Wingtips56 From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 269 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (10 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2146 times:
Part of the reason for the 757 at RNO was that due to the hot & high climate/elevation, the MD-80 was too restricted for the RNO-ORD run in Summer. For quite a while, they ran round-robin flights, ORD-RNO-SMF-ORD with the MD-80 afternoon trip. I think the 757 was bigger than the loads, but it could at least get off the ground.
Worked for WestAir, Apollo Airways, Desert Pacific, Western, AirCal and American Airlines
This is what I thought when someone earlier in the thread, asked if AS/Q!X would enter the RNO-OAK market. In the past RNO has been a well served market from PDX, now WN is the only non-stop 3x daily IIRC. I think Reno and Tahoe have not kept pace with Las Vegas, and more and more people are opting for Vegas. The fact that AS/QX can't justify even 1 n/s Q400 a day between PDX and RNO should help illustrate what I am saying.
psa1011 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 191 posts, RR: 0 Reply 6, posted (10 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1942 times:
Quoting JoePatroni707 (Reply 3): Too bad rno does not get the attention. Not too many years back rno was a all 757 station for AA (B check station). Really get historical, back in 88 or 89 AA had a DAILY scheduled 767 to ORD.
I had no idea RNO ever had scheduled widebody service. In 89 or 90 I flew the AA 757 RNO-ORD (and returned on a same-plane ORD-SJC-RNO routing on an MD-80). Would have loved the 767.
DocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 17896 posts, RR: 57 Reply 7, posted (10 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1925 times:
Quoting iowaman (Reply 1): Not sure that AS would be interested, but I'm guessing G4 is highly interested. LAS-RNO on starts Feb. 1 twice weekly - I wouldn't be surprised if the 757s end up doing a LAS-RNO-HNL routing.
I think the 757 would be a point in G4's favor as opposed to the 73G. RNO is already at about 4,400 feet MSL and has a mountain range between it and the ocean. A 73G could make it, but probably not with the kind of payload that a 752 could. HI is a cargo-heavy market (although I'm not sure how much cargo would be coming through RNO), but that could provide extra revenue for a 757 operator.
I just wonder: are there 180-200 people who want to fly from RNO to HNL (and specifically HNL, rather than another island) on enough of a frequency to merit the service? I do know that Hawaiians seem to love LAS (It's where they go on vacation...such an odd thing for me as a mainlander), so maybe RNO can market aggressively and aim for a part of the market?
FATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5738 posts, RR: 16 Reply 9, posted (10 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1669 times:
Quoting DocLightning (Reply 7): I just wonder: are there 180-200 people who want to fly from RNO to HNL (and specifically HNL, rather than another island) on enough of a frequency to merit the service? I do know that Hawaiians seem to love LAS (It's where they go on vacation...such an odd thing for me as a mainlander), so maybe RNO can market aggressively and aim for a part of the market?
Other than LAS-HNL (and the planned AZA-HNL), Allegiant has been operating Hawaii at only 1X/week or seasonal 2X/week frequency. G4 has also suspended some 1X/weekly service during slow periods such as suspending SMX-HNL for February.
Allegiant or someone else might be interested in RNO if the potential weekly passenger number over much of the year is high enough with some low period suspensions. But I would not expect more than weekly service.
The numbers I've seen on an annualized basis show the Reno MSA averages about 120 Reno residents as weekly visitors to Oahu. But someone's detailed analysis might uncover enough high period outbound/inbound traffic that combined with non-stop/low fare market stimulation and interisland transfers that RNO could support a weekly flight during much of the year (with low season suspensions).
For example, since Allegiant began service on FAT-HNL the number of Fresno MSA residents weekly to Oahu has increased by roughly 50% based on the Hawaii Tourism numbers I've seen. Additionally, since FAT-HNL began, travel by Fresno MSA residents to the other islands is up by over 20%.
Its hard to say if RNO might see enough increase to justify weekly service. We can only wait and see what decision someone might make.
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
Jetsgo From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3034 posts, RR: 5 Reply 10, posted (10 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1584 times:
I miss the QX Q400 to LAX, granted the market is served by AA, UA, and WN. I wouldn't mind seeing QX step in on the OAK route just like they did when WN dumped SJC. However, what I'd really like is for DL to open up either MSP or ATL. It seems I can never find a convenient connection through SLC, often leading me to fly another carrier or make the trek down to SMF.
Jetsgo From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3034 posts, RR: 5 Reply 14, posted (10 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1429 times:
If I recall correctly, it was "big" news when DL reintroduced MSPRNO in 2011 for the first time since NW cut the route in 2006. It was once daily 738 at the time and did quite well with cargo. Whether or not it has since been moved to seasonal or cut altogether I don't know.
iowaman From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4254 posts, RR: 7 Reply 15, posted (10 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 1335 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW FORUM MODERATOR
Quoting RWA380 (Reply 5): . In the past RNO has been a well served market from PDX, now WN is the only non-stop 3x daily IIRC
It's actually down to 2x daily. One of the two flights each way runs LAX-RNO-PDX and PDX-RNO-LAX, so I wouldn't be surprised if there is quite a bit of through traffic since WN doesn't run LAX-PDX non-stop. One of the return flights does PDX-RNO-SAN which probably also carries a fair amount of "one-stopper" traffic.
Quoting RWA380 (Reply 5): I think Reno and Tahoe have not kept pace with Las Vegas, and more and more people are opting for Vegas. The fact that AS/QX can't justify even 1 n/s Q400 a day between PDX and RNO should help illustrate what I am saying.
Vegas and Reno just don't compare for tourism. RNO reminds me more of IFP than LAS from an attraction and casino standpoint. Vegas also has a much larger population base.
WN on PDX-RNO is showing a 65% load-factor (per flightaware beta, so take it FWIW). Nothing too impressive.
Quoting MountainFlyer (Reply 11): Doesn't DL already have a seasonal MSP-RNO route, or is that gone for good?
Nothing in the schedules that is bookable so I'm guessing it's gone for good unfortunately.
A little history on the route - NW last flew it in 2006, with DL starting 1x daily 738 service July 1, 2011. Not sure how long it lasted but (apparently) not long.
TSS From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2979 posts, RR: 5 Reply 16, posted (10 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 1302 times:
Quoting Jetsgo (Reply 10): However, what I'd really like is for DL to open up either MSP or ATL.
Until relatively recently DL offered RNO-ATL and back seasonally on a 757, but I don't think they've offered it for the last couple of summers. I never took advantage of those flights because they ran counter to my needs: The plane left RNO for ATL in the morning and left ATL for RNO in the middle of the day. Had the scheduling been reversed I'd have gladly given it a try.
Able to kill active threads stone dead with a single post!
Jetsgo From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3034 posts, RR: 5 Reply 19, posted (10 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1058 times:
Quoting iowaman (Reply 15): A little history on the route - NW last flew it in 2006, with DL starting 1x daily 738 service July 1, 2011.
Quoting Jetsgo (Reply 14): DL reintroduced MSPRNO in 2011 for the first time since NW cut the route in 2006. It was once daily 738
Quoting TSS (Reply 16): The plane left RNO for ATL in the morning and left ATL for RNO in the middle of the day.
Just what I'm looking for. Hope to see it again.
Quoting AF022 (Reply 18): Is RNO too small for NYC direct service?
I would assume so. It wouldn't exactly make sense for UA, AA, or DL to open the route over their other hubs and it's unlikely for B6 to open up shop. Getting out here only requires one connection on pretty much any airline.
All of Reno's Top 10 air city-pairs currently support nonstop service. New York City, Boston, Washington DC, and Houston are probably the top metro areas that could support some nonstop service to RNO, even if seasonal and less than daily. After that, pick-em as to what other metro areas may be able to sustain nonstop service here.
I do believe that Reno bills itself as the Worlds Biggest Little City and with that, along with gaming, live night shows, various events and other adult entertainment forms, as well as being close to number of ski resorts for wintertime, and Lake Tahoe as a year-round resort area, Reno maybe could do more to get a lot more folks out there to experience and enjoy all that the area has to offer. I've personally thought of Reno as Alpine Las Vegas, but I sort of feel that the folks of Reno aren't quite promoting this along these lines, and I guess a lot of folks around the country and world don't quite see it that way either.
At any rate, all the best to RNO and area, and that convenient air service is available there for all.
This would be the revenue train, but as stated above RNO is so, not Vegas, that I doubt hard working Hawaiian travellers will want to spend the same kind of money for Reno over Las Vegas for their one or twice a year vacation. Reno would have to be much cheaper, and that's not going to be profitable.