Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Next To BOS: China Or Middle East?  
User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4086 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 6033 times:

There have been an awful lot of rumors circulating about the next new international service at Boston's Logan Airport. Some people say 'China' while others say 'Middle East.' Sadly, no one is saying that new service will come from a U.S.-based carrier.

So, the ones I've heard mentioned most (in no particular order):
--Turkish
--Emirates
--Qatar
--China (?)
--Hainan (I think they either gave up or were never really serious to begin with)

Also interesting is that there seems to be NO talk of service to South America. New England is very culturally diverse, with (it would seem) a ready-made population base to support service to that continent.

[Edited 2013-01-04 07:36:32]

55 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineclrd4t8koff From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5822 times:

South America surprises me also. Living in Boston, I can tell you it has a very large Brazilian and Colombian population. Is it on the same level as Miami or NYC - no, but it's rather large. Would think a BOS-BOG on a 738/757 would work or a 787 on BOS-GIG/GRU?

My guess is going to be the Middle East - TK, QR, EK

[Edited 2013-01-04 09:50:29]

User currently offlineMalayil From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5772 times:

Its going to be Emirates.

User currently onlineSCQ83 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 850 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5733 times:

Quoting clrd4t8koff (Reply 1):
South America surprises me also. Living in Boston, I can tell you it has a very large Brazilian and Colombian population. Is it on the same level as Miami or NYC - no, but it's rather large. Would think a BOS-BOG on a 738/757 would work or a 787 on BOS-GIG/GRU?

There is nothing surprising about it.

NYC and MIA/MCO have tons of Latin American tourists and more business links... BOS does not. On top of whatever VFR they might have. And BOS for North-South connections does not work, since anyone flying from BOS can easily connect in JFK, MIA, MCO, CLT, IAD, DFW... to Brazil or anywhere else in LATAM.

I could only see a connection to a hub...the likes of a Copa PTY-BOS with a B737 so passengers can connect to somewhere else. Yet BOS is more Brazilian/Portuguese than Spanish, so even for VFR, Copa/PTY might not be a good idea.


User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4086 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5696 times:

Quoting Malayil (Reply 2):
Its going to be Emirates.

  

Of all the rumors, this seems to be the one that most people are certain about.


User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 5695 times:

BOS-GRU on a 787 *might* work, but who would fly it? UA isn't going to put a 787 in BOS for that route. NYC/Florida gave a stronger local area market and serve almost all connections better or as well as BOS would.

Quoting Malayil (Reply 2):

I agree. It will be EK to DXB.

Middle East, for those of you who don't know what DXB or EK are.  


User currently offlinemah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32624 posts, RR: 72
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5605 times:

Emirates is coming to Boston soon.

BOS-Brazil is a good sized market - to CNF, GRU and GIG - but yield sucks. The 787 doesn't fix that situation. It's like BOS-Portugal, which, while served, is not served by a regular scheduled airline and is very underserved relative to demand.

New England lacks business ties to the entire Latin America region and is poorly located geographically to support service. We've already seen AeroMexico and TACA come and quickly leave.



a.
User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8289 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5580 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Middle East, Emirates has only so many quality American cities left it can fly to. Boston is one or two on that list.

User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8237 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5572 times:

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 6):
BOS-Brazil is a good sized market - to CNF, GRU and GIG - but yield sucks. The 787 doesn't fix that situation. It's like BOS-Portugal, which, while served, is not served by a regular scheduled airline and is very underserved relative to demand.

Well, BOS-LIS is served by a regularly scheduled airline: SATA. They even code-share with US and TP. I've been on it too  
But I agree that the yields are low and with so much competition from BOS to Europe and S.America, I just don't see any new routes popping up. Brazil seems especially difficult because Brazilians don't feel attracted to visit cold, northern Boston, and it's just too far of a vacation destination for New Englanders. When you think about it, Brazil is just as far as Hawaii.


User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12905 posts, RR: 100
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 5550 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ChrisNH (Thread starter):
Sadly, no one is saying that new service will come from a U.S.-based carrier.

Not a surprise. Longhaul thrives with connections.

Quoting ChrisNH (Reply 4):
Quoting Malayil (Reply 2):
Its going to be Emirates.

  

Of all the rumors, this seems to be the one that most people are certain about.

That would be my best guess.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlinemah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32624 posts, RR: 72
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 5496 times:

Quoting airbazar (Reply 8):
Well, BOS-LIS is served by a regularly scheduled airline: SATA. They even code-share with US and TP. I've been on it too

All SATA flights to Boston are public charter.



a.
User currently onlineSCQ83 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 850 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 5484 times:

Quoting airbazar (Reply 8):
Well, BOS-LIS is served by a regularly scheduled airline: SATA. They even code-share with US and TP.


Served by an unknown non-aligned airline such as SATA via PDL (Azores) 2 times a week. Hardly a service anyone would consider when flying to Europe. This is like saying that Boston is connected to Africa because of the TACV flight... factually it is, but in practice?


User currently offlineicelandair75w From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 152 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5375 times:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...icago-as-787-deliveries-begin.html

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/11/1...urkish-airlines-expands-to-boston/

+1 more that I can't release  


User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5320 times:

Is TK to BOS and SFO confirmed? I thiught it was still just a wish list destination.

User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5320 times:

Quoting ChrisNH (Thread starter):
Sadly, no one is saying that new service will come from a U.S.-based carrier.

Keep your fingers crossed that B6 tries a Central American leisure/VFR route ex: BOS-SJO at a 2-4x weekly frequency.

Quoting ChrisNH (Thread starter):
--Hainan (I think they either gave up or were never really serious to begin with)

Hainan sold or transferred the route Authority BOS-PEK to China Eastern whose largest hub is PVG and the bigger market from BOS. I think I have read that China-U.S. may become open skies soon. It would be interesting to see who jumps in then if anyone. Could CA possibly start BOS-PEK? Does anyone have overall BOS-China traffic? I'm only able to get top three markets PEK/PVG/CAN (There's also HKG but I'm leaving that one out).


User currently offline2travel2know2 From Panama, joined Apr 2010, 2577 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5309 times:

Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 3):
I could only see a connection to a hub...the likes of a Copa PTY-BOS with a B737 so passengers can connect to somewhere else. Yet BOS is more Brazilian/Portuguese than Spanish, so even for VFR, Copa/PTY might not be a good idea.

If timed properly, a CM B737-700 BOS-PTY-BOS could work.
CM already flies to several Brazilian cities out of its hubs and if those Brazilian cities help CM to fly thrice daily to PUJ and 4 times per day to both CUN and MCO I can't see why Brazilians wouldn't consider CM when flying between South America and BOS.
Even at once per day, people in New England might like to fly international between BOS and Latin America / Caribbean and avoid connections in EWR, MIA, ATL or IAH.



I'm not on CM's payroll.
User currently offlinemah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32624 posts, RR: 72
Reply 16, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5246 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 13):

Is TK to BOS and SFO confirmed? I thiught it was still just a wish list destination.

]

TK (and QR) to BOS are nothing more than a wish list. But EK, I'm hearing, is the real deal.



a.
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 5231 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 13):

TK tells the universe their expansion plans years ahead of time. They probably seriously will fly to BOS in a few years (at least that is their plan, but who knows.) But EK will beat them, and possibly hurt TK service.


User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5100 times:

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 17):
TK tells the universe their expansion plans years ahead of time. They probably seriously will fly to BOS in a few years (at least that is their plan, but who knows.) But EK will beat them, and possibly hurt TK service.

They are required to by Turkish Law to announce when they start analyzing/researching a new route.


User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5047 times:

Quoting adamh8297 (Reply 18):

True. But probably doesn't help the TK profit. I bet we will see EK in BOS in late this year (2013)


User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 4978 times:

Quoting adamh8297 (Reply 18):
They are required to by Turkish Law to announce when they start analyzing/researching a new route.

To the general public, or to the Turkish authorities in a source that usually ends up getting leaked to the public?  

I've heard that EK was also going to start service to MIA, how serious is that?

Also, JL may be eating up a good part of the BOS-China market...


User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 4874 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 20):

I've heard from multiple creditable sources that BOS is the next EK American Destination. The EK North America thread reached a general consensus that BOS and then MIA would be next.


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7561 posts, RR: 43
Reply 22, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 4861 times:

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 6):
We've already seen AeroMexico and TACA come and quickly leave.

Could AM perhaps return to BOS with better schedules and with codeshares with DL and the European SkyTeam carriers serving BOS?



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4818 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 20):
Also, JL may be eating up a good part of the BOS-China market...

Play around with connections to Chinese cities from BOS via NRT on various dates: you may not like what you see unless you do not mind a stopover in Tokyo.

http://www.ar.jal.com/arl/en/flight_planning/schedule/

JL's BOS-NRT flight does connect well with other major Japanese cities plus SIN, HKG, BKK, SGN, HAN, ICN, PUS


User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8193 posts, RR: 24
Reply 24, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4810 times:

Hasn't Qatar already announced BOS?


This Website Censors Me
User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4907 times:

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 22):

Could AM perhaps return to BOS with better schedules and with codeshares with DL and the European SkyTeam carriers serving BOS?

It was a codeshare with DL and here are the times of the previous flight when I flew it.

Flight: Delta 8042
Depart: 8:30 AM (BOS)
Arrive: 1:30 PM (MEX)

Flight: Delta 8043
Depart: 4:30 PM (MEX)
Arrive: 10:20 PM (BOS)

AM would be hard pressed to make the flight work for European connections since you would negate any connections offered by MEX.


EXAMPLE

Depart 8:00 PM (BOS)
Arrive 1:00 AM (MEX)

Depart 12:00 PM (MEX)
Arrive 5:50 PM (BOS)

The European Skyteam connections would be only CDG, LHR, FCO, and AMS as well. These flights are spread apart at BOS too so it may not be possible to connect to all 4. The flight also overflies a good portion of the U.S. so DL connections are pointless when you can go through ATL. The flight can also be considered a transcon due to its length too and its probably too thin traffic wise.

As anecdotal information, I flew the route Saturday-Saturday and many travellers such as myself were connecting onto flights towards Pacific Mexican Resorts: ACA (when it was a bit safer), PVR, ZIH, SJD. Connecting at MEX was a complete disaster (bad signage, slow immigration, overcrowded bottlenecks) and a few people missed connections. I vowed never to connect their again.


User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4664 times:

Quoting adamh8297 (Reply 14):
Hainan sold or transferred the route Authority BOS-PEK to China Eastern whose largest hub is PVG and the bigger market from BOS. I think I have read that China-U.S. may become open skies soon. It would be interesting to see who jumps in then if anyone. Could CA possibly start BOS-PEK? Does anyone have overall BOS-China traffic? I'm only able to get top three markets PEK/PVG/CAN (There's also HKG but I'm leaving that one out).

I think the traffic right is not an issue in the BOS's China route. The most important thing is when the chinese carriers can get 787. Chinese carriers have no proper plane to fly this route now. China Easter: no 787 order now. Air China: their 787-900 will not be delivered in the near future. China Southern: their base CAN can't support such a route. The only possible one is Hainan.


User currently offlineclrd4t8koff From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4676 times:

If EK is the next new carrier, what is the likely aircraft to open the route? 77L, 773ER?

User currently onlineSCQ83 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 850 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 4631 times:

For China, I would bet on Air China or Hainan to PEK.

Air China being a public airline seems to open routes for political/economical reasons... i.e. they just want to connect China with "X" country or city (as a sample, they started MAD if they were granted 5th freedom rights to GRU... so China now has a connection to both Spain and Brazil in its own airline). Maybe the Chinese government wants to have a direct connection from China to BOS (research centers, universities, etc.). So they still serve cities such as ATH or LGW (duplicated with LHR).

Hainan somehow also serves "niche" markets that noone else serves, such as BRU or BER (they even served BUD!), BOS could fit here.


User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 4521 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 26):
I think the traffic right is not an issue in the BOS's China route. The most important thing is when the chinese carriers can get 787. Chinese carriers have no proper plane to fly this route now. China Easter: no 787 order now. Air China: their 787-900 will not be delivered in the near future. China Southern: their base CAN can't support such a route. The only possible one is Hainan.

The 787 is not the magic wand for BOS-China or any long haul service that is not yet served. In the past 8 years BOS-PVG increased 186% and BOS-PEK increased 90%. If trends are even 50% of recent growth a 777 will be able to serve the route someday. Having a variety of new one-stops should stimulate secondary markets as well. EK will prove this when they start BOS-DXB with a 777.


Also just checked BOS web site, for October 2012 BOS-NRT-BOS had loads of 93.2% (assuming 787 was flown on all flights)


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24906 posts, RR: 22
Reply 30, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4377 times:

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 10):
Quoting airbazar (Reply 8):
Well, BOS-LIS is served by a regularly scheduled airline: SATA. They even code-share with US and TP. I've been on it too

All SATA flights to Boston are public charter.

Are you sure about that? I didn't think public charters could display fares/schedules in GDS, codeshare, or sell connections involving other carriers, all of which SATA does on their PDL-BOS route.


User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4086 posts, RR: 2
Reply 31, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4348 times:

Quoting adamh8297 (Reply 29):
The 787 is not the magic wand for BOS-China or any long haul service that is not yet served

I actually think it is. The 787 allowed JAL to break into the market profitably, and that's what it's all about...profit. Any route can evolve to a bigger plane, and that's what you'd expect, but the trick is to find a plane that can fly small loads long distances and make money at it.


User currently offlinesurfandsnow From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 2857 posts, RR: 30
Reply 32, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4117 times:

Quoting ChrisNH (Thread starter):
There have been an awful lot of rumors circulating about the next new international service at Boston's Logan Airport. Some people say 'China' while others say 'Middle East.'

I haven't heard anything about BOS-China coming to fruition anytime soon, and certainly not before some kind of BOS service by a Middle Eastern carrier.

Quoting ChrisNH (Thread starter):
Sadly, no one is saying that new service will come from a U.S.-based carrier.

Why would it? The legacies have largely consolidated international service - especially long haul - into their strongest primary hubs that offer the best FF bases and network connectivity.

For AA, that's the cornerstones of DFW/LAX/MIA/NYC/ORD. 10-15 years ago, I'd have called you crazy if you claimed AA would someday drop all BOS Eagle flights, BOS-SJU, BOS-SFO, and/or BOS-LHR. Low and behold, that day has come. AA had been losing ground in BOS for years, I suppose the cornerstone strategy was the final nail in the coffin for what was once a major focus city and international gateway. Going forward it appears BOS will just be another domestic spoke with service to the 5 cornerstone hubs.

For DL, that's the ATL/DTW/MSP/NYC/SLC hubs, along with strategic international gateways at LAX and SEA. Of all the legacies, DL appears to have been most successful at holding their ground in BOS, with transatlantic services intact (thanks to the AF/KL JV, of course) and even an array of Delta Connection services to the Midwest and South. If any U.S. legacy was to add new international service from BOS, it would be DL. But with existing services to LHR, CDG, AMS, and YYZ, I can't see what else DL could possibly want to add from BOS that isn't already well served by another airline or easily accessible through a DL or partner hub.

For UA, that's EWR/DEN/IAD/IAH/LAX/ORD/SFO. PMUA cut their BOS-LHR flight - a holdover from the PanAm era - years ago. BOS has been just another domestic spoke (as it was for PMCO) ever since, and I can't imagine why that will ever change in the future.

For US, that's the CLT/PHL/PHX hubs and major DCA focus city. They recently slashed services at BOS (along with LGA, PIT, LAS, etc.) to focus on the four aforementioned markets. However, a few international routes still remain to Caribbean/Latin American hotspots. I wonder if this is merely an aircraft utilization tool for otherwise idle shuttle aircraft, though - if US does sell the Shuttle operation to B6 or WN, I bet these routes would end as a result. I certainly wouldn't look for US to add any new international services from BOS, that's for sure.

Now, that is not to see we won't see any new international service from BOS by a U.S. carrier. B6 continues to grow its Caribbean/Latin American network, and surely BOS can gain additional new international service from them as a result. If you want to see a U.S. carrier add international from BOS, they are surely your best bet.

Quoting ChrisNH (Thread starter):
So, the ones I've heard mentioned most (in no particular order):
--Turkish
--Emirates
--Qatar

TK and QR has officially stated they will start BOS, but it sounds like EK might beat them to the punch. I don't think BOS could support all 3 in the short term, though. One or two would probably delay their entry to BOS for at least a few years... So it will be interesting to see who gets there first!

Quoting ChrisNH (Thread starter):
--China (?)
--Hainan (I think they either gave up or were never really serious to begin with)

I haven't heard any serious talk about BOS-China for a while. Hainan came close to launching HNL-China service, only to back out at the last minute. They never got nearly as far with BOS-China. I guess SEA (and YYZ) should count their blessings that the airline actually followed through with their intentions! I believe the airline blamed visa policies as their official reasoning, and IMO that is valid. Americans can't get visas on arrival, and Chinese have to jump through hoops to get an American visa.

The next transpacific service from BOS would probably be a resumption of KE - nonstop in both directions this time around. ICN would offer excellent access to cities throughout China and other Asian countries (including Japan, where secondary markets are often much easier to reach via ICN than NRT), with a visa-free flow of O&D pax to boot.

Quoting ChrisNH (Thread starter):
Also interesting is that there seems to be NO talk of service to South America. New England is very culturally diverse, with (it would seem) a ready-made population base to support service to that continent.

This ready-made population base you speak of can easily get to South America via JFK, EWR, ATL, MIA, and in some cases IAD. I suppose even YYZ, ORD, DTW, DFW, and IAH could be options if the price is right. There are not strong enough business and/or VFR ties between BOS and anywhere in South America to justify a nonstop flight, and there is not much connectivity beyond BOS. Even LAX is a huge challenge from South America, in terms of yields anyway. Perhaps when Brazilians and/or other South Americans get visa free access to the U.S., and when Americans can easily obtain Brazilian visas and/or not pay high reciprocity fees to the likes of Argentina and Chile, traffic flows will increase to the point where BOS-South America could happen. Hey, there's always those rumors of B6 getting some A330s or A350s too  .



Flying in the middle seat of coach is much better than not flying at all!
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4108 times:

Quoting surfandsnow (Reply 32):

I agree with all of this, but one question: How long did you spend writing that?

I think EK will beat QR and TK. TK looks like it will be last to the party, and I doubt BOS could support all 3.

As far as China and South America...The only airlines that might serve it have better places to go, and I just don't see BOS-China or SA anytime soon.

I think Middle East and Caribbean will see expansion, and maybe a few more European carriers expanding.

Maybe RyanAtlantic  


User currently offlinemah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32624 posts, RR: 72
Reply 34, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4085 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 30):
Are you sure about that? I didn't think public charters could display fares/schedules in GDS, codeshare, or sell connections involving other carriers, all of which SATA does on their PDL-BOS route.

Absolutely sure. Public charter operated by SATA on behalf of Azores Express. Public charters can display and publish fares.

http://www.sata.pt/en/sata/azores-express-en



a.
User currently offlinealphaomega From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 568 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3975 times:

Quoting Malayil (Reply 2):
Its going to be Emirates.

Haha - sorry guys, but no. QR and TK are the only middle eastern carriers that have somewhat of a plan beyond rumor so far, and have actually announced so. Now, can EK certainly announce BOS tomorrow and be flying there in a month? Sure...but I don't see it.

Both Aeromexico and Copa applied for landing rights and were denied, so I would bet seeing them working out their schedules before any other new carrier gets in.

If all of the rumors I've heard lately come true, then you will see QR, TK, AM, CM, and KE serving BOS by the end of the year. BOS may also see the LH 747-8 this summer. LAN and TACA were also rumors but I think have died out.


User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4086 posts, RR: 2
Reply 36, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3866 times:

Quoting surfandsnow (Reply 32):
AA had been losing ground in BOS for years,

In the Crandall days, AA was a competitively violent airline. Years later, thoroughly weakened and unable to fight, AA got sand kicked in its face by JetBlue. In those violent days of AAs existence, they would have mounted a fight. But today's AA is a much weakened entity, groveling for a dance partner any way it can.



[Edited 2013-01-06 06:35:17]

User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3790 times:

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 33):
I think EK will beat QR and TK. TK looks like it will be last to the party, and I doubt BOS could support all 3.

I agree with you on EK but I think TK beats QR since they can provide a tremendous amount of new one-stop opportunities from BOS.

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 33):
As far as China and South America...The only airlines that might serve it have better places to go, and I just don't see BOS-China or SA anytime soon.

I thought this myself until I looked at all the possible connections made from the JL flight and was pretty disappointed. You can only connect to PEK and PVG going to Asia. Going back to BOS 1-stop involves an overnight at NRT. They are also a schedule change away of making BOS-NRT-ICN really tight as well. In my opinion, JL left the door open for another Asian Carrier and a Chinese carrier may not be ambitious enough so I will quote what surfandsnow said in a previous post.

Quoting surfandsnow (Reply 32):
The next transpacific service from BOS would probably be a resumption of KE - nonstop in both directions this time around. ICN would offer excellent access to cities throughout China and other Asian countries (including Japan, where secondary markets are often much easier to reach via ICN than NRT), with a visa-free flow of O&D pax to boot.

KE would have DL to offer connections with as well as all of the interlines (especially B6).

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 34):
Absolutely sure. Public charter operated by SATA on behalf of Azores Express. Public charters can display and publish fares.

http://www.sata.pt/en/sata/azores-express-en

Besides US, they also interline with VX from SFO and LAX and it is bookable on SATA's website.

Quoting alphaomega (Reply 35):
Both Aeromexico and Copa applied for landing rights and were denied, so I would bet seeing them working out their schedules before any other new carrier gets in.

Denied by who? DOT? Massport? Massport would give Copa incentives to start BOS-PTY


User currently onlineSCQ83 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 850 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3754 times:

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 33):
I think EK will beat QR and TK. TK looks like it will be last to the party, and I doubt BOS could support all 3.
Quoting adamh8297 (Reply 37):
I agree with you on EK but I think TK beats QR since they can provide a tremendous amount of new one-stop opportunities from BOS.

I also think that coming EK first, TK makes more sense as a second one.

EK and TK networks are largely complementary (TK is also suitable for Turkey, Levant, Russia, Eastern Europe, Central Asia) whilst QR and EK serve exactly the same markets geographically. Not to mention that I am sure DXB and IST have a much larger O&D from BOS or anywhere else in the US than DOH. So EK (which has a much stronger brand awareness) coming with a daily flight, they might keep QR away for a while. TK? Not much IMO.

And TK has been expanding so aggressively... how many destinations have they added in 2012 only? 20, 30?

[Edited 2013-01-06 07:59:35]

User currently offlinealphaomega From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 568 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3649 times:

Quoting adamh8297 (Reply 37):
Denied by who? DOT? Massport? Massport would give Copa incentives to start BOS-PTY

You don't apply for landing rights with Massport, and yes they would give them incentives. Airlines must have approved landing rights from CBP for all international arrivals, and CBP denied both due to their schedule. The issue is with CBP not staffing for the flights during the overnight hours which is when CM and AM would be operating. Trivial problem to have when trying to court new service, but something Massport is currently fighting.


User currently offlinemah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32624 posts, RR: 72
Reply 40, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3586 times:

Quoting ChrisNH (Reply 36):
But today's AA is a much weakened entity, groveling for a dance partner any way it can.

So an airline that is constantly leading every other airline in revenue growth this year is a weakened entity? And you do realize AA is not actively seeking a merger partner, right?

I realize you are bitter about AA and BOS, but that doesn't change reality.



a.
User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 41, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3565 times:

Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 38):
Quoting adamh8297 (Reply 37):

I agree TK would make more sense than QR 2nd. But I'm not sure they will make it in time. But of course, QR might try to jump in and take a different market instead of BOS if/when EK beats them.

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 40):

AA would indeed prefer to go alone. Though for the past couple of years, AA has been a bit of a shadow of its former self. They held on longer than anyone else, but currently aren't in the best shape, and haven't been for a few years. That said, when they come out of BK (hopefully alone) than I think we will see them back at the front of the pack, especially with all the new 737/320s. By the way, Revenue growth this year counts for 5.5 days.  


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24906 posts, RR: 22
Reply 42, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3503 times:

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 34):
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 30):
Are you sure about that? I didn't think public charters could display fares/schedules in GDS, codeshare, or sell connections involving other carriers, all of which SATA does on their PDL-BOS route.

Absolutely sure. Public charter operated by SATA on behalf of Azores Express. Public charters can display and publish fares.

http://www.sata.pt/en/sata/azores-ex...ss-en

The way the first paragaph of that link is worded makes it sound like the Azores Express charters are separate from the SATA International flights. How can charters codeshare with scheduled carriers? Where is that covered in DOT rules? I can't see how that could be handled in accounting systems etc.


User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 43, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3413 times:

Quoting 2travel2know2 (Reply 15):
If timed properly, a CM B737-700 BOS-PTY-BOS could work.
CM already flies to several Brazilian cities out of its hubs and if those Brazilian cities help CM to fly thrice daily to PUJ and 4 times per day to both CUN and MCO I can't see why Brazilians wouldn't consider CM when flying between South America and BOS.
Even at once per day, people in New England might like to fly international between BOS and Latin America / Caribbean and avoid connections in EWR, MIA, ATL or IAH.

Good prediction   


Unofficial: Copa Airlines (CM) To BOS


User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1989 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3332 times:

Quoting clrd4t8koff (Reply 1):
South America surprises me also. Living in Boston, I can tell you it has a very large Brazilian and Colombian population. Is it on the same level as Miami or NYC - no, but it's rather large. Would think a BOS-BOG on a 738/757 would work or a 787 on BOS-GIG/GRU?

How big is BOS-BOG? That would be a route B6 would start with an A320 most likely, but it might be pushing it (it's 100 miles shorter than BOS-SFO, but BOG may have elevation issues, which may explain why they don't fly JFK-BOG).

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 6):
BOS-Brazil is a good sized market - to CNF, GRU and GIG - but yield sucks.
Quoting surfandsnow (Reply 32):
There are not strong enough business and/or VFR ties between BOS and anywhere in South America to justify a nonstop flight, and there is not much connectivity beyond BOS. Even LAX is a huge challenge from South America, in terms of yields anyway. Perhaps when Brazilians and/or other South Americans get visa free access to the U.S., and when Americans can easily obtain Brazilian visas and/or not pay high reciprocity fees to the likes of Argentina and Chile, traffic flows will increase to the point where BOS-South America could happen. Hey, there's always those rumors of B6 getting some A330s or A350s too .

BOS would be a good connection point for East Asia-Brazil flights! Flying NRT-GRU via BOS adds only 3 miles! How are the yields on East Asia-Brazil?



2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 45, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3304 times:

Quoting BOStonsox (Reply 44):

BOS would be a good connection point for East Asia-Brazil flights! Flying NRT-GRU via BOS adds only 3 miles! How are the yields on East Asia-Brazil?

I doubt it, seeing as BOS has only one flight to Asia and one to South America! Having an effective connection hub requires drawing from many destinations and frequencies on both ends. Also, why not a place like DXB which has natural advantages for being a hub airport, or JFK which has much more O&D than BOS on both ends? Operating a hub without sufficient O&D on both ends is difficult; DL has struggled with ATL to both Asia and South America and ATL is still a larger market.


User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 46, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3280 times:

Quoting BOStonsox (Reply 44):
How big is BOS-BOG? That would be a route B6 would start with an A320 most likely, but it might be pushing it (it's 100 miles shorter than BOS-SFO, but BOG may have elevation issues, which may explain why they don't fly JFK-BOG).

BOS-BOG is only 20 PDEW - B6 can try to pry a few passengers via MCO/FLL from AA, DL UA and by summer CM.


User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1989 posts, RR: 0
Reply 47, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3266 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 45):
I doubt it, seeing as BOS has only one flight to Asia and one to South America! Having an effective connection hub requires drawing from many destinations and frequencies on both ends. Also, why not a place like DXB which has natural advantages for being a hub airport, or JFK which has much more O&D than BOS on both ends? Operating a hub without sufficient O&D on both ends is difficult; DL has struggled with ATL to both Asia and South America and ATL is still a larger market.

I was thinking of either JL doing fifth-freedom flights NRT-BOS-GRU or a codeshare between an Asian carrier and a South American one that sends pax through BOS. If a carrier had Asian traffic as well as BOS traffic to South America, maybe it would help!



2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlinepenguins From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 282 posts, RR: 0
Reply 48, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3237 times:

Boston has both a big, not huge, Chinese and Middle Eastern communities. I've lived there and I know that all of the Chinese college students go back to China to visit their families and all the Middle Eastern's return back to the Middle East. I think that the Middle East will come first because it is a shorter distance and there are many ethnicities and religions that have roots the Middle East. TK has already announced operations to Boston and it is defiantly not a "wish list" destination.

User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 49, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3215 times:

Quoting penguins (Reply 48):

But for a route as long as BOS-China, the business travelers are much more important for yields. You can always fill the Y cabin with low prices.


User currently offlinepenguins From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 282 posts, RR: 0
Reply 50, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3204 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 49):
Quoting penguins (Reply 48):

But for a route as long as BOS-China, the business travelers are much more important for yields. You can always fill the Y cabin with low prices.

That is a very valid point and I do agree that the flight is bound to happen sooner rather than later. My main reason for choosing the Middle East is that IMO the 787 is the only economical plane for the China-BOS route. None of the Chinese carriers have theirs yet while Middle Eastern airlines have the equipment to operate the route right now and have announced intentions to do so.


User currently offlineUA787DEN From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 420 posts, RR: 0
Reply 51, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3115 times:

Copa PTY-BOS in Amadeus. There is a thread devoted to it. Maybe they have authority now?

User currently offlineicelandair75w From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 152 posts, RR: 0
Reply 52, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2996 times:

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 51):
Copa PTY-BOS in Amadeus. There is a thread devoted to it. Maybe they have authority now?

They do indeed have authority now.


User currently offlinejetbluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2972 posts, RR: 14
Reply 53, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2899 times:

This article leads me to believe EK is very close to announcing BOS. It is a bit of reading between the lines, but this quote especially struck me:

"In the U.S., Emirates has commercial relationships with JetBlue Airways Corp. (JBLU) at Kennedy and Alaska Airlines in Seattle which allow for connecting flights, and Clark said he aims to “push into other points” with the former. Integrated schedules would allow for easier transfers, though the airlines need to be “careful” about antitrust and pricing issues, he said."

"Other points" could very well mean BOS, B6's second largest domestic hub.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...rjumbos-for-network-expansion.html

jetbluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlinealphaomega From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 568 posts, RR: 0
Reply 54, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2887 times:

Quoting icelandair75w (Reply 52):
Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 51):
Copa PTY-BOS in Amadeus. There is a thread devoted to it. Maybe they have authority now?

They do indeed have authority now.

Their initial schedule request was for 0100-0500, so glad to see they were able to work out 1800-1000. Long ground time but if it works, glad to see it! Interesting that they're starting with daily flights - I don't even think they did this with IAD or MCO when they started. Good for BOS!


User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8237 posts, RR: 10
Reply 55, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2790 times:

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 34):
Absolutely sure. Public charter operated by SATA on behalf of Azores Express. Public charters can display and publish fares.

The link you provided doesn't say anything about today's flight's to Boston. It just implies that Azores Express (which is a travel company owned by SATA), sells charters. This link is just as vague about their operations:
http://www.sata.pt/en/sata/sata-internacional-en

I know they have seasonal charters to various destinations but I'm not convinced that their regularly scheduled flights are charters although it's possible for if nothing else for accounting and regulatory purposes only. But from a consumer point of view they are a regular airline like any other, their crappy service notwithstanding  


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will CO Fly To The Middle East Or Africa? Ex.TLV posted Thu Dec 15 2005 03:28:35 by MD90fan
EDI/GLA To Either DOH Or AUH: News Next Week? posted Sun Jan 8 2012 02:54:23 by damian
AC To The Middle East... Why Hasn't It Happened? posted Wed Oct 20 2010 17:20:34 by IBOAviator
Why No Connection From The Middle East To HKT/PEN? posted Tue Mar 9 2010 08:25:30 by gabrielchew
HA To DFW, ORD, Or East Of The Mississippi? posted Wed Jan 27 2010 18:12:34 by Globalcabotage
Singapore Airlines A330 To Middle East+South Asia posted Wed Jan 6 2010 09:33:02 by 777way
ORD To The Middle East, Any Updates? posted Thu Dec 3 2009 17:32:15 by Globalcabotage
UK To Middle East With LCC - Could It Work? posted Mon Jul 13 2009 13:32:16 by Gilesdavies
Airblue To Expand In Middle East posted Sun Jun 29 2008 11:24:13 by 777way
China Airlines Former Africa/Middle East Services posted Thu May 1 2008 10:24:06 by 777way