Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA On The West Coast...  
User currently offlineolddominion727 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 395 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 12464 times:

In cities where AA pulled out of like BUR, SBP, OAK and others that they don't service at all like CLD, MFR, FRM, GEG, EUG...are those USExpress routes staying and morphing into AE?

With the signing of EMB175/CR9, could AE bring those to FAT, OAK, SBP, BUR to DFW once they switch from USAirways?

Lastly should PHX remain a hub, will AA keep the flights to HI?

95 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7959 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 12409 times:

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
Lastly should PHX remain a hub, will AA keep the flights to HI?

I probably should run my numbers again, but most of those flights to Hawaii are popular with O and D pax here. It's a pretty large market, especially since G4 just started flights.

Since a lot of people don't like G4's penny pinching and the odd hours of HA, I think at least 1 or two flights should remain with US.



Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
User currently offlineRWA380 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 12395 times:

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
EUG

AA has provided service to EUG in the past.....

http://www.departedflights.com/EUG89p1.html



AA AC AQ AS BD BN CO CS DL EA EZ HA HP KL KN MP MW NK NW OO OZ PA PS QX RC RH RW SA TG TW UA US VS WA WC WN
User currently offlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17147 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 12357 times:

I expect that the current PHX-BUR route will change to DFW. Maybe they could also add a flight to ORD.


Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26139 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 12321 times:

Sure some US stations will be back in the AA network, however I believe one of the bigger issues is staffing.

Even under the revised post BK AA contracts a certain level of activity will require mainline staffing, which can change their entire costing profiles.

But yes PHX is a good gateway for secondary Western markets.

Quoting B747forever (Reply 3):
I expect that the current PHX-BUR route will change to DFW.

Why ?

AA just dropped the DFW route. Obviously if there was some hope for it, they would have stuck around knowing under BK they would be reducing their cost.

Like I just mentioned above, PHX is a much better gateway for places like Burbank as they have natural traffic demand and more economic being mere 1-hour flight away, unlike Dallas halfway across the country.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinepoint2point From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 2766 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 12198 times:

DFW to FAT - 112 pax per day - maybe

DFW to OAK - 94 pax per day - already WN served DAL - OAK - probably not, too long and thin, let WN have it.

DWF to SBP - 21 pax per day - no

DFW to BUR - 41 pax per day - no

DFW to EUG - 25 pax per day - no

DFW to MFR - 21 pax per day - no

DFW to GEG - 156 pax per day - okay chance

DFW to FRM - huh? Fairmont Minnesota?

DFW - CLD - >10 pax per day - no

 

[Edited 2013-02-23 19:25:21]

User currently offlinewhatusaid From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 667 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 12096 times:

FAT-DFW needs more seats not less. The Ejet might be an option for a 3rd RT off season but that's about it.

User currently offlineoc2dc From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 410 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 12097 times:

I wonder if the new AA will continue serving LGB from PHX . AA used to fly LGB-DFW and for a short while LGB-JFK.

As routes get right sized and flying shifts from PHX to DFW, I would think LGB would be on the chopping block. Lets hope that's not the case.

[Edited 2013-02-23 19:42:46]


I'm not complaining, I'm critiquing...
User currently offlineweb500sjc From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 749 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 12057 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting point2point (Reply 5):

CLD wouldn't be served from DFW...it would have to be LAX, LAS, PHX, or SFO. The only two of those I could see happening would be LAX or PHX. But considering the only airline that flies to CLD is Skywest under UAX branding. I don't see a return.



Boiler Up!
User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1904 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 11878 times:

Quoting point2point (Reply 5):
DFW to FRM - huh? Fairmont Minnesota?.


The OP is referring to Farmington N.M.

Quoting point2point (Reply 5):
DFW to FAT - 112 pax per day - maybe
DFW to OAK - 94 pax per day - already WN served DAL - OAK - probably not, too long and thin, let WN have it.
DWF to SBP - 21 pax per day - no
DFW to BUR - 41 pax per day - no
DFW to EUG - 25 pax per day - no
DFW to MFR - 21 pax per day - no
DFW to GEG - 156 pax per day - okay chance
DFW to FRM - huh? Fairmont Minnesota?
DFW - CLD - >10 pax per day - no
.


Why are you basing your decision on O&D stats? AA has 700+ daily flights out of DFW. If AA decides to fly these routes ex-DFW, it will be based more so on connecting traffic than solely on local O&D just like many routes out of DFW.


User currently offlineTan Flyr From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1920 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 11821 times:

Quoting whatusaid (Reply 6):
FAT-DFW needs more seats not less. The Ejet might be an option for a 3rd RT off season but that's about it.


During the spring/summer/early fall tourist season an Ejet flight to DFW would be great. Timed like the 3rd MD80 was a few years back..about a 9 am departure and then you could move the evening mainline to a 7PM departure and the E to a 9pm DFW departure!


User currently offlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17147 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 11517 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 4):
Why ?

AA just dropped the DFW route. Obviously if there was some hope for it, they would have stuck around knowing under BK they would be reducing their cost.

Because many flights will probably switch over to DFW from PHX, and BUR would most likely be such a route. I know that AA cut their BUR-DFW flight just a year or two ago, but I still believe that they could shift over one of the around 10 daily LAX-DFW flights and make it work out of BUR.

And here is another reason;

Quoting EricR (Reply 9):
has 700+ daily flights out of DFW. If AA decides to fly these routes ex-DFW, it will be based more so on connecting traffic than solely on local O&D just like many routes out of DFW.



Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13746 posts, RR: 61
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 11500 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting B747forever (Reply 11):
many flights will probably switch over to DFW from PHX, and BUR would most likely be such a route.

Doubtful. BUR is a popular destination from PHX, as lots of locals want to avoid LAX. It'll stick around based on local O&D traffic alone.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11972 posts, RR: 62
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 11109 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 4):
Why ?

AA just dropped the DFW route. Obviously if there was some hope for it, they would have stuck around knowing under BK they would be reducing their cost.

BUR is the main route I could see switching back to DFW, for several reasons. First, DFW is obviously a far larger hub with far higher connectivity. Second, DFW now offers the same traffic flows as PHX does, but AA will now have one less competitor (US) fighting for east-bound customers, which should help. And finally, there is a healthy local market DFW-BUR due to local corporate connections.

I obviously don't know for sure, but I would not at all be surprised to see BUR switch back to DFW from PHX.


User currently offlinePHX Flyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 604 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 10948 times:

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
Lastly should PHX remain a hub, will AA keep the flights to HI?

You make it sound as if it was a remote possibility that PHX remains a hub. The fact is that PHX will be THE western hub in the new AA route network, whereas LAX will remain the international gateway - which won't preclude PHX from getting some intercontinental flights to OneWorld hub airports and a couple of others, too. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to scale PHX back, nor are there any plans to do so.


User currently offlineripcordd From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1197 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks ago) and read 10772 times:

PHX will be scaled back all those people connecting in PHX to the midwest or east will now be flown to DFW better hub cheaper costs in DFW PHX will be scaled down.

User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13746 posts, RR: 61
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks ago) and read 10712 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ripcordd (Reply 15):
PHX will be scaled back

No it won't. The combined traffic that AA and US already enjoy isn't diminishing, and US clearly needs PHX for both connections and O&D. The combined company will not pull down PHX operations noticeably.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently onlineWALmsp From United States of America, joined Sep 2010, 160 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 4 weeks ago) and read 10692 times:

Quoting Tan Flyr (Reply 10):

Quoting point2point (Reply 5):
DFW to FRM - huh? Fairmont Minnesota?.


The OP is referring to Farmington N.M.

Darn, I'v got relatives in and around Fairmont...  



In memory of my Dad, Robert "Bob" Fenrich, WAL 1964-1979, MSP ONT LAX
User currently offlineWinginit From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 13 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 9984 times:

Quoting PHX+Flyer" class="quote" target="_blank">PHX Flyer (Reply 14):
You make it sound as if it was a remote possibility that PHX remains a hub. The fact is that PHX will be THE western hub in the new AA route network, whereas LAX will remain the international gateway - which won't preclude PHX from getting some intercontinental flights to OneWorld hub airports and a couple of others, too. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to scale PHX back, nor are there any plans to do so.

Is that the 'fact'? And how can you be so certain that there are no plans to do so with the merger still in such primitive stages? Is your statement anything outside of speculation? Because it seems quite reasonable that much of the connection and origin activity would be moved from PHX to DFW.



The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent American Airlines' positions, strategies or opinion
User currently offlineoc2dc From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 410 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 9750 times:

Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 16):
Quoting ripcordd (Reply 15):
PHX will be scaled back

No it won't. The combined traffic that AA and US already enjoy isn't diminishing, and US clearly needs PHX for both connections and O&D. The combined company will not pull down PHX operations noticeably.

The reason for a scale back is not because combined traffic is diminishing, it's because many cities from PHX are better served through DFW. There is no need for redundancy.

It is cheaper for AA to funnel US passengers through its DFW hub as opposed to having two hubs serving the same purpose.

DFW will see some growth and up-gauging. PHX will see some cuts and down-gauging because of traffic shifting through to DFW.

That being said, I don't see PHX being dismanteled completely. It will still have a role in the network, just not as big.



I'm not complaining, I'm critiquing...
User currently offlinepoint2point From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 2766 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 9548 times:

Quoting EricR (Reply 9):
The OP is referring to Farmington N.M.

Okay, then that's FMN..... not trying to be picky but........

Quoting EricR (Reply 9):
Why are you basing your decision on O&D stats? AA has 700+ daily flights out of DFW. If AA decides to fly these routes ex-DFW, it will be based more so on connecting traffic than solely on local O&D just like many routes out of DFW.

O&D is where the money is. I think that as carriers go forward, if they don't plan according to what the O&D is, then I predict they will have $$$$ problems. Connects will probably be getting somewhat less attention going forward, and if there isn't $$$$ to be earned from them, carriers shouldn't be catering to them...... And if O&D isn't supporting 700+ daily flights at DWF, then they'll need to cut flights until they do. And this goes for any hub.

There may be some exceptions, which I'll allow for, but I'll even go to say that if at any carrier on its domestic routes, at least 90% of these flights aren't at least 80%+ full and earning a decent local RPM, and then of that 80%+ l/f at least 50% isn't local O&D traffic, then a flight shouldn't be in the schedule.

Just my   

 


User currently offlineawacsooner From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 1972 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 9460 times:

Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 16):

No it won't. The combined traffic that AA and US already enjoy isn't diminishing, and US clearly needs PHX for both connections and O&D. The combined company will not pull down PHX operations noticeably.

I'm sure the folks at STL said the same thing...

Let's just wait and see, shall we?


User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7959 posts, RR: 19
Reply 22, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 9416 times:

Quoting awacsooner (Reply 21):
I'm sure the folks at STL said the same thing...

Difference-

PHX is a large, growing metropolis. STL is in the rust belt.



Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
User currently offlineAllegiantFlyer From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 200 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 9279 times:

Quoting awacsooner (Reply 21):
I'm sure the folks at STL said the same thing...

Are we serious right now? a;ll you have to do is take 10 minutes out of your day to watch this video.They clearly say that the O&D market is way bigger in PHX than in PIT or STL etc. PHX will remain a hub and the company said so to a board,mayor and congressmen.If your willing to blatantly lie to a congressman and mayor of the 5th largest city in the country,well that just describes yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1-b-b6PHRs


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13746 posts, RR: 61
Reply 24, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 9236 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting awacsooner (Reply 21):
Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 16):

No it won't. The combined traffic that AA and US already enjoy isn't diminishing, and US clearly needs PHX for both connections and O&D. The combined company will not pull down PHX operations noticeably.

I'm sure the folks at STL said the same thing...

And they'd have probably been right, had 9/11 and two recessions not occurred.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
25 bobloblaw : The problem with BUR is yield not volume. While a DFW flight is possible, I wouldn't count on an ORD flight. When I see PHX being downsized, it think
26 DesertAir : US sends a lot of people from TUS into PHX for connections. AA runs a sizable operation from TUS to DFW and a couple of flights a day to ORD. PHX will
27 ripcordd : PHX works now for US but a combined AA/US PHX will not work as good as it does now. US puts 70% connecting thru PHX and only around 30% O/D the combi
28 Beardown91737 : It isn't AA restarting service, it is US keeping service. No matter what is going to be painted on the planes, it doesn't mean that Parker and Co wil
29 N737AA : Parker said that PHX will have a large operation post merger....."I owe it to them" N737AA
30 Post contains images LAXintl : Many Western secondary markets work out of PHX. DFW would have totally different cost and revenue picture.
31 GRUIAD : For those people that think PHX will be a similarly sized hub in 5-10 years should listen to how Parker describes PHX from a yield perspective. I was
32 awacsooner : That's what I'm getting at...but the folks who think that PHX won't get touched or will actually INCREASE are flat out dreaming.
33 Winginit : Executive words within the first month following a merger announcement are about as valid and useful as those of campaigning politicians. I bet he sa
34 Post contains links HiFlyerAS : Parker's promises to the PHX establishment sound like the same song and dance that DL gave to MSP. We'll keep x number of people here, we won't close
35 ripcordd : PHX will never end up like STL but bigger markets connecting in PHX will be over flown and the people will be put thru DFW & ORD smaller markets t
36 Stabilator : While I'd like to see their HI flights stay, I'm not sure it's justifiable with LAX an hour away. Why not just connect them through there? Why would t
37 us330 : Large operation does not mean hub. This is not meant as a knock on Phoenix or PHX, or meant to imply that Phoenix resembles Pittsburgh or St. Louis (
38 MAH4546 : And SANNRT under the JAL ATI. I don't see PHXNRT happening short-term. Long term, just depends on how the hub/focus city shapes itself. PHL and MIA w
39 jc2354 : One thing not mentioned in this threat so far, is AAdvantage. Frequent flyers have no problem rearranging their schedules and paying slightly more, ju
40 oc2dc : As I understand it, WN has some of the highest costs in the industry. How is it that AA will not be able to compete against WN at PHX when WN is eith
41 Post contains images PHX787 : Well we are somewhat in debt to him too. Our airport would not be the way it is today if HP hadn't been so successful. As much as some of us think D.
42 Post contains links MAH4546 : The PHX hub has shrunk since the merger. Less flights and less destinations, especially to the East and Midwest. Sort of like this? Memphis will be a
43 PHX787 : Why do people like comparing PHX to MEM? There are huge differences between the two. MEM's leaders were practically talking out of their arse
44 EricR : The PHX hub has shrunk since the merger. Less flights and less destinations, especially to the East and Midwest. . And more telling is the number of d
45 MAH4546 : But the one thing that matters most is this: they are the weakest hubs in a merged airline with at least one too many. As are the ones in PHX. Again,
46 Post contains images commavia : Well, I'd at least put it this way: from my perspective, the chances of PHX retaining a hub in its current form is far less than 50/50 - I'd actually
47 AeroWesty : When Parker said, "PHX will have a large operation post merger," he didn't say that PHX wouldn't receive any cuts. While I agree there are some conne
48 olddominion727 : LAX to Hawaii is fine, but AA is touting that the world will be "one connection away." How's that going to be possible if they have to make a double c
49 MAH4546 : AA flies all of those today sans BOI.
50 RWA380 : The main point being, there has not been an airline merger, takeover, or whatever you wish to call it, that has happened, where the combined carrier d
51 olddominion727 : very true RWA... lets ask CMH, CVG, MEM, DFW (DL dehub) MCI (dehub of EA and BN), LAS from N7 and HP, SJC, RDU, BNA from AA
52 Cactus742 : Don't forget many routes to eastern cities also that have disappeared from PHX since the HP/US merger: MSY, IAD, MIA, CLE, BDL, RDU...
53 HPRamper : Woah, is that routes or frequencies?
54 EricR : MSY, MIA, BDL, RDU, IAD, CLE are actual discontinued routes from PHX. In addition, you can also add OKC, ICT, and YYZ to this list.
55 mah4546 : Routes. The number of routes that US has cut from PHX since the merger, I'd guess, is probably around two dozen or so. Meanwhile all that was added w
56 LAXdude1023 : AA already flies DFW-FAT. I would imagine it will keep at least once a day. This (along with BOI) are missing from DFW. Those are great 319 routes. Y
57 jporterfi : I would think that AA/US would want to stick with 2x CR2 on the PHX-SBP route rather than decrease frequency to 1x CR9/EMB175. I doubt the route can
58 Post contains links and images point2point : There will have to be hubs. A good portion of our nation is not able to fly nonstop to another good portion of our nation. The concern becomes as to
59 Beardown91737 : EUG, MFR, BIL, FSD, COS, PSC, and others are UA codeshares, but US has access to them... for now. Western presence: SAN, SNA, PSP, LGB, LAX, ONT, BUR
60 wn676 : Pretty good guess, I count 22 not including MBJ and LGA which were added (and subsequently cut) post-merger. SJO has been flown since 2003 by the way
61 commavia : Bigger markets to ORD specifically? And they all could (and have, and/or currently do) connect nicely over LAX and/or DFW, as well. Define "enough."
62 AeroWesty : AA has orders for 42 787s plus 58 options. Then there are the 20 77Ws, a few already delivered. US has 22 A350s on order, plus 8 A330s left to be del
63 commavia : Typo on my part - sorry. I meant "narrowbodies." AA alone has several hundred new 737s and A319s/A321s on order, and US has several dozen more.[Edite
64 N737AA : AA at DFW is on average 30% O&D and 70% connect. N737AA
65 LAXdude1023 : Thats way too simplistic. For example, DEN is going to need a higher percentage of O&D to make its flights work because the international O&D
66 EricR : It is important to note that the airfares sited above is for the entire airport and not by specific carrier. In the case of the top 3 airports listed
67 Stabilator : How substatial is US's PHX-Mexico presence? Will the combined carrier cut those routes in favor of LAX? I thought I read on here that the LAX-Mexico m
68 PHX787 : Ok dude I don't know what your deal is with PHX bashing but you haven;t presented a reasonable argument YET about why PHX should be de-hubbed, especi
69 Post contains links mah4546 : Let me requote what I typed earlier: Memphis will be an integral hub in the combined network of Delta and Northwest airlines following a proposed mer
70 LAXdude1023 : Of course it will, but that is in no way specific to PHX. Airfare is going to go up in every single market in the US. Those are the fares and O&D
71 commavia : As I've said before, I recognize that you clearly have a great deal personally invested in the outcome here, as do many in PHX, but with all due resp
72 Post contains images point2point : t/y for this. I personally don't think that this is good for any carrier to be with such low O&D anywhere. If big picture-wise this is so..... OU
73 PDX88 : Your expectations for PHX aren't based on anything either. The reason PHX is so important to US today is because that is all US has west of the Missi
74 LAXintl : Rather good sized. America West built up a strong Mexico franchise, both to beach markets, and to ethnic ones. Under US Air, and with the recent decl
75 HPRamper : Anything Southern California-to-Midwest or further east - whose feed to be quite honest is the only reason a hub at PHX could survive in the first pl
76 Post contains links LAXdude1023 : Im not denying that O&D generates the highest yield more times than not. Thats not what Im arguing at all. What I am saying is that it cant be lo
77 tan flyr : I'd like to throw a question out there for some of you that may have access to the data. What is the difference in the average contract price for JET-
78 Post contains images Stabilator : Thanks for the enlightenment guys! If AA has the most extensive market of any U.S. carrier, where are most of the flights from? MIA, JFK, ORD...?
79 us330 : How can a hub be too large to sustain extra service? The bigger the hub, the more service it can sustain--ATL's the perfect example of that. DFW is f
80 Post contains images PHX787 : I wonder how legally-binding these are in general. If they have all of this in writing, then I say there's grounds for a lawsuit. When you say you're
81 LAXintl : I can give you actuals however they will vary day to day, but as general rule West Coast tends to be the most expensive with Southern US the cheapest
82 mah4546 : I assure you there is nothing legally binding about these comments and grounds for a lawsuit.
83 brilondon : No bias here though, right? I am certain that AA will rationalize the hubs. Whether that is to reduce the dependency on one over the other, only time
84 tan flyr : I presumed the west coast would be higher..heck we pay the highest Gasoline prices due to CARB and a host of other factors. Naturally Texas will prob
85 HPRamper : It always seems to be open ended statements. There is never a "airport X will ALWAYS be a hub" or "hub X will permanently remain as it is." It's mere
86 prost : Any idea if the combined AA/US will have much of an impact on the AA-US codeshare? I've never heard what Mr. Parker feels about this codeshare in the
87 HPRamper : I was unaware AA was currently codesharing with US.
88 iFlyLOTs : You have to remember that airlines too are businesses, and they will do what is best for profits. You also hear people complaining about outsourcing
89 prost : What I meant was the merged AA/US and the codeshare with AS. I haven't heard if there would be any changes to the AA - AS code share, as I've never s
90 us330 : Just because something is in writing doesn't mean it is a legally binding instrument--if it's a quote transcribed by a journalist, then the airline i
91 N737AA : His statements are based on numbers and yours are based on emotion. PHX will be overflown for DFW in most cases. Parker has said that there will be a
92 Post contains images point2point : I meant to say this earlier, but no one has to be sorry to me for stating an opinion. If correct, then no worries, and if incorrect, then an apology
93 brilondon : I agree, and with the renovations going on at DFW to Terminal A and I believe that they are adding to Terminal E as well. I don't believe for a minut
94 N737AA : Terminal B is also getting an additional 10 or so gates to handle the additional RJ flying AA will be doing under the new agreement with APA. LOTS of
95 EricR : The industrial land north of PHX is slowly being acquired by the City of Phoenix. It has always been the long term plan to has always been to acquire
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
WN Flying 735's On The West Coast Again? posted Sun May 25 2008 22:05:58 by Wedgetail737
F9 E170 On The West Coast posted Tue Mar 13 2007 23:41:26 by FutureFO
Skywest UX, And DLC Monopoly On The West Coast? posted Mon Feb 12 2007 00:47:12 by Flyboy80
Big Storm On The West Coast posted Sat Dec 31 2005 18:36:38 by Freedomtofly
DC9's On The West Coast posted Thu Jan 13 2005 18:38:09 by MDW22L31C
Cargo Hub On The West Coast posted Fri Apr 16 2004 22:11:46 by Leneld
America West Metal On The East Coast posted Fri Aug 15 2008 12:45:23 by Bkircher
AA Eagle CR7 Running The West Coast posted Wed Apr 9 2008 21:35:21 by AS739X
AA's Plans For SJC And The West Coast? posted Tue Jan 28 2003 04:49:34 by United777
FL Logo Aircraft To The West Coast? posted Wed Nov 7 2012 22:15:46 by olddominion727