Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BA A318 Damaged At JFK  
User currently offlinebdak From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 89 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 34278 times:

The BA Source www.thebasource.com is reporting that the BA1/2 Club World London City Service is cancelled for a second day in a row, after the a318 aircraft used to operate the service was damaged at JFK. Does anyone have any idea what happened? Or any pics?

52 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 3286 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 33837 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I wouldn't be surprised if it was damaged during pushback. The space over by T7 around gates 1-3 isn't very plentiful


\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7685 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 33755 times:

Here is the full The BA Source report dated 3 February:

"British Airways A318 G-EUNA sustained damage to its tailfin whilst under scheduled maintenance at New York JFK resulting in the cancellation of BA2 New York JFK – London City today."


User currently onlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8456 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 31192 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Where is the second A318 used for ths LCY to JFK flights ?

User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 3286 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 30788 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 4):

G-EUNA is probably operating club World flight 3/4



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineEagleBoy From Niue, joined Dec 2009, 1880 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 29924 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Maybe down for MX over the winter. I assume they don't refit it (with those 32 F seats) just for the summer schedule?

User currently offlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 724 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 29614 times:

Quoting VV701 (Reply 2):
"British Airways A318 G-EUNA sustained damage to its tailfin whilst under scheduled maintenance at New York JFK resulting in the cancellation of BA2 New York JFK – London City today."

I can't help imagining someone being insistent that A320s fit through a certain hanger door, so an A318 must too.


User currently offlinefca767 From United Kingdom, joined exactly 8 years ago today! , 1786 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 28879 times:

Quoting SSTeve (Reply 7):
I can't help imagining someone being insistent that A320s fit through a certain hanger door, so an A318 must too.

A318's are smaller/same size


User currently offlinehoMsar From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1202 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 28690 times:

Quoting fca767 (Reply 8):
A318's are smaller/same size

A318 has a taller tail.



I was raised by a cup of coffee.
User currently onlineaudidudi From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 500 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 28601 times:

Quoting mesaflyguy (Reply 5):

Then that would be G-EUNB, as G-EUNA is the aircraft involved the mishap.


User currently offlinerobbb From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 28492 times:

A319/A320/A321 tail height is 11.76m

A318 tail height is 12.51m


User currently offlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 724 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 28514 times:

Quoting fca767 (Reply 8):
A318's are smaller/same size

Hopefully not said just before shortening one.  


User currently offlinerampbro From Canada, joined Nov 2012, 255 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 28402 times:

Quoting fca767 (Reply 8):
A318's are smaller/same size

That is exactly how this incident occurred.


User currently offlinebthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 518 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 28107 times:

Quoting EagleBoy (Reply 6):
Maybe down for MX over the winter. I assume they don't refit it (with those 32 F seats) just for the summer schedule?

I thought it was a year round twice daily? (except Saturdays)


User currently offlinemesaflyguy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 3286 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 26882 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting audidudi (Reply 10):

Whoops, you're right. Got distracted when I was typing



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlinefca767 From United Kingdom, joined exactly 8 years ago today! , 1786 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 26131 times:

Quoting hoMsar (Reply 9):
A318 has a taller tail.

Ohhh...that's funny...i would never have thought that...sorry to ssteve for doubting... 
Quoting rampbro (Reply 13):
That is exactly how this incident occurred.

They need a warning Label on the hanger or aircraft, warning tail may be taller than they appear  


User currently offlinejumpjets From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2012, 876 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 23622 times:

Quoting bthebest (Reply 14):
I thought it was a year round twice daily?

Yes except normally in August when it goes down to one a day while more heavy maintenance is performed.

This year I believe it is also only operating once a day during some of April - but I don't know why.


User currently offlineEagleBoy From Niue, joined Dec 2009, 1880 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 22313 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting hoMsar (Reply 9):
A318 has a taller tail.

apparently the taller tail is to compensate for the shorter body, not sure but I assume it's a centre of gravity issue?


User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 8
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 22232 times:

The taller tail is probably for better directional stability.


Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlineContinental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5520 posts, RR: 18
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 21956 times:

Quoting robbb (Reply 11):

A319/A320/A321 tail height is 11.76m

A318 tail height is 12.51m

What kind of hangar are they using? We're talking a difference of 0.75 m (2.46 ft). Is the hangar entrance really that tight?


User currently offlineezalpha From Canada, joined Mar 2010, 33 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 21376 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 19):
The taller tail is probably for better directional stability.

I believe that's true. Of all 747s, the 747SP has the tallest tail.


User currently offlinekjfk527 From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 20860 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The aircraft is currently parked in American Airlines Hangar 10, Bay # 4. It was in Bay # 6 yesterday and was repositioned today. Their is plenty of space for the A318 in both Bay #4 and Bay # 6 with more than enough clearance for the tail.

The aircraft normally RONs over the weekend on AA hardstand number 3.

I will try and snap a picture of the bird in the hangar tomorrow if it is still there.


User currently offlineN243NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1639 posts, RR: 20
Reply 22, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 20856 times:

Quoting EagleBoy (Reply 18):
apparently the taller tail is to compensate for the shorter body, not sure but I assume it's a centre of gravity issue

Sort of. It's not for adjusting the location of the center of gravity, if that's what you're suggesting. The shorter fuselage means the stabilizer and rudder are farther from the aircraft's CG and therefore has less of a moment arm to counter any yawing tendency. Without a larger rudder area to compensate, the 318 would be less directionally stable than its larger variants.



B-52s don't take off. They scare the ground away.
User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21562 posts, RR: 59
Reply 23, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 20281 times:

Quoting fca767 (Reply 16):
Ohhh...that's funny...i would never have thought that...sorry to ssteve for doubting...

Shortest 737NGs have taller tails. 747SP has taller tail. It's to combat yaw do to wingspan v length being greater.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineBryanG From United States of America, joined May 1999, 436 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 20990 times:

N243NW is exactly correct, from a physics standpoint. It's a moment arm issue. It's not uncommon for shortened airframes to have taller tails in a line of aircraft, and vice versa.

For example the A340-600 has a shorter tail than the A340-500, because of the longer fuselage, therefore a different moment arm.


User currently offlinerojo From Spain, joined Sep 2000, 2476 posts, RR: 9
Reply 25, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 21173 times:

Didn't F9 also learned the difference in tail height between A319 and A318 the hard way?
I remember some news about their A318 not being able to clear DEN's bridge ...


User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2969 posts, RR: 1
Reply 26, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 21349 times:

Quoting N243NW (Reply 23):
The shorter fuselage means the stabilizer and rudder are farther from the aircraft's CG and therefore has less of a moment arm to counter any yawing tendency.

Actually the rudder is CLOSER to the CG, and has less moment arm.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineSpeedbird741 From Portugal, joined Aug 2008, 654 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 20900 times:

Quoting ezalpha (Reply 21):
I believe that's true. Of all 747s, the 747SP has the tallest tail.

It is correct, yes. The A330-200 also has a taller vertical stabilizer than the A330-300 and A340-300 due to it's shorter fuselage, and also has a shorter vertical stabilizer than the A340-200, which has 4 engines and therefore is more stable and has better directional control  

Speedbird741



Boa noite Faro, Air Portugal 257 climbing flight level 340
User currently offlineViajero From Mexico, joined Aug 2008, 134 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 20091 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting rojo (Reply 26):
Didn't F9 also learned the difference in tail height between A319 and A318 the hard way?
I remember some news about their A318 not being able to clear DEN's bridge ...

They did indeed. Now the remaining A318s In Frontier's fleet have a placard in the cockpit concerning the DEN bridges. I believe the bridge itself has signs on it as well.


User currently offlineBN747dfwhnl From United States of America, joined May 2005, 75 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 18455 times:

Quoting Viajero (Reply 29):
I believe the bridge itself has signs on it as well.

Yes; it does.


User currently offlineplatinumfoota From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 556 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 17242 times:

Hmmm... Does the 777-200 have a taller tail than a 777-300??


Never forget United 93
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11687 posts, RR: 60
Reply 31, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 15800 times:

Quoting platinumfoota (Reply 31):
Hmmm... Does the 777-200 have a taller tail than a 777-300??

Not exactly, only the -200LF and -200F, but I believe that the tail itself is the same size and that the variation is due to other factors. Design shrinks often have the taller tail, hence the A318, B747-SP and early A332s. However there are also exceptions, like the A310, which is shorter.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineflyinTLow From Germany, joined Oct 2004, 524 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 15140 times:

It is not about the "normal" directional stability, but about being able to compensate the yaw momentum in case of an engine failure. With the same or at least similar engines attatched, you need the same yaw momentum compensation by the tail fin.
Now as momentum is force x arm, when shortening the arm, you have to increase the force somehow. You can do that by increasing the aerodynamic area.

Looking at the A320 family, A319/20/21 all have the same tail fin, but the rudder of the A321 does not deflect as far as the A319 one. On the A318, the deflection was not sufficient, hence the "taller" tailfin with increased "deflectable rudder area".



- When dreams take flight, follow them -
User currently offlineEagleBoy From Niue, joined Dec 2009, 1880 posts, RR: 2
Reply 33, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 14985 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting N243NW (Reply 23):
It's not for adjusting the location of the center of gravity, if that's what you're suggesting. The shorter fuselage means the stabilizer and rudder are farther from the aircraft's CG and therefore has less of a moment arm to counter any yawing tendency. Without a larger rudder area to compensate, the 318 would be less directionally stable than its larger variants.
Quoting ikramerica (Reply 24):
It's to combat yaw do to wingspan v length being greater.
Quoting BryanG (Reply 25):
N243NW is exactly correct, from a physics standpoint. It's a moment arm issue. It's not uncommon for shortened airframes to have taller tails in a line of aircraft, and vice versa.

Thanks for the clarification.....I knew the shorter body needed the taller tail but didn't know the physics of it.


User currently offlinegkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24961 posts, RR: 56
Reply 34, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 14993 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 32):
Not exactly, only the -200LF and -200F

Same thing is it not? Or do you mean the 200LR?  



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3297 posts, RR: 1
Reply 35, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 14916 times:

Quoting platinumfoota (Reply 31):
Does the 777-200 have a taller tail than a 777-300??

The B777-300 is a stretch whereas the taller tail comes into play with a shrink of the baseline model, like the B747SP, the A330-200 and the A318. It's not just early A332s that have the taller fin, they've all got it.
The B737NG has a bigger tail and wing across all models.

[Edited 2013-02-05 03:25:44]

User currently offlineclydenairways From Ireland, joined Jan 2007, 1275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 36, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 14951 times:

How is BA coping with one of these aircraft out of service? It's a problem when you have a very small sub-fleet, you have nothing that can replace it directly.

User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3297 posts, RR: 1
Reply 37, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 14882 times:

Quoting BryanG (Reply 25):
For example the A340-600 has a shorter tail than the A340-500, because of the longer fuselage, therefore a different moment arm.

Is this right? I thought they were identical. Is the eight inch (seriously?) difference in height not accounted for by the nose down attitude of the shorter body?

[Edited 2013-02-05 03:29:19]

[Edited 2013-02-05 03:29:43]

User currently offlinegkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24961 posts, RR: 56
Reply 38, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 14767 times:

Quoting clydenairways (Reply 37):
How is BA coping with one of these aircraft out of service? It's a problem when you have a very small sub-fleet, you have nothing that can replace it directly.

Presumably sending folk in and out of LHR?



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7685 posts, RR: 17
Reply 39, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 13290 times:

Quoting bthebest (Reply 14):
I thought it was a year round twice daily? (except Saturdays)

The frequency of the LCY-SNN-JFK-LCY rotation is reduced from twice daily to daily during the holiday period in August each year.

In 2012 BA003/04 - the rotation 'NA was operating before it was damaged - did not operate from 29 July to 31 August inclusive. 'NA was at LGW undergoing routine maintenance from 29 July to 8 August. and 'NB followed on 17 August returning to LCY on 3 September.

In 2011 the last BA003/04 rotation was on 31 July and the next 0n 31 August. That year 'NA was undergoing maintenance at LGW from 29 July until 8 August while 'NB was at LGW from 6 to 31 August.

The gap between 8 and 17 August in 2012 when neither aircraft was under maintenance but BNA003/04 did not operate strongly suggests that operating the second flight in August would not be justified by demand. However data published by the CAA for 2011 - full year 2012 numbers have not yet been published - shows that in August 2011 passengers carried on this route (1,234) were significantly more than half the number carried on average in the other elven months of that year (1,853). So unless the August figures are boosted by a weakening in average per passenger yield that month looks to be operationally more profitable.

BA did say when announcing this service that routine maintenance would be carried out in "bite sized chunks" at LGW. These "chunks" are not all in August. It is not unusual for either aircraft to visit LGW for maintenance at other times. For example in 2012 'NA was ferried into and then out of LGW on the following day on six occasions, most usually arriving there on a Saturday and retuning to LCY on the Sunday. However in addition to the August visit there was another longer visit from 5 to 10 April. But this also looks as if it was for planned maintenance as it was from the Thursday before to the Tuesday after the Easter holiday weekend.


User currently offlineBryanG From United States of America, joined May 1999, 436 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9511 times:

Quoting gkirk (Reply 39):
Is this right?

No, I was incorrect, and I stand humbly corrected. Vertical stabilizers on the 340-500/600 have the same dimensions.

After further research, this post addressed that issue in detail: A340-500/-600 Vertical Stabilizer? (by GearDownPlease Oct 28 2008 in Tech Ops)


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21798 posts, RR: 55
Reply 41, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 9398 times:

Quoting BryanG (Reply 41):
No, I was incorrect, and I stand humbly corrected. Vertical stabilizers on the 340-500/600 have the same dimensions.

Airbus took the vertical stabilizer off the 330-200 and put it on the 340-500/600 - they could have put a different size on the -600 because it's longer, but since they already had a stabilizer that was designed and tested and certified, the cost/benefit analysis just didn't make sense.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11687 posts, RR: 60
Reply 42, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 8644 times:

Quoting gkirk (Reply 35):
Same thing is it not? Or do you mean the 200LR?

It's a special low fat variant of the LR  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlinesralfalo From Germany, joined Nov 2005, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 43, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 7696 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

G-EUNA is back in service, currently operating BA001 to JFK

image of fixed tail fin: http://t.co/uRSMnuFw


User currently offlineTC957 From UK - England, joined May 2012, 977 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 7048 times:

See - nothing a bit of tape can't fix...

User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7685 posts, RR: 17
Reply 45, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 7013 times:

Quoting sralfalo (Reply 44):
G-EUNA is back in service, currently operating BA001 to JFK

It was returned to service on 6 February operating JFK-LCY (B A002).


User currently offlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 724 posts, RR: 2
Reply 46, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 6774 times:

I started the jokes about it being assumed to be no taller than an A320... do we know what actually hit the tail?

User currently offlineaxelesgg From Sweden, joined Jan 2010, 189 posts, RR: 0
Reply 47, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 5888 times:

A Privatair 737-700 seems like a good replacement, if only LCY were certified for that model  

User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3297 posts, RR: 1
Reply 48, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5670 times:

Quoting axelesgg (Reply 47):
A Privatair 737-700 seems like a good replacement, if only LCY were certified for that model

Given BA operate seven daily flights from LHR they're not likely to need that.


User currently onlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4937 posts, RR: 1
Reply 49, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5389 times:

Quoting axelesgg (Reply 47):
737-700 seems like a good replacement, if only LCY were certified for that model

What about an all-premium configured CSeries or Emb-NG? By now, the historical load factors on this service could indicate the optimal seat number and aircraft model.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11687 posts, RR: 60
Reply 50, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5245 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 49):
What about an all-premium configured CSeries or Emb-NG? By now, the historical load factors on this service could indicate the optimal seat number and aircraft model.

The former is planned and apparently capable non stop both ways, the latter will depend on how the specs firm up as Embraer refine the NG.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineLofty From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2008, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 51, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4907 times:

I understand that the aircraft was in the hanger with a safety wire which the engineers attach themselves to when working at hight. The wire was not removed before the aircraft pushed back and cut into the tail.

User currently offlineyeelep From United States of America, joined Apr 2011, 669 posts, RR: 0
Reply 52, posted (1 year 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 4304 times:

Quoting ikramerica (Reply 23):
Shortest 737NGs have taller tails.

All NG's have the same size vertical stab.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA Miss Approach At JFK? posted Tue Aug 10 2004 10:44:32 by Jetblue15
Extra BA Concorde Departure At JFK Friday Oct 3rd posted Fri Oct 3 2003 01:57:21 by LGA777
BA Traffic Rights At SNN Enroute To JFK posted Fri Aug 27 2010 04:42:55 by smartt1982
American And BA “exploring” Co-location At JFK posted Thu Apr 1 2010 10:28:48 by speedbird9
Damaged Air Maroc 767 At JFK posted Wed Aug 12 2009 09:29:56 by N471WN
BA A318 X 2 At LHR? posted Fri Jul 4 2008 07:15:42 by Speedmarque
Damaged CX Aircraft At JFK? posted Fri Apr 27 2007 15:16:59 by Jayhup
Some Questions About BA At JFK posted Fri Mar 25 2005 21:15:14 by Richierich
Questions 4 BA CS At JFK&LHR posted Thu Aug 5 2004 17:41:23 by Swatpamike
Elevating Jetways At BA Term At JFK posted Sun Jul 11 2004 06:30:59 by UCLAX