Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Its Official; CX Orders 3 More 748F. Cancels 777F  
User currently offlineCX Flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6642 posts, RR: 55
Posted (1 year 10 months 2 days ago) and read 14605 times:

A press release posted on the Hong Kong Stock exchange website:

http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/list...sehk/2013/0301/LTN201303011355.pdf

Basically, three more 748Fs ordered (To be delivered 2013!! - what frames are these?)

Existing order for eight 777Fs cancelled and transferred to Air China Cargo who will sell seven 747-400BCFs.

CX has taken up options for five 777Fs.

Boeing will buy back four 747-400BCFs from CX.

29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13552 posts, RR: 100
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days ago) and read 14520 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

This surprised me. I guess the 748F performs 'well enough' for CX!

Quoting CX Flyboy (Thread starter):
(To be delivered 2013!! - what frames are these?)

Boeing had not sold out the line and is 'hungry' for short term orders. A win-win for both.

Quoting CX Flyboy (Thread starter):
Boeing will buy back four 747-400BCFs from CX.

Nice deal for CX...

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineCX Flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6642 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days ago) and read 14460 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 1):
Quoting CX Flyboy (Thread starter):
Boeing will buy back four 747-400BCFs from CX.

Nice deal for CX...

CX has been desperate to offload the BCFs remaining in our fleet. B-KAE had already been painted all-white for return to Boeing soon. All the 744BCFs have been retired from CX service already - not a particularly fruitful experiment for CX was the BCF!

Air China Cargo has also been desperate to offload their BCFs so this 777F deal works well for them.


User currently offlineHBGDS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 2 days ago) and read 14125 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 1):
Boeing had not sold out the line and is 'hungry' for short term orders. A win-win for both.

  

Definitely. According to this piece, Boeing is actually parking 748Fs in the desert and its backlog is sinking fast (67 firm orders, 38 built)
http://cargofacts.net/profiles/blogs...es-reflect-the-decline-in-demand-f


User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31440 posts, RR: 85
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 14053 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

747-400 converted freighters lost their luster as soon as the 777 freighter entered service. The latest-spec 777Fs will lift 95% of the weight and 89% of the volume with significantly better operating costs.




Quoting lightsaber (Reply 1):
I guess the 748F performs 'well enough' for CX!

While it doesn't yet have the payload-range that CX had hoped, their head of Cargo Operations has been quite favorable of the type in his comments to the press.


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26175 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 13964 times:

Interesting on the 777F.

Only couple months ago I heard CX Cargo VP Nick Rhodes speak about how they were looking forward to the 777F as it would provide a good regional feeder plane, allow the permanent retirement of the mostly parked BCF fleet, and also be good to replace -400F on some markets that did not warrant the capacity.

Clearly there were ongoing talks behind the scenes with partner Air China and regarding their joint venture cargo carrier operations.

Interesting !



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 13218 posts, RR: 36
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 13830 times:

Quoting CX Flyboy (Thread starter):
Basically, three more 748Fs ordered (To be delivered 2013!! - what frames are these?)


Line number 1483, 1484 & 1486. Those frames appeared in the assembly order list last year, see:

Official 747-8 Flight Tracking & Production #10 (by 747classic Nov 24 201 in Civil Aviation)

[Edited 2013-03-01 07:46:58]


Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently offlinefrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3849 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 13831 times:

The 748F is a good fit for CX. A top up order was to be expected, and I would bet on a couple more in the future.

The 777F, on the other hand, is not that convenient for CX's ops. Their cargo operation doesn't palletize loads.
The pallets are just delivered and transferred between aircrafts. Different types mean different pallet shapes and extra workload to transfer between different aircrafts, which Cathay is not geared to do.



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlinena From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10818 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 13549 times:

Fine, lets hope this is followed by a substantial order for 748Is soon!

Quoting CX Flyboy (Reply 2):
Air China Cargo has also been desperate to offload their BCFs so this 777F deal works well for them.

Hmm, so why then are they taking another one these days? http://www.skyliner-aviation.de/regdb.main?LC=nav4&page=4


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 13218 posts, RR: 36
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 13513 times:

Quoting na (Reply 8):
Hmm, so why then are they taking another one these days?

Because they have to wait at least a year before Boeing can deliver a 777? Just guessing.



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently offlinena From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10818 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 13449 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 9):
Because they have to wait at least a year before Boeing can deliver a 777? Just guessing.

Likely, yes.
Seems all the operators still flying 742Fs will be able to get 744BCFs for graps soon. The whole cargo-market situation is not looking good for further 744 conversions right now. Are there any frames under conversion at the moment?


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 13218 posts, RR: 36
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 13368 times:

Quoting na (Reply 10):
Seems all the operators still flying 742Fs will be able to get 744BCFs for graps soon.

I hope so. The high fuel and maintenance costs of those old frames may force airlines to pull out of the cargo market.

This is a nice article about the weak cargo market: http://www.scmp.com/business/compani...airlines-pull-out-air-cargo-market

[Edited 2013-03-01 08:36:27]


Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently onlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12973 posts, RR: 25
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 13094 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 11):
This is a nice article about the weak cargo market: http://www.scmp.com/business/compani...arket

Seems this thread is crossing with the CA one a lot.

That thread also had a good article posted;

http://cargofacts.net/profiles/blogs...es-reflect-the-decline-in-demand-f

It notes on top of it all, the flood of pax 777Ws and A330s into the airlines means a lot more belly space has come onto the market, undermining the pure freighter companies.

I'm not at all sure why Boeing would be taking back BCFs, unless there was a clause allowing customers to return them if they bought new iron.



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineSEPilot From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 7202 posts, RR: 50
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 13071 times:

Quoting CX Flyboy (Reply 2):

CX has been desperate to offload the BCFs remaining in our fleet. B-KAE had already been painted all-white for return to Boeing soon. All the 744BCFs have been retired from CX service already - not a particularly fruitful experiment for CX was the BCF!

What exactly was their problem with the BCF? Does Air China have the same complaint?



The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...Dan Keebler
User currently offlinekaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12600 posts, RR: 34
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 12816 times:

Quoting SEPilot (Reply 13):
What exactly was their problem with the BCF? Does Air China have the same complaint?

Is it that the -BCF doesn't have an opening nose section (as on standard 744F/748Fs), which obviously makes loading/unloading a pain.

Does the BCF have any difference in range or payload compared to the standard -400F?


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 13218 posts, RR: 36
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 12609 times:

Quoting kaitak (Reply 14):
Does the BCF have any difference in range or payload compared to the standard -400F?

I found this on aspireaviation.com:

"As for grounding the 747-400BCF, the cost saving is more significant as not only the 747-8F is 16% more fuel efficient per payload tonne than the 747-400F and around 23% more fuel efficient than the 747-400BCF, the 747-400BCF is also maintenance-heavy which is very expensive."

So yes, there is clearly a difference between the -400BCF and the -400F.



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31440 posts, RR: 85
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 11906 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Revelation (Reply 12):
I'm not at all sure why Boeing would be taking back BCFs, unless there was a clause allowing customers to return them if they bought new iron.

Boeing can re-sell them to operators currently flying 747-200 freighters. They can also use them to re-stock their 747-400 spares stores.



Quoting kaitak (Reply 14):
Does the BCF have any difference in range or payload compared to the standard -400F?

The 747-400BCF is about 9% down on volume due to floor loading and whether or not one cuts forward on the upper deck to recover some extra ceiling space. Payload will depend on what the weights of the donor aircraft are.


User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26175 posts, RR: 50
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 11794 times:

I forgot the exact quote but the Atlas Air CEO in an earnings call made a comment about the BCF.

He basically said the model lacked payload capability (it has higher OEW, lacks nose door etc), had heavier maintenance burden, and worse operational reliability.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineflightsimer From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 606 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9902 times:

Quoting na (Reply 10):

Yes, Evergreen still has at least one in conversion with Boeing ATM with another two expected by years end. At least. Hat was the plan as of December.



Commercial Pilot- SEL, MEL, Instrument
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26175 posts, RR: 50
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 9009 times:

Here is what the head of Cathay Cargo had to say about the BCF during an interview with Air Cargo World in November.

As the 747-8s entered service, Cathay has taken out older freighters, namely its 747-400BCFs.

When fuel prices were lower, there was a case on some routes to use older freighters, but in the current situation the BCFs are a burden, especially on long-haul routes, Rhodes reflected. “If you fly Hong Kong-Paris and back [with an older freighter], your revenue gets nowhere near covering the cost of fuel,” he said.

Cathay’s fleet is now down to 21 freighter aircraft — eight 747-8s, which are used chiefly across the Pacific, six 747-400ERFs (deployed on sectors to Europe) and six 747-400Fs serving regional lanes. Cathay also has one remaining 747-400BCF on lease, which is used largely for backup. “Twenty one freighters seems optimal for us in the current market conditions. We will get two more -8s next year. I hope the market will pick up, otherwise we will have to take out some capacity,” Rhodes said.


Also -

A few years back, the idea of turning some of these 747-400s into all-cargo configurations may have looked appealing, but the downturn has all but buried such a scenario. “There is no sense in retaining any -400 for conversion. It would take a dramatic fall in the fuel price to make that look viable,” Rhodes commented.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently onlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12973 posts, RR: 25
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 8634 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 16):
Boeing can re-sell them to operators currently flying 747-200 freighters. They can also use them to re-stock their 747-400 spares stores.

From what I can see, most of the -200Fs are already gone, and many of their operators went with them, or are on the verge of going with them.

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 15):
"As for grounding the 747-400BCF, the cost saving is more significant as not only the 747-8F is 16% more fuel efficient per payload tonne than the 747-400F and around 23% more fuel efficient than the 747-400BCF, the 747-400BCF is also maintenance-heavy which is very expensive."
Quoting Stitch (Reply 16):
The 747-400BCF is about 9% down on volume due to floor loading and whether or not one cuts forward on the upper deck to recover some extra ceiling space.
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 19):
Rhodes reflected. “If you fly Hong Kong-Paris and back [with an older freighter], your revenue gets nowhere near covering the cost of fuel,” he said.

All very interesting. In a way it can be looked at as a positive for Boeing, especially the 3rd quote, which can be read as saying if you want to be a player you need to have the -8F.



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineCX Flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6642 posts, RR: 55
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 8216 times:

Quoting na (Reply 8):
Quoting CX Flyboy (Reply 2):
Air China Cargo has also been desperate to offload their BCFs so this 777F deal works well for them.

Hmm, so why then are they taking another one these days? http://www.skyliner-aviation.de/regd...age=4

Cathay now own half of Air China Cargo. Cathay's investment in the airline involved a large payment not of cash, but of several 747-400BCFs in lieu of cash payment. God knows why Air China agreed to such a thing....I suppose CX marketed the BCFs to them very well ! Anyway Air China soon told CX that they did not want the remaining frames that were going to them but it was all part of a deal in black and white and it was hard to get out of it. CX wanted those BCFs gone from it's own fleet. This latest deal obviously works for everyone and I wonder whether that is a big part of the reason why these 8 777Fs have been diverted to Air China Cargo. Sounds like part of a very complicated behind the scenes deal.

As for the latest BCF, I imagine it will still join the Air China Cargo fleet but for how long would be interesting to know, especially since the 777Fs start arriving this year to them.


User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13552 posts, RR: 100
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 6867 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'm still waiting for another 748I order. I haven't given up hope yet.   

Quoting Stitch (Reply 4):

747-400 converted freighters lost their luster as soon as the 777 freighter entered service. The latest-spec 777Fs will lift 95% of the weight and 89% of the volume with significantly better operating costs.

That is a wise move by Boeing. While cutting 744 future revenue.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 4):
While it doesn't yet have the payload-range that CX had hoped, their head of Cargo Operations has been quite favorable of the type in his comments to the press.

I think you noticed all my comments were 'understated.' I'll be more excited about the 748 after a little weight loss and an engine PIP, but it is a good airframe.

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 15):
the 747-400BCF is also maintenance-heavy which is very expensive."

I'm not surprised that the BCFs have a few extra issues...

Quoting Revelation (Reply 20):
From what I can see, most of the -200Fs are already gone, and many of their operators went with them, or are on the verge of going with them.

How many hours are the 742Fs flying per year? I'm just curious. I'd imagine they are not high utilization today.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlinesweair From Sweden, joined Nov 2011, 1834 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5842 times:

With less heavy air freighters in the future air forces the 748f can find a niche, somewhat outsized cargo can be loaded through the nose door, not very wide or high items but long items that no other cargo aircraft can load through the side door. And it can carry a decent load about as far as the 77F, 130t iirc. It will need infrastructure that heavy airlift does not.

User currently offlineFlyer732 From Namibia, joined Nov 1999, 1368 posts, RR: 21
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5713 times:

Quoting kaitak (Reply 14):
Is it that the -BCF doesn't have an opening nose section (as on standard 744F/748Fs), which obviously makes loading/unloading a pain.

Not really, on the 744F if there isn't a need for oversized cargo, they won't open the nose door. I can't tell you how many times I've watched Cargolux in LUX load a 744F without ever opening the nose door.


25 VC10er : Why did FedEx never fly a 747 of any type? I am a total novice here, but when I see UPS 747's (I assume they still have them) why were they wrong for
26 col : They had a few when they took over Flying Tiger, but they didn't operate for too long.
27 Flying-Tiger : Can´t get rid of the feeling that this one of the less-stellar freighter deals of Boeing. In total it is just three new freighters added for Boeing,
28 na : Well, you never know. CX is in the pipeline to order a VLA, and this could point towards the 748I!
29 Stitch : If Boeing was willing to "buy the business", I expect we'd see a fair bit more 747-8 Intercontinental orders and Boeing would not be trying to secure
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CX Orders 2 More 773ER posted Thu Jun 1 2006 19:39:31 by Navion
Official CX Orders 16 777-300ER Plus 20 Options posted Thu Dec 1 2005 09:37:54 by CCA
American Orders 5 More B777-300ERs posted Fri Feb 1 2013 08:09:23 by behramjee
EL AL Orders 2 More 737-900ER's posted Fri Aug 3 2012 17:16:28 by redrooster3
BA Orders More 777's posted Thu Jul 5 2012 09:39:46 by Sheridan125
ALC Orders 8 More 789's + MoU For 60 737 MAX's posted Tue May 1 2012 09:54:25 by redrooster3
Saudi Arabian Orders 8 More 77W's posted Tue Jan 24 2012 07:17:40 by redrooster3
Qatar Orders More A380's, Recieves 100th Plane posted Sat Oct 1 2011 23:31:40 by QatarA340
LH Orders 2 More A 380 posted Thu Sep 29 2011 07:14:39 by N14AZ
Republic Orders More E190s For Frontier posted Mon Nov 8 2010 07:09:06 by william