CharterFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted (14 years 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1799 times:
I want to believe in what you say, but I find that your message has no relevant arguments.
Do not take it as a mark of aggressiveness from me, but I am curious to know in what Air Transat is surpassed by your airline, Canada 3000. I know that Canada 3000 operates the most modern fleet in Canada (avg. 6 years old), which is not the case of Air Transat (avg. 18 years old), but I would like you to back your opinions my facts.
Buff From Australia, joined Mar 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1 Reply 5, posted (14 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1799 times:
One of the first things I learned in this business is not to knock the competition. If one doesn't have something positive to say about another company, then say nothing. I have a great many friends flying for Transat. I studied their operation from pilots', flight attendants', passengers', maintenance engineers', and travel agents' points of view prior to my decision to work for Canada 3000.
Both had great advantages, but I chose Canada 3000 because of its potential in the scheduled domestic and international markets.
My response to the question asked was complimentary of Air Transat. Like I said, they have a good reputation in all the areas I investigated, even though they are our competition.
That's just my opinion. Hardly worth starting a fight, given the good nature of the original question and the request for - Anything else to say?.
CharterFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1788 times:
With my last post, my intention wasn't at all to start a war between you and me, since I don't work for Air Transat and I'm far from being an unconditional defender of this airline. Actually, I'm collecting information in order to include them in a personal research.
Anyway, you gave me better answers in your last post and I thank you.