Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA's Overnight B 747-400 In HKG  
User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9107 posts, RR: 15
Posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 6902 times:

UA has 1 B 747-400 sitting in HKG overnight (SFO-HKG-SFO). Should/will they use it to open up new intra-Asia routes? Let's say HKG-TPE or HKG-BKK or HKG-DEL (They have done the later two)?

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6763 times:

I have no good info here, but is it possible they rotate aircraft through HKG for down time and maintenance? Also, add flights, and there is a higher chance of everything getting screwed up. Done right, an Asian destination could work. A problem is timing-dead of night departure times. United is starting TPE-SFO and already has BKK-NRT, so HKG traffic would rely on Asian pax, who are more likely to take a daytime flight on a very highly served HKG route. UA operates DEL-EWR. Same there, but there might be a bit of a market. The question is, is it profitable to fly an old 744 in the middle of the night to Airports you already serve more conveniently? I think in this case the answer is No.

User currently onlineTWA772LR From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 1164 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6726 times:

How about HKG-CGK? CGK is a hole in UA's pacific network that can be filled, why not from HKG?


Я говорю по-русский. :)
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6613 times:

I agree CGK is a hole in the network. I don't know if UA could make it work to HKG.The thing is, Asia is big. Real big. HKG-CGK is a tad bit longer than LAX-DTW or MIA-PHX. It couldn't be done with reasonable turnaround times and profitability. We are talking about flying 3500 nm and turning a 744 3 times in an overnight stay to compete at bad times on a high capacity route with multiple other carriers.

User currently offlinewarreng24 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 705 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5999 times:

Quoting United Airline (Thread starter):
UA has 1 B 747-400 sitting in HKG overnight (SFO-HKG-SFO). Should/will they use it to open up new intra-Asia routes? Let's say HKG-TPE or HKG-BKK or HKG-DEL (They have done the later two)?

IIRC, before the start of the HKG-SGN tag-on, PMUA always had a B744 sitting overnight in HKG. It came in handy as a "spare" if the HKG-SIN tag-on B744 went MX.

Once the HKG-SGN tag-on started, there was no B744 RON's in HKG.

Then after the merger with CO, there was 2 x B744 RON's in HKG. I believe they were rotated in/out for overnight MX. The HKG-SIN and HKG-SGN tag-on's were operated by PMCO B738's (in a COMIKE configuration).

During Mid-2013, B744 operations will be consolidated to SFO. Therefore, the B744 on ORD-HKG will revert to a PMUA B772. I'd imagine that UA will continue to have a B772 or a B744 RON at HKG. HKG-SIN is currently scheduled to remain as a B744, but I'd imagine that scheduling will rotate in the B722 as loads/demand permit.

IIRC, the PMCO 772 that operates EWR-HKG-EWR has always RON at HKG.


User currently offlineluv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12090 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5966 times:

It could also be possible that the aircraft that over night get a good cleaning while on the ground.


You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently onlineAA94 From United States of America, joined Aug 2011, 532 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4922 times:

If I'm looking at the schedule right, I believe the flight pair in question is UA869/862. The aircraft arrives into HKG at 1900 local, and departs the next day for SFO at 1230 local. That leaves around ~15.5 hours in between, and even less if you account for the time it takes to deplane and service the aircraft after UA869, and the time it takes to service and enplane the aircraft for UA 862, not to mention servicing/enplaning/deplaning for a tag flight.

With a flight time of ~5 hours on HKG-CGK, it simply doesn't seem possible that UA could turn an aircraft during the overnight. Even if it were possible, when you add in the factors that UA787DEN touches upon, there's really no case for adding a flight simply to utilize the aircraft.



Choose a challenge over competence / Eleanor Roosevelt
User currently offlineflyingdoc787 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 37 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2838 times:

How about HKG-MNL-HKG? Flying time between HKG and MNL is around 2 hours, so that will give enough time for the flight to arrive and depart MNL at a decent time, and still keep within the current HKG arrival (1900) and departure (1230). The plane can RON in MNL, just as DL's 744s do. MNL has capabilities for MX as well.
Possible schedule:
dep. HKG 2015 arr. MNL 2215 (RON)
dep. MNL 0900 arr. HKG 1100

UA already has operations in MNL from GUM, so resources on the ground are there. The Philippines-USA market is huge, albeit mostly low-yield VFR, so I don't think opening this route would conflict with UA's current GUM operations; they might even complement them.

However, I don't know about current restrictions on flights operated by US-based carriers to/from the Philippines. In any case, one can always dream! It would be great to have UA's 744 in Manila!


User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2677 times:

MNL is the best idea I've seen so far. But a UA 744 needs more than an hour or hour and a half for an international turn, and if it needs MX they would be screwed. I honestly don't know how it would do. CX operates 744s on the route. KA, 5J, and PR also operate it, and probably with lower costs simply because they are Asian carriers. Also, foreign carriers pay a king's ransom to fly MNL. I think that a 772 might make it work, leaving HKG at 2100 at leaving MNL at 0700. But an old 744 just wouldn't work. Airlines don't add routes for the hell of it. They add routes to make money, and UA on HKG-MNL won't.

User currently offlineFI642 From Monaco, joined Mar 2005, 1079 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2437 times:

HKG is a perfect place for a spare any MX issues. Additional capacity to another market certainly has been explored and
isn't worth the effort.



737MAX, Cool Planes for the Worlds Coolest Airline.
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2376 times:

There is a difference between could and would. Could UA serve MNL or TPE from HKG? Barring MX or cleaning I don't know about, yes. Would they? No. No. No.

User currently offlineFI642 From Monaco, joined Mar 2005, 1079 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2314 times:

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 10):
Would they? No. No. N

Agreed. Do they even have Traffic Rights to do this? Probably not.



737MAX, Cool Planes for the Worlds Coolest Airline.
User currently offlineVC10er From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 2793 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1988 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I know when United down guagded to a 737 from HKG to SIN, there was a huge cry of anger and I was #1 on that rampage. Now they have gone back to the 747. United's premium product (especially First) was very good (not nearly as good as most of it's Asian rivals- but in a UA contex very good). All that said, United 737's are very nice birds and can they feed other smaller Asian cities with them out of NRT or HKG? Hanoi perhaps or KL? Also..can a Singapoian buy a ticket from SIN to HKG (on the 747) only?

Last: the Denver to Tokyo 787, will that 787 just turn and go back to Denver or could it tag?

[Edited 2012-12-29 23:42:06]


The world is missing love, let's use our flights to spread it!
User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1602 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1980 times:

Just because you have a car in your drive way overnite, that is no reason to go on a "Road Trip"

User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20322 posts, RR: 63
Reply 14, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1963 times:

Quoting VC10er (Reply 12):
can a Singapoian buy a ticket from SIN to HKG (on the 747) only?

Yes.



International Homo of Mystery
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UA 747-400 In SEA? Emergency Landing? posted Tue Jul 17 2007 05:56:39 by F9Animal
Ten Percent Of 747-400 In Storage posted Tue Mar 2 2010 10:24:54 by b741
Attn PHL Spotters: AF 747-400 In Town posted Thu Jul 30 2009 19:46:32 by USflt1778
NW 747-400 In OMA 4/24 posted Fri Apr 24 2009 06:24:41 by Joeljack
Delta 747-400 In JAX On Friday posted Thu Dec 25 2008 10:03:25 by DELTA7478
KLM 747-400 In BLL posted Tue Oct 14 2008 10:16:16 by Jakobsen74
MH Flies The B 747-400 To HKG Every Friday? posted Thu Nov 29 2007 05:31:33 by United Airline
Why Two AF 747-400's In JNB? posted Fri Dec 8 2006 22:41:23 by RootsAir
Air France 747-400 In Boston posted Tue Oct 10 2006 22:13:28 by JustPlanes
UA Domestic 747-400 This Summer posted Sun Mar 19 2006 00:31:38 by Planespotting