Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Google Plans To Build New Hangar At SJC  
User currently offlineboeing773ER From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 441 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 9843 times:

Link

Google plans to build an $82 Million dollar private hangar at SJC airport for their own private use.

It is planned to house 8 Jets of their top 3 executives, which one includes a 767.


Work Hard, Fly Right.
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offline26point2 From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 856 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 9809 times:

Any idea what is happening with the Google Moffett Field hangar lease? Perhaps it's coming to an end.

Wonder where the new complex will be built at KSJC. Old and no longer used Long Term Lot is my guess.


User currently offlinewedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5950 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 9622 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

There's plenty of room for a large hangar for Google.

User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1652 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 9497 times:

Did SJC lift the Curfew ??

Why would google want to put planes at SJC when they can operate 24/7 at Moffet Field or someplace else ?? Or did SJC now becme a 24 Hour airport ??


User currently offlineHumanitarian From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 106 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 9456 times:

Quoting COSPN (Reply 3):
Why would google want to put planes at SJC when they can operate 24/7 at Moffet Field or someplace else ??

Because they are likely to be asked to leave Moffett sometime in the future. Also, the aircraft owners and Google go to great lengths to say these aircraft having nothing to do with Google. They are privately owned by the two founders and former CEO of Google. Btw, I believe these three guys still own the majority of Google stock.


User currently onlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6194 posts, RR: 24
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 9046 times:

Quoting COSPN (Reply 3):
Did SJC lift the Curfew ??

Why would google want to put planes at SJC when they can operate 24/7 at Moffet Field or someplace else ?? Or did SJC now becme a 24 Hour airport

Very, very loose curfew rules. There are minimal issue's arriving after curfew and I believe a small fine to depart after curfew.



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7959 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 8995 times:

Hmmm let me guess, it's going to be made of chrome?   

Quoting COSPN (Reply 3):
Did SJC lift the Curfew ??

I thought private jets were exempt from the curfew?



Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 544 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 8975 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 6):
I thought private jets were exempt from the curfew?

I was just about to post saying that they aren't, but then I found this in a Google search:

Noise,not Size:San Jose Changes Curfew Policy (by Gamps Oct 14 2003 in Civil Aviation)



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlineb764 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 758 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 8110 times:

Besides the 767, anyone know the makeup of the Google fleet? I know in the past there were a few G-Vs.

User currently offline26point2 From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 856 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 7067 times:

Google made a pitch to pay for refurbishment of the iconic old Moffett Field dirigible hangar built to house the US Navy Macon airship. In return Google would lease part of hangar for their fleet. Evidently terms could not be agreed to so Google looked elsewhere for a secure long term lease. Seems things where difficult partly because Moffett is a US Government/NASA facility who wouldn't commit to a long term solution.

Signature is building a new FBO at KSJC and the Google folks are joining that venture.


User currently offlineeclipseflight7 From Somalia, joined Apr 2004, 518 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 6801 times:

San Jose's development came at the right time with Moffett's relatively hostile response to infrastructure development. That's some significant capital going into SJC, and it's creating value for SJC, Google, and Signature, more than the empty lots had before. The losers are the lease holders of Blue City Holdings current facilities, and Atlantic also loses a sole source location.


Holy sh*ts and burritos.
User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 544 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 5056 times:

Quoting b764 (Reply 8):
Besides the 767, anyone know the makeup of the Google fleet? I know in the past there were a few G-Vs.

I can't say how I know this, but they have one Boeing 767 and one Boeing 757. I don't know about the rest of their fleet.

Quoting 26point2 (Reply 9):
Signature is building a new FBO at KSJC and the Google folks are joining that venture.

I heard something about this on the news last night, but they didn't say where on the field Signature's FBO's going to be. Does anyone know for sure? I'm hoping it's going to be on the west side somewhere near Atlantic...



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offline71Zulu From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3088 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4980 times:

Quoting as739x (Reply 5):
Very, very loose curfew rules. There are minimal issue's arriving after curfew and I believe a small fine to depart after curfew.

Would the 49ers be able to get around the curfew? I have seen them use SFO in the wee hours of the morning but then last night this AS flight landed at 1:45am. Is it because the AS flight was running late?


http://flightaware.com/live/flight/A...2/history/20130209/0045Z/PHOG/KSJC



The good old days: Delta L-1011s at MSY
User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 544 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4945 times:

Quoting 71Zulu (Reply 12):
last night this AS flight landed at 1:45am. Is it because the AS flight was running late?

In my experience, it's not uncommon to see a delayed flight landing past curfew. OTOH, I've also seen short flights that were running late and ended up being cancelled because they were going to land after curfew (a US PHX-SJC flight I was waiting for a few years back comes to mind). I would venture to guess that the distance of the flight has an effect i.e. a Hawaii or a transcon (one of the few that's left) that's projecting to land after curfew will still take off, whereas a short flight will just cancel instead.



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlineeclipseflight7 From Somalia, joined Apr 2004, 518 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4887 times:

Quoting warden145 (Reply 11):
I heard something about this on the news last night, but they didn't say where on the field Signature's FBO's going to be. Does anyone know for sure? I'm hoping it's going to be on the west side somewhere near Atlantic..

SJC put up two sections for bid, the area north of Atlantic and the area south of Atlantic and the other hangar complex that would've demolished the area where the GA aircraft hangars are now. Based on the designs shown and the scope of the project, Signature are taking the area north of Atlantic. There is another parcel farther north that I believe is being reserved for future development.



Holy sh*ts and burritos.
User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 544 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4738 times:

Quoting eclipseflight7 (Reply 14):
SJC put up two sections for bid, the area north of Atlantic and the area south of Atlantic and the other hangar complex that would've demolished the area where the GA aircraft hangars are now. Based on the designs shown and the scope of the project, Signature are taking the area north of Atlantic. There is another parcel farther north that I believe is being reserved for future development.

Thank you! I'm guessing the two parcels you're talking about are the two old long-term lots (AFAIK they're not being used anymore) along Martin north of Brokaw? I wonder if they'll extend Aviation to connect it to the Martin/Brokaw intersection while they're at it?



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlineJetBlueGuy2006 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1665 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4561 times:

The drawings are impressive:

http://www.flysanjose.com/fl/about/n..._releases/Signature_Renderings.pdf



Home Airport: Capital Region International Airport (KLAN)
User currently offlineLimaNiner From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 404 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 4441 times:

Bummer -- they could practically bike from their homes to Moffett, now they have to take 101, which sucks when there's traffic.  

User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 544 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 4171 times:

Quoting JetBlueGuy2006 (Reply 16):
The drawings are impressive:

http://www.flysanjose.com/fl/about/n..._releases/Signature_Renderings.pdf

Thank you for the file...HOLY MARY, they're getting ambitious! This will put Signature's SFO ops to shame...are they going to run the two stations concurrently, or are they thinking of ditching SFO in favor of SJC? (it would surprise me if they ditched SFO, but given how big this operation's proposed to be, I can't help but wonder)

As long as the SJC station has fresh-baked chocolate chip cookies like SFO usually does...   

Quoting JetBlueGuy2006 (Reply 16):
Bummer -- they could practically bike from their homes to Moffett, now they have to take 101, which sucks when there's traffic.

There's always Central Expressway or the 280...for that matter, depending on where they live, the 280 might be a better bet in any event...



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1652 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3964 times:

So what was all the fuss about Oracle CEO Larry Ellison flying in late to SJC and paying huge fines or denided landing and having to go elsewhere??

from wikipedia.org

Ellison is a licensed pilot who has owned several aircraft. He was cited by the City of San Jose, California, for violating its limits on late-night takeoffs and landings from San Jose Mineta International Airport by planes weighing more than 75,000 pounds (34 019 kg). In January 2000, Ellison sued over the interpretation of the airport rule, contending that his Gulfstream V "plane is certified by the manufacturer to fly at two weights: 75,000 pounds, and at 90,000 pounds, for heavier loads or long flights requiring more fuel. But the pilot only lands the plane in San Jose when it weighs 75,000 pounds or less, and has the logs to prove it..."[39] U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel ruled over the matter in June 2001, calling for a waiver for Ellison's jet, but did not invalidate the curfew.[40]



I just remeber in my mind "ok add SJU to the NIMBY list like BUR"

[Edited 2013-02-09 17:00:13]

User currently offlineDiamondFlyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1630 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3911 times:

Quoting 26point2 (Reply 9):
Google made a pitch to pay for refurbishment of the iconic old Moffett Field dirigible hangar built to house the US Navy Macon airship. In return Google would lease part of hangar for their fleet. Evidently terms could not be agreed to so Google looked elsewhere for a secure long term lease. Seems things where difficult partly because Moffett is a US Government/NASA facility who wouldn't commit to a long term solution.

This is probably the beginning of the end for Moffett. Which is a shame, because that airship hangar could be valuable in the future. Yes, they still have the wooden airship hangars, but the rigid hangar is resource that once gone, will never come back. And without some external covering, I don't see it lasting much longer.

-DiamondFlyer


User currently offlineeclipseflight7 From Somalia, joined Apr 2004, 518 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3794 times:

Quoting warden145 (Reply 15):
Thank you! I'm guessing the two parcels you're talking about are the two old long-term lots (AFAIK they're not being used anymore) along Martin north of Brokaw? I wonder if they'll extend Aviation to connect it to the Martin/Brokaw intersection while they're at it?

I didn't see street names, but those were the areas clearly marked in the RFP. I think this is taking another 1/3 of the west side of the airport, but I know it was adjacent to Atlanic.

Quoting warden145 (Reply 18):
Thank you for the file...HOLY MARY, they're getting ambitious! This will put Signature's SFO ops to shame...are they going to run the two stations concurrently, or are they thinking of ditching SFO in favor of SJC? (it would surprise me if they ditched SFO, but given how big this operation's proposed to be, I can't help but wonder)

As long as the SJC station has fresh-baked chocolate chip cookies like SFO usually does

If you want to see ambitious, look at Signatures renderings for the new Luton. SFO isn't going anywhere, because network matters, and no company will willingly give up a sole source location at a major airport.

Those cookies are at every location, and they're baked after lunch daily. Although they might catch your game if you happen to wander in for desert everyday.



Holy sh*ts and burritos.
User currently offlineaal151heavy From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 107 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3673 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting b764 (Reply 8):
Besides the 767, anyone know the makeup of the Google fleet? I know in the past there were a few G-Vs.

Here are some of them, including one with a fake Netjets "QS" reg.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ben Wang


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ben Wang


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © John R. Beckman


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gail Richard Snyder, III



Here is an investigative report done by one of the local TV stations about the google fleet using Moffett Field:

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/tech/150386125.html


User currently onlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6194 posts, RR: 24
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3505 times:

Quoting 71Zulu (Reply 12):
Would the 49ers be able to get around the curfew? I have seen them use SFO in the wee hours of the morning but then last night this AS flight landed at 1:45am. Is it because the AS flight was running late?

Yes, there were no issues this season when the Niners returned from late East coast games. The only issue I could see is coming back from playing the rare International game. Years back, the Niners returned from MEX (2005 I believe) and needed to use SFO due to Customs.

As you can see in your example with the AS flight there are no real issues arriving after curfew.



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 544 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3418 times:

Quoting eclipseflight7 (Reply 21):
If you want to see ambitious, look at Signatures renderings for the new Luton. SFO isn't going anywhere, because network matters, and no company will willingly give up a sole source location at a major airport.

Those cookies are at every location, and they're baked after lunch daily. Although they might catch your game if you happen to wander in for desert everyday.

Like I said, I would be surprised if they were to leave SFO, particularly considering that for all practical purposes they're the only FBO at SFO...just, with plans for such a large station so close by, the question had to be asked.  

Re: the cookies, I don't go to Signature unless I'm picking someone up there (however, given the nature of my work, that's a fairly regular occurrence). Depending on who's on duty at the front desk at SFO, sometimes I get dirty looks, but when a plane gets delayed and I'm required to be on location, it's a much better place to wait than Terminal 3-F   



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlinebthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 522 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3037 times:

OP is a bit misleading. Google aren't building the hanger, SJC are and have given the contract to Signature. Operations won't be limited to Google jets - although they will clearly be a prime customer.

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...-at-silicon-valley-airport-382125/


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
$17 Billion To Build New Airport At San Diego posted Wed Apr 19 2006 19:43:38 by KarlB737
AirTran To Build New Hanger At ATL posted Thu Aug 29 2002 19:32:41 by Hartsfieldboy
Lufthansa Plans To Start New Low Cost Airline posted Sun Sep 16 2012 03:24:14 by kl911
CLT To Build New Runway posted Mon Aug 27 2012 19:40:53 by USAirALB
Peru To Build A New Cusco Airport posted Thu Aug 23 2012 10:33:09 by STT757
Latam Plans To Open 4 New Destinations In Europe posted Tue Jul 24 2012 05:35:19 by SCL767
Lufthansa To Build Satellite T2 At MUC posted Thu Dec 23 2010 04:31:36 by B6A322
What's In A Name? Plans To Build Orgi Airport posted Thu Jul 29 2010 00:27:58 by TK787
Aer Lingus To Anchor New Terminal 2 At Dublin posted Fri Jun 25 2010 09:00:49 by bestwestern
Airbus To Build New Higher Weight A380 Variant posted Tue May 18 2010 06:18:35 by aviationbuff