Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA Becomes The Largest Foreign Carrier In PEK  
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 9162 times:

Just find some data, surprisingly, UA has exceeded SQ and KE to become the largest foreign career in PEK. Is this kind of seasonal thing? I can't find the passenger data but UA really has a strong presence in the East Asia!



33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinestylo777 From Turkey, joined Feb 2006, 2904 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 9148 times:

this is also surprising to me, since they "only" have four daily flights (SFO, EWR, IAD, ORD).
on the other hand SQ and KE has less flights per day (SQ 24 weekly and KE 11 weekly).


User currently offlinecarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2910 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 8768 times:

Very surprising indeed.
I would have guessed either of the two Korean carriers just because of the close distance plus flights not only to ICN & PUS but also to some of the provincial cities too.
I would have thought Asiana might have made the list too.


User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 8743 times:

Quoting stylo777 (Reply 1):
on the other hand SQ and KE has less flights per day (SQ 24 weekly and KE 11 weekly).
SQ operate 4xdaily using a mixture of 777 and 333. KE operate 11xweekly PEK-ICN using wide-bodies and 1xdaily PEK-GMP using 739. Also 1xdaily 739 to Busan and 1xdaily 739 to Jeju. It seems that UA is really the biggest foreign player in PEK...

[Edited 2013-02-21 04:04:15]

User currently offlineJohnClipper From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2005, 826 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 8571 times:

Technically, Dragonair is the largest foreign carrier.

User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8090 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 8489 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting stylo777 (Reply 1):
this is also surprising to me, since they "only" have four daily flights (SFO, EWR, IAD, ORD).
on the other hand SQ and KE has less flights per day (SQ 24 weekly and KE 11 weekly).

"omly" 4 daily flights ? well only to Peking; EWR. IAD, ORD and SFO. Shanghai also has 4 flights from LAX, SFO, ORD and Newark. 8 flights daily to the PRC by 777 or 744's.


User currently offlineaviationRob From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2011, 3 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 8376 times:

Good spot Carpethead - i just ran the OAG numbers and they show to following:

1) Air China 136,698
2) Dragonair 24,836
3) United Airlines 16,534
4) Asiana Airlines 14,890
5) Singapore Airlines 14,829
6) Korean Air 14,558
7) Hainan Airlines 12,304
8) China Southern Airlines 11,910
9) Emirates 11,802
10) Japan Airlines 9,618

Seems that Asiana is missing.

(these are non-stop, operating, scheduled passenger flights 18th Feb-24th Feb 2013)

Regards,
Rob


User currently offlineRyanairGuru From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 4690 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8130 times:

Quoting JohnClipper (Reply 4):
Technically, Dragonair is the largest foreign carrier.

  

Not even "technically". Dragonair is not a PRC carrier, period.

United is the second largest international carrier at PEK. That, however, is still noteworthy  



Worked Hard, Flew Right
User currently offlineUnited1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5815 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 8098 times:

Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 7):
Not even "technically". Dragonair is not a PRC carrier, period.

Well technically Hong Kong is part PRC....  So suppose that is debatable....



Semper Fi - PowerPoint makes us stupid.
User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11120 posts, RR: 62
Reply 9, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 8013 times:

United's presence in China really is quite impressive - 8 daily departures from the Mainland plus 6 daily departures from Hong Kong. Wow! That's what comes of having hubs (SFO, ORD, EWR) perfectly-tailored for China flying, plus a strong local sales network and a long history in the market.

User currently onlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8203 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7936 times:

Quoting United1 (Reply 8):
Well technically Hong Kong is part PRC....  So suppose that is debatable....

Hong Kong to China is a little like Puerto Rico to the US. Neither one has a UN seat. Both are totally, by 100% consensus part of their mother nations.

But, both are considered "nations" by the Olympics and each competed in 2012 under their own separate flags!

For this analysis, I believe NYC-SJU is a domestic flight and HKG-PEK is also a domestic flight (yes, they have different passports). It is not fair to say Dragonair is a "foreign" carrier at Beijing.

Quoting commavia (Reply 9):

United's presence in China really is quite impressive - 8 daily departures from the Mainland plus 6 daily departures from Hong Kong. Wow! That's what comes of having hubs (SFO, ORD, EWR) perfectly-tailored for China flying, plus a strong local sales network and a long history in the market.


It seems their yield is higher to China than AA or Delta, but this is circumstantial.


User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 16935 posts, RR: 48
Reply 11, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7880 times:

Quoting aviationRob (Reply 6):
Good spot Carpethead - i just ran the OAG numbers and they show to following:

1) Air China 136,698
2) Dragonair 24,836
3) United Airlines 16,534

I imagine if you rerun the numbers by ASM/ASKs, UA is much bigger than KA



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlinejayunited From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 781 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 7521 times:

I think the location of these flights are key I'm not sure about the Washington D.C. area but all the other markets SFO, ORD, EWR, have a rather large Chinese population that continues to grow year after year and United history in China and Asia for the most part really helps them out. United over the years has developed strong ties to the Chinese communities not only in the States but also in China and it seems to be paying off. Also having Air China in the Star Alliance helps bolster United's presence in this region as well. However I am still surprised by those numbers.

User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19097 posts, RR: 53
Reply 13, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 7394 times:

A different picture emerges if you look at an entire year - in this case, 2012 - by total one-way seats for the top-20 airlines in PEK. Note that it is for all seats, so domestic airlines that also operate international services are included as a whole - but at least you can see where everything fits:

CA 20046937
CZ 7814129
MU 6974941
HU 4283223
MF 1106824
3U 890496
SC 829692
KA 741728
ZH 612002
JD 482928
SQ 450108
FM 431968
KE 426363
UA 413712
OZ 412438

CN 402773
NH 378271
EK 305118
LH 281090
CX 214599


Source: OAG.



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24322 posts, RR: 47
Reply 14, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 7305 times:

Quoting commavia (Reply 9):
plus 6 daily departures from Hong Kong.

I think you are missing one.

UA has 7 markets from HKG. GUM is less then daily at 5x weekly this summer.

ORD
SFO
EWR
GUM
NRT
SGN
SIN



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineJohnClipper From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2005, 826 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6072 times:

Quoting Flighty (Reply 10):
Hong Kong to China is a little like Puerto Rico to the US. Neither one has a UN seat. Both are totally, by 100% consensus part of their mother nations.

But, both are considered "nations" by the Olympics and each competed in 2012 under their own separate flags!

For this analysis, I believe NYC-SJU is a domestic flight and HKG-PEK is also a domestic flight (yes, they have different passports). It is not fair to say Dragonair is a "foreign" carrier at Beijing.

Ah, not even close. HKG-PEK or any HKG-PRC flights are INTERNATIONAL flights. Flights arriving into PEK, for example, have to clear immigration and customs just like flight from the U.S. SJU-USA flights do not.


User currently offlinedavidho1985 From Hong Kong, joined Oct 2012, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6057 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Flighty (Reply 10):
For this analysis, I believe NYC-SJU is a domestic flight and HKG-PEK is also a domestic flight (yes, they have different passports). It is not fair to say Dragonair is a "foreign" carrier at Beijing.

All flights between Hong Kong and China are considered as Internation flights.
Boarding / deboarding take place in the internation portion of the terminal in China (HKG has no domestic flights, thus no domestic terminal).


User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5986 times:

Quoting JohnClipper (Reply 15):
Ah, not even close. HKG-PEK or any HKG-PRC flights are INTERNATIONAL flights. Flights arriving into PEK, for example, have to clear immigration and customs just like flight from the U.S. SJU-USA flights do not.

Officially, it's not INTERNATIONAL Flights! It's REGIONAL Flights. And the immigration process is different. Mainland citizens use "Entry Permit for Travelling to and from Hong Kong and Macau" which is issued by the Ministry of Public Security to enter HK or Macau but use Passport which is issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to travel abroad.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24075 posts, RR: 22
Reply 18, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5799 times:

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 13):
A different picture emerges if you look at an entire year -

That data for the week of February 18-24 may not be representative of other periods due to the Chinese New Year shortly before that week. I doubt all routes and carriers are affected equally by that major holiday period.

In any case, saying UA is the largest foreign carrier based on only one week of data is rather misleading.


User currently offlineJohnClipper From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2005, 826 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5710 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 17):
Officially, it's not INTERNATIONAL Flights! It's REGIONAL Flights. And the immigration process is different. Mainland citizens use "Entry Permit for Travelling to and from Hong Kong and Macau" which is issued by the Ministry of Public Security to enter HK or Macau but use Passport which is issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to travel abroad.

But they are still international flights. They arrive at international terminals, not domestic terminals.


User currently offlinefraspotter From United States of America, joined May 2004, 2336 posts, RR: 9
Reply 20, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5485 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 17):
Officially, it's not INTERNATIONAL Flights! It's REGIONAL Flights.

It's both... You can have regional international flights (DTW-YYZ) and regional domestic flights (AUS-IAH). "Regional" is in reference to distance, nothing else...



"Drunks run stop signs. Stoners wait for them to turn green."
User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5447 times:

Quoting fraspotter (Reply 20):
It's both... You can have regional international flights (DTW-YYZ) and regional domestic flights (AUS-IAH). "Regional" is in reference to distance, nothing else...

Maybe Territorial Flights. Officially, Territorial Flights (地区航班) means flights to Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.


User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5447 times:

Quoting davidho1985 (Reply 16):
All flights between Hong Kong and China are considered as Internation flights.

Maybe for flights, it's kind of arguable. But CX is really a China Hong Kong carrier right?


User currently onlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8203 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5371 times:

Quoting JohnClipper (Reply 15):
Ah, not even close. HKG-PEK or any HKG-PRC flights are INTERNATIONAL flights.

Hong Kong is located in the PRC!! It is not a foreign country to the PRC... it is definitely inside it.


User currently offlineChazPilot From United States of America, joined Feb 2011, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 4342 times:

Can we pls drop the geopolitics here and get back to the main purpose of this thread?

To folllow in justinlee's first post - good point about the a/c in operation here. KE definitely (and SQ to an extent) operate smaller a/c on average than UA, which only sends in 744 and 777. That graph is showing seat capacity, which unless I'm about to put my foot in my mouth means just that - the number of available seats they fly in/out in the given time period. It doesn't mean they are necessarily the highest on pax numbers(?)


User currently offlinedavidho1985 From Hong Kong, joined Oct 2012, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3784 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting justinlee (Reply 21):
Maybe Territorial Flights. Officially, Territorial Flights (地区航班) means flights to Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.

The terms " Territorial Flights (地区航班)" mainly used to avoid classifing flights to/from Taiwan as domesitc flight / international flight.

Nither PRC or Taiwan will be happy for nither classification.


User currently offlineB2443 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 697 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3449 times:

UA's PEK number doesn't add up. OK, 7 day's available seats of 16,660, which works out 2,380 seats per day, which means average 595 seats per flight (based on 4 flights/day), which makes no sense. UA's 744s/772s don't have that kind of configuration. Does "capacity" include both arriving and departing seats?

[Edited 2013-02-22 13:57:09]

User currently offlinebennator From Singapore, joined Mar 2012, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3086 times:

Quoting justinlee (Reply 22):
Maybe for flights, it's kind of arguable. But CX is really a China Hong Kong carrier right?

I'm actually not sure. It's headquartered in HK, so in that sense it's Chinese, but looking at its largest shareholders here: http://www.cathaypacific.com/cpa/en_...56ef7cf010VgnVCM32000011d21c39____ , the largest shareholder is Swire Pacific, a UK company. Now, since the two shareholders listed do not add up to 100%, I don't know if it is majority held by HK (and thus Chinese) owners, or not, but I'm not sure it's easy to find.

OTOH, you could get around this by arguing that the headquarter site is more important than the ownership, at which point UA would be the largest.


User currently onlinecipango From Ireland, joined Jul 2009, 473 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2544 times:

Quoting Flighty (Reply 10):
For this analysis, I believe NYC-SJU is a domestic flight and HKG-PEK is also a domestic flight (yes, they have different passports). It is not fair to say Dragonair is a "foreign" carrier at Beijing.

Just felt I needed to add to this. If I have to clear immigration in China, on top of obtaining an expensive Visa to travel to China, then I feel I am travelling internationally.

Likewise for Chinese coming to Hong Kong. They can not just cross the border, they enter into a long and expensive process to obtain a document allowing them into Hong Kong. If they were domestic, all of this would be invalid.

Hong Kong to all people in Hong Kong is not part of China. It is independent and survives very well on its own.



Next Flights: DUB-BHX-DUB, DUB-BHX-DUB, DUB-LIS-DUB.
User currently offlinehuaiwei From Singapore, joined Oct 2008, 1099 posts, RR: 2
Reply 29, posted (1 year 1 month 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2331 times:

Quoting ChazPilot (Reply 24):
That graph is showing seat capacity, which unless I'm about to put my foot in my mouth means just that - the number of available seats they fly in/out in the given time period. It doesn't mean they are necessarily the highest on pax numbers(?)

Precisely what I was thinking the moment I saw the figures. UA may have to fly larger planes due to range, but do their planes fill up to match that of regional carriers who fly smaller planes on more frequent trips?

Quoting cipango (Reply 28):
Hong Kong to all people in Hong Kong is not part of China. It is independent and survives very well on its own.

Your Chief Executive won't agree to that, so your point is moot unless you think he is not a HK resident.

Anyway, everyone is right. HK considers the flights as international. China considers them as regional (which has a different meaning from the "regional" as used in places like the US). You just need to check up the respective airline websites and take a look at their annual reports to see how they view the same routes.

That should end the geopolitical talk, I hope?  



It's huaiwei...not huawei. I have nothing to do with the PRC! :)
User currently offlinedtfg From China, joined Jan 2013, 74 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

It is not so surprising. UA operates 4 daily flights at PEK, 3 by 777 (EWR ORD IAD) and one by 747 (SFO), SQ also serve 4 flights but the total capacity is lower than UA since they use 330 and 777. KE and OZ, though they have more frequencies, they use narrow body planes on several routes.

I wonder if UA would add PEK-LAX or add more frequencies on its existing routes


User currently offlinejfk777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 8090 posts, RR: 7
Reply 31, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1866 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting dtfg (Reply 30):
I wonder if UA would add PEK-LAX or add more frequencies on its existing routes

I would love to see AA fly a 777 from LAX to Peking like they do to Shangahi, then UA had to do it too.


User currently offlinejustinlee From China, joined Aug 2012, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1759 times:

Quoting cipango (Reply 28):
Likewise for Chinese coming to Hong Kong. They can not just cross the border, they enter into a long and expensive process to obtain a document allowing them into Hong Kong. If they were domestic, all of this would be invalid.

Hi, I just go to the police station nearby to get a entry permit to Hong Kong. It takes me 1 hour and 40 RMB (which is about 6 USD) to get that. If you think that's long and expensive, I have nothing to say  


User currently offlinedtfg From China, joined Jan 2013, 74 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1620 times:

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 31):
I would love to see AA fly a 777 from LAX to Peking like they do to Shangahi, then UA had to do it too.

Rumors said AA is seriously considering this route as well as JFK-PEK/PVG. I think the slot of PEK would be a major problem. their PEK-ORD is still bleeding i guess


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
WestJet Now Largest Foreign Carrier In LAS posted Mon May 3 2010 20:32:26 by Viscount724
Is Qantas The Largest Foreign Carrier Into SIN? posted Mon Jan 3 2005 06:17:02 by Qantasclub
Chile Becomes The Fastest Growing Market In LaTam posted Mon Jan 28 2013 15:21:52 by SCL767
The Largest Foreign Airlines Flying Into AU/NZ? posted Fri Jan 25 2013 02:01:49 by United Airline
NWA Is The Largest A330 Operator In The World posted Tue Sep 25 2007 05:26:55 by Nwab787techops
What Is The Largest A/C To Fly In/out Of DCA? posted Wed May 9 2007 03:33:51 by 777fan
Airbus 300A, Who Is The Largest PAX Carrier posted Fri Aug 25 2006 00:24:02 by Arecibo
Spirit Is The Largest International Carrier At FLL posted Tue Jun 13 2006 00:10:45 by Belizexp
Is AC The Only Foreign Carrier To Have...? posted Sat Oct 15 2005 21:38:39 by AirCanada014
The Largest A346 Operator In The World? posted Thu Jul 7 2005 01:23:39 by JMJAirways