miaami From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 381 posts, RR: 0 Posted (5 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6500 times:
According to AA.com. AA will be adding a second daily 777 on MIA-LHR, year round starting in April 2013. With this flight AA/BA will have 5 daily flights year round. Interesting addition seeing that this additional flight usually only operates during the winter months and is only 3 days per week. Definitely good news for Miami. With the delivery of the new 777-300's hopefully that will free up some 777-200's that can be allocated elsewhere. Could there be more Europe flying on AA from Miami on the horizon?
mah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31111 posts, RR: 74 Reply 1, posted (5 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6446 times:
Quoting miaami (Thread starter): Could there be more Europe flying on AA from Miami on the horizon?
Yes. Daily service to Milan is supposedly on the horizon - and even though this has been rumored for years, it's expected to finally get off the ground post-BK.
Also, at the same time AA goes double-daily on MIALHR, IB goes double-daily on MIAMAD.
Byrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2140 posts, RR: 1 Reply 5, posted (5 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5944 times:
With regards to EU routes, AA has failed to take advantage of their dominance at MIA. Have they ever considered FRA or DME?
The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
doug From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 825 posts, RR: 0 Reply 6, posted (5 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5883 times:
Nice add on for a hub on the rise also for local Miami people channel 10 will air a whole 30 minute special on American and its future in Miami on Thursday Dec 14 at 8 pm.
Sheridan125 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2012, 25 posts, RR: 0 Reply 7, posted (5 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5517 times:
This development is exactly what a Joint Venture is all baout. Providing excellent schedules on key routes. MIA can now really be used as connecting hub for a very wide range of key routes.
Doubtful. Low-yielding, zero connecting traffic, little business traffic. Much better suited for a charter or leisure-based carrier rather than a large network airline like AA.
In terms of airport facilities, yes. SA used to fly a 747 into FLL in the 90s. I don't think there's enough traffic on LON-FLL to justify a 777, though.
Quoting mah4546 (Reply 16): In this case I wonder if BA is making it's third frequency seasonal, or maybe AA will go to 17w in the winter?
Aren't AA/BA metal neutral across the Atlantic? It looks like they just swapped the BA 777 for an AA one.
United_fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7157 posts, RR: 8 Reply 19, posted (5 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 2008 times:
Quoting OB1504 (Reply 18): Quoting United_fan (Reply 13):
Is there room for a 777 @ FLL ?
In terms of airport facilities, yes. SA used to fly a 747 into FLL in the 90s. I don't think there's enough traffic on LON-FLL to justify a 777, though.
I remember seeing the SA 744 in June 2001 @ FLL. Doesn't the 777 have a wider wingspan than a 747?
'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
jfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 7342 posts, RR: 7 Reply 21, posted (5 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1594 times:
Quoting by738 (Reply 17): Sounds perfect for a BA LGW 777
Please don't Gatwick Miami again, we have been there and done that. The UK's policy of all airline after 1977 had to be "Gatwicked" sucked and was even used aginast Virgin Atlantic and British Caledonian. Cathay Pacific and ANZ were Gatwicked too.
LGW has found its niche as an LCC and holiday airport as shown us by Virgins 744's with 500 seats to Orlando.