Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No CX F Class To Australia?  
User currently offlinenickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1485 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 5753 times:

Just wondering if anyone has any ideas why there is no First Class offered on any of Cathay's flights to Australia. Obviously, I can see why there is no need to, for example ADL and CNS, but I'm surprised there's no market for one daily flight to MEL and SYD on a 77W with First Class. I realise they're going for frequency in the market, but still a bit surprised that they don't want to offer First Class fares between Australia and Europe.

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8290 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5392 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting nickofatlanta (Thread starter):
daily flight to MEL and SYD on a 77W with First Class. I realise they're going for frequency in the market, but still a bit surprised that they don't want to offer First Class fares between Australia and Europe.

No demand for First Class on Cathay from HKG to Sydney ? Hey QF flies their A380 to HKG so there has to be some First demand.


User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17367 posts, RR: 46
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5376 times:

There is very little true F demand out there in general, but there are plenty of F seats by comparison chasing that tiny demand, so if CX doesn't send any F seats to Australia, it's probably because there is no demand. In spite of SQ's 380s to SYD, they still send plenty of 333s to Australia, and SYD was the first destination for Scoot. I suspect AustraliaAsia is so hyper-competitive and leisure heavy at this point that there is no reason for F.


E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlinetayser From Australia, joined Mar 2008, 1125 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5364 times:

8-9 hours to Hong Kong - Business will give you a bed of some concoction - First class I can understand paying the extra on a AU-EU flight or AU-US flight, but Asia, J makes do.

$0.02


User currently offlinecarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2951 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5332 times:

I thought some of CX's A333s had first-class. That's one of the reasons we hardly saw those sub-types in Japan.
Or did they get rid of that sub-fleet?


User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5298 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5171 times:

Quoting carpethead (Reply 4):
I thought some of CX's A333s had first-class. That's one of the reasons we hardly saw those sub-types in Japan.
Or did they get rid of that sub-fleet?

All converted to 3 class several years ago now.

Re the 77Ws, CX has routes that need the range of the 77W.


User currently offlinektachiya From Japan, joined Sep 2004, 1792 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 5074 times:

Quoting carpethead (Reply 4):
I thought some of CX's A333s had first-class. That's one of the reasons we hardly saw those sub-types in Japan.
Or did they get rid of that sub-fleet?

Is it the ones with 260 seats or so??? We saw one of the birds at Centrair the other day but would it have even less seats than that if it were configured with F?



Flown on: DC-10-30, B747-200B, B747-300, B747-300SR, B747-400, B747-400D, B767-300, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-300
User currently offlineCX Flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6588 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4871 times:

There are some rumblings about maybe some type changes on a couple of the Australian routes within CX. Nothing announced as yet but they are going to be reviewing their strategies.

User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5298 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4802 times:

Quoting CX Flyboy (Reply 7):
There are some rumblings about maybe some type changes on a couple of the Australian routes within CX. Nothing announced as yet but they are going to be reviewing their strategies.

It was mentioned a while back about the possibility of 77Ws to Australia on some flights maybe 1 each to SYD and MEL. Maybe even 744s in the short term since HKG-SYD/MEL is shorter than LAX/SFO burning less fuel. They could use the 77Ws elsewhere, not to say that 77Ws would be what they are even planning.

AKL had First seasonally for a few years when they ran the 744s here in the NZ summer, they only ran the 744s for additional Y seating not so they could sell F though.


User currently offlinecarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2951 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4717 times:

Quoting carpethead (Reply 4):
All converted to 3 class several years ago now.

Thanks. So much for keeping up to date.
I assume 3-class is biz, premium economy, and economy.


User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5298 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4647 times:

Quoting carpethead (Reply 9):
I assume 3-class is biz, premium economy, and economy.

That should of read 2 class, many of these aircraft will now be 3 class with J, Y+, Y.


User currently offlineCXB77L From Australia, joined Feb 2009, 2597 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4044 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 1):
Hey QF flies their A380 to HKG so there has to be some First demand.

Some, yes, but I'd imagine that if there was sufficient demand, CX will be sending F equipped aircraft there. The only CX aircraft with F are the 777-300ERs with 6 F seats, or the 747-400 with 9. If they can't fill 6 F seats regularly on flights to HKG they'd probably be better off flying the route without F.

Quoting CX Flyboy (Reply 7):
There are some rumblings about maybe some type changes on a couple of the Australian routes within CX. Nothing announced as yet but they are going to be reviewing their strategies.

I suppose even if there were some type changes it wouldn't affect PER. It would be nice to see them send something other than A333s here  



Boeing 777 fanboy
User currently offlineklinit From Australia, joined Jan 2013, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3944 times:

Quoting tayser (Reply 3):
8-9 hours to Hong Kong - Business will give you a bed of some concoction - First class I can understand paying the extra on a AU-EU flight or AU-US flight, but Asia, J makes do.

Although all I ever see of first class is the ten second glance as I keep walking to the back of the plane, a significant chunk of the Aus-HK traffic on CX is part of an Aus-EU(or even US) itinerary for quite a lot of passengers....


User currently offlinecrAAzy From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 773 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2124 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CX Flyboy (Reply 7):
There are some rumblings about maybe some type changes on a couple of the Australian routes within CX. Nothing announced as yet but they are going to be reviewing their strategies.

I tend to think there may be some truth to these rumblings seeing CX's strategy into LHR using a the mix of 4 class and 3 class equipment now. If true, it would be a welcome change to have F back on CX into AUS ... although it will likely be a too little late for my AONE6 this July (not that I'm complaining about QF's A380 on the route for a few days/week).


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No ANA Services To Australia/New Zealand? posted Thu Sep 15 2005 20:56:45 by B742
Why No 757's To Australia? posted Fri Feb 2 2001 02:48:27 by Aduum
Why No CX To TLV? posted Sun Oct 15 2006 20:50:06 by 7474ever
USA Airlines To SEA & BLI; Why No Bus Link To YVR posted Fri Nov 16 2012 19:24:03 by kamloops
Why No International Charters To North Korea? posted Fri Nov 9 2012 15:00:42 by 777way
Why No CX In ZRH? posted Sun Dec 11 2011 08:58:19 by winGl3t
Why No USA Equal To The Paris/Farnbourgh posted Tue Jul 20 2010 19:53:14 by rsmith6621a
Why No EK A380 To BOM/DEL? posted Tue Mar 30 2010 07:12:51 by jayeshrulz
Why No A340 Pax To Freight Conversions? posted Sat Mar 6 2010 04:20:18 by olle
Why No US Carriers To KUL posted Wed Mar 3 2010 16:27:03 by Qantas777