Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Very Slight Change In Lufthansa Livery  
User currently offlineLZ129 From Germany, joined Feb 2013, 85 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 24428 times:

I can't take any credit for noticing this - the keen observer was a friend of mine - but is it possible, that without making anything public, Lufthansa have changed their livery? I will admit, it is a very very very slight change, but compare the front of D-AIKE

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Lufth...d=d9c94f09d806e0b3decb758111e51e00

to the newer D-AIKR

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Lufth...d=64dfb0137083fe5e7bdd2c738a81d0ab

and you will notice that the ventral grey covers different portions of the radome.

Does anybody here have an explanation for this? And is it noteworthy at all or is this a normal modus operandi for an airline?

32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15739 posts, RR: 27
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 24190 times:

Quoting LZ129 (Thread starter):
Does anybody here have an explanation for this?

Maybe it's just easier to paint the radome all one color.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlinecbphoto From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1555 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 24078 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 1):
Maybe it's just easier to paint the radome all one color.

If I had to guess, I would say this as well. The radome is a different material and does require I believe a different paint technique to be applied to it. I am going off my memory on that, so I could be wrong, but it would seem to make sense!



ETOPS: Engines Turning or Passengers Swimming
User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6138 posts, RR: 23
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 24008 times:

Is it just me, or in the first pic, doesn't it look like the gray under coat starts to slant up a little just behind the pitot tubes?? This could be the difference between the two.


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15739 posts, RR: 27
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 23964 times:

Quoting cbphoto (Reply 2):
The radome is a different material and does require I believe a different paint technique to be applied to it. I am going off my memory on that,

They're usually painted separately I think. Once in a while you'll even see one that's been painted upside down.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlineLZ129 From Germany, joined Feb 2013, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 23964 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 1):
Maybe it's just easier to paint the radome all one color.

The problem is, they still cover some of the radome in grey. Wouldn't they have left it white completely if that was the reason for the change?

You can see it better in this picture:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Lufth...d=ec88c949140011bf63857e2a3a9b6c05

[Edited 2013-02-20 10:35:06]

User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15739 posts, RR: 27
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 23911 times:

Quoting LZ129 (Reply 5):
The problem is, they still cover some of the radome in grey.

Good catch. If not that, it may just be a variation between different paint shops. It wouldn't be the first time they just did something a little bit off.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlineLZ129 From Germany, joined Feb 2013, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 23861 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 6):
Good catch. If not that, it may just be a variation between different paint shops.

I thought so, too, but D-AIKQ shows the same change, so it seems to be something they did deliberately.

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Lufth...d=1695439cb51004d0d754f632e5cd531a


User currently offlineLZ129 From Germany, joined Feb 2013, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 23795 times:

I just checked again and the change is on D-AIKP, D-AIKQ and D-AIKR - in other words: on all the frames delivered in 2012.

User currently offlinena From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10731 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 23456 times:

Didnt notice that so far, thanks. Surely that has to do with the radome issue.
One thing that changed recently is the registration on LH planes. LH used the LH Corporate font before which perfectly matches the logos, the authorities forced the airline to use a less elegant standard font based on the DIN now.


User currently onlineYYCSpotter From Canada, joined Jul 2012, 190 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 18773 times:

One other thing that I noticed, was the lack of naming of the aircraft. has LH stopped naming their aircraft?


I
User currently offlinena From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10731 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 18482 times:

Quoting YYCSpotter (Reply 10):
One other thing that I noticed, was the lack of naming of the aircraft. has LH stopped naming their aircraft?

That refers to most airplanes aquired in the past few years (except the fleet "flagships" A380s and 747-8s which all carry names). LH seems to be very slow with naming aircraft recently, although a few of the latest deliveries have names. Odd when so many names are free now that one third of the 737s have gone to the scrappers in the past one-and-a-half years.

But its not a change in policy, maybe they job positions responsible have been axed in the cost cutting process.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12142 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 17979 times:

It looks line all they did was lower the waterline between the two colors, maybe by about 3" (76 mm). That way the radome is all white, at least on the A-333 and A-343. What about the rest of the fleet, like the B-744/8s?

The color change on the radar does not effect the efficency of the weather radar. But, I believe they don't use lacquer (oil based), but do use an emulsion paint (water based). The different types of paints can be color matched.


User currently offlineB757forever From United States of America, joined May 2010, 401 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 17470 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 1):
Maybe it's just easier to paint the radome all one color.

Many airlines avoid liveries that require multiple colors on parts such as radomes, engine cowls etc. These parts, unlike most of the aircraft, are sometimes replaced due to damage. Having these parts painted in all one color avoids the mis-match issues you may have if your spares are not masked and sprayed in an identical fashion. The radome and engine cowlings are highly visible and any mis-match looks terribly un-professional.


User currently offlinehorstroad From Germany, joined Apr 2010, 268 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 17049 times:

the line between the white upper fuselage and the grey belly is defined by the leading edge and trailing edge of the wings. it usually follows the respective water line*. it seems that in the "old" paint scheme this line goes horizontal where the fuselage narrows towards the nose. due to the nose down pitch of A330 and A340 the line seems to be bent upwards. withe the "new" paint scheme they follow the water line all the way to the random. I think the paint shops got new guidelines when someone realized that this bend looks odd



*I'm not sure if the term water line is correct, as the fuselage has a nose down orientation. on these aircraft, does the water line follow the stringer or is it parallel to the ground when the aircraft is on the ground?


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12142 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 16888 times:

Quoting horstroad (Reply 14):
*I'm not sure if the term water line is correct, as the fuselage has a nose down orientation. on these aircraft, does the water line follow the stringer or is it parallel to the ground when the aircraft is on the ground?

Waterline is (or was) the straight line, respective to the airplane, not the ground. So, yes, it follows the stringers

Imagine how weird the tail will look when all those A-330s are painted into the new AA livery.


User currently offlineDarksnowynight From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1361 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 16226 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 15):
Imagine how weird the tail will look when all those A-330s are painted into the new AA livery.

The 777s also have that down angle. It won't be too controversial.



Posting without Knowledge is simply Tolerated Vandalism... We are the Vandals.
User currently onlinerichiemo From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 16160 times:

I'm glad to see I'm not the only airline geek to notice such things. Regardless of whether official change or not, there are few classier liveries out there than Lufthansa. Understated grace is there ever was. Bold tail and airline title, and that's all you need.

User currently offlinereffado From Brazil, joined Feb 2012, 226 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 15452 times:

Quoting na (Reply 9):

Lufthansa just uses Helvetica on their logo, but I'm not sure what they used in the regs. But I wouldn't be surprised if they changed the registration font to something following the DIN, but I don't see the point. Looks pretty readable now, and always has.


User currently offlinehorstroad From Germany, joined Apr 2010, 268 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 15261 times:

Quoting reffado (Reply 18):
Lufthansa just uses Helvetica on their logo, but I'm not sure what they used in the regs.

I think the regs are still helvetica, but regular or medium instead of bold... there are so many variations of helvetica...

http://www.911fonts.com/search.php?s=helvetica


User currently offlinetwincessna340a From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 15159 times:

Quoting reffado (Reply 18):
Regardless of whether official change or not, there are few classier liveries out there than Lufthansa. Understated grace is there ever was. Bold tail and airline title, and that's all you need.

Agree eleventy billion times and couldn't have said it better myself. Everytime there is a livery thread here this thought comes to mind.


User currently offlinereffado From Brazil, joined Feb 2012, 226 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 15053 times:

Quoting twincessna340a (Reply 20):

Agreed. They managed to achieve the purpose of a livery with minimalist elements, and they do it much better than a low of airlines out there. And let's not forget that they always keep their planes very clean!


User currently offlineJBo From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 2336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 14900 times:

Quoting as739x (Reply 3):
Is it just me, or in the first pic, doesn't it look like the gray under coat starts to slant up a little just behind the pitot tubes?? This could be the difference between the two.

I agree with this observation ... the waterline slants/curves slightly upward towards the nose. I think LH noticed that and rectified that, and probably made a slight adjustment so it hits below the radome to avoid paint conflicts.

Quoting horstroad (Reply 19):

I think the regs are still helvetica, but regular or medium instead of bold... there are so many variations of helvetica...

It's definitely a different typeface, most likely based on DIN as others have said.



I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
User currently offlineLZ129 From Germany, joined Feb 2013, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 10670 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 12):
It looks line all they did was lower the waterline between the two colors, maybe by about 3" (76 mm). That way the radome is all white, at least on the A-333 and A-343.

That does sound like a reasonable explanation, but (and I have to repeat myself here) if you look very closely at this picture

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Lufth...d=ec88c949140011bf63857e2a3a9b6c05

you will notice that a tiny bit of the radome is still painted grey - even with the new livery. If the radome issue was the cause of the change, wouldn't they have gone all the way and left it entirely white?
Or am I seeing something that's not there and it actually is all white?

[Edited 2013-02-21 01:39:16]

User currently offlinena From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10731 posts, RR: 9
Reply 24, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 9838 times:

Quoting reffado (Reply 18):
Lufthansa just uses Helvetica on their logo, but I'm not sure what they used in the regs. But I wouldn't be surprised if they changed the registration font to something following the DIN, but I don't see the point. Looks pretty readable now, and always has.

LH uses a slightly modified Helvetica, not the standard you can buy.

Quoting horstroad (Reply 19):
I think the regs are still helvetica, but regular or medium instead of bold... there are so many variations of helvetica...

Registrations are in a modified DIN Bold Font now. They stared that with the first A380 or around that time, as all A380s and 748s use the new font. I think thats an official font also used by many other airlines, perhaps one of those infamous EU regulations created by bored officials who have to justify their ridiculously high wages. I noticed though this font is also used by non-European airlines.
LH also does change the reg´s on older planes when they have a major check. I noticed that on MD11F D-ALCC after they removed the 100 years air cargo stickers.

Quoting LZ129 (Reply 23):
you will notice that a tiny bit of the radome is still painted grey - even with the new livery. If the radome issue was the cause of the change, wouldn't they have gone all the way and left it entirely white?
Or am I seeing something that's not there and it actually is all white?

You are right. I think the "waterline" just was slightly curved upwards at the front before. Maybe it just has to do with who painted the plane and how exactly they follwowed LHs paint plans. You´ll see the waterline meets the wing leading edge still at the same height.


25 a3xx900 : Correct, and on the rear of the plane the line meets the 'tip' of the flaps in retracted state on all aircraft. Since this edge is higher, on the fro
27 Post contains images flyingalex : They are slow in naming them, yes, but they are definitely still naming aircraft. For example, I flew on D-AISK (an A321) in March 2008, about a mont
28 garpd : I don't think this is a deliberate change. To me. tt looks more like the job of masking off the grey and white areas on D-AIKE during painting was rus
29 LZ129 : That is almost certainly incorrect. All but the last three A333 have the upward creep. Both the old and the new style seem to be deliberate.
30 Post contains links garpd : That doesn't mean the upward sweep was correct. Quality Control can fail at many levels. All other LH Aircraft seem to feature a level belly line. ht
31 LZ129 : With the exception of the A343's. But since they have the same nose it is plausible that the same mistake was made there... So it actually looks as t
32 garpd : I'm not saying I'm right by any means! But yes, that is my theory. However, say this was a glitch, for arguments sake. It is quite small, only noticea
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Slight Change In Style In BA First Cabin posted Sat May 19 2001 14:42:11 by Capt.Picard
Lufthansa Engine Change In ATL 8/21? posted Sun Aug 23 2009 19:25:44 by Jbmitt
Subtle Change In Malaysia Airlines Livery posted Thu Feb 6 2003 14:46:19 by Airmale
When Did LH Font Change In The 1960s? posted Mon Aug 13 2012 16:08:07 by LH707330
Are All DL Connection Planes In New Livery? posted Tue Jul 3 2012 18:15:24 by FWAERJ
A Change In Airport Profiling To Come? posted Sun Jul 1 2012 09:20:23 by readytotaxi
(VERY) Hard Landing In CLT? posted Tue May 22 2012 08:06:14 by Gonzalo
Aeroflot Sukhoi Superjet 100 In Skyteam Livery posted Sat Mar 3 2012 14:34:52 by AeroMexiBoi
Frontier Commercials-Change In Advertising? posted Fri Feb 3 2012 08:02:48 by Atrude777
When Will We See An A380 In Alliance Livery? posted Fri Jan 13 2012 02:25:27 by MCO2BRS