Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LH/UA May Give Up NYC-FRA Slots For JV  
User currently offlineSchweigend From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 618 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 8177 times:

To satisfy EC antitrust regulators investigating their A++ Joint Venture, LH/UA are offering to relinquish NYC-FRA slots amounting to 7 weekly flights.

From Air Transport Weekly, 21 Dec:

Quote:
Competitors may choose which arrival and departure slots at Frankfurt and New York they take on to allow as many as seven additional weekly flights, the offer states. This could rise to 21 weekly flights if a rival pulls out of the route.
http://atwonline.com/airports-routes...ffer-slots-antitrust-approval-1221

So far as I know, only LH, UA, and DL serve the NYC-FRA route. Could AA be the one to restart JFK-FRA service? Right now they connect pax via LHR. Or might BA dare it? Air Berlin?

Holiday Cheers,

Scottie

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinedocpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 8167 times:

SQ serves it too daily.

User currently offlineSchweigend From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 618 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 8082 times:

Quoting docpepz (Reply 1):

Hmmm, I wonder if SQ could be the one ATW is referring to when they talk about an additional 14 weekly flights "if a rival pulls out".

WHO might take up this offer? Who would like an NYC-FRA slot? I suppose DL could add a second daily flight....


User currently offlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2360 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 8079 times:

AA needs to jump on this immediately. If not AA, the AB could certainly use those slots.


The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlinefn1001 From Moldova, joined Sep 2008, 234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 7922 times:

The huge capacity on this route needs FRA as a connecting hub with strong feeder traffic behind. I guess on the other side of the pond it is the same situation. My bet goes to Oneworld, since they have on both ends many connections.


Mai bine să-ţi fie rău decît să-ţi pară rău.
User currently offlinealoges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8707 posts, RR: 42
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 7649 times:

Quoting Schweigend (Thread starter):
Could AA be the one to restart JFK-FRA service?

I doubt it. They cut JFK and MIA and reduced DFW to a 767; there's just no oneworld connectivity at FRA.* So the only sensible connections for AA pax are train rides, but AFAIK AA is a long-standing partner in the German Railways' "Rail&Fly" programme (which makes train connections easier for airline passengers), yet they still discontinued JFK.

*You could of course connect to an AB flight at FRA, but if they make it until the opening of BER (whenever that may be), that will be their hub and not FRA. Apart from that, the only European oneworld members whose hubs aren't closer to the US than FRA are Finnair and S7 - but both HEL and MOW already have flights to JFK, so why connect in FRA?



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlinemah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32782 posts, RR: 72
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 7580 times:

AA absolutely will apply for the slot. No ifs, ands or buts about it.


a.
User currently offlineAirAfreak From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 716 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 7525 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

SIA will never pull out of JFK-FRA because they have the superior product, have operated this flight for decades, and have always had the demand long before the days of Star Alliance. SIA is above and beyond UA and LH. Remember, they have the service "even other airlines talk about."

Singapore Airlines
A Great Way to Fly.

-Air Afreak

p.s. (why doesn't LH follow SQ. If SQ can offer the widest seat in Business, LH should follow.) Efficiency is CLEARLY not all-things German, when SQ has and can compete on JFK-FRA successfully with fewer seats in J. Come on LH, I expect you to think long-term, not short-term! (And don't ask me for a source, you know better!)



Do you lead an Intercontinental life?
User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 7409 times:

If SQ pulls out, they would no longer serve New York with the imminent end of SIN-EWR. Seeing as SQ often gets some high-yielding O&D traffic from JFK to Europe on that flight, I oubt they would pull out, at least unless they route the flight via another European destination.

Speaking of SQ, could they fly SIN-TLV-MIA or would they not receive overflight rights from Malaysia?


User currently onlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9376 posts, RR: 29
Reply 9, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 7318 times:

Quoting AirAfreak (Reply 7):
Efficiency is CLEARLY not all-things German, when SQ has and can compete on JFK-FRA

Apply the SQ cost base and SIN work rules to Germany, otherwise you compare apples and peaches.

We have seen slot exchanges over the years where the incumbent carrier went back to the old system after a few years or even less. Such as VIE/FRA where Adria had 2 CRJ flights daily which could even be booked via LH, IIRC.

FRA is an LH/* fortress, AA could not compete efficiently due to the lack of connectivity. DL is no real competition to LH and besides that we have only * carriers on the route. besides, FRA is not really slot restricted for the next couple of years. the only times when slots are not available is after 9 pm, and that is artificial due to a stupid, unflexible night ban regulation.



.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4429 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 7057 times:

Quoting Schweigend (Thread starter):
Could AA be the one to restart JFK-FRA service? Right now they connect pax via LHR. Or might BA dare it? Air Berlin?

Why would anyone want these slots? It's not that Star has to give up frequency (the only thing they offered are slots to start NYC-FRA), and thus any new flight will mean additional capcity.

Quoting Byrdluvs747 (Reply 3):
AA needs to jump on this immediately. If not AA, the AB could certainly use those slots.

Why? They would have to compete with UA/LH, SQ and DL which mean you have to have a superior product (or lower price) in order to attract the current passengers on this route. AB will not be interested as I doubt EY sees something in this market. However, maybe something for QR?


User currently offlinedocpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 7050 times:

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 9):
Apply the SQ cost base and SIN work rules to Germany, otherwise you compare apples and peaches.

In the 2011 annual report the LH Group had 116,000 employees and staff costs were 6.8 bil Euros making for EUR58,000 cost per employee.

In the same time period, SQ (parent airline) had 22,000 employees and staff costs of SGD2.26 bil or EUR1.41 bil making for a wage bill of EUR64,000 per employee.

Sure we're not comparing apples and apples because I would really like to compare LH the airline vs SQ the airline, but I don't think their staff costs are too far apart. If not for the plunging EUR against the SGD, SQ staff costs would be marginally lower than LH.

From what I understand from SQ contacts, JFK as a standalone destination never made money but in SQ's management accounting they take the profitability of the whole route SIN-FRA-JFK vv which as a whole is profitable.

But devoting 3 A380s to this route with it sitting on the ground all day in JFK, there are probably better ways to utilise the asset.


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8375 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 7024 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting docpepz (Reply 11):
But devoting 3 A380s to this route with it sitting on the ground all day in JFK, there are probably better ways to utilise the asset.

A380's sit at airports all day long because the its profitable to fly at night. AF & LH have A380's sitting all day at J'berg because Day time South Africa to Europe doesn't work.


User currently offlineVC10er From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 2896 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 6646 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The SQ flight is considerably more money than either UA or LH. I fly to FRA a lot every year. I was there in Nov to connect to Moscow. I always choose United over LH because of LH's painful angled lie - bumps seat. The United lie flats are far better, especially outbound when it's all about sleep, and NYC to FRA is not a long flight.

So what will this mean? Less options on UA or LH?



The world is missing love, let's use our flights to spread it!
User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3477 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 6539 times:

I am confused...what is a NYC-FRA slot?

Isnt there open skies? Cant any carrier start service JFK-FRA when they wanted?

Is this a slot issue in FRA?

And can UA/LH give the carrier any slot it wants without discontinuing its own service?


User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21529 posts, RR: 59
Reply 15, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 6509 times:

Slots? Maybe just a cap on flights so they can't flood market against competition?


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25332 posts, RR: 22
Reply 16, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 6415 times:

Quoting AirAfreak (Reply 7):
SIA will never pull out of JFK-FRA because they have the superior product, have operated this flight for decades, and have always had the demand long before the days of Star Alliance.

I disagree. When/if there's an aircraft that can economically operate JFK-SIN nonstop I expect SQ will drop the 5th freedom tagon FRA-JFK. Those types of operations are far fewer than they used to be and 5th freedom services usually have lower yields. I've often found SQ to have the lowest fares on the FRA-JFK-FRA route. When it's part of another longhaul route you also can't design the schedule to fully meet the needs of the 5th freedom market since the departure and arrival times at SIN are more critical, as well as the night curfew at FRA..


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7582 posts, RR: 42
Reply 17, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 6315 times:

Quoting Byrdluvs747 (Reply 3):
AA needs to jump on this immediately. If not AA, the AB could certainly use those slots

AA recently abandoning JFK-FRA does not bode well for them returning. I don't think anything has changed since then that would make a new AA JFK-FRA service successful. AA even closed its AAdmiral lounge at FRA, no?

As for AB, I am not too sure. AB's hubs are DUS and TXL, so they would not have the advantage of connections other than to a very few airports

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 9):
DL is no real competition to LH and besides that we have only * carriers on the route.

There is DL flying JFK-FRA.



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 3128 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5930 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 14):

But JFK and EWR are both slot-controlled airports.



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5782 times:

If AA did not wnat to serve FRA-JFK, what about Openskies? It would mean the acquisition of more 757s for Openskies, bur given it's now a member of oneworld, and if it wa schasing the premium market (Business and premium economy, with a smaill economy section) then maybe it could work. Especially as it would be part of the AA/BA/IB JV, so there may be some corporate clients of AA who would appreciate such a flight.


Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21529 posts, RR: 59
Reply 20, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5483 times:

Quoting mesaflyguy (Reply 18):

But not destination specific. And any EU airline can start new service to EWR tomorrow.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3477 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5367 times:

Quoting mesaflyguy (Reply 18):
But JFK and EWR are both slot-controlled airports.

JFK has plenty of slots available. I don't know about FRA.

But is the flight from JFK or EWR?

Just to say: "They need to give up slots NYC-FRA" makes no sense.

Open skies between the 2 countries.

Slots at FRA? Slots at JFK? Slots at EWR?

Where/what/how?

The thread is a bit ambiguous


User currently offlineaaexecplat From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 635 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5278 times:

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 17):
AA recently abandoning JFK-FRA does not bode well for them returning. I don't think anything has changed since then that would make a new AA JFK-FRA service successful. AA even closed its AAdmiral lounge at FRA, no?

Errr..."recently abandoning JFK-FRA" and "I don't think anything has changed since then..." aren't helping your credibility on this topic. The JFK-FRA flight was axed in November 2000. 12 Years ago. And a significant event that has happened since then is Chapter 11, thereby lowering AA's costs. The route may very well be viable now.


User currently offlinekyrone From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5241 times:

Watch this be Qatar's followup to JFK-ATH, QR metal on JFK-FRA.

User currently offlineSonomaFlyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1796 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4993 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

"Slots" usually refer to a allocation of landing/takeoff positions at an airport that is "full." For example, LHR is full given it only has two runways so slots are allocated. There are so many slots available for given time periods.

There is nothing ambiguous about the thread, the release states what LH and UA are offering in terms of giving up slots if required by regulators to get their joint venture approved.


25 DolphinAir747 : I doubt that we will see JFK/EWR-FRA on a new carrier without a hub at either end anytime soon, especially since the route is already flown by 3 carri
26 EddieDude : Oops, I was seriously confused with ORD-FRA, which was cancelled by AA recently. Apologies for the confusion. While I do appreciate being corrected,
27 PanHAM : yes, that's what I said, besides DL there are only * members on that route. The whole story does not make sense at all. LH has agreed to such "slots
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Hubs Airlines May Give Up On? posted Fri Jul 26 2002 07:36:51 by Deltaflyertoo
Hubs Airlines May Give Up On? posted Fri Jul 26 2002 07:36:51 by Deltaflyertoo
Will LX, OS Join The LH/UA/AC/CO Tatl JV? posted Tue Jul 6 2010 04:02:30 by UAL777UK
10 A320s For Spring Air (may Be Up To 20) posted Fri Dec 22 2006 06:38:01 by Jimyvr
CO First Class Pax Give Up Seats For Soldiers posted Fri Dec 12 2003 23:09:02 by Artsyman
Will LX, OS Join The LH/UA/AC/CO Tatl JV? posted Tue Jul 6 2010 04:02:30 by UAL777UK
JetBlue To Give Up 5 Slots At LGB/ 3 To AA/2 To AS posted Tue Feb 4 2003 16:44:03 by FATFlyer
Why Is BA Not Willing To Give Up LHR Slots? posted Sun Jan 27 2002 02:26:42 by Jiml1126
10 A320s For Spring Air (may Be Up To 20) posted Fri Dec 22 2006 06:38:01 by Jimyvr
Qantas Prepared To Give Up Sydney Slots posted Mon May 7 2001 10:53:43 by United Airline
CO First Class Pax Give Up Seats For Soldiers posted Fri Dec 12 2003 23:09:02 by Artsyman
TAP Air Portugal May Be Up For Sale! posted Wed Jul 19 2000 21:20:37 by Reno_air
JetBlue To Give Up 5 Slots At LGB/ 3 To AA/2 To AS posted Tue Feb 4 2003 16:44:03 by FATFlyer
VS Wins All LHR Slots For Short-Haul Ops posted Sun Nov 18 2012 17:14:01 by AA94
Why Is BA Not Willing To Give Up LHR Slots? posted Sun Jan 27 2002 02:26:42 by Jiml1126
Threat Of LH F/A Strike May Be Over posted Mon Nov 12 2012 15:34:54 by aloges
Qantas Prepared To Give Up Sydney Slots posted Mon May 7 2001 10:53:43 by United Airline
TAP Air Portugal May Be Up For Sale! posted Wed Jul 19 2000 21:20:37 by Reno_air
VS Wins All LHR Slots For Short-Haul Ops posted Sun Nov 18 2012 17:14:01 by AA94
Threat Of LH F/A Strike May Be Over posted Mon Nov 12 2012 15:34:54 by aloges