Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will SQ Start New US Routes?  
User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 13259 times:

With SQ cutting the two longest flights in the world this year, have they announced if they will start any new one-stop SIN-U.S. routes or add capacity to exisiting ones?

Could EWR-ICN-SIN work, since SQ has rights to transport passengers between the U.S. and South Korea, or maybe a route via a *A hub like IST if they have the rights? Also, SIN-TLV-MIA would be interesting; however there is no way to avoid Malaysian and Indonesian airspace during a takeoff from SIN, is there?

39 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinewedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5892 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 13024 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Thread starter):
Could EWR-ICN-SIN work, since SQ has rights to transport passengers between the U.S. and South Korea, or maybe a route via a *A hub like IST if they have the rights? Also, SIN-TLV-MIA would be interesting; however there is no way to avoid Malaysian and Indonesian airspace during a takeoff from SIN, is there?

Before SQ received their A345's for the nonstops, didn't the 1-stops go to EWR or JFK through FRA or something like that? The IAH flight goes through Moscow.


User currently onlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2133 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 12960 times:

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 1):
Before SQ received their A345's for the nonstops, didn't the 1-stops go to EWR or JFK through FRA or something like that? The IAH flight goes through Moscow.

Before the nonstop SQ had a SIN-AMS-EWR flight. Their current JFK flight goes via FRA.


User currently offlineBoston From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 12928 times:

SIN has not announced any new service to the US and I would be hard pressed to believe SQ will add any new flights to the US in the near future. Non-stop LAX and EWR service continues through OCT and NOV '13 respectively. SQ continues to serve LAX via NRT, SFO via ICN, IAH via DME and JFK via FRA. Keep in mind the SIN-LAX and SIN-EWR flights did not have any economy seating. Both flights were business class with 100 seats. I can't imagine they would add anymore capacity to existing routes for just 100 seats to the west coast and 100 seats to the east coast. The only possibility I could see for a new route, and this would be a very very slim chance, would be something like SIN-ICN-ORD or SIN-NRT-ORD. SIN-TLV-MIA would be a cool route, but that surely won't happen. Should SIN decide to do some kind of a 1 stop flight through Europe/Middle East, MIA would be down the list of being considered for service. ORD, EWR, ATL, IAD, or DFW would be considered before MIA. SQ is retiring their A345s so maybe they will re-evaluate non-stop service to the US again when they start taking delivery on the A350 orders around 2015.

User currently offlinesfjeff From El Salvador, joined Dec 2009, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 12432 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Thread starter):
SFO via ICN

And also via HKG, and currently 388.



Jeff in San Salvador
User currently offlineBA0197 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2011, 276 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 12412 times:

I for one can testify that on their SIN-DME-IAH flights, I hardly ever see an Asians. The vast majority of pax are Russian. To me that equates to their not being able to generate originating SIN pax to fly to IAH on them and they are looking to other countries for profit, when serving non-west coast destinations in the US.

User currently offlinechangyou From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 269 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 11986 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

[quote=BA0197,reply=5] their SIN-DME-IAH flights, I hardly ever see an Asians[/quot
Ive operated this flight numerous times last year and we carried a substantiate amount of vietnamese/singaporeans/malaysians. Vietnamese were mostly immigrants while Singaporenas/Malaysians were students. The premium section however were mostly Russians/Americans but there are a handful of Singaporeans/Indonesians too. Good thing is, regardless pax origin from SIN or not the load factor is very encouraging.


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8293 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 11906 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sfjeff (Reply 4):
Quoting DolphinAir747 (Thread starter):
SFO via ICN

And also via HKG, and currently 388.
Quoting Boston (Reply 3):
SIN has not announced any new service to the US and I would be hard pressed to believe SQ will add any new flights to the US in the near future. Non-stop LAX and EWR service continues through OCT and NOV '13 respectively. SQ continues to serve LAX via NRT, SFO via ICN, IAH via DME and JFK via

With the exception of Houston to Moscow by 77W and ICN to SFO, all other flights are by A380. SQ has increased seats in all classes to The USA by just introducing their Whale jet. A380's with Singapore "Girls" are hard to compete with from LAX to Tokyo where every one else flies a 777. SFO to HKG is similar, Cathay flies twice daily but CX doesn't have "Cathay Girls", even though they are a very good airline.


User currently onlineadamh8297 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 845 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 11896 times:

How about....

MIA-LHR-SIN (would need extra slots)
MIA-NRT-SIN


User currently offline9vswr From Singapore, joined Jun 2008, 76 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 11641 times:

Maybe the long rumoured SIN-MXP-JFK to replace the EWR nonstop once it ceases? SQ obtained the Italian government's approval to operate the route last year...

User currently offlineqf002 From Australia, joined Jul 2011, 2949 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks ago) and read 11231 times:

The J heavy A380s will be very useful.

Replacing the 77W to JFK with a J heavy A380 will give them a 40 seat boost in J and will add F seats while limiting the amount of Y capacity they have to add (only 80 seats compared to 170 with the older A380 configuration). That should cater to the market pretty well, and will generate far more profit for SQ than the older arrangement.

LAX is a bit tricker. The NRT flights are very popular, so there will definitely be more demand than SQ can support once they take their existing 500 weekly seats out of the market. Perhaps growth at SFO using the A380 is the answer, or SQ is looking to cut back supply and focus on the very top end of the market on this very competitive route.

I'd love to see a second daily to LAX, but I think we're far more likely to see a 77W sent elsewhere. I like the idea of ORD.

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 7):
With the exception of Houston to Moscow by 77W and ICN to SFO, all other flights are by A380.

SIN-FRA-JFK is also a 77W.


User currently onlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2133 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks ago) and read 11154 times:

Quoting qf002 (Reply 10):
SIN-FRA-JFK is also a 77W.

Only for the winter though. It reverts back to the A380 at the end of March.


User currently offlinechangyou From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 269 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9881 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

SQ will maintain its twice daily presence at JFK/EWR and LAX. Announcement will be made nearer to the suspension of the two non stop flights later this year.
Rumoured:
SIN-PEK-JFK/EWR
SIN-LHR-JFK/EWR
SIN-MXP-JFK/EWR
SIN-PVG-LAX
and of course the long sought after SIN-SYD-LAX...


User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5298 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9873 times:

Quoting Polot (Reply 11):
Only for the winter though. It reverts back to the A380 at the end of March

At the same time HKG-SFO reverts to a 77W. I do wonder with MEL losing 1 of its 2 daily A380s from June 30th weather SQ will have enough slack to run both HKG-SFO and FRA-JFK with A380s? Or if they are even planning this?

It will be interesting to see what happens with SQ here overall as they have 8 77Ws for delivery from Mid 2013 through mid 2014 so i'd have thought a new route or 2 would possibly be on the cards. Although non A380 flights to SYD and MEL may get 77Ws to bring the product into line with the A380s. And also AMS which has seen 77Ws briefly may get them permanently IMO.


User currently offlinefactsonly From Montserrat, joined Aug 2012, 820 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 9409 times:

Quoting Polot (Reply 2):
Before the nonstop SQ had a SIN-AMS-EWR flight.
Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 13):
And also AMS which has seen 77Ws briefly may get them permanently IMO.

SQ it is time to bring back the good old days:

- SIN-AMS-YYZ
- SIN-AMS-ORD
- SIN-AMS-EWR

but now with B77W or....more.


  


User currently offlineJohnClipper From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2005, 837 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 9198 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 7):
A380's with Singapore "Girls" are hard to compete with from LAX to Tokyo where every one else flies a 777. SFO to HKG is similar, Cathay flies twice daily but CX doesn't have "Cathay Girls", even though they are a very good airline.

My experience is the opposite and I prefer CX "girls" to SQ "girls". I think it has gone to their heads and they now do not offer a service that is unique among Asian airlines.


User currently offlineTN486 From Australia, joined Jul 2008, 916 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 8228 times:

This article may be of interest to you in dealing with the OP's question.
http://finance.ninemsn.com.au/newsbu...a-asks-pilots-to-take-unpaid-leave



remember the t shirt "I own an airline"on the front - "qantas" on the back
User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 6911 times:

Quoting Boston (Reply 3):
The only possibility I could see for a new route, and this would be a very very slim chance, would be something like SIN-ICN-ORD or SIN-NRT-ORD. SIN-TLV-MIA would be a cool route, but that surely won't happen. Should SIN decide to do some kind of a 1 stop flight through Europe/Middle East, MIA would be down the list of being considered for service. ORD, EWR, ATL, IAD, or DFW would be considered before MIA. SQ is retiring their A345s so maybe they will re-evaluate non-stop service to the US again when they start taking delivery on the A350 orders around 2015.

How about EWR-BOM/DEL/BLR-SIN, if they had rights from the US government? Speaking from personal experience, many frequent business travelers (read: high-yielding) from the NY/NJ area to India ditch the convenience of a nonstop because they want to avoid the UA product which they consider sub-par to instead fly BA, EK, etc. However, considering SQ's hard and soft product, if they had the rights for such a flight, they could probably take a lot of these pax who would prefer a nonstop if they could fly an airline like SQ rather than UA, as well as the pax in the back who are conscious enough about airline quality to pay a premium to fly SQ Y rather than UA/LH/EK Y, or to fly on the only nonstop from EWR to BLR (again, read: high-yielding).

Quoting BA0197 (Reply 5):
I for one can testify that on their SIN-DME-IAH flights, I hardly ever see an Asians. The vast majority of pax are Russian. To me that equates to their not being able to generate originating SIN pax to fly to IAH on them and they are looking to other countries for profit, when serving non-west coast destinations in the US.

It's probably not because SQ is unable to have pax fly all the way to IAH, but rather because both segments are profitable in themselves. I assume SIN-BCN-GRU must be the same situation, as opposed to flights like SIN-HKG-SFO where SQ fills the flights far more with pax taking the full route.

Quoting changyou (Reply 12):
SQ will maintain its twice daily presence at JFK/EWR and LAX. Announcement will be made nearer to the suspension of the two non stop flights later this year.
Rumoured:
SIN-PEK-JFK/EWR
SIN-LHR-JFK/EWR
SIN-MXP-JFK/EWR
SIN-PVG-LAX
and of course the long sought after SIN-SYD-LAX...

Does SQ have fifth freedom rights via China? Also, I would love to have a way of flying EWR-LHR on *A without taking UA and their 757s...


User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 6824 times:

EWR-BOM-SIN is exactly 3 miles shorter than JFK-FRA-SIN.

http://www.gcmap.com/mapui?P=%0D%0Aj...-sin%0D%0Aewr-bom-sin&MS=wls&DU=mi


User currently offlineCOflyerBOS From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 304 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6529 times:

I thought I remembered reading an article a few months ago that the majority of the passengers on the IAH end of the SIN-DME-IAH flight were flying to SE Asia.

SQ apparently was surprised (negatively) by how few were flying IAH-DME only but surprised (pleasantly) by how successful the route was to SIN.


User currently offlineBA0197 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2011, 276 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6496 times:

Quoting COflyerBOS (Reply 19):
I thought I remembered reading an article a few months ago that the majority of the passengers on the IAH end of the SIN-DME-IAH flight were flying to SE Asia.

SQ apparently was surprised (negatively) by how few were flying IAH-DME only but surprised (pleasantly) by how successful the route was to SIN.

Perhaps I have a bad impression, but the only people I see transferring onto AA flights from SQ are Russians. And they have been increasing. I frequently have 10 SQ DME originating pax transferring onto a MIA of DFW flight. But like I said I'm looking at a select few pax.


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24905 posts, RR: 46
Reply 21, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6466 times:

The SQ LAX sales office basically told me to wait and see and they indeed were working on options for replacement of a 2nd flight.

At one time SQ has 3 flights at LAX, so the drop to merely the single NRT A380 would be a big drop in travel options and removes a host of connection markets that SQ historically has been able to sell from here.

The low risk and easy replacement could be return of the SIN-TPE-LAX flight operated on the 777, though with liberal openskies agreements, SQ does have other routing options they can pursue as well.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6429 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 21):
The low risk and easy replacement could be return of the SIN-TPE-LAX flight operated on the 777, though with liberal openskies agreements, SQ does have other routing options they can pursue as well.

Was this route removed partly due to the supersititions resulting from the major accident on this route? I know that for this reason SQ stopped painting their aircraft in special liveries out of supersititon.

Also, has anyone ever routed a direct flight with a stop in India?


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24922 posts, RR: 22
Reply 23, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6363 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 17):
How about EWR-BOM/DEL/BLR-SIN, if they had rights from the US government?

The current Singapore-India bilateral (dated 2007, assuming it hasn't changed since) specifically excludes the USA from their 5th freedom rights beyond India.


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24905 posts, RR: 46
Reply 24, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6312 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 22):
Was this route removed partly due to the supersititions resulting from the major accident on this route? I know that for this reason SQ stopped painting their aircraft in special liveries out of supersititon.

The 2000 crash in TPE seems not be an issue. The SIN-TPE-LAX route continued till end of 2008.

At the time SQ said it was the global economic issues and fuel cost (remember it ran up to $145/bbl that summer) that necessitating cutting capacity. The route cut was one several announced at the same time.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 6462 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 23):
The current Singapore-India bilateral (dated 2007, assuming it hasn't changed since) specifically excludes the USA from their 5th freedom rights beyond India.

How about bringing back YYZ with YYZ-BOM-SIN then?


User currently offlinenomorerjs From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 450 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 6327 times:

ORD-HKG-SIN would be a nice compliment to UA. Time the flights and use the alliance to it's best.

User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 6474 times:

Quoting nomorerjs (Reply 26):
Time the flights and use the alliance to it's best.

Haha I laughed so hard when I read the word "alliance" in a thread about SQ...no flame war intended, but SQ, maybe on par with CX, is the least cooperative airline in its alliance. SQ will happily sell you a JFK-FRA ticket on their site but won't even sell you a flight with a codeshare on an LH flight, i.e. JFK-FRA-MXP.


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8293 posts, RR: 7
Reply 28, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 6420 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting qf002 (Reply 10):
Quoting jfk777 (Reply 7):
With the exception of Houston to Moscow by 77W and ICN to SFO, all other flights are by A380.

SIN-FRA-JFK is also a 77W.

The JFK route has had A380 on it recently, maybe the 77W is just for the winter.


User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5298 posts, RR: 11
Reply 29, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 6122 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 28):
The JFK route has had A380 on it recently, maybe the 77W is just for the winter.

At this stage that is the case back to A380 late March, while HKG-SFO will go back to 77W.

Thinking about SQ possible changes routes to the US maybe something along the following and i'll admit to not knowing alot about SQ or some of the route rights they may need.

Change SIN-FRA-JFK to SIN-MXP-JFK using a 77W, this has been rumoured for a while.SIN-FRA would continue with an A380 terminator service freeing up an A380 that wouldn't be used to JFK, MEL losing an A380 from June 30th could also mean the 2 freed up A380s going onto HKG-SFO from July.

As mentioned earlier I wonder if SQ could run SIN-PVG-LAX with a 77W? And SIN-PEK-EWR?


User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1303 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 6065 times:

Quoting BA0197 (Reply 20):
Perhaps I have a bad impression, but the only people I see transferring onto AA flights from SQ are Russians. And they have been increasing. I frequently have 10 SQ DME originating pax transferring onto a MIA of DFW flight. But like I said I'm looking at a select few pax.

You can see the numbers on the IAH website at www.fly2houston.com

You can look at SQ's numbers, just look at the Asia versus Europe traffic.
In the few months I pulled it seems DME floats around ~20% per the numbers.



Ciao Windjet mi manchi
User currently offlinegauravpai From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 31, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 5593 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 17):
How about EWR-BOM/DEL/BLR-SIN, if they had rights from the US government?

rights from US gov-maybe??
what about rights from the Indian govt???
with AI flying BOM-EWR nonstop and DEL-JFK/EWR, i doubt they will allow SQ to make a flight like that.

do SQ have the right to fly nonstop india/US?
i doubt it


User currently offlineDolphinAir747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2012, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 5214 times:

Quoting gauravpai (Reply 31):
rights from US gov-maybe??
what about rights from the Indian govt???
with AI flying BOM-EWR nonstop and DEL-JFK/EWR, i doubt they will allow SQ to make a flight like that.

Apparently they don't, as another member pointed out, so I wondered if SIN-BOM-YYZ could work. IIRC AI doesn't fly BOM-YYZ. However, if the Indian government wants to be overly protectionist of AI not giving fifth freedom routes to much better-managed carriers with way superior service makes sense...


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24922 posts, RR: 22
Reply 33, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 5124 times:

Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 32):
I wondered if SIN-BOM-YYZ could work. IIRC AI doesn't fly BOM-YYZ.

BOM is a small market to/from Canada which explains why nobody's operating it. It didn't work when AC operated YYZ-LHR-BOM-SIN for several years using both 747s and L-1011s. Traffic beyond LHR was almost all 5th freedom at low yields, and BA complained AC was carrying too much 5th freedom traffic which is often restricted in the bilaterals to a certain percentage of total passengers..

India is also such a price-sensitive market and there's so much capacity from Canada via Europe and the Gulf (and via the Pacific), I doubt many passengers to/from BOM would be willing to pay a premium to fly nonstop on SQ. That type of a 5th freedom route just doesn't seem compatible with SQ's premium product and cost structure. Canada-SIN is also a small market so the route would have to rely almost exclusively on 5th freedom.

I'm not even sure the latest Canada-SIN bilateral includes 5th freedom rights that would permit such a routing. It does give SQ unlimited nonstop rights to Canada but that's never likely to happen considering the small O&D market. SIN also isn't well-located geographically to serve as a hub to/from North America except for a few equally small markets like Indonesia and Malaysia. It's too far south to be competitive for most of the rest of Asia.

SQ must have dozens of potentially more lucrative routes than Canada-SIN via India.


User currently offlineSQ452 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1110 posts, RR: 0
Reply 34, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4752 times:

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 30):
You can see the numbers on the IAH website at www.fly2houston.com

You can look at SQ's numbers, just look at the Asia versus Europe traffic.
In the few months I pulled it seems DME floats around ~20% per the numbers.

Sorry, where are you seeing these numbers on that site (couldn't find it)?

Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 29):
As mentioned earlier I wonder if SQ could run SIN-PVG-LAX with a 77W? And SIN-PEK-EWR?

SIN-PVG-LAX I can see working given the traffic to China and the lack of a quality, premium airline (no disrespect to UA, China Eastern or Air China but your product simply doesn't measure up to SQ's).

I remember ages ago BOS being talked about as a destination (perhaps via Europe). Doubt that will happen with TK and QR expected to close in on BOS in 2013 and JL already on a route to Asia but it would be nice. ORD seems like the most logical option in my opinion, hopefully they get it right this time and route it through Asia rather than AMS like they tried last time.

Honestly I think SQ sending their 787's to Scoot dented a lot of the potential for expansion in the USA for SQ further on down the road. 787 would have been the perfect size aircraft for a couple of US cities that are a bit too small for 77W service.



SIN > CVG > BOS
User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1303 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4640 times:

Quoting SQ452 (Reply 34):
Sorry, where are you seeing these numbers on that site (couldn't find it)?
http://www.fly2houston.com/TrafficStats

see above. You can then downlaod the PDF by month. SQ is broken down by both Asia and Europe



Ciao Windjet mi manchi
User currently offlineabrelosojos From Venezuela, joined May 2005, 5076 posts, RR: 55
Reply 36, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4282 times:

If the Indian government would allow, SQ would love to do a SIN-BOM-EWR. SIN-BOM-YYZ would be a disaster as many long haul Canadian markets (including India, but not limited to it) have limited J and F demand. Note SQ pulled out of even YVR.

Saludos,
A.



Live, and let live.
User currently offlineinfinit From Singapore, joined Jul 2008, 548 posts, RR: 1
Reply 37, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4259 times:

Quoting changyou (Reply 12):
SQ will maintain its twice daily presence at JFK/EWR and LAX
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 33):
India is also such a price-sensitive market and there's so much capacity from Canada via Europe and the Gulf (and via the Pacific), I doubt many passengers to/from BOM would be willing to pay a premium to fly nonstop on SQ.

Oh you'd be surprised. My friends in SQ tell me the highest yielding markets for them these days are Australia, India and China. In India and China the middle class is smaller but you have a larger price-sensitive low income group and also a larger high income that would fly nothing but SQ. SQ is a big status symbol. Many of the Indian and Chinese nationals I know of living in Singapore testify to not flying with any other airline where ever possible. Indonesians too.. which is why SQ still offers F on SIN-CGK, a 1hr20minute flight.

But okay, maybe Canada is too much of a stretch but I've sure there'd be sufficient demand and yield for at least one Indian-American route.


User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1303 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 4156 times:

To add to my prior post
SQ IAH numbers from the HAS website: http://www.fly2houston.com/TrafficStats
(I don't have the exact seat figures available each month though one could figure that out)
17% drop in pax going onto Singapore this year over last; nearly 8% increase in pax to Moscow

Houston through to Singapore Jan 1 thorugh Nov 30, 2012
Deplaned..... Enplaned ..... Total ......... Prior Year (11 months)
32,197 ........ 35,089 ....... 67,286 ........ 81,045

Houston to Moscow Jan 1 through Nov 30, 2012
Deplaned...... Enplaned ...... Total .......... Prior Year (11 months)
17,973 ........ 18,178 ........ 36,151 ........ 33,561



Ciao Windjet mi manchi
User currently offlineanrec80 From Canada, joined Jan 2011, 140 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 4060 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 7):
With the exception of Houston to Moscow by 77W and ICN to SFO, all other flights are by A380. SQ has increased seats in all classes to The USA by just introducing their Whale jet. A380's with Singapore "Girls" are hard to compete with from LAX to Tokyo where every one else flies a 777. SFO to HKG is similar, Cathay flies twice daily but CX doesn't have "Cathay Girls", even though they are a very good airline.

Hmm - I was shopping for tickets to Germany for summer and/or Spring Break (late Mar) and see mix of 77W and 388 on JFK-FRA.

Quoting COflyerBOS (Reply 19):
SQ apparently was surprised (negatively) by how few were flying IAH-DME only but surprised (pleasantly) by how successful the route was to SIN.
Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 27):
Haha I laughed so hard when I read the word "alliance" in a thread about SQ...no flame war intended, but SQ, maybe on par with CX, is the least cooperative airline in its alliance. SQ will happily sell you a JFK-FRA ticket on their site but won't even sell you a flight with a codeshare on an LH flight, i.e. JFK-FRA-MXP.

Yep. Many potential and frequent travelers to Moscow find that Moscow is underserved from the US. I know people from West Coast (Vancouver, Seattle, San Francisco) who ticket their SQ flight IAH-DME and YVR/SEA-IAH separately. I have done that as well. It yields a descent fare and a great connection. It's unfortunate you can't get these tickets on one itinerary and have to take risks with respect to connections. There is certainly a window of opportunity for SQ (perhaps SIN-DME-SEA)?

You can find tickets on JFK-FRA route through US, but at a ridiculous published airfare.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
If You Could Start New US Airways Routes? posted Thu Oct 14 2004 17:37:03 by US A333 PIT
Volaris Applies For Host Of New US Routes posted Mon Aug 29 2011 09:20:28 by LAXintl
Kingfisher Airlines To Start 8 New Int'l Routes posted Mon Mar 15 2010 15:07:23 by ojas
When Will SQ Start Dumping Its Oldest 777s? posted Thu Sep 6 2007 15:12:40 by El Al 001
Aer Lingus Want To Open More New US Routes In 2008 posted Tue May 8 2007 10:53:46 by EI321
Aer Lingus Officially Announce 3 New US Routes posted Thu Mar 22 2007 14:53:34 by EI321
Will DL Add New European Routes This Fall? posted Thu Feb 1 2007 05:41:11 by Twolz2rn
Status Of New US Routes? posted Sat Jul 15 2006 08:29:02 by Mah584jr
E-Jets Opening Up New US Routes? posted Tue Nov 8 2005 11:02:58 by FLY777UAL
New US Routes? posted Sat Sep 10 2005 21:38:10 by BHXDTW