Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
FL Announces New MEM Service  
User currently offlineJohnJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1657 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5170 times:

About the only glimmer of good news to come out of Memphis recently, Southwest under their AirTran banner will add service from Memphis to Chicago, Orlando and Baltimore this summer - from the Memphis Commercial Appeal:

Southwest said in a release that it would operate twice a day service between Memphis and Chicago Midway and once a day to Orlando and Baltimore/Washington.

The flights are in addition to AirTran's five daily roundtrips between Memphis and Atlanta.


Full article:

http://www.commercialappeal.com/news...n-subsidiary-announces-new-servic/

37 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7886 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5128 times:

Uh oh, cue the "Is FL/WN gonna make a hub out of MEM" threads...  

I don't see a full blown hub, but I think there is room for some more service other than DL



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineQANTAS747-438 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1936 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5033 times:

Great news. I wonder why MEM is one of the last FL stations to be converted over to WN? I can see WN having a 30-35 flt operation out of MEM.


My posts/replies are strictly my opinion and not that of any company, organization, or Southwest Airlines.
User currently offlinealggag From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 98 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5011 times:

Quoting QANTAS747-438 (Reply 2):
Great news. I wonder why MEM is one of the last FL stations to be converted over to WN? I can see WN having a 30-35 flt operation out of MEM.

Don't they only have two gates to work with? That would only allow them to run about 20 flights.


User currently offlinebobloblaw From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1710 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4996 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Will MDW-MEM be a code share? The others can stand alone as FL.

User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 22923 posts, RR: 20
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4976 times:

Quoting alggag (Reply 3):
Don't they only have two gates to work with? That would only allow them to run about 20 flights.

Been to MEM lately? WN can have as many gates as they like.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlinesdoyon From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 257 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4955 times:

Quoting alggag (Reply 3):
Don't they only have two gates to work with? That would only allow them to run about 20 flights.

With DL reducing MEM as they've done (and probably will continue to do), I could see WN/FL taking over another gate or two in Terminal A.


User currently offlineTdan From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 429 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4937 times:

Quoting alggag (Reply 3):

Don't they only have two gates to work with? That would only allow them to run about 20 flights

...and the airport has about 50 empty other gates! In all seriousness, it's just a matter of time before DL doesn't renew many of the A gates, particularly when the B construction is done. WN will be in there with its own metal before too long.



We will ride this thunderbird, silver shadows on the earth, a thousand leagues away our land of birth... -Captain Bruce
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7565 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4885 times:

Everyone keeps talking about WN growing MEM to a 30-40 flight/day operation, but was is the justification?

MEM doesn't appear to be anymore special than dozens of WN mid-sized markets that have less than 20 flights/day.


User currently offlinetype-rated From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 4990 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4869 times:

Back around the time SO & NC merged to make RC, the city greatly expanded MEM. Even with DL & RC in full swing there were tons of open gates. This must have been around 1977-78 or so. Everytime I have been through there since there have always been tons of gates open.


Fly North Central Airlines..The route of the Northliners!
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 22923 posts, RR: 20
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4829 times:

Quoting PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 8):
MEM doesn't appear to be anymore special than dozens of WN mid-sized markets that have less than 20 flights/day.

Please list the dozens of markets. You are far overestimating the number of WN stations in cities with comparable size and location to MEM that are that small. LBB, CRB and ALB aren't really peers.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlinediverdave From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4811 times:

Quoting Tdan (Reply 7):
...and the airport has about 50 empty other gates! In all seriousness, it's just a matter of time before DL doesn't renew many of the A gates, particularly when the B construction is done. WN will be in there with its own metal before too long.

Heck, WN can have a whole terminal!

David


User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6751 posts, RR: 32
Reply 12, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4792 times:

Quoting type-rated (Reply 9):
Back around the time SO & NC merged to make RC, the city greatly expanded MEM. Even with DL & RC in full swing there were tons of open gates. This must have been around 1977-78 or so.

And the airport looks like it's still stuck in the 1970's. Gray brick, low ceilings, and narrow hallways. It wouldn't work as a hub with many aircraft larger than a DC-9 or A319.


User currently offlineenilria From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 7138 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4706 times:

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 1):
I don't see a full blown hub

Since WN has no hubs? If 15 flights is a hub and that's the most they will have, I guess you can choose to call that a hub.

Quoting JohnJ (Thread starter):
Southwest under their AirTran banner will add service from Memphis to Chicago, Orlando and Baltimore this summer

So whose metal is it? I hope it is WN metal unless the code share is truly fixed.


User currently offlinesdoyon From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 257 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4694 times:

Quoting enilria (Reply 13):
So whose metal is it? I hope it is WN metal unless the code share is truly fixed.

It's operated by FL.


User currently offlineselmer40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 98 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4517 times:

Quote:
It wouldn't work as a hub with many aircraft larger than a DC-9 or A319.

In the late 80s, before the improvements we have now, The Memphis NW/KL hub operated with large airplanes-at various times a 747, DC-10s, a 763, a MD-11, a A330, 753s, 752s, 722s, A320s as well as the mentioned DC9s and A319s. With five banks of flights and about 225 departures a day most of the airport's gates were well used.

[Edited 2013-02-04 11:54:44]


Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlineouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4588 posts, RR: 23
Reply 16, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4433 times:

Quoting enilria (Reply 13):
So whose metal is it? I hope it is WN metal unless the code share is truly fixed.

It's broke? News to me. Of course we've only seen the soft/limited launch of it right now so its hard to really judge it until full roll out takes place.


User currently offlineFlaps From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1267 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 4298 times:

Quoting ScottB (Reply 12):
And the airport looks like it's still stuck in the 1970's. Gray brick, low ceilings, and narrow hallways. It wouldn't work as a hub with many aircraft larger than a DC-9 or A319.

MEM is no worse than CLT in that regard. CLT does fine with what it has and so does MEM.


User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7886 posts, RR: 52
Reply 18, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3726 times:

Quoting enilria (Reply 13):
Since WN has no hubs? If 15 flights is a hub and that's the most they will have, I guess you can choose to call that a hub.

I don't want to be caught up in semantics... a "large operation" or a MDW or BWI or something is what I meant



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineb757capt From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1375 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3637 times:

Quoting Flaps (Reply 17):

Have you been to CLT lately?



The views written by this user are in no manner the views of my employer and should not be thought as such.
User currently offlineJBAirwaysFan From United States of America, joined May 2009, 977 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3062 times:

Good for MEM, but I would never expect a huge build up there. BNA is too close to build up MEM to a "hub".


In Loving Memory of Casey Edward Falconer; May 16, 1992-May 9, 2012
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6560 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3006 times:

The only other cities that could realistically be added from MEM are HOU, DEN, and maybe LAS.

ATL, BWI, MDW, MCO, HOU, DEN, LAS would allow for easy connectivity from the majority of the WN network.

I can see MEM being a 15-20 flight per day station, but nothing more.


User currently offlinebobloblaw From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1710 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2766 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MSYtristar (Reply 21):
The only other cities that could realistically be added from MEM are HOU, DEN, and maybe LAS.

ATL, BWI, MDW, MCO, HOU, DEN, LAS would allow for easy connectivity from the majority of the WN network.

I can see MEM being a 15-20 flight per day station, but nothing more.

I mostly agree, but when DL finally pulls the plug on MEM, there will be someone who flies LAX. It might still be DL to enhance LAX hub or it might be WN.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7565 posts, RR: 28
Reply 23, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2743 times:

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 10):
Please list the dozens of markets. You are far overestimating the number of WN stations in cities with comparable size and location to MEM that are that small. LBB, CRB and ALB aren't really peers.

What would drive MEM to be any different than cities like:
BHM, LIT, SDF, or OKC.

Those markets are within about 15-20 flights per day on average (maybe up to 25 during peak days). They all are connected to the major WN connecting cities/focus cities/hubs-but-we-don't officially call them hubs markets

Anything beyond 15-20 flights requires going into more O&D focused routes when either a) WN is not a significant player or has limited resourced in some of the larger O&D markets (NYC, BOS, DCA) or b) routes are long-and-thin (LAX, SFO)

WN is not going to be flying routes like from MEM to places like SAT, MSP, PIT, ALB

Quoting MSYtristar (Reply 21):
The only other cities that could realistically be added from MEM are HOU, DEN, and maybe LAS.

ATL, BWI, MDW, MCO, HOU, DEN, LAS would allow for easy connectivity from the majority of the WN network.

I can see MEM being a 15-20 flight per day station, but nothing more.

Exactly what I'm thinking. WN is going to focus on their focus cities from MEM. DL relies on RJs as it is even with the power of a connecting hub to make some of these routes and offers even less capacity per day than WN could if they operated just 1 737 on the route.


User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 22923 posts, RR: 20
Reply 24, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2732 times:

Quoting bobloblaw (Reply 22):
I mostly agree, but when DL finally pulls the plug on MEM, there will be someone who flies LAX. It might still be DL to enhance LAX hub or it might be WN.

I also think MEM will get a DAL flight or two once 2014 rolls around. There's a possibility, though I don't know how strong, that MEM will get connected to one or more of what I'll call "medium-sized medium-haul" stations. I'd put MSY, MCI, SAT, AUS and perhaps TPA in that category.

If we are talking about 8 to 12 destinations, that's probably closer to 30 flights than 15 to 20.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlinesteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9194 posts, RR: 20
Reply 25, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2711 times:

Quoting b757capt (Reply 19):

Have you been to CLT lately?

CLT in a state of disaray? Poor, poor CLT and their complete lack of airline service, which has only about 600 daily US flights a day...

Altho, I do wonder if he's talking about the terminals versus the amount and quality of service...

You know what, he is:

Quoting Flaps (Reply 17):
Quoting ScottB (Reply 12):And the airport looks like it's still stuck in the 1970's. Gray brick, low ceilings, and narrow hallways. It wouldn't work as a hub with many aircraft larger than a DC-9 or A319.

MEM is no worse than CLT in that regard. CLT does fine with what it has and so does MEM.

I know they added a new runway, or they're about to at least, but have they done any updates to their terminal space at CLT? If that's the case, then my sarcasm is out of line. My bad...



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 22923 posts, RR: 20
Reply 26, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2678 times:

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 25):
I know they added a new runway, or they're about to at least, but have they done any updates to their terminal space at CLT?

Well, D and the original part of E are only about 10 years old and IIRC B and C got facelifts around that time. Not brand new, to be sure, but certainly not 70s like MEM.

CLT and MEM are apples and oranges.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineenilria From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 7138 posts, RR: 13
Reply 27, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2510 times:

Quoting sdoyon (Reply 14):
Quoting enilria (Reply 13):
So whose metal is it? I hope it is WN metal unless the code share is truly fixed.

It's operated by FL.
Quoting ouboy79 (Reply 16):
Quoting enilria (Reply 13):
So whose metal is it? I hope it is WN metal unless the code share is truly fixed.

It's broke? News to me. Of course we've only seen the soft/limited launch of it right now so its hard to really judge it until full roll out takes place.

Well, this is a big deal then. MEM-MDW depends upon the code share. This is the first route they have announced in 18 months or so that expected code share to be functional. If they are now returning to scheduling as if there will be a code share (ATL-SDF expected a code share) then they must be very confident this time...or they are going to have more egg on their face...

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 18):
Quoting enilria (Reply 13):
Since WN has no hubs? If 15 flights is a hub and that's the most they will have, I guess you can choose to call that a hub.

I don't want to be caught up in semantics... a "large operation" or a MDW or BWI or something is what I meant

IMHO, if Delta closed the "hub" completely and had 20-23 flights per day, this is best case for MEM on WN and DL:

DL
8 ATL
4 DTW
4 MSP
2 LGA
2 DCA (maybe)
1 LAX (maybe)
1 SLC (probably not)
1 MCO

WN
4 ATL
2 MDW
2 HOU
2 DAL
1 PHX
1 LAS
1 MCO
1 FLL
2 BWI

I think B6 is very unlikely. F9 is a possibility as they have been there before and are now in CVG.


User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6560 posts, RR: 51
Reply 28, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2507 times:

This is far from scientific, but just as example of why MEM won't see anywhere close to the service it has now when DL closes up shop....

According to the latest numbers posted on faremeasure, MEM only has more than 100 PDEW to 22 cities. If/when the DL hub goes, MEM will realistically only be served from the major hub markets. MEM-LAX showed 234 daily passengers, which is probably enough for one nonstop on a 737 or A320 sized aircraft. That might be a market that DL would keep post hub closure, but who knows? I still don't see WN flying it. WN only serves cities nonstop from LAX east of (or on) the Mississippi River which have very strong O&D. 243 is a fair number, but it's nothing like what BNA, MDW, STL, ATL, BWI, MSY have...all cities flown by WN nonstop.

For comparison, I've posted the number of cities that see more than 100 PDEW from additional mid-sized metros.


CVG: 27
IND: 40
PIT: 41
MSY: 42
RDU: 45
SAT: 52


User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6751 posts, RR: 32
Reply 29, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2335 times:

Quoting selmer40 (Reply 15):
In the late 80s, before the improvements we have now, The Memphis NW/KL hub operated with large airplanes-at various times a 747, DC-10s, a 763, a MD-11, a A330, 753s, 752s, 722s, A320s as well as the mentioned DC9s and A319s. With five banks of flights and about 225 departures a day most of the airport's gates were well used.

I doubt the MEM hub was using an A330, an MD-11, or a 753 in the late 1980s. The MEM hub was always heavily reliant on smaller regional aircraft.

Quoting MSYtristar (Reply 21):
The only other cities that could realistically be added from MEM are HOU, DEN, and maybe LAS.

I think DAL-MEM is a lock post-2014. I don't think MEM-PHX is beyond the realm of possibility, either.


User currently offlineflyguy89 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 1914 posts, RR: 9
Reply 30, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2306 times:

Quoting MSYtristar (Reply 28):
This is far from scientific, but just as example of why MEM won't see anywhere close to the service it has now when DL closes up shop....

While indicative, there's definitely a level of stimulation in various markets which would occur with the introduction of lower fares. There's a good reason that MEM and CVG are only showing about half the number of markets with 100+ PDEW than even some smaller cities: Having among the highest if not THE highest airfares in the country.


User currently offlineFlyPeoria From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 434 posts, RR: 1
Reply 31, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2183 times:

Quoting ScottB (Reply 29):
Quoting selmer40 (Reply 15):
In the late 80s, before the improvements we have now, The Memphis NW/KL hub operated with large airplanes-at various times a 747, DC-10s, a 763, a MD-11, a A330, 753s, 752s, 722s, A320s as well as the mentioned DC9s and A319s. With five banks of flights and about 225 departures a day most of the airport's gates were well used.

I doubt the MEM hub was using an A330, an MD-11, or a 753 in the late 1980s. The MEM hub was always heavily reliant on smaller regional aircraft.

Well..."in the late 1980s," the A330 had yet to make its first flight. Same with the MD-11 and 757-300 but NW did use a 747-200 on a MEM-MSP roundtrip in 1987. I think they used DC-10s there as well.


User currently offlineJohnJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1657 posts, RR: 2
Reply 32, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2081 times:

Quoting FlyPeoria (Reply 31):
I think they used DC-10s there as well.

They did. Almost immediately after the RC/NW merger NW started bringing in DC-10s on the DTW route. I believe there are photos in the database of Northwest Orient-schemed DC-10s at MEM during that time period.


User currently offlineskycub From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 33, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2029 times:

Quoting selmer40 (Reply 15):
With five banks of flights and about 225 departures a day most of the airport's gates were well used.

When were there ever FIVE banks of flights a day in MEM? I am asking that honestly.....I always thought the NW MEM hub existed, mostly, of a three bank operation.

And looking at THIS:

http://www.departedflights.com/NWMEMhub.html

I see a lot of times where there were three, MAYBE four, flights a day to each destination.... but other than flights to some Airlink cities and other hub cities... I don't see where any destinations ever really had more than (usually) three or (occasionally) four flights a day....

While I agree with the number of flights... I am not sure about the number of banks.


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7565 posts, RR: 28
Reply 34, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1921 times:

MEM was historically a 3 bank hub that relied heavily on DC-9, 727, and turborprop aircraft. As 727s were phased out the A320 took its place. MEM got ARJs then got a heavy influx of CRJ aircraft to replace DC-9s & turboprops and/or add additional frequency.

MEM got a 4th bank that added an additional round of evening departures in about 2000, but it was then cut post-9/11. The 4th bank returned again for another brief period in about 2003-2004.

MEM never saw a significant amount of widebody (or even 757s) for that matter. MEM never saw more than 2-3 widebodies per day, and maybe about 5-10 757s at is peak. Yes AMS was operated by KLM MD-11, NW DC-10, NW/DL A330, and NW/DL 767. DTW & MSP saw DC-10 and 757 equipment on some flights throughout the day. Outside of those SEA & MCO saw 757 service:

Here is a breakdown of daily mainline operations:

June 1995: 111
DC9 77
320 20
727 7
757 6
MD11 1 (KLM- AMS)

June 2000: 132
DC9 87
319 4
320 25
727 5
757 9
DC10 2 (MSP & AMS)

June 2005: 92
DC9 54
319 18
320 17
757 3
DC10 1 (AMS)

June 2012: 35
DC9 5
319 5
320 13
M88 8
M90 2
738 1
767 1 (AMS)


User currently offlineselmer40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 98 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1772 times:

Quote:
Quoting skycub (reply 33)
When were there ever FIVE banks of flights a day in MEM?

My timetables for July 1986 and July 1987 show a fifth bank at 10 PM. A few exanples of departure times in the July 1987
timetable are-- to BHM 9.10a 12.45p 4.20p 8.00p 10.45p -- to DTW 8.55a 12.40p 4.15p 8.20p 10.40p --FSM 9.00a 12.35p 3.50p 8.15p 10.50p --to GLH 9.20a 12.50a 4.20p 8.20p 10.55p -- to HSV 9.10a 12.45p 4.20p 8.00p 10.45p --MSP 9.15a two flights 12.40p two flights 3.55p two flights 8.10p 10.45p --to MCO 8.55a 12.30p 4.15p 8.15p 10.40p --to TUP 6.20a 9.10a12.30p 3.55p 8.15p 1045p.........All of this is history. Returning to the now, the morning paper today says Southwest, with the new flights, may qualify for $375K from the airport competing service fund. Considering how Delta reacted in the ATL-COU market (pulling out) when American got funds, how will Delta react in MEM if Southwest gets funds?

[Edited 2013-02-05 13:21:47]

[Edited 2013-02-05 13:23:56]


Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 22923 posts, RR: 20
Reply 36, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1700 times:

Quoting selmer40 (Reply 35):
Considering how Delta reacted in the ATL-COU market (pulling out) when American got funds, how will Delta react in MEM if Southwest gets funds?

Apples and oranges (I feel like I've said that a lot in this thread). DL doesn't give a rip about COU. At least for now, DL is the carrier of choice for MEM locals.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlinepwm2txlhopper From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1324 posts, RR: 1
Reply 37, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1468 times:

I use to fly BOS to MEM on NW 757's -more than a few times- during the mid 1990s.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FL And New SAN Service posted Mon Apr 2 2007 11:32:31 by SANFan
US Announces New PDX Service! posted Mon Mar 12 2007 16:58:46 by HPRamper
Frontier Announces New YVR Service posted Tue Dec 12 2006 16:06:11 by NZblue
JetBlue Announces New SAN Service posted Tue Mar 18 2003 16:04:39 by FlyCMH
EK Announces New Service To IAD posted Thu Mar 15 2012 05:12:56 by globalflyer
Spirit Airlines Announces New Service To Orlando posted Tue Jan 24 2012 18:45:03 by southwest737500
Alaska Announces New Service Via Horizon Air posted Tue Jan 17 2012 20:44:45 by ASFlyer
CO Announces New Service: ORD-FLL/PBI & DEN-FLL posted Wed Nov 17 2010 10:13:44 by globalflyer
British Airways Announces New Service To San Juan posted Sun Oct 10 2010 19:23:45 by wladi755
Hawaiian Announces New OGG-LAS Service posted Wed Jun 9 2010 23:25:02 by HALFA