Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Does United Want A Fuel Refinery In NJ?  
User currently offlineWDBRR From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 611 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 5240 times:

Hess is closing their Woodbridge NJ fuel refinery
which is very close to Newark Airport...
I know Delta bought one some time ago, would
United consider since it's close to the EWR hub?

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinekgaiflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 4287 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5136 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If this is the Hess refinery that's visible from the NJ Turnpike, it is fairly elderly. I imagine keeping it maintained and running efficiently would be fairly expensive. I don't see how refining "Jet A" and selling nothing else would lead to anything but losses.

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16877 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5115 times:

UA management had stated they were going to see how it worked out for DL, there's plenty of available refineries in the Northeast becoming idle. Here's an article about Buckeye pipeline purchasing the Chevron facility in Perth Amboy, the article talks about DL's recent refinery deal and that Buckeye was also going to refine Bakken shale oil from Montana, North Dakota and Canada at the Perth Amboy facility.

Quote:
Buckeye’s plan is driven by changing dynamics in crude oil markets—while supplies are tight on the East Coast, a glut of oil exists in the western United States thanks in part to increased production of "Bakken’’ shale oil from Montana, the Dakotas and Canada. That makes it profitable for Buckeye to transport crude Bakken shale oil by train, and other oil supplies by boat from a hub in the Bahamas.

"We expect to spend approximately $200 million to $225 million of growth capital at Perth Amboy over the next three years to modernize the facility, transform it into a highly efficient multiproduct storage, blending and throughput facility," said Clark Smith, Buckeye’s CEO, on a recent earnings call

Now this is the interesting part of the article:

Quote:
High crude prices in the Northeast had prompted recent refinery sales including that of Philadelphia-area facility Trainer bought by Delta Airlines. Some analysts said unless it imported cheaper oil by train or boat, Delta would be hard pressed to make money.

But now Buckeye is exploring the option of importing Bakken crude by train at the behest of several unidentified customers.

The company’s management is keeping an eye on the jet fuel market as it also considers expanding pipelines to John F. Kennedy International Airport in the future, according to an investor presentation this spring.

After reading that excerpt it almost seems like they're hinting that one of their unidentified customers is an airline.

http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf...erth_amboy_refinery_to_get_ne.html



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlinePellegrine From France, joined Mar 2007, 2449 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5094 times:

This whole business is a joke to me. There is a reason for NE refineries going idle and being put into shutdown mode. That airlines are eyeing them now is beyond a joke.


oh boy!!!
User currently offlineluv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12113 posts, RR: 49
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 4904 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Pellegrine (Reply 3):
This whole business is a joke to me. There is a reason for NE refineries going idle and being put into shutdown mode. That airlines are eyeing them now is beyond a joke.

I have to agree, time will tell if the move was smart for DL, IMHO I think not.



You can cut the irony with a knife
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21654 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4744 times:

Quoting Pellegrine (Reply 3):
There is a reason for NE refineries going idle and being put into shutdown mode. That airlines are eyeing them now is beyond a joke.

   If Hess, an oil company, thinks the refinery doesn't have value anymore, why would an airline want it?

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineWDBRR From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 611 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4701 times:

Wouldn't fuel prices go up with less
refining facilities to keep up with demand?
Thought the airlines would want to keep
their fuel costs down.


User currently offlineburnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4621 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 2):
After reading that excerpt it almost seems like they're hinting that one of their unidentified customers is an airline.

DL has already stated they would be getting oil from Bakken.



"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlineTan Flyr From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1909 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4617 times:

This whole NE refining business is about as clear as crude oil..but there are some fundamentals that have to be recognized. These include:

The shutdown of the HOVENSA refinery in St. Croix was prompted by the EPA not giving a waiver on the fuel used to process (distill and crack) crude oils. They would have to IMPORT Natural Gas (LNG) to fuel teh refinery. Way too costly..result ..shut 'er down.

The export from Rotterdam (and a bit from the UK) of excess gasoline supplies since their consumers have shifted to more Diesels. Shell exports quite a bit to Montreal & NY, others to NYC, Boston & Philly. Add the fact that Irving Oil in Canada has a very modern and efficient refinery that exports over 150,000 barrells a day of finished fuels to varioys facilites in Maine, Boston and NYC at very competive pricing.

Most of the current refineries in PA/ NJ/ DE were set up to refine light to Medium African crudes , then Brent type crude from the North Sea and a bit of Arabian light...all easy to refine, but more costly raw materials.

PBF noted in December they are having built thousands of new Rail Tanker cars to bring unit trains of Bakken Light or Alberta Crudes to its' refinery in Delaware.. Taking advantage of tremendous cost differences. They seem to think it will take years for regualtors to approve any new pipelines from teh midwest to SE PA/ NJ/ Delaware area.(and probabaly not during the current administration)

and maybe the most intersting of all, actuall overall Gasoline consumption is down in the US..in many areas back to 2002 levels...hardly an incentive to re-hab older facilites and deal with current Government red-tape.

The upgraded and expanded Shell refinery in Port Arthur Texas, and the Marathon in Garyville, LA have added over 500,000 barrels of new capacity in the last few years (projects started over 10 years ago.) The problem with moving this refined product via barge (vs existing pipeline capacity from there to the mid-atlantic area) is antiquated US MAritime laws that state it must be hauled on US flagged tankers...there are very few if any of those available. Foreign flagged vessels could do it at very attractive rates.

So, long and short, you have to give DL the opportunity to see results thru several years and changing economic conditions before making any verdict. IF UA were to decide sometime to get into teh business, the logical parter is VAlero with its Bayonne, NJ ( one of the original Standard Oil refineries from 1909)


User currently offlinepanamair From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 4913 posts, RR: 25
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4540 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting burnsie28 (Reply 7):
DL has already stated they would be getting oil from Bakken.

Apparently, the first shipment of Bakken crude arrived at Trainer this week:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/nd-oil...shipped-pa-refinery-155139779.html


User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4308 times:

Quoting WDBRR (Reply 6):

Wouldn't fuel prices go up with less
refining facilities to keep up with demand?
Thought the airlines would want to keep
their fuel costs down.

Yes, and that's a reason being cited for the most recent jump in gas prices in the last week.

Delta's purchase of a refinery is something that is the gas prices continue to rise (Fuel prices right now are at levels more akin to the summertime than February.) may be something that was a smart idea. Could UA or another airline look into buying their own refinery? Of course they could, but as UA has stated, they want to see how it pans out for DL.


User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4549 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3949 times:

Are you kidding me, UAL management is so far behind the times they think we still use Radials..


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlinetommy767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6584 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3854 times:

I don't think UA would want to deal with all the NJ taxes that would be thrown upon them if they owned a refinery.


"Folks that's the news and I'm outta here!" -- Dennis Miller
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16877 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3818 times:

Quoting tommy767 (Reply 12):
I don't think UA would want to deal with all the NJ taxes that would be thrown upon them if they owned a refinery.

Speaking of taxes NJ has the fourth lowest gas tax in the US, ever see the lines of NY or PA license plates waiting for fuel on the Turnpike.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineTWA772LR From United States of America, joined Nov 2011, 2112 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3628 times:

Sounds like a stupid question but, why wouldn't UA buy a refinery in Houston? You know, the oil capital of the western hemisphere and location of their largest hub? I'm sure there are a few unused refineries in the area... Also with the taxes previous posters have stated, wouldn't the Texas taxes on oil and gas be lower?


Go coogs! \n//
User currently offlinesolarflyer22 From US Minor Outlying Islands, joined Nov 2009, 1101 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3572 times:

Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 14):
Sounds like a stupid question but, why wouldn't UA buy a refinery in Houston? You know, the oil capital of the western hemisphere and location of their largest hub? I'm sure there are a few unused refineries in the area... Also with the taxes previous posters have stated, wouldn't the Texas taxes on oil and gas be lower?

This is a complicated issue though I was in favor of what Delta did. In Houston, there are very few "Small" refineries for sale that would be suitable. You need a relatively small one for Jet A otherwise, you are kind of stuck being both a refiner and a airline. Ideally you want to only produce slightly more than what the airline consumes.

I think there is also a wall street penalty for public airlines for this. They don't like the combined entity. Its hard for them to value and its like mixing two totally different stocks together. Sounds mundane buts its quite true.


User currently offlinejayunited From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 950 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3290 times:

I think the jury is still out on this issue DL still needs to be given more time to properly see if their refinery is actually paying off which will probably take another year before the airline industry is able to get a really clear picture. United told employees and investors that they would take a wait and see approach to this business of owning a refinery. So even if there is some interest United will not make a move until they can be absolutely sure that owning a refinery can indeed offset some of the airlines fuel cost.

User currently offlinebrilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 4251 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2408 times:

Quoting kgaiflyer (Reply 1):
If this is the Hess refinery that's visible from the NJ Turnpike, it is fairly elderly. I imagine keeping it maintained and running efficiently would be fairly expensive. I don't see how refining "Jet A" and selling nothing else would lead to anything but losses.

They are not going to make money on their refineries, they are not in the fuel business. They are probably thinking that if they could secure their supply of fuel; they would not be at the mercy of the oil companies as much. It allows for a degee of certainty in their fuel expenses that they can control. That is the reason UA is looking at this purchase.



Rush for ever; Yankees all the way!!
User currently offlineUALWN From Andorra, joined Jun 2009, 2815 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2012 times:

Quoting solarflyer22 (Reply 15):
You need a relatively small one for Jet A otherwise, you are kind of stuck being both a refiner and a airline.

It has been said in a recent thread devoted to DL's refinery that right now only 20% of its production is Jet A. The rest, DL has to sell it (or barter it for Jet A) in the open market. DL wants to bring that 20% up to 33%, but some experts think that might be hard. So, yes, DL is now both an airline and a refiner.



AT7/111/146/Avro/CRJ/CR9/EMB/ERJ/E75/F50/100/L15/DC9/D10/M8X/717/727/737/747/757/767/777/AB6/310/319/320/321/330/340/380
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Does EK Want What It Wants In A A350/787? posted Fri May 6 2005 11:01:14 by Atmx2000
UA 737 Blown Into Fuel Truck In BUF posted Sun Jan 20 2013 09:22:29 by n797mx
Does WN Only Fly 73NG's In/Out Of MDW? posted Sun Sep 30 2012 22:10:23 by flaps30
Why Does AC Have Two Hangars In YVR? posted Sun Sep 9 2012 18:48:44 by multimark
Airbus To Start Testing Fuel Cells In A320 (2015) posted Wed Aug 8 2012 01:09:08 by Bralo20
Will United Serve South Africa In The Near Future? posted Sun Jul 1 2012 19:07:54 by GSP psgr
Airlines Who Want To Be In An Alliance, But Can't posted Fri Jan 20 2012 04:34:01 by VC10er
3 Dead In NJ Plane Crash posted Tue Dec 20 2011 09:45:57 by AirlineCritic
Does AC Serve More Destinations In Canada Or US? posted Mon Nov 28 2011 20:34:46 by aio86
Iran Air - Fuel Bans In Europe Question posted Sun Jan 2 2011 05:32:49 by Yirina77