Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
EWR For Sale On Virgin America  
User currently offlinedwcontroller From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 157 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 12752 times:

On Virgin America's web site EWR is up sale starting April 2nd. Six flights a day; three to LAX, three to SFO. Starting main cabin fares $149.00.

[Edited 2012-12-10 19:33:11]


Best phrase to hear at the airport - "All standbys have been cleared and may board at this time"
67 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineN62NA From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4593 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 12762 times:

Nice to see an airline that isn't UA (CO) at EWR!

User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1526 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 12718 times:

All I have to say is they have been trying for a long time, it's about time.


"When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it."- HF
User currently offlinephxa340 From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 906 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 12689 times:

Good luck Virgin - going to three UA hubs - your going to need it. 9x daily SFO and 7x daily LAX is going to be a lot more attractive than 3x

User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1079 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 12539 times:

Where'd they get the slots from?


My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlineusflyer msp From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2185 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 12523 times:

I am generally pretty skeptical about VX but I actually think VX will do pretty well out of EWR. If any airport ever needed fare relief it is EWR! Thanks to UA's pricing power, fares are often 2-3x higher out of EWR compared to JFK or LGA.

User currently offlinedbo861 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 908 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 12383 times:

Are they getting more aircraft for this, or decreasing frequencies on other routes? I thought they were only getting one additional aircraft between now and 2015..and I'm sure they'll need more than one aircraft to fly 6 transcons per day.

User currently offlineenilria From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 7718 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 12356 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 4):
Where'd they get the slots from?

They aren't getting airplanes so something else is going away. I wonder if that is where the slots come from. Perhaps they are closing IAD and did some sort of deal with UA? Something has to be closing.

The other interesting part is that assuming they bought these slots from somewhere, it means they must have gotten a new infusion of cash...

[Edited 2012-12-10 21:07:41]

User currently offlineKLAXAirport From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 154 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 12322 times:

This is great! I know its grueling if you live in Jersey to drive all the way to JFK just to fly Virgin America. This will be a great way for the NJ passengers to get a good experience. I would expect a lot of business travel with TOUGH competition. We'll see...

Cheers,
KLAXAirport   


User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1526 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 12172 times:

Quoting KLAXAirport (Reply 8):
I would expect a lot of business travel with TOUGH competition.

Most businesses in NY that are already established have their own carrier unless the carrier doesn't fly somewhere. New Yorkers take loyalty very seriously, not only airlines but look at the Yankees. I am not saying they won't get business travelers, I am just saying don't expect any amazing number.



"When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it."- HF
User currently offlinejetMarc From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 12130 times:

Getting EWR slots from American.

Examiner Article



"Sucka, I'm gonna send you out on Knuckle Airlines. Fist Class!!" ~ Mr. T
User currently offlineslcdeltarumd11 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3640 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 12065 times:

Three a day is enough to be competative no problem.

User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1526 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 12066 times:

Quoting jetMarc (Reply 10):
Getting EWR slots from American.

All it says about AA is that they are getting the gates from AA.



"When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it."- HF
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26169 posts, RR: 50
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 11949 times:

Yes, here is the schedule.

EWR-LAX
VX161 0915-1215 A320
VX165 1300-1555 A320
VX169 1855-2205 A320

LAX-EWR
VX162 0935-1800 A320
VX166 1305-2129 A320
VX170 2335-0759 A320


EWR-SFO
VX183 0730-1045 A319
VX187 1030-1345 A319
VX193 1729-2055 A319

SFO-EWR
VX174 0800-1624 A319
VX178 1445-2320 A319
VX182 2130-0559 A319

Quoting phxa340 (Reply 3):
Good luck Virgin - going to three UA hubs - your going to need it. 9x daily SFO and 7x daily LAX is going to be a lot more attractive than 3x

Look at the big picture.

Combined with JFK frequencies VX will be offering 30 departures daily between NYC and California !

They are a force to be reckoned with especially considering the rather decent fares they garner in the market compared to peers.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineDeltal1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 9700 posts, RR: 15
Reply 14, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 11933 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 13):

They are a force to be reckoned with especially considering the rather decent fares they garner in the market compared to peers.

and yet the are still burning money.



yep.
User currently offlineboilerla From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 380 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 11856 times:

I'm not so sure that UA's service to EWR from LAX & SFO is O&D. I imagine a lot of customers are connecting to int'l itineraries. Whenever I fly into NYC, I prefer JFK P.S. service if it was pure O&D. But when you go on to someplace in Europe you don't have a choice (alas) and you are in a regular service flight to EWR.

That said I'm sure UA will protect this with low fares, some new 739s that are coming in in 2013 and even more service. Hopefully a double EQM offer or two...


User currently offlinePlanesNTrains From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 5794 posts, RR: 28
Reply 16, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 11808 times:

Quoting Deltal1011man (Reply 14):
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 13):
They are a force to be reckoned with especially considering the rather decent fares they garner in the market compared to peers.
and yet the are still burning money.

The two are not mutually exclusive. In fact, I'd say the fact that they are still kicking even after losing as much as they have makes them all the more formidable.

-Dave



Next Trip: SEA-ABQ-SEA on Alaska
User currently offlinesouthwest737500 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 11318 times:

I hope VX does well, I for one would love to see them in CLT where US had the prices through the roof

WN is probably the savior hopefully they add CLT-DEN/LAS

just a thought


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 11285 times:

Quoting N62NA (Reply 1):
Nice to see an airline that isn't UA (CO) at EWR!

Especially in the Trans-Con market, in the '90s we had DL (LAX), AA (LAX), UA (SFO, LAX, SAN, SEA) and CO (SAN, SFO, SNA, SEA, LAX).

[Edited 2012-12-11 03:49:48]


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineklwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2100 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 11089 times:

As much as I love UA/CO, I am glad to see more competition in any airline's fortress hub. It increases choice and that's not a bad thing.

3x a day will make a dent. Let's see how UA responds that'll be real interesting. I think it was in the 2000s or late 1990's another smaller airline (don't remember which one--the memory is vague) decided to enter the EWR-SFO market. CO really retaliated heavily and really crushed them. Maybe someone recalls who this competitor was.


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 20, posted (2 years 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 10974 times:

Quoting klwright69 (Reply 19):
I think it was in the 2000s or late 1990's another smaller airline (don't remember which one--the memory is vague) decided to enter the EWR-SFO market. CO really retaliated heavily and really crushed them. Maybe someone recalls who this competitor was.

ATA.....



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineklwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2100 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (2 years 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 10275 times:

Yes, that is right. I knew it was an airline starting with "A." CO dumped all sorts of capacity and drove them out. Now we're dealing with the resources of the combined entity. Who know maybe UA won't respond that hard.

User currently offlineN62NA From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4593 posts, RR: 8
Reply 22, posted (2 years 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 10185 times:

Quoting jetMarc (Reply 10):
Getting EWR slots from American.

Examiner Article

As noted in a prior post it's just a gate. AA could probably drop another gate as well and not have it impact their meager EWR operation at all.


User currently offlineSurfandSnow From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 2908 posts, RR: 31
Reply 23, posted (2 years 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 10100 times:

I am very happy to see VX finally adding service to EWR. They have been wanting to do so for years, but complained that they could not get commercially viable slots. Congrats to them for this long-awaited accomplishment! However, it does raise some questions:

- Gate space came from AA. However, where did the scarce EWR slots come from? The only equivalent assets that VX could trade to other airlines would be their JFK slots (I don't think the beyond-perimeter DCA slot is transferable), and I doubt VX would want to give any of those up when they finally seem to be getting good pricing power and yields on their JFK routes.

- How does VX, which has slashed near term growth by capping the fleet for several years, come up with the aircraft capacity to offer this service? In the past, they cut underperforming routes within a year. If that is the case, then ORD and Mexico should be safe, while PHL and PDX should be worried right now. They could also cut frequency across the board.



Flying in the middle seat of coach is much better than not flying at all!
User currently offlinePhilly65 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 57 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (2 years 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 9943 times:

Looks like PHL is safe although they did drop one round trip on the LAX route...now at 2x's/day. I bet it will be frequency adjustments on other routes especially Mexico and/or Florida. Didn't they announce a few frequency cuts on other routes? That is probably funding the aircraft requirements for the EWR service.

User currently offlineusairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3474 posts, RR: 7
Reply 25, posted (2 years 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 10217 times:

Quoting SurfandSnow (Reply 23):
- How does VX, which has slashed near term growth by capping the fleet for several years, come up with the aircraft capacity to offer this service? In the past, they cut underperforming routes within a year. If that is the case, then ORD and Mexico should be safe, while PHL and PDX should be worried right now. They could also cut frequency across the board.

Yes I know the EWR-SFO/LAX market is much different than PHL-SFO/LAX but if US/UA can run VX out of PHL then UA better be able to run VX out of EWR. Though I suspect VX will be able to sell a number of F seats out of EWR.

Which flts/routes is AA curtailing? Are they giving up on LAX?


User currently offlineslcdeltarumd11 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3640 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (2 years 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 10090 times:

Quoting usflyer msp (Reply 5):
I am generally pretty skeptical about VX but I actually think VX will do pretty well out of EWR

I agree 100%. I am often skpetical of VX also but I really could see them do well out of EWR. Fares are often so high on these two routes. Very similar to EWR-DEN before Southwest went on the route.


User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6826 posts, RR: 32
Reply 27, posted (2 years 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 10214 times:

Quoting enilria (Reply 7):
They aren't getting airplanes so something else is going away.

   The schedule looks like it takes the better part of four aircraft since there look to be some lengthy turns at EWR. The evening arrival at 2129 from LAX (VX166) sits on the ground until 0915 or 1300, depending on whether the red-eye turns to the 0915 or 1300 departure. The 2320 arrival from SFO is similar.

Quoting usairways85 (Reply 25):
Though I suspect VX will be able to sell a number of F seats out of EWR.

I think that will be challenging given the level of loyalty among EWR-based travelers to the UA frequent flyer program.


User currently offlineusairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3474 posts, RR: 7
Reply 28, posted (2 years 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 10161 times:

Quoting ScottB (Reply 27):
I think that will be challenging given the level of loyalty among EWR-based travelers to the UA frequent flyer program.

True, though so many people in the NYC area pay outright for F and aren't necessarily die hard loyalists.

In the late summer/Fall I was on EWR-LAX on ~10 roundtrips and IFE options or lack thereof was evident. No wifi, many aircraft with no AC outlets, only over head monitors/no seat back TVs.


User currently offlineslcdeltarumd11 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3640 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (2 years 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 10101 times:

I wonder if we see united try to up its game and at least put PTV only aircraft on those routes. A united 757-300 is so inferior to virgin america its incredible for example but as other said lots of connections as well connecting hubs so they might not care too much. United has some 757-200s which are certainly more than adequate for the real cash paying business class customers

User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6200 posts, RR: 24
Reply 30, posted (2 years 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 10137 times:

Quoting SurfandSnow (Reply 23):

- How does VX, which has slashed near term growth by capping the fleet for several years, come up with the aircraft capacity to offer this service?

Been to SFO lately? They have a minimum of 3 or 4 planes always sitting around during the day. This actually should help them get aircraft up moving and making money.



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineOOer From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1507 posts, RR: 2
Reply 31, posted (2 years 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 10077 times:

Quoting dwcontroller (Thread starter):
On Virgin America's web site EWR is up sale starting April 2nd. Six flights a day; three to LAX, three to SFO. Starting main cabin fares $149.00.

...and then people wonder why they have yet to post a profitable quarter. Hopefully they'll run out of money next year and we can put them out of their misery.


User currently offlineslcdeltarumd11 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3640 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (2 years 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 9987 times:

Quoting dwcontroller (Thread starter):
On Virgin America's web site EWR is up sale starting April 2nd. Six flights a day; three to LAX, three to SFO. Starting main cabin fares $149.00.

That is a little over 5 cents a mile ($0.058 for SFO) for a brand new plane with one of the best inflight experiences out there. There is no way that covers the cost especially given how long these flights are and how much time time they take up


User currently offlinejetMarc From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 33, posted (2 years 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 9845 times:

Keep in mind "starting fares" usually only mean two or three seats and probably not even for all flights... its just a marketing gimic, not an entire flight with $150 tickets.


"Sucka, I'm gonna send you out on Knuckle Airlines. Fist Class!!" ~ Mr. T
User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5604 posts, RR: 12
Reply 34, posted (2 years 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 9816 times:

Quoting dbo861 (Reply 6):
Are they getting more aircraft for this, or decreasing frequencies on other routes?
Quoting enilria (Reply 7):
They aren't getting airplanes so something else is going away.
Quoting ScottB (Reply 27):
The schedule looks like it takes the better part of four aircraft since there look to be some lengthy turns at EWR. The evening arrival at 2129 from LAX (VX166) sits on the ground until 0915 or 1300, depending on whether the red-eye turns to the 0915 or 1300 departure. The 2320 arrival from SFO is similar.


It is interesting to look at a turn-schedule. The 2 "normal" (afternoon) turns at EWR are both :55 on the ground. But the other 4 turns are RONs (~10-13 hours each) and/or long ground times -- depending on which inbounds feed which outbounds.

Of course when all you fly into an e/c station are nonstops from the left coast, it is difficult to spread out the service during the day without some long layovers. That 3-hour time difference makes things tough for schedulers.

Quoting as739x (Reply 30):
Been to SFO lately? They have a minimum of 3 or 4 planes always sitting around during the day. This actually should help them get aircraft up moving and making money


They do seem to have a lot of down time don't they? I guess with their business model and current issues, a/c sitting on the ground just might be more sensible than increasing frequency/capacity on some of their shorter w/c routes (or adding more short haul cities such as PHX or SLC...)

Perhaps by tightening up the schedules system wide, they can squeeze out the a/c time needed for these new routes, but I doubt it. It seems probable that there will still need to be some route or capacity trimming needed to make this schedule work. As stated, 6 new transcon roundtrips (with some long turns) is a LOT of a/c time!

bb


User currently offlineVCy From Cyprus, joined Dec 2012, 236 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (2 years 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 9806 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thank God for Virgin America & America has a quality carrier  

User currently offlinetommy767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6936 posts, RR: 9
Reply 36, posted (2 years 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 9367 times:

Well this is good for me since it means FARE REDUCTIONS on these routes. It's f-ing ridic that UA is charging $697 for a one way flight to LAX from EWR over the holidays, yet it's 350 over at JFK.

Quoting boilerla (Reply 15):
That said I'm sure UA will protect this with low fares, some new 739s that are coming in in 2013 and even more service. Hopefully a double EQM offer or two...

Well be be quite frank, the 739s completely suck compared to the VX 320. Not even comparable and pax don't like the 739 compared to the 757s either.



"KEEP CLIMBING" -- DELTA
User currently offlinesqsfo From United States of America, joined Sep 2012, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (2 years 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 9192 times:

I have been on many UA flights and a few( 7 in total) on VX. The product offering and service onboard VX was FAR FAR FAR more superior. UA's tired and old cabins are becoming a real drag, but if the new fleets are equipped with PTV's and better AVOD systems, we could see the end of VX. If UA could reach some sort of deal with HR and labor unions, and retire the older FA's hire new ones( proficient ones, that actually give two shits about the passenger) UA can work wonders.

User currently offlineNWADTWE16 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (2 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7355 times:

Great news! and this will be a huge hit..lots of Northern Jersey/NYC catchment that doesnt want JFK that can now choose something other than UA...

User currently offlineflyby519 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 1235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (2 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 7291 times:

Quoting SurfandSnow (Reply 23):
Gate space came from AA. However, where did the scarce EWR slots come from? The only equivalent assets that VX could trade to other airlines would be their JFK slots (I don't think the beyond-perimeter DCA slot is transferable), and I doubt VX would want to give any of those up when they finally seem to be getting good pricing power and yields on their JFK routes.

Any updates on this?

Inquiring minds would like to know



These postings or comments are not a company-sponsored source of communication.
User currently offlinePHLwok From United States of America, joined May 2007, 527 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (2 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 7180 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 13):
EWR-LAX
VX161 0915-1215 A320
VX165 1300-1555 A320
VX169 1855-2205 A320

LAX-EWR
VX162 0935-1800 A320
VX166 1305-2129 A320
VX170 2335-0759 A320

These times for the first flight each day really aren't that good. First arrival westbound doesn't even allow for a business lunch. The eastbound redeye also gets in pretty late.


User currently offlineDeltal1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 9700 posts, RR: 15
Reply 41, posted (2 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 7057 times:

Quoting PlanesNTrains (Reply 16):

The two are not mutually exclusive. In fact, I'd say the fact that they are still kicking even after losing as much as they have makes them all the more formidable.

All it shows is someone(or people) are stupid enough to keeping letting VX burn money.


and FWIW losing money doesn't make them more formidable. This isn't Air India....It will run out at some point.  



yep.
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 42, posted (2 years 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 6644 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 4):
Where'd they get the slots from?
Quoting jetMarc (Reply 10):
Getting EWR slots from American.
Quoting airliner371 (Reply 12):
All it says about AA is that they are getting the gates from AA.
Quoting N62NA (Reply 22):
As noted in a prior post it's just a gate.
Quoting SurfandSnow (Reply 23):
Gate space came from AA. However, where did the scarce EWR slots come from?

The slots are indeed coming from AA, as are the gates. It's mentioned in the Port Authority Press release:

Quote:
Virgin America, a low-cost carrier with limited service in the New York metropolitan area, will take over aircraft slot rights at Newark Liberty from American, whose parent company is currently reorganizing under bankruptcy protection. Virgin America will have sufficient slots to offer six daily flights to Los Angeles and San Francisco starting next year. The arrangement is in accordance with a Federal Aviation Administration mandate to increase competition at Newark Liberty.

Also:

Quote:
Under the agreement, American is relinquishing three of the six gates it holds at Newark Liberty’s Terminal A. American will reduce its costs at the airport by allowing Virgin America to take over one gate and the Port Authority to control the other two for use by various carriers as needed.
http://www.panynj.gov/press-room/press-item.cfm?headLine_id=1723

Nice deal for competition at EWR. AA relinquishes three gates, two to be common use operated by the PA, and slots to VX and in return AA gets to reduce their costs. AA has shrunk significantly at EWR over the past decade, gone are LHR, SJU, BOS, BNA, RDU, STL etc.. The two common use gates will be available for other new entrants, all they need are some slots.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5604 posts, RR: 12
Reply 43, posted (2 years 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 6530 times:

Can someone clarify if the EWR slots are time-specific? Maybe this would explain the strange times and long turns of some of the VX flights...

bb


User currently offlineFlytravel From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (2 years 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 6368 times:

Quoting usairways85 (Reply 25):
Yes I know the EWR-SFO/LAX market is much different than PHL-SFO/LAX but if US/UA can run VX out of PHL then UA better be able to run VX out of EWR. Though I suspect VX will be able to sell a number of F seats out of EWR.


EWR
attracts a greater catchment including more high yield and more destination traffic. I wonder if this will just cannibalize VX's own PHL service, and then PHL service will be reduced to possibly just 1x daily or 2x daily SFO, like AS flying 1x daily to SEA. Since WN doesn't fly BWI-SFO nonstop, it'd be interesting if VX added 1x daily BWI-SFO as well.

[Edited 2012-12-12 14:21:52]

User currently offlineskycub From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 45, posted (2 years 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 6289 times:

So... they have yet to earn a profit flying trans-cons from LAX and SFO to major east coast cities.... so what do they do? Add yet more trans-cons from LAX and SFO to yet another east coast city.

User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1079 posts, RR: 0
Reply 46, posted (2 years 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 6264 times:

Delete Delete Delete

[Edited 2012-12-12 15:26:41]


My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 47, posted (2 years 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 6203 times:

Quote:
Virgin America will need to dedicate four or five planes to flying the coast-to-coast route, said Cush, and has plans to add one more to its 52-aircraft fleet before April.
http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf...irgin_airlines_newark_airport.html



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineNWADTWE16 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 48, posted (2 years 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 6173 times:

What is that supposed 'airline analyst' talking about with saying United only offers 'premium' seats out of EWR?

User currently offlineklwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2100 posts, RR: 3
Reply 49, posted (2 years 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 5946 times:

There is a lot of traffic on the route, but with the competition the fares may be unsustainable. UA will retaliate.

User currently offlineRDH3E From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 1827 posts, RR: 3
Reply 50, posted (2 years 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 5354 times:

From the OAG thread:

Quoting enilria (Reply 1):
UA LAX-EWR APR 7>12 MAY 8>13 JUN 8>14 JUL 8>14 AUG 8>13
Quoting enilria (Reply 1):
UA SFO-EWR APR 8>13 MAY 8>14 JUN 8>15 JUL 8>16 AUG 8>15

Looks like UA is none to happy with VX.


User currently offlineusairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3474 posts, RR: 7
Reply 51, posted (2 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5308 times:

Quoting RDH3E (Reply 50):
Looks like UA is none to happy with VX.

I think you really have to look at the overall capacity seat count. I wouldn't be surprised if UA dumps capacity on the route but if you dive into it they may have dropped 2 753 frequencies to add 4 319s (or something like that).


User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1079 posts, RR: 0
Reply 52, posted (2 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5268 times:

12 737-800's and 2 757's on EWR-LAX

11 737-800's, 3 A320's, 1 757, and 1 A319 on EWR-SFO.



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlineklwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2100 posts, RR: 3
Reply 53, posted (2 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5255 times:

Quoting usairways85 (Reply 51):
Quoting RDH3E (Reply 50):Looks like UA is none to happy with VX.
I think you really have to look at the overall capacity seat count. I wouldn't be surprised if UA dumps capacity on the route but if you dive into it they may have dropped 2 753 frequencies to add 4 319s (or something like that).

Well pick a date and see for yourselves. Of course a drop in capacity is NOT the case, it is a major increase overall. Just as I said earlier, UA will respond, just like when CO crushed ATA in SFO-EWR in the olden days.


User currently offlineklwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2100 posts, RR: 3
Reply 54, posted (2 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5252 times:

UA is not stupid here. They know VX is struggling.

User currently offlinetommy767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6936 posts, RR: 9
Reply 55, posted (2 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 5209 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 52):
12 737-800's and 2 757's on EWR-LAX

11 737-800's, 3 A320's, 1 757, and 1 A319 on EWR-SFO.

This schedule will change by April. I find it hard to believe that 12 738s will be on the route. Look for more variety.



"KEEP CLIMBING" -- DELTA
User currently offlineklwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2100 posts, RR: 3
Reply 56, posted (2 years 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 5152 times:

Quoting tommy767 (Reply 55):
usflyguy (Reply 52):12 737-800's and 2 757's on EWR-LAX

11 737-800's, 3 A320's, 1 757, and 1 A319 on EWR-SFO.
This schedule will change by April. I find it hard to believe that 12 738s will be on the route. Look for more variety.

Completely agree. Probably placeholders.


User currently offlineNWADTWE16 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 57, posted (2 years 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 4938 times:

Someone mentioned it in the OAG thread..does this rediculous response from UA warrant an investigation by the Govt? Clearly even UA knows their product sucks compared to VX so whats left to do but try and kill them with frequency. VX is still going to do very well with the EWR station despite anything UA does, and its clearly going to cost UA $$$ to be the bully.

User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1079 posts, RR: 0
Reply 58, posted (2 years 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 4913 times:

Quoting NWADTWE16 (Reply 57):
Someone mentioned it in the OAG thread..does this rediculous response from UA warrant an investigation by the Govt? Clearly even UA knows their product sucks compared to VX so whats left to do but try and kill them with frequency. VX is still going to do very well with the EWR station despite anything UA does, and its clearly going to cost UA $$$ to be the bully.

Should VX be investigated for having fares for sale that, obviously, aren't high enough to cover their costs?



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlineairliner371 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 1526 posts, RR: 2
Reply 59, posted (2 years 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 4887 times:

Quoting NWADTWE16 (Reply 57):
VX is still going to do very well with the EWR station despite anything UA does, and its clearly going to cost UA $$$ to be the bully.

Its not bullying, its business. You see it all the time in this industry, UA has money to be able to do this, VX on the other hand doesn't.

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 58):
Should VX be investigated for having fares for sale that, obviously, aren't high enough to cover their costs?

Very well put.

[Edited 2012-12-18 18:20:24]


"When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it."- HF
User currently offlineNWADTWE16 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 60, posted (2 years 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 4830 times:

I love how people defend less competition and airlines like UA being able to roll people over the coals in markets. You guys take it happily..well not everyone has money to throw away like that so competition is good and this competition is good as is B6 new SEA-ANC

User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20822 posts, RR: 62
Reply 61, posted (2 years 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 4828 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 58):
Should VX be investigated for having fares for sale that, obviously, aren't high enough to cover their costs?

Why? Fare wars happen constantly. UA and US are currently going at it, offering transcon fares in some markets for as low as $160 or so round-trip. I even saw one as low as $141 r/t with plenty of availability right through the summer.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlinemilemaster From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1073 posts, RR: 2
Reply 62, posted (2 years 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 4812 times:

Quoting usflyguy (Reply 58):
Should VX be investigated for having fares for sale that, obviously, aren't high enough to cover their costs

Investigated? By whom? The fare police?

It's not like the entire plane is priced at 149.00 a seat.


User currently onlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2370 posts, RR: 1
Reply 63, posted (2 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 4761 times:

Quoting NWADTWE16 (Reply 60):
I love how people defend less competition and airlines like UA being able to roll people over the coals in markets. You guys take it happily..well not everyone has money to throw away like that so competition is good and this competition is good as is B6 new SEA-ANC

You are the one who thinks UA should be investigated for adding more flights. Isn't that notion itself defending less competition? After all, if people truly like VX they will succeed against UA no matter how many flights UA adds.

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 61):
Why? Fare wars happen constantly. UA and US are currently going at it, offering transcon fares in some markets for as low as $160 or so round-trip. I even saw one as low as $141 r/t with plenty of availability right through the summer.
Quoting milemaster (Reply 62):
Investigated? By whom? The fare police?

You guys are obviously missing his point. I do not believe usflyguy believes VX should be investigated by anyone. He was using that argument to point out that UA should not (and will not) be investigated for "anti-competitive" behavior.


User currently offlineusflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1079 posts, RR: 0
Reply 64, posted (2 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 4752 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 61):
Quoting milemaster (Reply 62):

It was a rhetorical question in response to the call for UA to be investigated.



My post is my ideas and my opinions only, I do not represent the ideas or opinions of anyone else or company.
User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3628 posts, RR: 6
Reply 65, posted (2 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 4722 times:

What a stupid thing for UA to do at a slot restricted airport.

Let VX come in and have their 3 flights a day.

They can't add anymore.

And UA will still have pricing power.

By have 15 flights a day, UA is diluting their own pricing power.

And if I had to bet, VX is willing to ride it out because they waited a really long time to get these slots.

You think they are just going to cut frequencies like in PHL? No way.

DL, AA, UA, B6 and VX compete very well at JFK.

There's room in the inn for VX at EWR


User currently offlineNWADTWE16 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 242 posts, RR: 0
Reply 66, posted (2 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 4705 times:

As i stated in my response, someone else, in another thread posed the question ' does their behavior warrant an investigation?' . I simply re-quoted it in this thread, hoping for some rational responses as i dont know if its predatory as by law or not...

User currently offlineenilria From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 7718 posts, RR: 15
Reply 67, posted (2 years 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 4660 times:

Quoting NWADTWE16 (Reply 57):
Someone mentioned it in the OAG thread..does this rediculous response from UA warrant an investigation by the Govt?
Quoting NWADTWE16 (Reply 66):
As i stated in my response, someone else, in another thread posed the question ' does their behavior warrant an investigation?' . I simply re-quoted it in this thread, hoping for some rational responses as i dont know if its predatory as by law or not...
Quoting Polot (Reply 63):
You are the one who thinks UA should be investigated for adding more flights.
Quoting airliner371 (Reply 59):
Its not bullying, its business. You see it all the time in this industry, UA has money to be able to do this, VX on the other hand doesn't.

I'm the person who said that in the OAG thread and I'm the OP of that thread. I've been watching the OAG changes every week since many a.netters were in diapers and that is the most dramatic frequency increase I've ever seen after another carrier entered the market. I've talked to some other "folks" in the industry today and most were in disbelief at that level of frequency increase. I think if VX wishes to pursue it, the DOT/DOJ will investigate it.

Quoting milemaster (Reply 62):

Investigated? By whom? The fare police?
It's not like the entire plane is priced at 149.00 a seat.

The DOT/DOJ has held that fares priced above variable cost are acceptable. VX's fares are easily above that level.

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 65):
What a stupid thing for UA to do at a slot restricted airport.
Let VX come in and have their 3 flights a day.

I think they were warranted to add a couple of flights in each market, but what they did was way over the line. They will have to shave frequencies from other markets to do this. Given UA's childish behavior in IAH after losing the HOU CBP decision, their behavior is not unexpected, however.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
HAM Flight Blackboard For Sale On Ebay posted Wed Dec 12 2007 04:27:56 by ZakHH
Fly Free On Virgin America posted Tue Nov 27 2007 12:26:48 by AirTranTUS
Lifvest From AQ 243 For Sale On EBay posted Mon Aug 14 2006 11:18:23 by Aloha73G
Two BAC-1-11 Aircraft For Sale On Ebay posted Sat Jul 1 2006 20:10:25 by INNflight
Boeing 737-200 For Sale On E-Bay! posted Wed Feb 8 2006 07:07:22 by AndrewUber
The FlyI Guy For Sale On EBay! posted Fri Jan 6 2006 23:54:33 by Rookinla
Boeing 747 Seats For Sale On E-Bay! posted Wed Dec 7 2005 22:03:36 by DFORCE1
Airline For Sale On EBay posted Thu Nov 3 2005 19:51:27 by LatinAviation
Caribbean Airline For Sale On Ebay posted Tue Jun 28 2005 08:24:35 by AndrewUber
Latest On Virgin America? posted Sun May 22 2005 08:51:35 by 808luvAQ