Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Mihin Lanka To Switch From Airbus To Boeing  
User currently offline777way From Pakistan, joined Dec 2005, 5716 posts, RR: 4
Posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4212 times:

Fleets of both state owned carriers to be improved with Sri Lankan wil get six new A330s variant unspecified, while Mihin will be going most likely for the 737 http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_...e=article-details&code_title=73534

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinexms3200 From Sweden, joined Apr 2005, 108 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4168 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

With the current poor financial situation in Sri Lanka, it is highly doubtful that either carrier can afford new airplanes from either Airbus or Boeing. They have a much better shot of getting some used aircraft that other "third world" bottom feeding nations have parked, or in the worst case, looking at some of the boneyards in Mojave, Victorville, Marana for something flyable for a few years.

User currently offlinesailas From Finland, joined Jul 2007, 285 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3751 times:

i find it funny that in Finnish mihin lanka means literally "which thread Or where to put the thread" . Would a332 make any sense considering the small fleet size?


Airlines been on: AY, LX, SR, OS, SK, KF, EZY, FR, BA, LH, AF, TG, DC, FC, TK, KL, BT, CX, QR
User currently offlineBoeing777300 From North Korea, joined Jan 2004, 26 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2920 times:

The article mentions 777's, which seems an extremly big jump in capacity for a small airline like Mihin Lanka currently using A320's. As much as I would love to see another 777 operator, I think they are unlikely to buy any in the near or mid term future. More than likely 737-700 or -800 models.


Today, I am absolutely fantastic, tomorrow, who knows?
User currently offlinegardermoen From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 1522 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2821 times:

Seriously, the sooner Mihin Lanka is merged into Srilankan and operate as one unit, the better. If Mihin was to become the true LCC arm of Srilankan, then that would work too. But it seems they compete on some routes which makes no sense.
I have no idea why Srilankan surrendered Bahrain to Mihin. What makes Bahrain so different to the other Gulf markets that UL currently serves?

As much as travel into/from Sri Lanka is growing at promising levels, and Sri Lanka has been able to score some high profile airlines to its shores lately (Korean, BA, Turkish) , I highly doubt having two government controlled carriers make any sense to anyone. Let;s hope SriLankans entries into oneoworld reaps them some significant benefits.


User currently offlineflyhigh@tom From United Arab Emirates, joined Sep 2001, 398 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2604 times:

Mihin lanka was nothing but an airline brought into existence due to the whims and fancies of the President of Sri Lanka. The president's own brother in law infact is the CEO of the airline    and is paid handsomely every month by no small means considering the cost of living on the island.

No wonder the airline is bleeding money.

I remember reading initial reports when the airline was formed where not a single flight was flown for months but 2 aircraft were dry leased and yet the CEO and his cronies were getting paid from the Sri Lankan tax payers coffers   

Mihin Lanka has never made profit since its creation however the people involved in the management get paid on time with fat increments every month

http://groundviews.org/2012/11/28/mihin-lanka-not-yours-to-fly/

http://www.ft.lk/2012/11/28/loaded-w...tart-flights-to-more-destinations/

Srilankan Operate 330s and 340s. Agreed the 340s are not very fuel efficient but then they are barely able to fill it up every time it flies from the middle east. The 320s however are the workhorse for the both srilankan and mihin lanka. For the love of God i have no idea how they call them inefficient fuel guzzlers and want to replace them with new B737s and B777s! The 777 would just be too much of over capacity for them in the current scenario. Plus the million $$$ question is ...where does the money come from for these new aircraft and more importantly who is making $$$ out of commissions for the said new deals.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL 777 Configuration Switch From 2-5-2 To 3-3-3 posted Wed Jan 18 2006 04:48:22 by Airplanetire
SIA To Order New Airbus And Boeing Aircrafts posted Wed Oct 27 2010 23:27:23 by 328JET
More Private Jets Ordered From Airbus And Boeing posted Wed Oct 18 2006 16:47:20 by Manni
Domestic Series From Airbus And Boeing posted Mon Jun 4 2001 14:04:50 by SK A340
AF To Switch To 77W On MIA Route From Nov 1st? posted Thu Dec 16 2010 01:18:41 by LY777
BI To Switch Order From 77L To 77W posted Tue Oct 19 2010 17:50:25 by KFlyer
Aegean To Switch From STN To LHR? posted Thu Aug 6 2009 03:41:07 by Kiwiandrew
9W To Switch To B789 From B788? posted Tue Jul 29 2008 16:13:09 by LAXDESI
Northwest To Switch From Pepsi To Coke Products? posted Tue Jan 8 2008 17:04:19 by 1337Delta764
Why Did Cathay Pacific Switch From A330 To The B777-300 posted Tue Jun 26 2007 07:46:46 by PIAflyer