Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AF To Have 500-600 Too Many Flight Attendants  
User currently offlineusdcaguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 977 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 5564 times:

Tough news from AF. Looks like they are going to have "too many" flight attendants on staff starting next year and through 2015 as part of their restructuring efforts. A real shame. As usual, these numbers tend to decrease before cuts begin, but you have to wonder if they will all be eliminated through voluntary cuts. I really feel sorry for them and hope AF does not resort to layoffs.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-1...have-at-least-560-excess-crew.html

[Edited 2012-12-17 17:04:02]

32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently onlineanstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5263 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 5090 times:

And if they started working more hours to bring them closer to their 900 hour a year limit, I reckon you could double that number they could cut.

User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2205 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4950 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting anstar (Reply 1):
And if they started working more hours to bring them closer to their 900 hour a year limit, I reckon you could double that number they could cut.

I doubt that, when crews fly 900 block hours, the number of sick leaves go up considerably.

I finished 2010 with 884 block hours under my belt and ended up on sick leave for two weeks in early 2011, I was exhausted. I finished 2011 with 864 block hours and was ready to just quit - my motivation had gone. This year I'll have about 725 or so, and I have regained my motivation and wish to fly for a few more years.

For the body, working one hour in the air equals 1,5 hours on the ground, so my body feels like it has flown 1350 hours plus all those hours on the ground when you are still on duty. Couple that with getting up at 0300hrs five days in a row and working 10-12 hours every day - it wears you out.



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently onlineanstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5263 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4859 times:

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 2):
I doubt that, when crews fly 900 block hours, the number of sick leaves go up considerably.

But for a long haul FA - getting to 900 is not too difficult. I remeber chatting to some FA's on AF and they said they would normally do 2 and occasionally 3 long hauls a month.

Look at Virgin and BA and that number would be 4-6.


User currently offlineEagleBoy From Niue, joined Dec 2009, 1850 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4719 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting anstar (Reply 3):
But for a long haul FA - getting to 900 is not too difficult. I remember chatting to some FA's on AF and they said they would normally do 2 and occasionally 3 long hauls a month.
Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 2):
I doubt that, when crews fly 900 block hours, the number of sick leaves go up considerably.

It depends on your fleet and shift pattern. From 2004-2008 (5 consecutive years) I hit 900 hours every year. I got 7-10 days near the end with 'Do Not Change' notation on my rostered duties. This was all early shifts and short haul, 4-5 widebody longhaul trips per year. I was fine, got up at 4-5am, I finished by 2pm each day,was able to have a nap and have a life in the evening.

In the 2 years after that I was hit 780 and 820 hours but the duties were all over the place. I was a 40/60 mix of long/short haul. Minimum turnarounds were the norm (a rostering target perhaps?) I was exhausted most of the time and my quality of life dropped drastically. (I was sick a lot more but still worked as my company started to financially penalise sickness)

In the last 18 months I am now 90% mid/longhaul..... 8-9 1-nite stopovers every 2 months. I am still tired most of the time but that is bodyclock confusion rather than exhaustion. I have done 900 block hours in the last 365 days. 4 mid/longhaul trips in a month can easily generate 70 hours, add in a few A320 hops and you can get to 85-90 no bother.


User currently offlineLufthansa747 From Philippines, joined May 1999, 3201 posts, RR: 34
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4642 times:

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 2):
I finished 2010 with 884 block hours under my belt and ended up on sick leave for two weeks in early 2011, I was exhausted. I finished 2011 with 864 block hours and was ready to just quit - my motivation had gone. This year I'll have about 725 or so, and I have regained my motivation and wish to fly for a few more years.

I feel for you but in a world with Air Asia, Cebu Pacific and the like F/As flying like 7-8 sectors daily, that's what will happen.



Air Asia Super Elite, Cebu Pacific Titanium
User currently onlinefoxxray From France, joined May 2005, 391 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4564 times:

Quoting anstar (Reply 3):
But for a long haul FA - getting to 900 is not too difficult. I remeber chatting to some FA's on AF and they said they would normally do 2 and occasionally 3 long hauls a month.

Maybe back in 1960 ! They currently do 4 long hauls a month (and a very few times only 3 or up to 5).


User currently offlinebond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5428 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4497 times:

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 2):
For the body, working one hour in the air equals 1,5 hours on the ground, so my body feels like it has flown 1350 hours plus all those hours on the ground when you are still on duty. Couple that with getting up at 0300hrs five days in a row and working 10-12 hours every day - it wears you out.

Be thankful you don't have a desk job, like most folks, working 40-60 hours/week ....you'd need a lot of sick time for having to work 2500 hours a year ....working 5-6 days a week, every week  


Jimbo

[Edited 2012-12-18 04:35:06]


I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently offlineuaord2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 266 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4464 times:

Wait a second here. Are we talking 900 block hours a year? As in 75 per month?

At United, I am flying 1500 block hours in 2012. 900 is NOTHING!!!!!


User currently online76er From Netherlands, joined Mar 2007, 550 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4442 times:

Quoting bond007 (Reply 7):
Be thankful you don't have a desk job, like most folks, working 40-60 hours/week ....you'd need a lot of sick time for having to work 2500 hours a year ....working 5-6 days a week, every week

In the US perhaps. On the east side of the pond you'll find the far majority of deskjobs working MAX 40 hours a week, most of the time a lot less. No jetlag, no shiftlag, off during weekends to watch your kids play soccer... . and so on.


User currently offlinebond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5428 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4427 times:

Quoting 76er (Reply 9):
In the US perhaps. On the east side of the pond you'll find the far majority of deskjobs working MAX 40 hours a week, most of the time a lot less. No jetlag, no shiftlag, off during weekends to watch your kids play soccer... . and so on.

Still twice as many hours ....

So you are working every day with no days off? ...or are you getting 15 days+ off/month?


Jimbo



I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently online76er From Netherlands, joined Mar 2007, 550 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4386 times:

Yes, total hours are less. The hours that you do make are much more tiring. Noise, low humidity, starting your 10 hour workday at 10 PM, then do the same thing a few days later, but this time starting at 7AM. You should try it for a few years..  

User currently offlinecedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8142 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4366 times:

They have way too many pilots as well. An A320 driver I know at AF will fly Orly to Brest (50 min sector) and he's done for the day, off to a hotel. Long stretches of time off, a week at a time. They are hoping to let the number fall due to natural wastage rather than furlough / sack pilots who have had a lot of time and money spent on training. I think they have a way to go before the numbers are where they should be.

Quoting anstar (Reply 3):
I remeber chatting to some FA's on AF and they said they would normally do 2 and occasionally 3 long hauls a month. Look at Virgin and BA and that number would be 4-6.

No-one ever accused the French of overwork!



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2205 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4358 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting bond007 (Reply 7):
Be thankful you don't have a desk job, like most folks, working 40-60 hours/week

We can work up to 60 hours in a five-day period and we do that. 180 duty hours a month is not uncommon, with 100 block hours (which is max per month). Plus the added strain of working in a pressurised tube, which makes the body feel it's flying for 150 block hours. I work two-three weekends a month, have 8-10 nights in hotels a month. I love flying, but the glory days are over.

I certainly understand that most airlines and passengers want young blondes that fly for minimum wage for two years and then leave. But airfares will not be that much cheaper with minimum wage and minimum-experience crews - the airlines will benefit financially while crews and paying customers continue to complain - just look at Ryanair.



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlinebond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5428 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4246 times:

Quoting 76er (Reply 11):
You should try it for a few years.

I wouldn't know what to do with all that spare time  
Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 13):
but the glory days are over.

There never were any glory days in the aviation industry in my lifetime .. maybe a FA on a Super Constellation in the day!


Jimbo



I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently offlinefa4af From France, joined Jan 2001, 85 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4185 times:

Hello everyone,
I really enjoy reading about colleagues flying imaginary rosters such as ORY BES then off to a hotel, long periods of days off after that and so on. I have been flying for the last 15 years with AF, of which 12 on long haul sectors. I have never flown only 2 flights in a month, unles I had a substantial holiday period during that same month. Comparing working hours is almost always misleading, as airlines differ in the ways they log working hours, such as briefing times, days off, on call duties, training and so on.
I know within the AF/KL group, despite following the exact same trend, our colleagues from KL might enjoy a 6 day off time after a 24h layover in LAX, for instance, and we don't. On the other hand, we stay 48h in LAX and only 2 days off at home after that flight. Then in the course of that same month, we will have a 7 day break at home. Wich is best? In the long run, it's all about balancing your private life at home with your work-related absences. It's always easy and reassuring to make the others look lazy or more privileged as a justification for your own grudges. Fair enough.
Back to the FA redundancies at both AF and KL by the way, indeed, everyone is concerned that we might not find enough voluntaries among those who could technically leave. As someone pointed out in this forum, we are probably going to sign Transform 2015 and a lot of the flight roster changes will induce more redundancies through shorter layover times, fewer days off through the year and up to two FA's less working specific aircraft configurations such as the A380 with a half full Premiere cabin. Negotiations are well under way and anything that comes up in the news right now could only be sheer speculation.
Bons vols à tous
Enjoy your flights everyone


User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4703 posts, RR: 50
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3807 times:

Quoting fa4af (Reply 15):
I really enjoy reading about colleagues flying imaginary rosters such as ORY BES then off to a hotel,

And even then, if it existed it could perfectly be a result of the way a schedule is constructed as well (for example to pick up an overnighting aircraft early in the morning.



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlineKiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7555 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3229 times:

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 2):
I doubt that, when crews fly 900 block hours, the number of sick leaves go up considerably.

120 work days per year sounds tough  


User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2205 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3190 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KiwiRob (Reply 17):
120 work days per year sounds tough

Try 170-180 work days per year, like I have, that's a bit tougher  



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlineKiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7555 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3061 times:

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 18):
Try 170-180 work days per year, like I have, that's a bit tougher

That's barely half a year, makes me want to cry!

900 hours based on the 7.5 hour Norwegian work day is only 120 days.


User currently offlinesilentbob From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 2122 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3025 times:

Quoting uaord2000 (Reply 8):
Wait a second here. Are we talking 900 block hours a year? As in 75 per month?

At United, I am flying 1500 block hours in 2012. 900 is NOTHING!!!!!

And at a regional, you can look at an average of one block hour for every two hours of duty time. Working a five or six day stretch at a time, you still don't even feel normal after a day or two off. The am-pm schedule flips, long days and short nights just turn you into mush.


User currently online76er From Netherlands, joined Mar 2007, 550 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2980 times:

Those 900 are block hours flight duty, from pushback till parking. For a normal flightduty day you can add about 2 hours reporting on/off time. These hours do not include 'office' duty like simulator, fight safety, CRM and security recurrent training. Just to name a few.

User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2205 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2894 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KiwiRob (Reply 19):
900 hours based on the 7.5 hour Norwegian work day is only 120 days

So? That doesn't apply to aviation. Aviation is exempted from work rules set by the Government - aviation personnel and medical doctors are not covered by work-hour limitations like others are - bitter irony as work done by these professionals can have terrible consequences if they are not "on the ball" when they absolutely need to be.

BLOCK HOURS are from pushback till parking. This coming Sunday my roster says my duty hours are 12hrs 15mins but my block hours are 9 hours. Last week I had one day where my duty hours were 10hrs 30mins but my block hours were 3 hrs 55mins(!)... looking at my roster now, and I see that I often have 3-4 hours in addition to my block hours during a workday.

I am still on duty when the aircraft is on the ground. We are deboarding, checking, cleaning, changing aircraft, changing crew members (thus requiring a new briefing), boarding etc etc... we are still in uniform doing aviation-related work, often with passengers around every way you look. Ground time is not free time - DUTY HOURS are the hours I am at work, and they can be up to 14 hours - almost twice as many as the average pencil pusher has during his workday behind a desk.

I assume AF crews have similar days, hence pushing their limits even more will just wear people out - and that costs a lot too, even for the airlines.



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlinebond007 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 5428 posts, RR: 8
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2832 times:

Quoting CRJ900 (Reply 22):
DUTY HOURS are the hours I am at work, and they can be up to 14 hours - almost twice as many as the average pencil pusher has during his workday behind a desk.

....except you don't do it 5 days a week, every week  


Jimbo



I'd rather be on the ground wishing I was in the air, than in the air wishing I was on the ground!
User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2205 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2809 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting bond007 (Reply 23):
....except you don't do it 5 days a week, every week

True. I do it on average 4 days a week, every week  



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
25 OzGlobal : No-one ever accused the British of being 'fair and balanced.'
26 usdcaguy : You could say the same about Americans. Good ol' Anglo-Saxon "work ethic" nonsense. You have one life to live...make sure it's as much for you as pos
27 Aviaco : They are talking abot block hours, not about work time. I give an example for a typical day of an european airline: STR 06:00 - 06:55 FRA FRA 09:10 -
28 Post contains images A36001 : Sounds to me some people on this thread have had a bad day at work?
29 Mozart : Except that "fairness and balance" of the Brits have zero to do with this topic, whereas what is considered "a lot" or "too much" work in France is t
30 B727FA : Bwahaaaaaaahaaaaaa! 900 hr will put you on sick leave!
31 Aesma : Well right now you have workers at a steelworks making the news every day, they have been paid to do nothing for 18 months and are pretty upset about
32 jetblueguy22 : This thread has drifted from Air France having too many F/As to a debate over working time. It will be locked for all future posts. Blue
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FA Tried To Have Me Removed From The Flight! posted Thu Jan 17 2008 21:00:28 by Brick
Delta To Recall 65 Pilots & 200 Flight Attendants posted Fri Sep 8 2006 23:22:58 by KarlB737
NW FA To Vote On Joining Assn Of Flight Attendants posted Wed May 10 2006 01:49:15 by KarlB737
Possible For WN To Have 500 737s? posted Mon Jul 22 2002 00:31:40 by FlagshipAZ
How Many Flight Attendants On Here? posted Tue Jul 9 2002 18:24:07 by AASTEW
American To Recall 500 Flight Attendants posted Wed Jul 25 2012 10:16:23 by BDL757
NW To Cut 1,600 More Flight Attendants posted Thu Oct 3 2002 02:32:40 by Artsyman
AA To Hire 1500 Flight Attendants In 2013 posted Tue Oct 16 2012 20:18:53 by flyfree727
AA Flight Attendants To Start Using Galaxy Note posted Thu Sep 20 2012 10:40:43 by corinthians
Lufthansa Flight Attendants Voting To Strike posted Wed Aug 8 2012 14:11:18 by deltaflyertoo