Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
United To Concentrate 747 Fleet At San Francisco  
User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 951 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 8 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 14426 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

this move was decided on maintenace options. It appears UA's main 747 maintenance base is at SFO, so this will reduce down time... We might see a UA 747 here and there, but most will call SFO home effective inmediately

"United will replace 747s with Boeing 777-200s on its Chicago O'Hare to Tokyo Narita flight from 3 January 2013, and its Chicago-Hong Kong-Singapore flight from March 2013, it says."

"The airline will upgrade flights between San Francisco and Frankfurt, London Heathrow, Osaka Kansai, and Taipei to 747s from 777s as a result of the shift. It will also upgrade flights between Honolulu and Tokyo Narita to a 747 from a 777."

"United will continue to use 747-400s on flights between Los Angeles and Sydney, Australia."

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...rate-747s-at-san-francisco-380460/

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offline71Zulu From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3072 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 14372 times:

This thread now archived but was discussed a few weeks back,

UA Closing ORD 747-400 Pilot Base (by jetskipper Nov 27 2012 in Civil Aviation)



The good old days: Delta L-1011s at MSY
User currently offlinekamboi From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 13625 times:

This not to my liking being a resident of San Francisco. I used to like the 774, but after my last flight from FRA to SFO on board a 744, I try to avoid them. Reason being that UAs fleet are not equipped with AVOD in every seat. It's only in business class. Thank god I slept the entire flight otherwise I would've been bored to death. Those overhead monitors are so 80s. C'mon UA, you can do better than that. Plus in the article it says UA has 26 744 with an age of 17 years.

User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 13580 times:

Why didn't you bring some reading material with you? A laptop, tablet, or other such device?

NS


User currently offlineplanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3526 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 13460 times:

Quoting kamboi (Reply 2):
I used to like the 774, but after my last flight from FRA to SFO on board a 744, I try to avoid them. Reason being that UAs fleet are not equipped with AVOD in every seat. It's only in business class. Thank god I slept the entire flight otherwise I would've been bored to death. Those overhead monitors are so 80s.

No kidding. I'm doing SFO-NRT and SYD-SFO in February in Economy Plus, and while I have an iPhone 5 and lots of content to watch/listen to, there is also no power except in Business or First. And I'd prefer my phone not be completely dead by the time I get to NRT or SFO on the return, so it's not like I can even run the battery down all the way (which would only provide a few hours worth of entertainment anyway).

Woe is me I guess, ha ha. #FirstWorldProblems



Do you like movies about gladiators?
User currently offlineMesaFlyGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 3026 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 13259 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting gigneil (Reply 3):

LOL maybe he's like me, somebody who doesn't really read for pleasure! :p

I have TV and other material on my iPad and am sad to say that I plan some of my working around what I'm going to be flying on an upcoming trip incase I need something to do.  



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineNorcal773 From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 1447 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 12825 times:

I avoid the UA 747s like the plague coz they're horrible in Economy. Fly one SFO-HKG earlier this year and never again. I flew UA to MUC the other day and the first choice when booking was the 747 SFO-FRA and then an LH A321 or SFO-IAD on a 737 and the UA 902 which is a 772 across the pond. Chose the 2nd option in a heart beat just to avoid the 744, as graceful as they are. They need a retrofit bad if UA plans on keeping them for a few more years.


If you're going through hell, keep going
User currently offlineAussieItaliano From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 442 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 12481 times:

Quoting gigneil (Reply 3):
Why didn't you bring some reading material with you? A laptop, tablet, or other such device?

NS

Sure, those are all good options, but I think the issue is that the UA 744 Economy/Economy Plus product doesn't have AVOD at every seat, while most airlines competing on those same routes do (or are at least in the process of getting them).

We all have different entertainment preferences when we fly (or even on the ground for that matter). I personally can't read for long periods of time since I lose concentration, and I prefer not to bring my laptop if I can avoid it. I think that part of the allure of the PTV is that it's already there, so you don't have to bring anything extra.



LHR - The Capital of the World
User currently offlinelucky777 From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 12360 times:

It truly is a shame when you look at the condition of UA's 747-400's. Just look at what Delta has done with their refurbished 747's and you can see just how nice the Queen of the Sky can be if your willing to invest in your product. Google Delta 747 for images and you'll see exactly what i mean.

User currently offlinekamboi From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 12120 times:

Quoting gigneil (Reply 3):

For a 10:50 hour flight, that would've bored me too. I was connecting from BEY on the 3:20 Am flight BEY-FRA.


User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 11987 times:

Great news for a 747 lover soon moving to the Bay Area. Honestly when possible I'll fly across the oceans on LX, NH, SQ, etc.

User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2087 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 11938 times:

There were a lot of mechanical delays on the 744s at ORD. Reducing their utilization rates and consolidating maintenance at the big SFO facility might help a little. The 744 fleet is another step closer to retirement.

User currently offlineSonomaFlyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1762 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 10581 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

UA was broke a few years ago and declined to invest in retrofitting their 744's. They also deferred a ton of maintenance on the aircraft. The result is what you see now.

Their first class and business class products are competitive on the 744 but their economy class is terrible. If they even had a USB port to keep tablets or phones going, that would've been fine. Instead, they decided to do nothing regarding upgrading the back of the plane. They decided that folks are so myopic about price, they'll book UA regardless of how their hard product compares to the competition's. UA may actually be correct on that score given the fact their 744s usually fly full (whether their yields compare is another question).

On the other hand, UA is investing in upgrading sUA's 772s with nose to tail avod, switching from 2-5-2 to 3-3-3 seating and other upgrades to put their hard product on par with other airlines with which they compete. The same goes for the two class 763s.

Like many who take the time to know the various products available, I make a point to never fly UA's 744 if the trip is in economy or economy plus. Every airline that competes with UA on the 744 routes has a superior hard product and is often very close in price. It makes the decision easy. For those members of the public not bright enough to do about two minutes of research, UA has plenty of seats available for them on their 744s.

Within the next 7-10 years, UA will have a new wide body fleet of 787s and 359s. They will be state of the art in every respect and even economy class folks will have access to entertainment and power ports. The 744s will be chopped up or sitting in the desert.


User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2613 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 10165 times:

From my count it looks like 19 of 23 units are needed to run a real tight schedule with all SFO aircraft turning around.

It looks like up to 4 units could be built into the sked for maint/reliablility at SFO, (in addition to a paint line and heavy maintenance).

There is substantial down time at BKK 7+ hours, HKG 14+ hours, PEK 21+ hours, SYD 8+ hours, LAX 12+ hours.
Normal turns are made at MEL, KIX, ICN, FRA and LHR

FYI: UA's online timetable does not show the 744 on KIX

Too bad they don't have AVOD in Y, but that may indicate retirement is too close to fund reconfiguration or UA has decided they'll be OK on marketing the current 744 product from SFO as UA may be able to control traffic due to FF programs at the major hub.


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9168 posts, RR: 15
Reply 14, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 10121 times:

Will they be based in ORD again after a year or two or in the future?

User currently onlineusflyer msp From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2122 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 10058 times:

Quoting Norcal773 (Reply 6):
I avoid the UA 747s like the plague coz they're horrible in Economy. Fly one SFO-HKG earlier this year and never again. I flew UA to MUC the other day and the first choice when booking was the 747 SFO-FRA and then an LH A321 or SFO-IAD on a 737 and the UA 902 which is a 772 across the pond. Chose the 2nd option in a heart beat just to avoid the 744, as graceful as they are. They need a retrofit bad if UA plans on keeping them for a few more years.

True.

I flew MSP-HKG earlier this year and I flew MSP-IAH-NRT-HKG-NRT-EWR-MSP just to avoid flying SFO/ORD - HKG on a UA 747.


User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6123 posts, RR: 23
Reply 16, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 9647 times:

Quoting CALPSAFltSkeds (Reply 13):
FYI: UA's online timetable does not show the 744 on KIX

777 to 747: Effective 6.6.13



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineUSAirALB From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 3052 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 9632 times:

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 12):

IIRC, aren't a couple of UA's newest 744s wired for PTVs in Y? I'm seem to recall UA having the intention to install them, but 9/11 put a hold on those plans...permanently. It was supposed to be the same PTV system that the 3-class 763s and pre-refurb 777 have.



E135/E140/E145/E70/E75/E90/CR2/CR7/CR9/717/732/733/734/735/73G/738/739/752/753/762/772/319/320/321/333
User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 3026 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9585 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

So does this mean we won't see the 744 onIAH-NRT like planned?


\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently onlineJohnClipper From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2005, 843 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9349 times:

Quoting g500 (Thread starter):
"United will replace 747s with Boeing 777-200s on its Chicago O'Hare to Tokyo Narita flight from 3 January 2013, and its Chicago-Hong Kong-Singapore flight from March 2013, it says."

I thought the HKG-SIN tag was operated by the inbound 747 from SFO. According to the UA schedule, random flights in Feb and March HKG-SIN are still on the 744


User currently onlineJohnClipper From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2005, 843 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9349 times:

Scratch that...April is showing 777s.

User currently offlinecosyr From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 386 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 8946 times:

without in seat power, an ipad won't last a 15 hour flight to SYD playing movies, and if like a lot of people you can't read on planes, that is a rough flight. Thank god I am flying J on that route,upstairs. On the sUA 777s I would never consider J. Eight across! I don't care what the seat is like, middle seats in J are inappropriate.

User currently offlineSurfandsnow From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 2862 posts, RR: 30
Reply 22, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 8632 times:

This marks the end of an era at ORD; UA has graced the airport with 747s for 4 decades. Meanwhile, SFO will be 747 haven with almost all of its long haul international services operated by the type. Some very interesting fun facts to note:

- All UA and UAX services from ORD will now be operated by twin-engined jet aircraft. This has never been the case before, as there was always a mix of four, two, and (between the mid-1960s and early 2000s) three engined aircraft operating from the hub.

- All of ORD's transpacific services will now be operated by the 777. The U.S. carriers (UA and AA) use the older 772 variants, whilst the Asian carriers (CX, JL, KE, NH, and OZ) utilize the state of the art 77W.

Fortunately, this does not mean the end of the 747 at ORD. As it stands today, there are still at least two regularly scheduled 747 options. One must simply be willing to head to Europe rather than Asia  .

1) LH ORD-FRA. This route currently sees the 744, and is slated to get 748 service in the coming months. LH is extremely happy with the 748, and I daresay this flagship type will ply the ORD-FRA route for many years to come!

2) KL ORD-AMS. This is the one major intercontinental airline with a knack for operating venerable aircraft, and the rather rare 74M is but one example of this. Who knows how long they will keep serving ORD-AMS with the 74M, though.

It appears that even BA no longer sends the 747 to ORD anymore, even in the summer?



Flying in the middle seat of coach is much better than not flying at all!
User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 3026 posts, RR: 5
Reply 23, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 8568 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Surfandsnow (Reply 22):

Very true. It''s a shame to see such an iconic aircraft as the 747 dwindling in the U.S. (at least as a passenger carrier). Yes, there still are some, but not as many as there used to be.  

Also, one small correction, but OZ doesn't fly the 77W. Perhaps you meant the 772ER?



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlinesparkingwave From South Korea, joined Jun 2005, 670 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 8 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 7232 times:

Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 12):
They decided that folks are so myopic about price, they'll book UA regardless of how their hard product compares to the competition's.

I totally agree with that statement because not only do they not mind the lack of coach AVOD, they don't seem to mind paying those extra luggage fees for their U.S. domestic connections, either.

Quoting lucky777 (Reply 8):
Just look at what Delta has done with their refurbished 747's and you can see just how nice the Queen of the Sky can be if your willing to invest in your product.

DL is one-upping UA on refurbishments, but they're newer to the Pacific and have more to prove. On the other hand, UA has more legacy with all of Pan Am's former Pacific Division from 1984-85.

Let's see which airline outlasts the other with their 747-400s.



Flights to the moon and all major space stations. At Pan Am, the sky is no longer the limit!
25 gigneil : Delta not that long ago bought this company formerly known as Northwest Orient... NS
26 n471wn : This is why our prayers continue to have some competition on the SYD-SFO route.....UAL is so yesterday....
27 Post contains links Viscount724 : I believe much of their 747 (and 777) heavy maintenance is done in China by Ameco in PEK. Related 2010 item. http://chinaaviation.aero/news/airli...a
28 SonomaFlyer : What exactly do they need to "prove?" DL is an established carrier with a good reputation. Flying over the Pacific is no different than any other bod
29 STT757 : Not really, UA has significantly more lie flat equipped aircraft than DL. DL is actually behind the curve in update it's International hard products.
30 Post contains images quiet1 : Isn't UA (s-l-o-w-l-y) in the process of installing WiFi servers on the 747-400's to deliver streaming entertainment? And also, IIRC, installing power
31 gigneil : Yar. NS
32 kamboi : Are UAs 744 competitors to Europe , say BA, VS, AF, KL do have AVOD in economy? I suspect VS does but not sure about the others. My last trip out of S
33 Norcal773 : I believe they all do.. at least VS, BA, LH, KLM does. I flew LH 748 FRA-IAD a few weeks ago and it has the camera option too, very cool especially o
34 warden145 : IIRC LH does not have AVOD on their 747-430 fleet, or if they do now, it was a relatively recent update. That actually ended up being one of the thre
35 cosyr : It is true that I prefer these issues to IranAir
36 Norcal773 : At the end of the day, Airline Alliances is what counts for me. I'll fly on a UA 744 SFO-LHR in Economy Plus even with the crappy interior over a BA 7
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
United To End Mainline Service At BUR posted Fri Oct 10 2008 20:52:02 by Jamake1
A380 At San Francisco (SFO) posted Tue Aug 21 2007 07:07:50 by Superfly
United To Upgrade 747 Cabins? posted Wed Jul 12 2006 06:16:29 by Ha787
$17 Billion To Build New Airport At San Diego posted Wed Apr 19 2006 19:43:38 by KarlB737
Martinair To Replace 747 Fleet posted Tue Oct 19 2004 18:04:39 by MauriceB
Traffic Pattern At San Francisco posted Mon May 3 2004 08:51:15 by Soaringadi
MH 747-400 At SAN posted Thu Nov 13 2003 03:19:59 by Coronado990
Air Canada To Retire 747 Fleet posted Mon Jun 16 2003 08:55:53 by Airmale
Taxiway At San Francisco Intl posted Thu May 1 2003 10:12:01 by United777
United To Rplace 747's With 777's To China posted Wed Dec 13 2000 23:42:51 by Surf