Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How's China Southern's A380 To LAX Doing?  
User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8374 posts, RR: 7
Posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 21897 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

How is China Southern's A380 flight to LAX doing ? Are they loosing buckets with a 500 seat airplane.

43 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 21889 times:

Considering now it's the peak time for China-US route, they are doing pretty good. Actually it's oversold!

CZ327 (CAN-LAX) Max Booking 8/70/424
01/05 8/70/433
01/06 8/60/431
01/07 5/49/442

CZ328 (LAX-CAN) Max Booking 8/70/412
01/05 5/45/389
01/06 3/64/422
01/07 5/30/390

The data is from CZ booking system.


User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 306 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 21739 times:

I had heard that CZ was sending empty 380s to LAX; is this just an unbacked rumor?

User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8374 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 21679 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting justinlee (Reply 1):
CZ327 (CAN-LAX) Max Booking 8/70/424
01/05 8/70/433
01/06 8/60/431
01/07 5/49/442

CZ328 (LAX-CAN) Max Booking 8/70/412
01/05 5/45/389
01/06 3/64/422
01/07 5/30/390

The data is from CZ booking system.

How is it doing a onth from now ? Christmas everything is FULL.


User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17513 posts, RR: 45
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 21570 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 2):
I had heard that CZ was sending empty 380s to LAX; is this just an unbacked rumor?

The 777 wasn't that full, and only recently increased to daily, and fares to CAN are terrible in general, so it wouldn't surprise me



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25436 posts, RR: 49
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 21500 times:

CZ barely maintained 60% LF with their 777 to LAX for the last decade.

Yes its true the A380s are now fuller, however its on the back of strong push of cheap fares.

For instance CZ is selling business class tickets to parts of Asia ~$2000 round trip which normally cost $4000-5000+
Ultimately I doubt CZ is even breaking even with a full plane at LAX due to the low fares which is making CZ the consolidators favorite airline of the month currently.

As CZ has said themselves they don't have the right routes for the A380, and until the CAAC allows them to add markets they requested (eg PEK-CDG), they must throw the A380 on what they have and hope for the best.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinewedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5911 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 21353 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

CZ's A380 flight is probably subsidized by the PRC government anyway. So passenger performance is probably not a huge issue.

User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 971 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 20884 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

LAX, CDG. HKG are the markets CZ was targeting when they ordered A380s. Don't understand all the naysaying

User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6151 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 20831 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 7):

LAX, CDG. HKG are the markets CZ was targeting when they ordered A380s. Don't understand all the naysaying

How do you make LAX a target destination when you have a sub-70% load factor on the 777? That makes no sense.

These loads will plummet once the Chinese New Years is over. So jfk777 your right, not a good point or reference using January.



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlinebogoss From China, joined May 2012, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 20631 times:

I remember this was once discussed in a Chinese forum so I did some digging... only 3 days from 30 November to 2 December and of course it didn't speak for the whole season. However, plus the first reply that justinlee has given, it's better than nothing or you know, how the 777 was doing...

CZ 327 CAN-LAX and CZ 328 LAX-CAN from 30 November to 2 December







[Edited 2013-01-05 12:37:20]

User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 971 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 20531 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting as739x (Reply 8):

Why do you think they ordered the A380? To fly it where?


User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17513 posts, RR: 45
Reply 11, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 20477 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 10):
Why do you think they ordered the A380? To fly it where?

It's China. They order everything, so of *course* they had to have the 380, no matter the need for it, or more importantly the lack thereof.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6151 posts, RR: 24
Reply 12, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 19846 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 10):

I don't know, I am not with their planning department. But please explain a load-factor of sub-70% on a route with a 777, then expect to make a profit with a A380.

I don't mean to be argumentative. It just doesn't make sense.



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25436 posts, RR: 49
Reply 13, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 19792 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 10):
Why do you think they ordered the A380? To fly it where?

I guess you don't know that China Southern did not wake up one day and order the A380.

The Chinese government (CASGC) did.

Government then opted to allocate the A380 to China Southern, when reportedly Air China did not want to model.
This is the manner large procurements are handled in China.

China Southern provided the Chinese government a list of routes they wished for to utilize the A380 on - namely PEK-CDG.
This authority has yet to be granted (probably blocked by CA). Matter of fact the Chinese did not even allow CZ to operate the model on longhaul routes which forced them to keep the mode on 3 loss making (RMB100 million) shorthaul routes for 1-year.
http://centreforaviation.com/analysi...ation-still-faces-challenges-83737

The CEO of CZ had an interview a few months ago and explained this. The carrier at the moment does not have markets where the A380 was suitable per his own words.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineUnited885 From Germany, joined Apr 2011, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 19502 times:

How often does CZ serve LAX with their A380?
Every day?



I haven´t been everywhere, but it´s on my list.
User currently offlineg500 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 971 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 19089 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 13):

Nope I did not know the Government ordered their A380s

I have no ego whatsoever, I immediately admit when I'm wrong or I in this case when I don't know something


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25436 posts, RR: 49
Reply 16, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 18907 times:

Quoting United885 (Reply 14):
How often does CZ serve LAX with their A380?
Every day?

Yes daily, similar to their previous 777 schedule.

Quoting g500 (Reply 15):
Nope I did not know the Government ordered their A380s

I have no ego whatsoever, I immediately admit when I'm wrong or I in this case when I don't know something

No worries. Hopefully A.net is a place where people can come and learn in addition to having fun.

At the end, many people have doubts about CZ's A380 use as it hardly was based on commercial desires, but much more along the line of politics.

As another example, even when airlines in China order smaller things like 737s, the government places the order, and behind the scenes divides out the aircraft to multiple airlines. Not exactly the most transparent manner to acquire aircraft.
Same thing with routes, the government has divided the country up into spheres of influence by airlines, and limits their ability to openly compete against each other. Suppose its like the US pre-deregulation.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinepeh From Australia, joined Nov 2006, 340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 17537 times:

Nothing else in China has to make money. Why should its airline routes be any different?


Flown: ATR72, DASH 8, 737, 747, 767, 777, A300, A320, A321, A330, A340, MD80
User currently offlinesurfandsnow From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 2870 posts, RR: 30
Reply 18, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 16659 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Thread starter):

A few things to consider:

On the positive side of things, CZ is a SkyTeam member - it can tap into DL's FFer base and network connectivity at LAX. CZ offers the only nonstop flight between LAX and CAN, which is in fact currently the only nonstop link between China's third largest city and the U.S. CAN serves as the gateway to the Pearl River Delta, already a major global manufacturing center with a massive population and booming local economy. Also keep in mind that the airline's costs are much lower than those of competing American and Northeast Asian carriers, so lower yields may not necessarily mean unprofitability.

However, there are many negative things to consider. While most Asian airlines are revered for their excellent service, mainland Chinese carriers have a notorious reputation for poor service. The name "China Southern" is quite unknown in the U.S., as is "Guangzhou", which is not a hip international destination like Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong. CAN is an overwhelmingly domestic hub, but if one is connecting to another Chinese market it will probably be much quicker to transit farther north (PEK, ICN, etc.). Also, the potential for U.S.-China travel is rather limited as Americans can't get visas on arrival (I believe this just changed, but only for those transiting through PEK) and it is very difficult for Chinese to get American visas. Overall, it seems the only viable Chinese markets nonstop from the U.S. are PEK and PVG, and even those are adequately served as is evident by the lack of American and Chinese carrier interest in starting new routes. There was a lot of hype over the scarce U.S.-China authorities (on the U.S. side) a few years ago, but now there are plenty of unused authorities available. In particular, the Chinese government has given preferential access to secondary markets (anything other than PEK/PVG) for U.S. carriers, but other than an unsuccessful NRT-CAN service by NW in the mid-2000s and a UA SFO-CAN proposal that never came to fruition, nobody is interested in them. Finally, there is a certain prestige factor with the A380. However, LAX has so many A380 options that the novelty of the type has probably already worn off. For those that do want to fly the A380, the choice is something like this: the pollution of a gritty Chinese manufacturing metropolis, or the beautiful beaches of Sydney?  .

Bottom line: CZ is probably not doing well on this route today, but it could have great long term potential. Even if they are losing money it, they are probably losing *less* doing this than a bunch of domestic hops, or sending the A380 anywhere else... They don't have many options to use the A380 in their current network, this is the best option out of many bad options. I think they are banking on eventually being able to use it out of PEK and/or PVG...



Flying in the middle seat of coach is much better than not flying at all!
User currently offlinejfidler From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 16495 times:

Quoting surfandsnow (Reply 20):
CAN is an overwhelmingly domestic hub, but if one is connecting to another Chinese market it will probably be much quicker to transit farther north (PEK, ICN, etc.).

I think this may have a lot to do with it. I was in CAN recently, and there were no great options for getting back to the US at a reasonable price (in C). I ended up flying back to PEK and heading to the US from there.

I took a CZ A380 on PEK-CAN about a month ago, and I had mistakenly assumed they used such a big plane on a domestic route due to high demand. It's interesting to read in this thread that their choice of such equipment on the route may have been due to restrictions from the Chinese government instead of market forces.


User currently offlinescottpilgrim From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2013, 7 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 15379 times:

Quoting peh (Reply 17):
Nothing else in China has to make money. Why should its airline routes be any different?

I would also tend to think that CZ is not a wholly profit-oriented establishment like CX or virtually every airline in private hands. It follows that CAN-LAX route may exist not solely for the sake of money making but for such motives as prestige of having a direct flight to the USA, creating jobs for university graduates, etc that CZ/the Chinese government attaches greater importance to. I don't think the poor yields on this route particularly upsets them, so long as those motives are achieved.


User currently offlinebogoss From China, joined May 2012, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 14795 times:

wow, I thought people are really more interested in data whatsoever and apparently I was somehow wrong, lot of things to learn in here including making a point out of assumption.

User currently offlineBestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7152 posts, RR: 57
Reply 22, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 14595 times:

Quoting phxa340 (Reply 26):
How come when a Chinese airline utilizes a European built aircraft on a route that makes no sense and we discuss it we all become Anti-China and Anti-A380. Reality check - the A380 isn't going to work for everyone so when it fails on a particular route, own it. Don't bash us for it and don't accuse of being nationalistic. Now back to the topic at hand ...

Americans not nationalistic - since when?

Sorry, but this thread is full of the usual Crap that comes with the A380 and China on airliners.net. You missed the entire Pre A380 launch hysteria. Chinese aviation threads here are full of badly informed rumours.

Bear in mind that if you read my posts on Hainan Air, they don't need the A380 - whilst CZ - which is Asia's largest airline - do. I've also said on many occasions that China international aviation isn't paved with gold.

China doesn't do things for the short term either. The A380 is a long term play for CZ - not a short term folly. CZ is also a very very profitable airline - so lets give them some benefit of the doubt.

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 13):
China Southern provided the Chinese government a list of routes they wished for to utilize the A380 on - namely PEK-CDG.

You are aware that China has a one carrier, one route rule. CDG PEK is already operated by CA. CZ is trying to get around this rule by proposing a quasi codeshare.

Quoting bogoss (Reply 28):
making a point out of assumption

And then that assumption becomes reality.

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 3):
Christmas everything is FULL.

Christmas, that Chinese festival.

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 3):
How is it doing a onth from now ?

As Chinese New year will fall in early Feb it will be packed solid.



The world is really getting smaller these days
User currently offlineSA7700 From South Africa, joined Dec 2003, 3431 posts, RR: 26
Reply 23, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 14558 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Whilst everyone has the right to an opinion, we ask that this thread not be turned into yet another meaningless Airbus vs. Boeing thread with some users hurling unfounded insults around. Please stay on topic or this thread will be locked for further discussions.

Thanks for your co-operation.

Regards,

SA7700



When you are doing stuff that nobody has done before, there is no manual – Kevin McCloud (Grand Designs)
User currently offlineBestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7152 posts, RR: 57
Reply 24, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 14407 times:

Quoting surfandsnow (Reply 18):
Bottom line: CZ is probably not doing well on this route today, but it could have great long term potential. Even if they are losing money it, they are probably losing *less* doing this than a bunch of domestic hops, or sending the A380 anywhere else... They don't have many options to use the A380 in their current network, this is the best option out of many bad options. I think they are banking on eventually being able to use it out of PEK and/or PVG...

From CAN, the A380 will eventually serve CDG, AMS and SYD alongside LAX. The config for domestic operations isn't right - too J class heavy, but to compete against the CASM of the high speed train, a higher density A380 may be the proper future on high long density long legged routes - today being flown by A346s 77Ws and 333's (Beijing to Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Urumqi)

From about 2017 (ish) - CZ will move to their own (SkyTeam) purpose built airport in Beijing, which will remove the slot constraints and route constraints. Then the A380 order will look inspired, as will the CA 748 order as it will free up both carriers, alongside Hainan Air who will move to terminal 2.



The world is really getting smaller these days
User currently offlineUnited885 From Germany, joined Apr 2011, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 14640 times:

Quoting BestWestern (Reply 24):
I think they are banking on eventually being able to use it out of PEK and/or PVG...

I remember that there were rumors shortly after their order, that CZ will base their A380 at PVG.

[Edited 2013-01-06 01:27:02]


I haven´t been everywhere, but it´s on my list.
User currently offlineBestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7152 posts, RR: 57
Reply 26, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 14500 times:

Quoting peh (Reply 17):
Nothing else in China has to make money. Why should its airline routes be any different?

China Southern is a very profitable airline. It's subsidiary, Xiamen Airlines has the longest track record of Airline profitability in the world according to CAPA.



The world is really getting smaller these days
User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17513 posts, RR: 45
Reply 27, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 12375 times:

Quoting BestWestern (Reply 22):
China doesn't do things for the short term either. The A380 is a long term play for CZ - not a short term folly. CZ is also a very very profitable airline - so lets give them some benefit of the doubt.

You say that like there's some brilliant master fleet plan when the reality is the aircraft orders are made by the government and divided up among the carriers from there. No rational carrier under their own directive would come up with the motley fleets the Chinese carriers have.

Quoting BestWestern (Reply 22):
Christmas, that Chinese festival.

It's a big holiday in the US, and people take the time off to fly to China.

Quoting bogoss (Reply 21):
wow, I thought people are really more interested in data whatsoever and apparently I was somehow wrong, lot of things to learn in here including making a point out of assumption.

The CZ LAX LF data is publicly available but do tell us what data you have.

Quoting BestWestern (Reply 26):
China Southern is a very profitable airline. It's subsidiary, Xiamen Airlines has the longest track record of Airline profitability in the world according to CAPA.

Pan Am was profitable in the 60s--not particularly meaningful in a hyper regulated environment.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlinebogoss From China, joined May 2012, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 11659 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 27):
The CZ LAX LF data is publicly available but do tell us what data you have.

See reply #9, that's what I can get from my position, 3-day LF from 2 months ago, and reply #1 by justinlee for the past 3 days. Until someone can manage to get an average number of this 380 route(please?), these are what we have on the table, and sadly, they are not as convincing as one's mind...


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25436 posts, RR: 49
Reply 29, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 11420 times:

Well here are the A380 loads so far.

Oct - 68.1% (only half month was A380)
Nov - 57.5%

LAX-CAN loads were significantly heavier then CAN-LAX during this period. Probably due lots of promotion on this end with discount fares.

The December statistics should be out before the end of January.


Also for the record their LF from Jan - Oct using the 777 averaged mere 54.1%. That's only about 150 passengers per flight. Too bad CZ A332s don't have the range for LAX as even the 777 was too much airplane for the market.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinewinglets747 From Australia, joined Mar 2007, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 10878 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 29):
The December statistics should be out before the end of January.

Which stats are those? DOT/BTS stats usually take months to come out.



Stay hungry. Stay foolish.
User currently offlinebogoss From China, joined May 2012, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 10643 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 29):
Well here are the A380 loads so far.

Oct - 68.1% (only half month was A380)
Nov - 57.5%

The December statistics should be out before the end of January.

Voilà, that's what the OP was wondering at the first place... numbers and figures... although do you think you're able to tell us where it comes from?

I had read through some report saying 80% was the average and 60% was the C+F, didn't share it in here because I can't verify its credibility...

Quote:
The passenger load factor in first class and business class is over 60%, not to mention the booming sales of economy class seats. The average load factor of CZ's Airbus A380 Los Angles service is over 80%.


[Edited 2013-01-06 21:48:53]

User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25436 posts, RR: 49
Reply 32, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 10562 times:

Numbers are from our local monthly airport statistics.


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 10018 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 32):

I check DOT statistics. Even before the introduction of A380, the LF of CAN-LAX route in 2012 is not so bad. I don't know what your source of data is.

2012-01: 86.03%
2012-02: 77.26%
2012-03: 78.76%
2012-04: 81.44%
2012-05: 87.01%
2012-06: 90.35%


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25436 posts, RR: 49
Reply 34, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 9970 times:

The monthly statistics supplied by air carriers here at LAX.

Avail online at:
http://www.lawa.org/welcome_lax.aspx?id=798

Average per flight passenger count for the 11 months Jan - November was 145.9.

With 772ER having 284 seats, that would equal a 51.3% LF.

But was we know the A380 started in mid October.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 9917 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 34):
Average per flight passenger count for the 11 months Jan - November was 145.9.

I got the total departure number of 2011 is 75,142 and arrival number is 75,072. Considering there are 365 days in 2011, the average daily departure number should be 75,142/365=206 while the average daily arrival number should be 75,072/365=205.

For the 772 CZ use in the CAN-LAX route, there are 284 seats. So the LF should be around 72% in 2011. For the figure in 2012, because CZ changed the plane they use so we can't get a exact number using this method.

Please show yours.


User currently offlinebrilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4237 posts, RR: 1
Reply 36, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 9814 times:

Quoting g500 (Reply 15):
Nope I did not know the Government ordered their A380s

The government orders all their aircraft and then they go to the airlines.



Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 9806 times:

Quoting brilondon (Reply 36):
The government orders all their aircraft and then they go to the airlines.

It's not the government who makes the orders but the AVIC Group. Of course you can say AVIC is a state owned company. Besides, the new trend is that leasing companies in China have the right to place orders by themselves. For example, ICBC Leasing made a 42 Airbus 320 order with Airbus directly in 2011.


User currently offlinelaca773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 4020 posts, RR: 2
Reply 38, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 9664 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Is CZ using LAX to showcase the A380? It seems to me the best a/c for this market would be the 787.

User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 9648 times:

Quoting laca773 (Reply 38):
Is CZ using LAX to showcase the A380? It seems to me the best a/c for this market would be the 787.

Actually when they brought the 380, they intended to put it in PEK and use it at PEK-AMS and PEK-CDG route. In fact, when the 380s were delivered, all 4 planes were put in CZ's PEK base. But CA used their resources and made it impossible. Then CZ had to try them on different routes, PEK-CAN, PEK-HKG and now CAN-LAX.


User currently offlineBestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7152 posts, RR: 57
Reply 40, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 9542 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 39):
they intended to put it in PEK and use it at PEK-AMS and PEK-CDG route.

PEK CDG was never possible because CDG was already operated by Air China. AMS-PEK was recently decoupled from CAN, so it was too early to put an A380 on that route. AMS and CDG - thanks to the strong relationship with AF/KL will go A380 from CAN. From my limited usage, Loads on CAN CDG with CZ are always pretty strong in Y and Y+. J is rarely full, and F seems to be nothing more than a very comfortable crew rest zone.

Quoting justinlee (Reply 39):
Then CZ had to try them on different routes, PEK-CAN, PEK-HKG and now CAN-LAX.

PEK HKG A380 was only a short season route - it went from an A320 to A380.

Quoting justinlee (Reply 39):
In fact, when the 380s were delivered, all 4 planes were put in CZ's PEK base.

The fourth aircraft was delivered on 15th Sept was placed into Guangzhou for the CAN PVG route on 17th Sept.

Quoting justinlee (Reply 39):
But CA used their resources

CA and CAAC are very close indeed.



The world is really getting smaller these days
User currently offlinebrilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4237 posts, RR: 1
Reply 41, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 9400 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 37):
ICBC Leasing made a 42 Airbus 320 order with Airbus directly in 2011.

Sorry, I don't know who ICBC are.



Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 42, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 9281 times:

Quoting BestWestern (Reply 40):
PEK CDG was never possible because CDG was already operated by Air China. AMS-PEK was recently decoupled from CAN, so it was too early to put an A380 on that route. AMS and CDG - thanks to the strong relationship with AF/KL will go A380 from CAN. From my limited usage, Loads on CAN CDG with CZ are always pretty strong in Y and Y+. J is rarely full, and F seems to be nothing more than a very comfortable crew rest zone.

PEK-CDG is possible. But the condition of CA is to JV in this route, which CZ will never agree.

Quoting BestWestern (Reply 40):
The fourth aircraft was delivered on 15th Sept was placed into Guangzhou for the CAN PVG route on 17th Sept.

It's like a cross utilization by both CAN and PEK base. The pilots are from the PEK base while FAs are half PEK and half CAN.

Quoting BestWestern (Reply 40):
CA and CAAC are very close indeed.

Yep! CA is the eldest son of CAAC, MU and CZ are younger sons. HU is step-son...

Quoting brilondon (Reply 41):
Sorry, I don't know who ICBC are.

ICBC is the largest bank in China, just like RBC I think   Actually it ranks the No.5 in Forbes 2000 global largest public companies.



[Edited 2013-01-07 23:33:50]

User currently offlineAsiaflyer From Singapore, joined May 2007, 1136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 43, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 9198 times:

Quoting brilondon (Reply 41):
Sorry, I don't know who ICBC are.


It is the worlds largest bank by market cap. Who could guess?  



SQ,MI,MH,CX,KA,CA,CZ,MU,KE,OZ,QF,NZ,FD,JQ,3K,5J,IT,AI,IC,QR,SK,LF,KL,AF,LH,LX,OS,SR,BA,SN,FR,WF,1I,5T,VZ,VX,AC,NW,UA,US,
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
China Southern Moves To Tbit At LAX posted Fri Jan 19 2007 20:40:46 by BALAX
Korean Goes Double Daily A380 To LAX posted Sun Nov 4 2012 21:51:16 by LAXintl
Garuda And China Airlines Codeshare To LAX & SFO posted Wed Aug 29 2012 08:13:23 by LAXintl
China Southern+Eastern To Cairns posted Tue Aug 14 2012 03:35:20 by Brad330
AF Bringing A380 To LAX In Summer 2012 posted Sun Jan 8 2012 13:32:17 by DTWLAX
AF Swithces To A380 To LAX From May 2012 posted Thu Oct 27 2011 13:29:40 by LY777
Singapore Airlines A380 To LAX From 27 Mar 2011 posted Fri Dec 3 2010 07:47:55 by Docpepz
Does AF Plan To Send The A380 To LAX? posted Tue Jul 27 2010 09:48:32 by LY777
777Fs For China Southern - Off To The Desert posted Tue Apr 14 2009 09:56:49 by Clickhappy
Qantas A380 To LAX posted Sat Apr 11 2009 07:07:14 by FISHERM