has been stagnant for years, and Jetstar is reduced to low-yield inbound package tourism from Japan.

Jetstar Pacific is a basket-case controlled by a SkyTeam member.

I've debunked the myth of China and especially Shanghai's economic size on the current NZ Aviation Thread.

Note the reference to Boxes - Very important revenue stream on all wide body routes !


User currently offlineLufthansa From Christmas Island, joined May 1999, 3213 posts, RR: 10
Reply 34, posted (1 year 9 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3155 times:

Quoting rutankrd (Reply 32):
Again Australia has far more trade with those South East countries previously stated and will have into the future , Oh and even the USA than with Europe.

Yes, it's a little sad, but it's now largely true. Australia's top 3 trading partners are Japan, China and then the USA. the UK still makes the list further down but the USA alone is over double its size. With that is of course business travel demand.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Tarom Adds Flights To LHR posted Thu Nov 24 2011 23:15:29 by ju068
Qantas Flights To Nadi posted Sun Oct 17 2010 23:07:20 by alotoairlines
A380 Flights To LHR posted Sat Dec 6 2008 21:21:31 by Legacytravel
KLM To End Widebody Flights To LHR posted Sat Nov 24 2007 05:04:57 by HB-IWC
Benefits Of DL Operating Flights To LHR And LGW? posted Mon Sep 24 2007 18:43:25 by RafflesKing
Air New Zealand Flights To LHR From The US. posted Sun Sep 16 2007 19:36:16 by Brucek
BA Moving All Texan Flights To LHR-official posted Wed Jun 27 2007 18:48:07 by BAStew
BA YVR Flights To LHR T1? posted Sat Mar 24 2007 20:32:57 by ANother
TAM Confirms Flights To LHR Starting October 28th posted Sat Jun 24 2006 00:45:00 by Jog
AA Codeshares On EI Flights To LHR posted Sat Apr 22 2006 11:42:30 by EIRules