Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DL And ISP History and Future?  
User currently offlineJBAirwaysFan From United States of America, joined May 2009, 911 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4997 times:

I know Delta used to have a decent operation at Long Island MacArthur Airport. In the 90s they saw DLX flights to MCO, FLL, etc and RJ service to CVG and ATL. They pulled out of ISP back in 2008 when oil spiked and they were preparing to work out a merger deal with NW.

Now, DL is doing very well. WN has actually backed down with connecting options leaving only BWI as a "hub" for connections as well as Florida flights. US flies to PHL and DCA but they are an arm and a leg (even a left nut sometimes) to get onto. So my question is whether or not DL could re-enter the ISP market with possible ATL/DTW service on a CRJ-700 or maybe even a DC-9/717 (especially to ATL when the 717s come in). I know they are focused a lot on LGA right now, but I believe they have done all of their expanding. I know ISP still has DL designated ticket counters as of 2011, so I thought maybe.

Anyway, just throwing it out there since ISP isn't connected to much of a mega hub for a lot of connections. Could also drive the US prices down a bit.


In Loving Memory of Casey Edward Falconer; May 16, 1992-May 9, 2012
28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently onlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3176 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 4843 times:

They have so many LGA slots that they don't know how to use them

Perhaps bring back the 80s and early 90s with 4 times a day to LGA haha


User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 4736 times:

You never know with LGA...with all the "new" MD-80/90s and 717s, they could reasonably enter the market. My guess is a 717 if mainline. A couple daily CR7/CR9 flights to ATL or DTW might happen. Many other Airports will be receiving the MAX soon, and more MDs/717s will be free.

User currently offlineart at isp From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 178 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4639 times:

Like many, I would welcome the return of DL to ISP, but I just don't think it will happen any time soon.

For one thing, DL has made a tremendous investment in LGA and JFK, and I don't think they want to dilute the traffic to either airport. The NYC airports are more important to carriers-more passengers, more profits. Look at WN-they built up ISP because in 1999 they could not or would not go into LGA....slots were scarce if not non-existant, and WN was still following a strategy of flying to secondary airports within major markets. Once they opened LGA, it spelled the beginning of the end for ISP, which now has barely 20 flights a day, as opposed to 50+ when WN was in their heyday there.

The other factor is that I don't think enough people would use ISP even if they came back. Airlines come and go there, and for whatever reason, if given a choice between ISP and LGA or JFK, the NYC airfares are usually considerably lower. ISP doesn't have enough variety of destinations to offset losses in certain markets, so I don't think it can be profitable for carriers like DL.

IF they did decide to come back, or if UA came back with IAD or even CLE or EWR, which they did in the 80's and early 90's, I would jump on it, and would be happy to connect all the time, as I did with US before they went downhill. You never know--we may see AA back at ISP in one form or another  

Happy New Year all.....


User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4574 times:

The NYC airfares a lower for one reason: everyone serves them, giving a darn lot of competition. If ISP wasn't stealing from NYC and if there was a closer DL hub, they might serve it now. I think the CR9 or 717 would be great equipment to bring there, but not for quite a few years.

User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4516 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would love to see even a few CRJs to ATL or something along those lines. I hope that with the new faces in airport managment at ISP we will see some improvement. I'd be happy if WN even improved their service a bit. I mean, it was supposed to be a MX base and they just abandoned it. They own 8 gates that they use about 40-50% of at peak times.

I would love to see UA come in with 1 or 2 daily to ORD or maybe Dash's to IAD, but I doubt it. I did, however, hear that CLT flights from US Airways were on the horizon (I read that here, but it seemed like it was known by a few people and not just one). I think it could work with 1-2 daily CRJs.



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineJBAirwaysFan From United States of America, joined May 2009, 911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4375 times:

I don't know. I mean I spoke with the former commissioner about Delta going into ISP again. She said she was trying. I just thought I would toss it around on here to get some feedback. Yes, WN has completely shrunk ISP which is another reason why I think ISP would be viable for new entrants. Though I think if WN began ISP-ATL (fat chance I know) then DL would probably be back within a week like they did when FL started SWF-ATL. Though now with their new rule, they can't use the CRJ for ISP-ATL because it is over 750 miles.


In Loving Memory of Casey Edward Falconer; May 16, 1992-May 9, 2012
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4364 times:

New rule?!?! What/when/why?! ...Ok, they can use the E175 :p Then a 717 in the future maybe. But I do agree with you that DL will try to kill of the route fast if WN starts up.

User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4349 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 7):

I could see a daily CR7 service, probably not an E175 (though we can hope   ).

And I'm not sure if you're saying that the rule isn't new or you just haven't heard it, but just incase, DL has its own self-rule against running single-class aircraft on routes over 750 miles. Hope this helps .   



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4345 times:

Ok. The CR7/CR9s are all 2/3 class and could run it, right?

User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4335 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 9):

Yup. They ran a CR7 daily to ATL from SWF before they cut it (presumeably because of FL's exiting the market).

According to great circle mapper, there is only an twelve-mile difference between ATL-ISP/SWF as the crow flies:

ATL-ISP%0D%0AATL-SWF&MS=wls&DU=mi" target="_blank">http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=ATL-ISP%0D%0AATL-SWF&MS=wls&DU=mi

I'd think it would be fine, especially if they can run a CR9 from ATL-PVD like they used to.



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4333 times:

Cool. A CR7/9 or hopefully the E170/175 in the future would be fun. But first that WN plane needs to get back on the taxiway. Then we can talk of putting more planes in there.

User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4258 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 11):

LOL somebody posted that the plane flew out of ISP yesterday. I assume it went to BWI for further inspections?



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlinebobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3624 times:

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 1):
They have so many LGA slots that they don't know how to use them

What is the source of that little gem?


User currently onlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3176 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3526 times:

Quoting bobnwa (Reply 13):
What is the source of that little gem?

They're RJ schedule

And the pilots that I know that fly the RJs half empty between LGA and IAH and DFW

They are making they're name in NYC...but dont think for a second that a lot of that high frequency RJ stuff to major hubs of other carriers is making them any money


User currently offlineJBAirwaysFan From United States of America, joined May 2009, 911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3005 times:

It just seem that DL is in the best position of any other carrier to reinstate ISP service. The fact that DL is making a name for the NYC area, to me, is even more of a reason to reinstate ISP since Long Island is so heavily populated and NYC airports do actually have a bad name, not to mention ISP is accessible to the city via the LIRR at Ronkonkoma. I believe there is regular shuttle service between LIMA and LIRR Ronkonkoma. DL would then pretty much have their bases covered in all of the Greater NY area (HPN, JFK, LGA, EWR, and then ISP).


In Loving Memory of Casey Edward Falconer; May 16, 1992-May 9, 2012
User currently offlineRobertS975 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 931 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2962 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Properly marketed and priced, there is certainly the population base on Long Island to support DL service to both ATL and DTW. DL would need to have at least two, preferably three daily flights in each market.

User currently offlinecanyonblue17 From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 412 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2841 times:

Just wondering....who will we see fly ISP-ATL first, WN or DL?

User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2688 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting canyonblue17 (Reply 17):

I'd think DL, considering what WN has been doing at ATL.



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineFlytravel From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2228 times:

I'd think that if 6x daily LGA-ATL doesn't transition or work out well for WN, WN will offer ISP-ATL 1x or 2x daily just as a leisure route.

LGA-ATL on WN might be a tough challenge since WN is still pretty new or a small carrier on both the Atlanta and New York side, and DL will fare match. It's over 500 miles and there will be less connection flow than how FL operated the route.

WN might just wind up resuming LGA-BWI on a 3x daily basis permitting flows like LGA-BWI-ORF/CLT/ATL thus reasonable one stops between LGA and different southeast cities. Also those cities like GRR and FNT are only showing up with BWI service and not MDW.

WN could launch BNA-ATL instead, but it maybe too short (and driveable) just like BWI-LGA anyways.

[Edited 2012-12-30 14:44:43]

User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2159 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Flytravel (Reply 19):

While WN is relatively new at LGA and EWR, they are almost a household name on LI. Plus, they've been at ISP for a long time.



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlinegabrielz From United States of America, joined May 2004, 69 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2069 times:

The problem with ISP is that it's relatively near one of the world's largest and best-connected domestic and international airports that is a hub for two major carriers (DL, B6) -- one of which is a low cost carrier. It is also close to one of the nation's busiest small-ish airports (LGA) that -- despite delays -- is still very quick and easy from a user standpoint. This makes ISP an O&D only airport - like ONT, and if it weren't for Florida, it would be in similarly dire straits.

User currently offlinecatiii From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 2802 posts, RR: 3
Reply 22, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1862 times:

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 2):

No city is getting a DL 737MAX anytime soon. Not sure what you're talking about.


User currently offlineAv8tor From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 141 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1830 times:

B6 will enter ISP in 2013 and will dominate.

User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (1 year 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1804 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Av8tor (Reply 23):

We can only pray at this point for that.



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
25 UA787DEN : We can pray for B6/UA/DL/AA. But even if one does start service in the next few years, it will be a while before all the majors (excluding AS) serve i
26 Art at ISP : Unfortunately I think those saying B6 will come to ISP this coming year are overly optimistic. There is no economic case for them to do so. As with th
27 tsnamm : I don't think it has as much to do with drawing business from JFK or LGA for that matter, as it does with where would they fly to? B6 serves every ot
28 jfklganyc : I think B6 will end up at ISP eventually. Their planes are too big for ISP-BOS..so I would expect to see ISP-FLL/PBI/MCO at some point
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New DL And US Seasonal Service Coming To EYW posted Sun Nov 4 2012 20:48:28 by JBAirwaysFan
DL And AA? An Interesting Article posted Sat May 12 2012 01:07:53 by BDL757
DL And UA Join US With Common AA Domain Names posted Tue Mar 13 2012 06:35:42 by cha747
Update On DL And AA DCA Slots posted Fri Mar 2 2012 20:59:22 by washingtonian
Why Did DL And VS End Their FF Relationship? posted Sun Feb 26 2012 05:26:40 by RobertS975
UA, DL and Hawaiian Service From OAK posted Wed Jan 4 2012 02:19:46 by olddominion727
A Question To DL And UA Employees Re Bankruptcy posted Tue Nov 15 2011 15:36:36 by ozark1
Whats Up With DL And QF Flights To HNL posted Sun Jan 9 2011 09:00:34 by DTWAGENT
DL And CO 777S At HK Hangar posted Thu Aug 12 2010 06:49:17 by gauravpai
Why DL And Not AA Or UA On CMH-LAX? posted Sat Mar 20 2010 12:17:49 by LHCVG