Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Helicopter Crash In Central London  
User currently offlinea380heavy From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 258 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 13463 times:

Sky News is reporting a helicopter has hit a crane in the Vauxhall area of central London and has crashed. No word on survivors but a ploom of smoke is now being shown.

Update: eyewitnesses saying aircraft plummeted straight down on to a road and has hit 2 cars.

[Edited 2013-01-16 00:25:05]


Flown in:732,733,734,738,742,752,763,772,F27,DC9,MD-11,A300,A332,ATR72,DHC-6,Bell206,C172,Auster,PA-28
45 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineanstar From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 5080 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 13370 times:

Looks really bad from the pictures I have seen  

User currently offlinea380heavy From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 258 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 13329 times:

Further update: Sky sources are saying the aircraft was an Agusta 109 with just the pilot on board.


Flown in:732,733,734,738,742,752,763,772,F27,DC9,MD-11,A300,A332,ATR72,DHC-6,Bell206,C172,Auster,PA-28
User currently offlineZSOFN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1411 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 13293 times:

Some pics via Twitter:

https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/291462625852796928

https://twitter.com/helenlewis/status/291462401516253185

...and the crane it's believed that it hit:

https://twitter.com/jaystarz1/status/291460508069015554

Looks nasty.


User currently offlineEGPH From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 13222 times:

Just for anyone not having access to any of the live coverage the helicopter hit the crane in very low visibility conditions due to low lying mist.

Further update: One eyewitness reports that a number of cars were passing as the helicopter hit the road and it is "highly likely" that there were ground injuries or fatalities.

[Edited 2013-01-16 00:51:27]

User currently offlineedina From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 736 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 12938 times:

I'm can't confirm whether this is definite, but it would seem that Battersea Heliport is currently closed. I live directly under one of the approach path, approximately 1.5 miles away, and since 0800 the have been no movements overhead.


Worked on - Caravelle Mercure A300 A320 F27 SD3-60 BAe146 747-100/200/400 DC10-30 767 777 737-400 757 A319 A321
User currently offlineseansasLCY From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2007, 805 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 12582 times:

Confirmed that two people are dead. Vauxhall station is closed. The helicopter apparently hit a crane on the top of a new development.

User currently offlineshamrock350 From Ireland, joined Mar 2005, 6272 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 12558 times:

Scotland Yard have confirmed that 2 people have died.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-21040410

It hit a crane at the under construction St George Wharf tower, I think it's around 180m tall and close to completion making it the tallest structure in that area of London.


User currently offlineSKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1616 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 12484 times:

Apparently the fire brigade rescued a man for a burning car... Looks like carnage!!!


Next Flights: LHR-LBA (319-SK), MAN-ARN (736-SK), ARN-LHR (763-BA), LHR-CPH (CR9-SK), CPH-LHR (320-SK), LHR-IAH (744-BA)
User currently offlineseansasLCY From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2007, 805 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 12374 times:

Lots of people on the radio are saying that the crane never had lights on.

This political blogger also reports that someone tweeted the Met Police Helicopter Team in October saying the same thing http://order-order.com/2013/01/16/wa...copter-pilots-told-off-in-october/


User currently offlineshamrock350 From Ireland, joined Mar 2005, 6272 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 12157 times:

Here's a photo from Sky News.

http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/qq160/Shamrock380/bauhzo2cyaaknxb-1-778x437_zps3074649f.jpg

It's difficult to see the top of the tower through the fog right now but the fog was much worse earlier so the crane would have been completely invisible.

Quoting seansasLCY (Reply 9):

Lots of people on the radio are saying that the crane never had lights on.

The crane had a red navigation light, the tower itself was also lit during the night but at 8am in foggy conditions I'm not sure how effective these would have been. The Shard for example is completely invisible in fog, you can't even see it's very bright lights at the top when this happens.


User currently offlinecaptcufflinks From UK - England, joined Dec 2012, 92 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 11861 times:

Very tragic indeed.

I do wonder why he was flying this morning. If he was under VFR then there's no chance he had the visibility for it. If he was under IFR then why the heck wasn't he at MSA?

I was supposed to be up in the air first thing but there was no chance I could have done it with the weather the way it was.

I suspect we shall learn more in the coming hours and days.


User currently offlineEGPH From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 11757 times:

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe has just confirmed that the helicopter was landing rather than departing and was diverting to Battersea Heliport not details on where it was originally going.

Routing update: A police news conference just taken place has confirmed the helicopter routing as Redhill Aerodrome to Elstree Aerodrome with a diversion to Battersea necessary (no reason for diversion needed)

[Edited 2013-01-16 03:22:52]

User currently offlinebueb0g From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2010, 623 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 11531 times:

RIP to those lost. Does anyone know if cranes like that usually have anti collision lights on the end of the arm, like towers do?


Roger roger, what's our vector, victor?
User currently offlineEGPH From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 11432 times:

Quoting bueb0g (Reply 13):

News reports seem to suggest that the crane did have lights on it but there have been suggestions they were not operating/working at the time of the crash. The building under construction did apparently have internal lighting on throughout the night though.


User currently offlineplanejamie From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2011, 576 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 11351 times:

This is very tragic. I'm going to rule out terrorism first and foremost purely because I do not feel this was a deliberate act, I know a lot of news sources are citing that as the reason behind it.

As a private pilot I'm no expert however I do know that any area of London on a chart has many different layers of airspace. Chances are the MSA would've put them into airspace it wouldn't be authorised to operate in. So the helicopter would've been IFR. Even with a thick mist/fog, early morning/sunrise could have made it difficult to see the lights on the crane if there were any. I should also add a friend of mine has told me there was a NOTAM issued about the crane being there.

I think this is a very tragic accident (and I stress the word accident) and my thoughts are with the pilot, people on the ground and their families.


User currently offlineCaptCufflinks From UK - England, joined Dec 2012, 92 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 11306 times:

Quoting bueb0g (Reply 13):

RIP to those lost. Does anyone know if cranes like that usually have anti collision lights on the end of the arm, like towers do?

Only if the obstruction is 500 feet above ground level.

If it is 300 feet AGL then it will be published in the ENR section of the AIP. If permanent, or there for a long time, it will also be displayed on aeronautical charts specific to the area. Between 300-500 ft AGL lighting is not mandatory.


User currently offlineCaptCufflinks From UK - England, joined Dec 2012, 92 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 11040 times:

Quoting planejamie (Reply 15):
Chances are the MSA would've put them into airspace it wouldn't be authorised to operate in. So the helicopter would've been IFR.

If they were IFR, then they have to abide by the MSA, thus meaning they would have had clearance into the higher air spaces. You can't be flying an IFR flight and not be cleared into various higher classes of airspace in this country.

I think you might be suggesting he was VFR and therefore not cleared into airspace which is why he wasn't abiding by and MSA restriction. This only brings us back to my original point questioning why he was flying VFR I'm the weather that was present, which was bad this morning.

EGPH offers an answer though:

Quoting EGPH (Reply 14):
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe has just confirmed that the helicopter was landing rather than departing and was diverting to Battersea Heliport not details on where it was originally going.


Perhaps he lost VFR and looked for a way to safety, hence the diversion.


User currently offlineBthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 10957 times:

Quoting planejamie (Reply 15):
I know a lot of news sources are citing that as the reason behind it.

Really? all the ones I've seen have made clear there were no terrorism links.

Quoting planejamie (Reply 15):
Even with a thick mist/fog, early morning/sunrise could have made it difficult to see the lights on the crane if there were any.

That is true. What I'm confused about is that the weather minimum for operating to/from Battersea are 1000m visibility and 600ft cloud level. LCY reported 700m and 100ft BKN at 8am (when the crash occurred). I could understand the visibility being different at Battersea but doubt the cloud level would be significantly different, especially as eyewitnesses have reported very low cloud/fog. Why was he given clearance to approach?

Quoting CaptCufflinks (Reply 17):
Perhaps he lost VFR and looked for a way to safety, hence the diversion.

If that was the case, not sure why he was flying over central London between Redhill and Elstree. Direct routing takes you nowhere near!

[Edited 2013-01-16 04:44:21]

User currently offlineart From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 3341 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 10840 times:

Tragic event. One should be thankful that a helicopter and crane jib dropping into a city street did not kill or injure a large number of people.

User currently offlinebongodog1964 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 3471 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 10788 times:

Quoting Bthebest (Reply 18):
Quoting CaptCufflinks (Reply 17):
Perhaps he lost VFR and looked for a way to safety, hence the diversion.

If that was the case, not sure why he was flying over central London between Redhill and Elstree. Direct routing takes you nowhere near!

By my reckoning the accident spot is more or less on the direct line between Redhill and Elstree. If (and its pure assumption on my part) the weather was closing in, the logical solution might be to descend onto the Thames, then follow the river westwards to Battersea


User currently offlineCaptCufflinks From UK - England, joined Dec 2012, 92 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 10704 times:

Quoting Bthebest (Reply 18):
If that was the case, not sure why he was flying over central London between Redhill and Elstree. Direct routing takes you nowhere near!

Sorry, but that is just wrong.

Battersea is just to the east of the direct line between the two places. Map enclosed FYI:

http://i46.tinypic.com/ouse2h.jpg

The red line is the direct, approximate, route between the two aerodromes the black circle is the approximate location of Battersea.


User currently offlineBthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 10336 times:

Still 10 miles out on a 50 mile flight but I suppose there aren't any other places to divert to really.

Still interesting that he was approaching from the east, but until we know the exact reasons for the diversion can't really pinpoint anything. Will just have to wait a few weeks for the AAIB report.

Edit:

Although if you thought my geography was bad:

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...and-at-the-london-heliport-381121/

[Edited 2013-01-16 06:33:19]

User currently offlineblobby3 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2011, 7 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 10187 times:

Regarding the question of direct route across London I believe there is a restriction on flying directly over central London due to proximity of LHR and LCY. I believe there are defined helicopter routes in various directions to cross London so I think its unlikely it would have planned to fly directly from Redhill to Elstree.

One of the routes (H4?) runs along the Thames so if it was, as has been reported, diverting to Battersea Heliport due to the fog then it would have had to get there by flying along that route. Odd that it approached from the East I agree but who knows.

Very sorry for the family of the people killed and injured, could have been a lot worse but thats no consolation to them.


User currently offlineBthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 9515 times:




Quoting blobby3 (Reply 23):
One of the routes (H4?) runs along the Thames

Correct, but like you said that's from the east, i would have expected H3/7/10 from the west for the Redhill-Elstree routing. I doubt his cross London routing would have taken him any further east as that would interfere with LCY. Will definitely be interesting when the full details come out.


User currently offlineGF777 From Bahrain, joined Jan 2009, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day ago) and read 9185 times:

Shouldn't a NOTAM be issued about such new construction, giving it is a new building which is something might be new to the pilot or maybe just forgot about such new high tower?!

He could easily fly higher than the highest obstacle in that area.

Thoughts and prayer to the two people who lost their life...


User currently offlinekaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12321 posts, RR: 35
Reply 26, posted (1 year 3 months 23 hours ago) and read 8502 times:

Any update on the heli's ID; all I have found was that it was an Agusta 109. Any registration known?

(BBC) Radio 4 said that it had requested permission to enter/cross the Heathrow control zone, but never did so.


User currently offlineBthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 3 months 23 hours ago) and read 8819 times:

Quoting GF777 (Reply 25):
Shouldn't a NOTAM be issued about such new construction,

it was, twice.

Quoting GF777 (Reply 25):
He could easily fly higher than the highest obstacle in that area.

Depends if he is VFR or IFR at the time. Cloudbase was reported to be as low as 100ft.


User currently offlineBthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 3 months 23 hours ago) and read 8871 times:

Quoting kaitak (Reply 26):
Any update on the heli's ID; all I have found was that it was an Agusta 109.

Some reports it is G-CRST, with some pictures of debris matching livery. The pilot was flying for charter company Rotormotion.


User currently offlineEGPH From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 233 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (1 year 3 months 23 hours ago) and read 8627 times:

As a slight aside on this, does anyone know roughly how low airliners on approach to the 27s at LHR fly over central London? Couple of time I've been in the Westminster area they seem to have been no higher than 3,000ft. Could certainly create a ceiling for any helicopters wanting to transit central London at around 2,000ft!

User currently offlineTimRees From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2001, 354 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 3 months 23 hours ago) and read 8261 times:

Aircraft usually intercept the 27 ILSs at 3000ft at around 10 nautical miles or further out. If turned in short than that they descend to 2500ft but this doesn't happen that often.
LHR was on 09s this morning though and approaches to Battersea would have been easterly too.


User currently offline71Zulu From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3049 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 3 months 23 hours ago) and read 8388 times:

Pilot was Pete Barnes, over 12,000 hrs and flew in movie films, RIP

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013...helicopter-crash-pilot-pete-barnes



The good old days: Delta L-1011s at MSY
User currently offlinetrent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 510 posts, RR: 2
Reply 32, posted (1 year 3 months 18 hours ago) and read 5285 times:

Is this thread relevant to civil aviation?

This was an accident at a construction site, not a scheduled passenger flight.

Newsworthy, yes, but I wonder if it's relevant.


User currently offlinealberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2823 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 3 months 18 hours ago) and read 5227 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 32):

Is this thread relevant to civil aviation?

This was an accident at a construction site, not a scheduled passenger flight.

you do realize that it was a civil helicopter involved in a crash right ???



short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
User currently offlineDiamondFlyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1400 posts, RR: 3
Reply 34, posted (1 year 3 months 17 hours ago) and read 5017 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 32):
This was an accident at a construction site, not a scheduled passenger flight.

And this, is why I only use A.net for a laugh. The sheer ignorance of people on here is amazing.

-DiamondFlyer



Rock Chalk Jayhawk
User currently offlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 5940 posts, RR: 30
Reply 35, posted (1 year 3 months 13 hours ago) and read 3826 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DiamondFlyer (Reply 34):
And this, is why I only use A.net for a laugh.

You only use it for a laugh? Too bad. If you took the time to use it for more than that, you would realize that most of the important breaking news in the industry appear here, hours before they become publicly available.



MGGS
User currently offlineDiamondFlyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1400 posts, RR: 3
Reply 36, posted (1 year 3 months 13 hours ago) and read 3834 times:

Quoting AR385 (Reply 35):

You only use it for a laugh? Too bad. If you took the time to use it for more than that, you would realize that most of the important breaking news in the industry appear here, hours before they become publicly available.

It also is full of utter non-sense. And people who think that Civil Aviation is nothing but airliners. Don't get me wrong, there is good material here, but there is also a bunch of garbage.

-DiamondFlyer



Rock Chalk Jayhawk
User currently offlinebueb0g From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2010, 623 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (1 year 3 months 4 hours ago) and read 2942 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 32):
Is this thread relevant to civil aviation?

Don't know about you, but to me, an accident involving a civil, commercial aircraft seems pretty relevant to civil aviation. It's not all 747s...



Roger roger, what's our vector, victor?
User currently offlineBthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (1 year 3 months 4 hours ago) and read 2911 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 32):
Is this thread relevant to civil aviation?

This was an accident at a construction site, not a scheduled passenger flight.

Civil aircraft, civil airspace, scheduled flight. There's also the implications it may have on the wider ranging civil aviation community in terms of London airspace management.


User currently offlinetrent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 510 posts, RR: 2
Reply 39, posted (1 year 3 months 4 hours ago) and read 2866 times:

Quoting alberchico (Reply 33):
This was an accident at a construction site, not a scheduled passenger flight.

you do realize that it was a civil helicopter involved in a crash right ???

OK, so I've been flamed for something I didn't realise. I thought it broke forum rules to be nasty and disrespectful to others on threads... Look, I don't live in a western country & where I live was reported on the news as a helicopter crash at a construction site - as in a helicopter involved in the construction of the building. So, no; not all the facts were reported or understood.


User currently offlineBthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (1 year 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2832 times:

Quoting trent1000 (Reply 39):
OK, so I've been flamed for something I didn't realise. I thought it broke forum rules to be nasty and disrespectful to others on threads...

I'm sure no one meant to be mean, but there is enough information in the thread to establish the details and its relevance  


User currently offlinegulfstream650 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2008, 528 posts, RR: 0
Reply 41, posted (1 year 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2813 times:

So the crane operator was late for work because he overslept.

Lucky!



I don't proclaim to be the best pilot in the world but I'm safe
User currently offlinebuyantukhaa From Mongolia, joined May 2004, 2828 posts, RR: 3
Reply 42, posted (1 year 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2783 times:

I tried to find the locations of the heliport and the accident, and got confused - the Thames has an S-curve in between the two, but the orientation of the river is the same in both places and the two locations are in similar spots relative to the river, could it be that the pilot mixed them up without having GPS? Just a very uninformed guess...


I scratch my head, therefore I am.
User currently offlineblobby3 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2011, 7 posts, RR: 0
Reply 43, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2202 times:

For those interested there is some more information published by the AAIB on this accident. Apologies if this is posted elsewhere. This has some additional information on the route taken by the aircraft which was being discussed above.

http://www.aaib.gov.uk/latest_news/s...ial_bulletin_s1_2013_published.cfm


User currently offlinebthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 493 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2060 times:

Quoting blobby3 (Reply 43):
http://www.aaib.gov.uk/latest_news/s...ial_bulletin_s1_2013_published.cfm

I had a good read through that and some interesting points. One thing I don't understand is that while requesting Battersea he was told to hold along the river, no further west than Vauxhall bridge, although he proceeded towards Chelsea bridge before turning back towards Vauxhall.



Looks like he might have lost orientation, heading further along the river than he intended and then turned back putting him parallel with the tower, at which point he got clearance to head to Battersea and turned back again, hitting the crane.

As with all air crashes, its never just one problem, and it appears there were a few different things going on here.


User currently offlinebongodog1964 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2006, 3471 posts, RR: 3
Reply 45, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1954 times:

Quoting bthebest (Reply 44):
As with all air crashes, its never just one problem, and it appears there were a few different things going on here.

Having read the initial staement of facts I tend to agree with you. When this happened people couldn't quite work out the route the helicopter had taken. It now transpires that it had flown from Redhill to Elstree, failed to land and was now heading back to Redhill when a diversion to Battersea was sought,


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Helicopter Crash In Indiana On 8/31/08 posted Tue Sep 2 2008 07:14:21 by BAKJet
Helicopter Crash In Panama posted Fri May 30 2008 08:31:36 by Bentley55
Helicopter Crash In North Yorkshire posted Sat Jan 26 2008 14:42:19 by APP
Helicopter Crash In Indonesia (Jan 7) posted Mon Jan 7 2008 08:15:42 by SNA752
Helicopter Crash In Belgium. posted Wed Dec 26 2007 08:11:40 by SIBILLE
Light Plane Crash In Central Johannesburg posted Mon Dec 18 2006 21:06:35 by JoKeR
Helicopter Crash In Chicago posted Fri Jun 30 2006 19:52:43 by CcrlR
Helicopter Crash In Scotland - 2 Killed posted Wed Dec 21 2005 12:52:11 by Gkirk
Helicopter Crash In Heby, Sweden - All On Video posted Tue Jun 21 2005 14:54:58 by Metropolitan
Helicopter Crash In NYC East River posted Fri Jun 17 2005 22:55:47 by Andz