Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CSA To Deploy A333 On Moscow Route  
User currently offlineely747 From Slovakia, joined Jan 2013, 140 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 8360 times:

I'm quite surprised to see that Czech Airline is going to be flying an A333 on PRG - SVO route in S13. If I'm not mistaken among all the EU carriers it's only BA who serves Moscow flights on WD frames. What is behind OK's confidence to fill this aircraft? After all, it's a short haul segment. Also interesting to note increased frequencies to MXP, DUS or TXL just to name a few. Is OK's on board product so competitive to match LH ?


source:
http://airlineroute.net/2013/01/25/ok-s13update1/



[Edited 2013-01-26 23:41:01]

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinegr09 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2008, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8203 times:

They are planning to fly it 2x weekly to ICN and they have no clue what to do with it for the rest of the week. So they picked SVO and SVX. Terrible planning IMHO and I can't imagine this will make any profits. One (or two?) frame subfleet...

The OK's on board product is comparable to LH's short haul, the meals may be even better in J.


User currently offlineely747 From Slovakia, joined Jan 2013, 140 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 8039 times:

Quoting gr09 (Reply 1):



You answered the question I had "has CSA intended to tap in to Berlin / Dusseldorf - Moscow market?" The answer is NO. Is the A333 part of the fleet yet? If not, where is it coming from ? Had no joy finding this info on the official website. 2x weekly service to ICN, is this an addition to already operating KE flights? I assume, the PRG - ICN route would be mostly fuelled by the presence of S.Korean auto makers in the region.

[Edited 2013-01-27 01:09:33]

User currently offlinegr09 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2008, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7665 times:

The flights are supposed to be in cooperation with KE (codeshare + some additional CSA's codeshare on connecting flights from ICN) so we can speculate it will be an old KE's metal.

Look up this thread: Czech Airlines To Lease An A330 (by gr09 Dec 5 2012 in Civil Aviation)


User currently onlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 7528 times:

Quoting gr09 (Reply 1):
They are planning to fly it 2x weekly to ICN and they have no clue what to do with it for the rest of the week. So they picked SVO and SVX. Terrible planning IMHO and I can't imagine this will make any profits. One (or two?) frame subfleet...

As mentioned in the other thread, OK only has the A330 available on three full days of the week (Wednesday - Friday) and less than half a day on both Tuesday and Saturday. The schedule for the A330 make effective use of the aircradt and to be honest SVO - PRG is a busy route (10 dailies in S13).


User currently offlinegr09 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2008, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 7294 times:

Quoting LJ (Reply 4):
The schedule for the A330 make effective use of the aircradt and to be honest SVO - PRG is a busy route (10 dailies in S13).

I admit that Moscow is a very good and money making route for CSA but increasing capacity almost 2x on those particular flights? I'm no expert but that seems like quite a challenge. Even if they fill the seats, they would also have to fill the belly to make it profitable unless I'm missing something.


User currently offlineely747 From Slovakia, joined Jan 2013, 140 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 7198 times:

This makes me think the Czech Republic is a very popular destination for many Russians who generally like to splash out. That's why BA upgaged Moscow flights to 747 and 767 respectively making it shortest long haul service. So I'm quite positive about OK filing the front of A333. The market from Russia end seems to be there.

Having read the previous thread, I'm still trying o work out what makes PRG - INC route so attractive. Yes, there is quite significant trade going between the two counties but it's more to it. I guess PRG has got some advantage over AMS or CDG in terms of distance flown. So it would make a perfect sense for KE to drop a certain volume of pax in PRG and fly them either to Paris or Amsterdam on narrow bodies.

[Edited 2013-01-27 06:18:04]

User currently offlinefactsonly From Montserrat, joined Aug 2012, 811 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 7007 times:

Quoting ely747 (Reply 6):
I guess PRG has got some advantage over AMS or CDG in terms of distance flown. So it would make a perfect sense for KE to drop a certain volume of pax in PRG and fly them either to Paris or Amsterdam on narrow bodies.

I doubt that this is the case.

KE has just commenced a SKYTEAM codeshare with KLM on ICN-AMS-ICN, which raises KE's frequency on this route from 3x/week to daily. KE also codeshares on KL beyond AMS to GVA, BCN, CPH.

While KE operates ICN-CDG 9x/week with its own metal and codeshares on the daily AF flight from ICN as well, for a total of 16 weekly connections.

PRG is much more likely to give KE connections on OK to other East/Central European cities.


User currently onlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5723 times:

Quoting gr09 (Reply 5):
admit that Moscow is a very good and money making route for CSA but increasing capacity almost 2x on those particular flights?

They increased capacity on 4 weekly flights only. It's probably the best route to put it on (moreover as hopefully the seating is much better).


Quoting gr09 (Reply 5):
Even if they fill the seats, they would also have to fill the belly to make it profitable unless I'm missing something.

At least they can transport more (and larger) cargo between PRG and SVO. Thus it may open opportunity for Czech and/or Russian business (though it's only 4 weekly flights).

BTW whilst the SVX flights and OK0898 on Tuesday is already in the Skyteam timetable, I don't see OK0894 as an A333 yet (will probably adjusted shortly).


User currently offlinemah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32603 posts, RR: 72
Reply 9, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5438 times:

What a joke. If OK is serious about building up long haul, then send it long haul. Send it to New York, Miami or Colombo, all extremely popular with Czechs.


a.
User currently offlineFabo From Slovakia, joined Aug 2005, 1219 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3582 times:

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 9):
If OK is serious about building up long haul, then send it long haul.

Well this is where you fail, the premise is false. OK is not serious about building longhaul...  



The light at the end of tunnel turn out to be a lighted sing saying NO EXIT
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24817 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3413 times:

Quoting mah4546 (Reply 9):
What a joke. If OK is serious about building up long haul, then send it long haul. Send it to New York, Miami or Colombo, all extremely popular with Czechs.

The lowest round trip fares for nonstop services PRG-SVO for some random dates are roughly half (or slightly more) the lowest PRG-MIA one-stop connecting fares for the same dates.

So if you can fill an A330 on a 2.5 hour sector 4 x week at a fare that's more than half what you would get for a 10 or 11 hour nonstop 2 x week (probably all you could operate longhaul between the PRG-ICN rotations) in a highly competitive market with multiple daily connecting options like PRG-MIA, it may generate more revenue with lower operating costs, and without the development and marketing costs of starting a completely new route.


User currently offlineBoeing744 From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1829 posts, RR: 23
Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3033 times:

The Wikipedia page for CSA claims that the A333 will be in an all-Y configuration with 440 seats. This seems ridiculous... Is it correct?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czech_Airlines#Fleet


User currently offlinegr09 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2008, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2712 times:

Quoting Boeing744 (Reply 12):
Is it correct?

No it's not


User currently onlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1874 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 11):

So if you can fill an A330 on a 2.5 hour sector 4 x week at a fare that's more than half what you would get for a 10 or 11 hour nonstop 2 x week

Given the fact that the plane arrives in PRG at 16:50 on Tuesday and has to be in PRG Saturday morning, two long hauls can be a challenge (unless you accept unattractive schedules). The A330 can now make 14 flights between Tuesday evening and Saturday morning. Moreover pax to SVX will probably be glad to get a long haul product (though nothing is known about the product).

Tuesday
ICN dep 12:45 PRG arr 16:50
PRG dep 23:20 SVO arr 04:20 +1

Wednesday
SVO dep 05:30 PRG arr 06:15
PRG dep 11:00 SVO arr 5:40
SVO dep 17:00 PRG arr 17:55
PRG dep 19:45 SVX arr 04:10 +1

Thursday + Friday
SVX dep 05:25 PRG arr 06:05
PRG dep 11:00 SVO arr 5:40
SVO dep 17:00 PRG arr 17:55
PRG dep 19:45 SVX arr 04:10 +1

Saturday
SVX dep 05:25 PRG arr 06:05
PRG dep 12:55 ICN arr 15:40 +1

Sunday
ICN dep 12:45 PRG arr 16:50
PRG dep 18:30 ICN arr 11:15 +1

Will be a very busy A330-300.


User currently offlinedavidho1985 From Hong Kong, joined Oct 2012, 322 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 5 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1667 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Boeing744 (Reply 12):

No point to have a A333 with 440 seats flying between PRG and ICN.
Rumors said that the aircaft will be operated by KE (under we-lease arrangement),
such arrangement is made to allow KE to increase the frequency of PRG ICN
(KE is not allowed to further increase their frequency)


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AirBus To Deploy 2 A380s On Asian, US Tours posted Tue Aug 14 2007 14:52:33 by EI321
AC (Air Canada) To Deploy E190 On SAN-YYZ posted Tue Nov 28 2006 02:53:22 by DCAYOW
TG To Lose Big $$$$ On NYC Route For First 3 Years posted Tue Apr 19 2005 05:16:23 by Bkkair
VS To Challenge 1world On Kangaroo Route LHR - SYD posted Fri Jun 14 2002 19:16:38 by Singapore_Air
LAN Perú To Set A Record On The LIM-CUZ Route! posted Tue Aug 21 2012 04:11:37 by SCL767
QF To Stick With 744ERs On DFW Route posted Wed Sep 14 2011 16:50:16 by QFA787380
AF To Switch To 77W On MIA Route From Nov 1st? posted Thu Dec 16 2010 01:18:41 by LY777
When Did KE Deploy 744s On KE23/24 To SFO posted Mon Aug 9 2010 23:40:13 by fortunerunnner
DL Downgrading From 747 To A333 NRT-HKG Route. posted Sun May 16 2010 20:33:17 by vincentslc
Aeromexico To Use 777s On Buenos Aires Route posted Fri Jun 26 2009 06:45:21 by Juventus