Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Republic, UEX And The Q400  
User currently offlineinfiniti329 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 632 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2844 times:

I've read in several forums on a.net in the past few days that in nutshell that Republic's Q400 flying for United Express is an on going disaster.. Can anyone get into more detail about whats really going on with Republic and the Q? How is United contributing to problem or solution?

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2376 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2623 times:

Does anyone have a complete list of the tail numbers operated by Republic at this point already?


Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlineyyztpa From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2513 times:

Quoting infiniti329 (Thread starter):
I've read in several forums on a.net in the past few days that in nutshell that Republic's Q400 flying for United Express is an on going disaster.

Could you provide links to the posts?


User currently offlineflyboy80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1876 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 2427 times:

Do these Q400s have first class?

User currently offlineinfiniti329 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

Quoting yyztpa (Reply 2):
Could you provide links to the posts?
Republic Airways Order 47 Embraer E175 (by queb Jan 24 2013 in Civil Aviation)

This is where the majority of the posts are , in relation to republic picking up E-jet flying for Eagle


User currently offlinefloridaflyboy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2007 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

Quoting flyboy80 (Reply 3):
Do these Q400s have first class?

Right now, some do, some don't. But eventually, they will all have it.



Good goes around!
User currently offlineslider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6787 posts, RR: 34
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2365 times:

Certainly the Q400 is and has been a maintenance pig, but the issues for YX flying as UAX with them are largely driven by crew issues.

The wind-up was too rapid, crew availability is a big problem and there were some related issues.


User currently offlineItalianFlyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 1099 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2321 times:

From what I gather (FWIW) it is an intersection of the Q's integral mx complexities and RAH's absence of 'hands on' Q mx complexities. Other operators reported a pretty steep learning curve with this plane...to the point where SAS rejected the type. One would assume that is whats going on here.

User currently offlineGEG2RAP From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 848 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2300 times:

Quoting ItalianFlyer (Reply 7):
From what I gather (FWIW) it is an intersection of the Q's integral mx complexities and RAH's absence of 'hands on' Q mx complexities. Other operators reported a pretty steep learning curve with this plane...to the point where SAS rejected the type. One would assume that is whats going on here.

Also, based on experience at my station, if you get a former Lynx plane, on time has been ok. If you get a former Colgan plane, you might as well have the mechanics waiting.


User currently offlineItalianFlyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 1099 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2252 times:

Quoting GEG2RAP (Reply 8):
Also, based on experience at my station, if you get a former Lynx plane, on time has been ok. If you get a former Colgan plane, you might as well have the mechanics waiting.

Ive heard that too LOL....heres the list according to airfleets.net

http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/Republic%20Airways-active-dh8.htm

MSN Type Delivery date Registration Remark
4168 DHC-8 402 23/03/2011 N502LX
4182 DHC-8 402 22/04/2011 N508LX
4186 DHC-8 402 13/09/2012 N510LX
4188 DHC-8 402 07/09/2012 N188WQ
4196 DHC-8 402 07/09/2012 N196WQ
4202 DHC-8 402 29/10/2012 N202WQ
4208 DHC-8 402 12/10/2012 N208WQ
4209 DHC-8 402 12/10/2012 N209WQ
4214 DHC-8 402 17/10/2012 N214WQ
4323 DHC-8 402 01/10/2012 N323NG
4328 DHC-8 402 01/10/2012 N328NG
4339 DHC-8 402 01/01/2013 N339NG
4340 DHC-8 402 07/09/2012 N34NG
4342 DHC-8 402 12/10/2012 N342NG
4346 DHC-8 402 15/10/2012 N346NG
4356 DHC-8 402 07/09/2012 N356NG
4380 DHC-8 402 12/10/2012 N380NG


User currently offlineflyboy80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1876 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2020 times:

Anyone been inside these airplanes, or regularly work on them? I'm curious about their configuration. Is there only one forward LAV still, and do they have a forward galley for first class provisioning?

User currently offlinejetmatt777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2764 posts, RR: 33
Reply 11, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1984 times:

Quoting flyboy80 (Reply 10):
Anyone been inside these airplanes, or regularly work on them? I'm curious about their configuration. Is there only one forward LAV still, and do they have a forward galley for first class provisioning?

1 Lav up front, galley in the back...



No info
User currently offlineslider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6787 posts, RR: 34
Reply 12, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1927 times:

Quoting ItalianFlyer (Reply 7):
From what I gather (FWIW) it is an intersection of the Q's integral mx complexities and RAH's absence of 'hands on' Q mx complexities. Other operators reported a pretty steep learning curve with this plane...to the point where SAS rejected the type. One would assume that is whats going on here.

RAH and F9 had experience with the type via Lynx. It's not like they jumped into this blind.

And you better believe RAH put the screws to Bombardier because they knew what the scoop was with these aircraft.


User currently offlineItalianFlyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 1099 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (1 year 6 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

Quoting slider (Reply 12):
And you better believe RAH put the screws to Bombardier because they knew what the scoop was with these aircraft.

I had a chance to do some more research and you are correct. Looks like RAH is is doing the line mx while Bombardier is doing all heavy MRO work on the fleet through June 2021. So much for my learning curve theory.

http://www.avionics-intelligence.com...-turboprop-regional-airliners.html


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Wideroe And The Q400 posted Wed Jan 23 2008 16:25:24 by KaiGywer
Piedmont And The Q400 posted Sat Sep 22 2007 16:14:17 by ExpressPhl
CO And The Q400 posted Wed Aug 23 2006 01:22:27 by QantasA380
Questions About The CRJ 900X And The Q400 Stretch posted Wed Feb 1 2006 12:38:11 by OyKIE
F9 And QX And The Q400 posted Fri Apr 22 2005 06:53:39 by DLKAPA
United, Republic, And The C Series posted Sat Apr 3 2010 19:35:30 by GymClassHero
Shuttle America And The Republic Airways Group:? posted Tue May 26 2009 15:26:21 by TodaReisinger
Horizon And It's Opinion On The Q400 Vs The Cr7 posted Sat Jul 31 2004 21:38:59 by Cumulonimbus
Ethiopian And The 787 posted Tue Jan 15 2013 17:07:17 by dkny
Mexicana And The Boeing 727 posted Mon Jan 7 2013 11:49:38 by Mortyman