Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Were A332s Short-lived With LH?  
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3805 posts, RR: 29
Posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 12006 times:

Why did Lufthansa ever operate only 5 A300-200s? ...all which were acquired secondhand, for only 3 years (2003-06). Seems like 332s would have been an ideal long-term replacement for their A310-300s serving on 'thinner' intercontinental routes and would have nicely complemented their sizeable fleet of 333s and 340s.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ralf Meyermann



10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20541 posts, RR: 62
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 11996 times:

They were leased to fill in while awaiting A333 deliveries. See: Lufthansa Getting 2 X A343 And 5 X A332 On Lease. (by Hkgspotter1 Sep 21 2002 in Civil Aviation)


International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3805 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 11686 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 1):
They were leased to fill in while awaiting A333 deliveries

While this makes perfect sense (thank you also for the link), it seems that LH had/has enough routes for which the A332 would be 'right-sized' whereas the larger A333s might be somewhat oversized. To clarify, that was the context of my question.

That said, further research shows, ironically, that LHs A332s had a C48Y182 seating configuration...which adds up to 9 total seats more than their larger A333s which accomodate F8C56Y165...although LH may well have (re-)configured their A332s with a total somewhere betweeen an A313 and A333 had they decided to make A332s part of their long-term fleet plan.

Which leads me to ask...since LH's A332s were configured similar to their domestic/intra-European fleet of the time (lack of F), on what routes did LH typically operate their A332s?


User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20541 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 11554 times:

Quoting Tango-Bravo (Reply 2):
Which leads me to ask...since LH's A332s were configured similar to their domestic/intra-European fleet of the time (lack of F), on what routes did LH typically operate their A332s?

Ah, gotcha. The only other thread that came up in my search was this one:

Lufthansa Route Cuts And New A332 Destinations (by Johnnybgoode Jan 30 2003 in Civil Aviation)

The thread starter is a bit confusing, but it seems to indicate the 332s were initially scheduled to operate from FRA to ATL, PHL, BOS, CCS, CAI and on the third daily flight to JFK, but that doesn't seem right for only 5 frames, does it.

Hopefully someone else can do better.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineHirnie From Germany, joined May 2004, 594 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 10821 times:

I was on an A332 from BOS to FRA. The interior was not from LH. I think it was Sabena interior.

At that time I was told that LH wanted to go for the higher revenue with F class for which the A332 is too small. The A333 has only marginal higher operational costs compared with the 332 but that can be outwighted by more selling seats in the expensive classes.


User currently offlineRara From Germany, joined Jan 2007, 2079 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 8050 times:

The A332s were never more than a stop-gap in LH's fleet and didn't get much love. One was even painted wrongly with the crane in an awkward location on the tail - which is unusual for LH.

As to whether A332s wouldn't make sense in LH's destination network, remember that LH can always do with a bit more space compared to other airlines because of their premium-heavy configurations. That's why they can happily operate all those A380s and 747s in markets where those planes would be oversized for other airlines.



Samson was a biblical tough guy, but his dad Samsonite was even more of a hard case.
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25170 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 5515 times:

Quoting Hirnie (Reply 4):
I was on an A332 from BOS to FRA. The interior was not from LH. I think it was Sabena interior.

All A332s operated by LH were either ex-Sabena or ex-Swissair, after those carriers went bankrupt. I believe a couple of Swissair A332s that LX didn't want or need were leased by LH for a while, in addition to the ex-Sabena aircraft.


User currently offlineFiedman From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 210 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 5201 times:

Quoting Rara (Reply 5):
One was even painted wrongly with the crane in an awkward location on the tail - which is unusual for LH.

do you happen to remember the registration of that particular aircraft?



Westjet - Canada's National Low-fare Airline
User currently offlineRara From Germany, joined Jan 2007, 2079 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4557 times:

Quoting Fiedman (Reply 7):
do you happen to remember the registration of that particular aircraft?

Yes, it was D-AIME.. today an A380.



Samson was a biblical tough guy, but his dad Samsonite was even more of a hard case.
User currently offlineflyingalex From Germany, joined Jul 2010, 1016 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4481 times:

As others have said, the A332s were simply too small for LH. They didn't need the extra range that the A332 offers over an A333 (they have plenty of A340s to cover those missions), and it was one additional sub-type to manage. They no longer needed them once additional aircraft were delivered.


Public service announcement: "It's" = "it is". To indicate posession, write "its." Looks wrong, but it's correct grammar
User currently offlineearlynff From Germany, joined Sep 2007, 232 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1518 times:

I doubt they were ever scheduled to CCS...

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Do Airlines Offer Flights With 35 Min X-fers? posted Tue Nov 20 2012 17:54:00 by JAAlbert
Why Were There So Many SYR-VCV Flights Today? posted Sat Oct 1 2011 00:13:32 by SyrAlex
A380: Better Punctuality With LH Vs AF? posted Sun Oct 10 2010 13:57:54 by LY777
Why Were 707 Variants Given "20 Series" Numbers? posted Sat Aug 21 2010 17:43:28 by homsar
AV Codesharing With LH? posted Fri Jul 30 2010 09:23:28 by 777jaah
Why Were World Tails Not Popular? posted Mon May 31 2010 14:45:09 by will777
ATL-FRA DL Stepping Up Competition With LH posted Tue Mar 9 2010 23:12:17 by pqdtw
Livery Errors & Short-lived Paint Schemes posted Sun Dec 6 2009 04:58:17 by Faro
CO Codeshare With LH Questions? posted Tue Nov 3 2009 18:31:15 by Traindoc
OS Merger With LH Confirmed By EU Commission posted Fri Aug 28 2009 05:01:28 by TW741