CYKA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1390 times:
Several reports of people calling via cell phones from the doomed planes reported that there were severel terrorists armed with knives or simular stabbing weapons onboard.
Now, considering that there were 80+ people on average on each flight, couldn't they have overpowered the few attakers and taken control over the situation instead of sitting in their seats comfortably until the a/c were crashed into their targets?
It seems to me, that as citizens of the US they should have done something to prevent this tragedy. The only oddball of these events is the crash of the 757 near Pitsburgh(sp?), which does suggest some onboard struggle since the a/c crashed short of any target.
YYZ-Barry From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 21 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1243 times:
I think this is a valid question - but I believe that they probably acted very quickly, and probably attacked with great violence, i.e. slitting one of the FA's throat...at that point no matter how small the weapon, people will pay attention...plus I think it should not be overlooked that the flights had few PAXs...I think that was a factor...
these terrorists were working on a very short timeframe...they needed to take over the plane, subdue the crew and passengers and complete their mission...
don't know if anyone else thought about all those awful movies (i.e. Turbalence) that have come up in recent days...in the movies there are always demands, deadlines and whatever...today we saw what reality is...
CYKA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1191 times:
It is belived that they did not not have any firearms or other explosives, rather only stabbing weapons.(Besides how would they get them on the plane? I have transported army knives in my hand bag before so thats possible).
As one man I would not openly oppose the terrorists but a small group of pax sitting close by could have stormed one as a unit and others on the plane done the same once they realized what was going on.
Sure a few people would have gotten injured but the situation was, in my opinion, menageble. I cetainly wouldn't sit and do nothing, especially with the aircraft flying unusualy fast in close proximity to the ground.
Willfly4food From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 74 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1164 times:
Keep in mind this was a new idea. No one has ever done this before. I only hope that this will change the attitudes of passengers and crew alike. Anyone who acts in a threatening manner, be it a drugged out air-rager or worse, should be dealt with in an extream manner on any flight. I'm sorry to those who are ready to cry about their rights and blah, blah, blah, There are few options at 37,000 feet. People need to learn to behave or face that you will be dealt with the way I beleive Americans will deal with Bull Sh** from now on.
My thoughts and love go to all the families and friends of the victoms.
My hope for suffering goes to the families of the perpetators.
Srbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1148 times:
They just reported that one of them passengers on the plane that crashed outside of Pittsburgh called his wife on his cell phone telling her that he loved her and that he and two other passengers were going to try to overthrow the hijackers. One can now speculate that perhaps these three heroes sacrificed the lives of all of those onboard to save the lives of perhaps thousands (rumored targets were either the White House, the Capitol, or the Pentagon) on the ground in Washington D.C. It has also been reported in order to gain flightdeck access, the hijackers started to kill flight attendants so that one of the pilots would be forced to leave the cockpit and allow these hijackers access to the flight deck. I personally think that these passengers were in total complete shock of what was unfolding before them to really react in a manner to save their lives and the untold thousands that were killed on the ground. The one report I heard tonight while I was at work that really got me angry was that on one of the flights the hijackers commandeered, they herded the passengers into the rear of the plane and those with cellphones were told to call their families and tell them that they were going to die. This tragedy was not unavoidable, as how can one defend against a faceless enemy? As long as America is the global superpower, there will always be people that wish harm onto our country. The Oklahoma City bombing was early on thought to have been the work of Middle Eastern terrorists, only after a few days was it determined that it was the work of homegrown terrorists. These bombings in New York and Washington are clearly the work of a very sophisticated terrorist network, possibly those of Oslama Bin Laden, perpetuated and planned over a long period of time, not just something that was developed over a month or two. For all we know, this attack had been in the planning stage for a year or more. Today, America lost its' safety and sense of security.
Willfly4food From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 74 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1106 times:
That is no longer the thought, not after today. Now no one would be stupid enough to hijack an airplane and think they would live. Pax will now (I hope) kill anyone who poses a threat to a flight. There is no way you could hijack and think that the pax expect anything less than what happened today.
Airnewzealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2546 posts, RR: 6
Reply 11, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1098 times:
The passengers would of most probably had no idea of the intentions of what was going to happen to them!! Like most Hijackings, they land, and a list of demands are given!! Therefore, Pax, and Cabin Crew members ould of thought to remain calm, and do what the Hijackers said!!
A UA Flight Attendant onboard said that the hijackers had stabbed to death 2 Flight attendants and are entering the cockpit. She then said that they were going to the cockpit. The phone then Cut off...Minutes later they crashed.
There we have it...that is my theory any way!! It must of been really bad onboard...
PS: They took over the polane with Paper scissors and Butter knives served out onboard...The also took out Metal knives from the Galley! It is reported.
Victor Hotel From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 305 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1075 times:
Like mentioned before, I doubt anyone on board knew what the hijackers had in mind. The passengers probably belived they just wanted refuge in another country, so why risk your or other passengers lives when you belive there is a chance of servival by co-operation. I also think that had any one had the idea that they were headed for a building full of civilians they would have risked their lives anyway to try and steer away and possibly ditch in the harbour. Even if it meant being killed by the hijackers anyway.
STEINWAY From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1071 times:
May be those events are going to change pax reaction in future hijackings? Maybe pax won't remain in "quiet" in their seats anymore as they know how bad it can end up.
This is a page turned in "classic" hijacking and pax behaviour during hijacking.
Hias From Germany, joined Sep 2000, 349 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1068 times:
I know Northwest Airlines had a procedure for cabin crews when they notice that the plane has been hijacked and hijackers are in the cockpit. This procedure told them to do nothing to disturb the flight crew and the hijacker...
ELAL 744 From Israel, joined Jun 2000, 176 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1045 times:
I may be mistaken, but anti-terrorist lore has it that on an Ethiopian Airliner that was hijacked, the 2 hijackers were overcome by the onboard security staff. They then tied the terrorists to chairs and placed towels on their chests and slit their throats, watching them bleed to death. This is not in keeping with the idea of trial by jury, however it is a fantastic deterrent.
The people who are behind this tragedy, or who gave comfort to them should take warning: this attack has changed things. To paraphrase from the Koran: “Though you may dwell in high towers – death will come to you”.
Mandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6995 posts, RR: 78
Reply 18, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 994 times:
Pilots are responsible to make sure the pax don't get harmed. In most cases, they would obey what the hijacker wants... or at least pretend to... Anyway, pilots would assume it's a "normal" hijacking, and not a terrorist attack to use the plane as a bomb !
Hijackers need only say "I have explosives" while carrying a knife and the pilots would obey... by the time they realise this is not a "normal" hijacking, it would be too late...
Sad sad loss indeed...
When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
B757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 22, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 912 times:
My mom got caught once with pepper spray in her purse. The security people took it before they would allow us through the security gate. I still think an employee(s) @ BOS, EWR, and DCA placed the weapons on the aircraft before anyone anyone actually was on the plane.
DC10Tony From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1012 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (13 years 4 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 890 times:
One of the reasons why I think the pax didn't do anything is probably because on each flight, the terrorists didn't make themselves known until about 10 min. before the crash, and when they made themselves known, they might've told pax. that they wouldn't be harmed if they cooperated. Had the pax known it was a kamikazi mission, I'm sure someone would've tried something.