Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Outlook For UA 787's In 2013  
User currently offlineTranspac787 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 3217 posts, RR: 13
Posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 12029 times:

In 2012, UA ended up getting all 6 of their initial 787 deliveries, where they had originally planned to get 5 in 2012 and the 6th would show up 1Q13.

So what's the outlook for 2013 for UA, in terms of delivery schedules?? Every article I can find online only lists delivery schedules for the "original 6", and I can't find anything for 2013 or beyond. Does anyone know how many 787's UA is planning to take delivery of this year?? Any idea on registration numbers?? Will they get any 787-9's in 2013??

As for routes, the only long-term / permanent routes planned so far are:

LAX-NRT
LAX-PVG
DEN-NRT
IAH-LOS

Any word on other future routes that will open with or switch to 787 service in 2013??

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31387 posts, RR: 85
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 11993 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Per All Things 787, LN117 and LN124 are the next two 787-8s assigned to UA and those will be delivered sometime in 2013 (Boeing is currently building up to LN98).

User currently offlineVCy From Cyprus, joined Dec 2012, 236 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 11974 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Would be nice to finally see someone connecting LCA with the US. EWR-LCA would be good with a 787 but i dont see it becoming reality.

User currently offlinespeedbird0125 From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 184 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 11975 times:

How about LAX-KIX, LAX-NGO, or SFO-NGO?

User currently offlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2359 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 11930 times:

Quoting Transpac787 (Thread starter):
Will they get any 787-9's in 2013??

789 EIS is not until 2014, so no, UA won't be getting any this year.


User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2775 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 11890 times:

This has been discussed in:

United/Cont. Existing Fleet Upgrade Status 14 (by LipeGIG Dec 10 2012 in Civil Aviation)


User currently offlineAVENSAB727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 973 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 11795 times:

IAH-SCL could be a good 787 new route.


Always look on the bright side of Life!
User currently offlineFI642 From Monaco, joined Mar 2005, 1079 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 11644 times:

Given the teething issues with the aircraft, they may wait to announce further routes.
While this has been discussed before, I would tend to believe that until completely
comfortable with the aircraft, markets will be limited.



737MAX, Cool Planes for the Worlds Coolest Airline.
User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 11478 times:

Quoting Transpac787 (Thread starter):
As for routes, the only long-term / permanent routes planned so far are:

LAX-NRT
LAX-PVG
DEN-NRT
IAH-LOS

I think DEN-NRT will start and I do not know about IAH-LOS but the others may not all switch to 787 in March. Each of those routes need at least two aircraft to operate. A couple were delivered to UA at the end of the year to get Boeing's totals up, but there are currently only 6 and All things 787 lists only two more going into production so that by March they are likely to only have 8 so either they will have to be ready to sub a 772 or they will wait until more 787s are delivered. Considering that the outstations, other than NRT, may not have much experience with the 787, it is possible that LAX-PVG may not go to the 787 on time since neither end is a 787 maintenance base. At NRT UA can get some help from NH and IAH is the main UA 787 maintenance base. Until the kinks are worked out, I doubt UA will risk that level of utilization on the 787, particularly since they will need to add positioning flights to IAH for maintenance.

Quoting speedbird0125 (Reply 3):
How about LAX-KIX, LAX-NGO, or SFO-NGO?

I would not expect to see any of these. I would not be surprised if SFO-KIX is downguaged to a 787.


User currently offlineTranspac787 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 3217 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 11363 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 1):

Per All Things 787, LN117 and LN124 are the next two 787-8s assigned to UA and those will be delivered sometime in 2013 (Boeing is currently building up to LN98).

Good page, thanks. Do we have any idea what the registration numbers of the next few birds in the lineup will be?? Has UA reserved many/any for the 787 series??

Quoting speedbird0125 (Reply 3):
How about LAX-KIX, LAX-NGO, or SFO-NGO?

UA used to operate SFO-NGO - stopped flying it in 2008 or 2009. Would be nice to see it return.

Quoting United787 (Reply 5):

This has been discussed in:

United/Cont. Existing Fleet Upgrade Status 14

Not really, aside from the 1 or 2 sentences regarding the EIS for the sUA 788's.

Quoting AVENSAB727 (Reply 6):
IAH-SCL could be a good 787 new route.

I'm surprised it's not a market UA has considered yet, seeing how both DL and AA have a pretty solid market there.

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 8):
Each of those routes need at least two aircraft to operate.

Only if you wanted to operate them with 12 hours downtime. The NRT rotation works out pretty well.

The DEN-NRT aircraft turns out NRT-LAX and the LAX inbound turns out to DEN.

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 8):
they will need to add positioning flights to IAH for maintenance.

They already have them, both IAH-LAX and IAH-DEN are permanent on the schedules as the domestic tags for the NRT flights.


User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4120 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 11230 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 8):
LAX-PVG may not go to the 787 on time since neither end is a 787 maintenance base

LAX cannot handle 787 maintenance? Isn't that where the last 4 were delivered and prepared for service? Seems that they might have some working knowledge (certainly more than DEN will), I assumed it was a maintenance base since they are doing the induction work.

I have no knowledge of the delivery schedule, but the original CO order was for 11 788s and 14 789s. There are 5 788s left to be delivered, so I think it's well within reason that all of these will come in 2013, with the 789s starting sometime in 2014.

What I'm more curious about is if the UA order for 25 frames, originally scheduled for 2016, will be moved up.


User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 11109 times:

Quoting Transpac787 (Reply 9):
Only if you wanted to operate them with 12 hours downtime. The NRT rotation works out pretty well.

The DEN-NRT aircraft turns out NRT-LAX and the LAX inbound turns out to DEN.

They will still need to reposition to IAH so they will still effectively need 2 aircraft to operate the route.

Quoting FriendlySkies (Reply 10):
LAX cannot handle 787 maintenance? Isn't that where the last 4 were delivered and prepared for service? Seems that they might have some working knowledge (certainly more than DEN will), I assumed it was a maintenance base since they are doing the induction work.

Routine work can be done at LAX but the main maintenance facility for the 787 is IAH. Until they get over the teething problems, I suspect that they 787s will spend quite a bit of time at IAH.


User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7804 posts, RR: 25
Reply 12, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 11105 times:

Quoting AVENSAB727 (Reply 6):
IAH-SCL could be a good 787 new route.

IAH-SCL would be good, but I wonder if the 762 would be a better fit for it.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21580 posts, RR: 59
Reply 13, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 11061 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 11):
Routine work can be done at LAX but the main maintenance facility for the 787 is IAH. Until they get over the teething problems, I suspect that they 787s will spend quite a bit of time at IAH.

And to build up hours, you will continue to see IAH-LAX flights, just as the 777 did before Gulf War 2. So you could see a routing including IAH-LAX-XXX on one flight number to a destination further than you can reach from IAH.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineTranspac787 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 3217 posts, RR: 13
Reply 14, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 10992 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 11):
Routine work can be done at LAX but the main maintenance facility for the 787 is IAH.

Yes, that would explain why the last four (4) deliveries have been PAE-LAX then, instead of PAE-IAH  

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 12):
IAH-SCL would be good, but I wonder if the 762 would be a better fit for it.

They're due to exit pretty soon, and the 787 would have a lower trip cost than 762 anyway, despite being significantly higher capacity.


User currently offlineFI642 From Monaco, joined Mar 2005, 1079 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 10853 times:

Quoting Transpac787 (Reply 14):
They're due to exit pretty soon, and the 787 would have a lower trip cost than 762 anyway, despite being significantly higher capacity.

Considerably less, not to mention a more comfortable ride.



737MAX, Cool Planes for the Worlds Coolest Airline.
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 16, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 10830 times:

How many 787's are we due to pick up this year?


A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26128 posts, RR: 50
Reply 17, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 10624 times:

Keep in mind the first 787 crew base is IAH, with LAX expected to follow shortly.

So much of the flying will be contingent and built around these crewing factors.

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 8):
I would not expect to see any of these. I would not be surprised if SFO-KIX is downguaged to a 787.

Its actually getting upgauged to the 744 in June 6th schedule change.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 10583 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 8):
I think DEN-NRT will start and I do not know about IAH-LOS but the others may not all switch to 787 in March. Each of those routes need at least two aircraft to operate. A couple were delivered to UA at the end of the year to get Boeing's totals up, but there are currently only 6 and All things 787 lists only two more going into production so that by March they are likely to only have 8 so either they will have to be ready to sub a 772 or they will wait until more 787s are delivered. Considering that the outstations, other than NRT, may not have much experience with the 787, it is possible that LAX-PVG may not go to the 787 on time since neither end is a 787 maintenance base. At NRT UA can get some help from NH and IAH is the main UA 787 maintenance base. Until the kinks are worked out, I doubt UA will risk that level of utilization on the 787, particularly since they will need to add positioning flights to IAH for maintenance.

UA is indeed pushing some dates back to work with Boeing on reliability issues, however not all the dates are being pushed back and even the ones that are being pushed back only slightly;

LAX-NRT goes to 787 starting tomorrow, as scheduled
DEN-NRT on March 31 as scheduled
LAX-PVG starts on March 30 as scheduled
IAH-LOS was also to begin tomorrow with the 787 but instead will start at the end of the month
IAH-LHR will start March 1 instead of February 4
IAH-AMS will start February 24 instead of February 23

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...dule-on-reliability-issues-380631/



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineflood From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 1383 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 10049 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 18):
LAX-NRT goes to 787 starting tomorrow, as scheduled

Looks like ship 902 will be operating the NRT flight.

I was wondering, however... 902 is being positioned IAH-LAX as UA6879 with a delay of 4+ hours (currently en route). Around 30min after 902's initially scheduled departure, UA took ship 906 IAH-LAX as UA6860 (shows a delay of 38m due to 'aircraft change'). That said, they'll have two 787s at LAX... is this merely a precautionary move or anyone know the reason behind this?

Well, make that three 787s... ship 904 will be there in the morning as well - albeit as a regular scheduled flight.

[Edited 2013-01-02 20:34:59]

User currently offlinespeedbird0125 From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 184 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 8708 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 17):
Keep in mind the first 787 crew base is IAH, with LAX expected to follow shortly.

So much of the flying will be contingent and built around these crewing factors.

Do you know when 787 crews be based at LAX? It must be sCO crews who operate the 787 flights out of LAX following IAH base. What about DEN-NRT flight? Who is going to operate this flight? IAH crew? or is DEN also getting some crews for the DEN-NRT?


User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 8641 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting speedbird0125 (Reply 20):
It must be sCO crews who operate the 787 flights

All 787's are currently operated by sCO crews as it is a sCO airplane.



The only valid opinions are those based in facts
User currently offlinefun2fly From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1089 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 7568 times:

My vote is SFO>CAN. Similar to IAH>SCL, a long skinny route matching the purpose of the plane that fills out the route portfolio.

Interesting how the initial CO plans for EWR>BLR and EWR


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 23, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6909 times:

Quoting fun2fly (Reply 22):
Interesting how the initial CO plans for EWR>BLR and EWR

UA should have five more by the end of the year, which would be all 11 of the sCO 787-8 orders. So we shall see what happens then, but my guess is they would continue the trend of swapping out the 787s for 777s on competitive routes (SEA-NRT, LAX-LHR etc..) and move those 777s to EWR or IAH. I think the 787-9s are where we shall see some growth to new destinations in India and elsewhere, they should arrive in 2014 which by then should be a time to start growing again for UA.

The sUA 787-8s start arriving in 2016, it would be great if that could be moved up, and hopefully they replace the 3 class 763s.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5598 posts, RR: 7
Reply 24, posted (1 year 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6760 times:

Quoting Transpac787 (Thread starter):
So what's the outlook for 2013 for UA, in terms of delivery schedules??

They (CO) used to project deliveries for the following year in the "Fleet Plan" updates. Now they do only one year at a time and the updates are less frequent, the last one in October. There should be a 2013 update around the first of Feb. or so, when the first web conference of the year is usually scheduled.



I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
25 SonomaFlyer : Don't expect much in the way of expansion beyond the routes currently announced until two things happen: 1. Boeing and the subs get their issues sorte
26 hereandthere41 : Only two are coming in 2013. On the f/a side, IAH crews will be routed IAH-NRT (772), NRT-LAX-NRT (788), NRT-IAH (772) No word yet on who flies DEN-N
27 AirframeAS : So, at the end of 2013, we should have a total of 8 airframes. I was hoping for more like 15.
28 HoMsaR : Since the 787 has the same type rating as the 777, does UA use the same pilots for both, or does the 787 have its own separate pilot group?
29 fun2fly : It was supposed to be 6 in 2012 and 5 in 2013. So, Boeing is short 3 units for 2013? That's news. And it changes new route plan speculation for 2013.
30 Stitch : Boeing looks to be on production track, so if UA is not taking as many planes as they had planned, perhaps it is UA that is deferring deliveries?
31 STT757 : Where is this information coming from?
32 hereandthere41 : One of numerous places it was posted was United Daily on January 2, 2013 under "What you can expect in 2013". We are taking 24 737-900s and 2 787s fo
33 AirframeAS : Keep in mind, that's subject to change. I have a feeling we will take delivery more than just two Dream)liners this year.
34 fun2fly : That's a good source! Makes you wonder why the other 3 are not happening in 2013. Perhaps a conversion to 789? So, assuming the first 6 are spoken fo
35 VC10er : Of all the talk about destinations for the 6 to 11 787's, has Sao Paulo ever been a good bet?
36 amirs : any chance for ORD/SFO - TLV? easily can fill daily 788 service!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Special Ceremonies For UA 787 Entry Into Servi posted Fri Oct 19 2012 17:50:43 by vulindlela744
AM Finally Arrives At LHR,787 Will Be Used In 2013 posted Mon Dec 17 2012 14:53:38 by Gonzalo
UA Wants VS In Star, Plus UA 787 Speculation posted Mon Nov 12 2012 05:28:12 by STT757
Low Load Factor On A Once Only 787 Flight For UA posted Mon Sep 24 2012 11:27:12 by n797mx
UA To Get Their First B-787 In September posted Tue Jun 26 2012 03:06:26 by KC135TopBoom
787 In The UA Schedule posted Mon Jun 25 2012 06:43:31 by DFWHeavy
Boston.com: UA/CO To B In 2013 posted Thu Oct 27 2011 00:35:07 by bos2laf
UA Ad In Hemispheres On A350 & 787 posted Fri Jan 29 2010 00:30:57 by VC10er
WN Buyout Of F9 Beneficial For UA In DEN posted Tue Aug 11 2009 11:41:22 by N104UA
Delta Joins UA+US In $25 For 2nd Bag posted Tue Mar 18 2008 22:41:05 by LAXintl