Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fastest Airliner?  
User currently offlineRapo From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 395 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2561 times:

What is the fastest jetliner - current or older? Also, is it that cut and dry (engine choice, long/short range version, length)? Tell me what you know on the subject.

Thanks

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2279 times:

___

User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (15 years 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2297 times:

Well, other than the obvious "Concorde" answer (thank you Iain!), I believe that the fastest SUB-sonic airliner during commercial service is the 747SP, this due to the power to weight ratio with the PW's, and the reduced weight and drag from the fuselage shortening (among other modifications).

Airbus Industries, however, claims that the A340-200 has set the speed record--not flight time, but MPH (I believe they were flying AKL-Europe non-stop on that one...).

FLY777UAL


User currently offlineSea nw dc10 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 491 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (15 years 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2272 times:

hellooooo, concorde! duh! haha j/k

STEVE


User currently offlineMegatop From Denmark, joined May 1999, 349 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (15 years 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2266 times:

The Concorde is very fast. I had the plesure of flying on a AF Concorde i 1988.

But i belive that the russian TU144 was a little bit faster. But it did not stay on for a long time.

Megatop



User currently offlineDC-10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2252 times:

The Convair 880 and 990's routinely turned 5 hour flights into 3.5 hour flights or less....They cruised at over 660mph....cruised mind you...

User currently offlineBuff From Australia, joined Mar 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (15 years 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2225 times:

Ummm, 660 mph is 574 knots. The speed of sound at -60C is 573 knots. I'm having a little difficulty with the declared speed of either a CV880 or 990. Not the posters who have these handles, but the airplanes mentioned above.

There are a couple of determining factors about how fast an "airliner" can safely go. By airliner, I understand something the size of an F-28 or above, and a jet powered aircraft. In the old days, a DC-4 was an airliner, as was a DC-3...

Jet powered aircraft are usually far less efficient in design than the engines strapped onto them. What I mean by this is that the airliner can only go so fast before it approaches the speed of sound. Approaching the speed of sound, drag increases logarithmically, hence very efficient "streamlining" is required in the airframe design to minimize that extra drag.

The drag phenomenon makes itself known though prior to the aircraft going M1.0. Due to various curvatures on and around the airframe, certain airflows over the plane may reach local M1.0 even though the airplane itself is only doing, say M0.85. This becomes the Critical Mach number of the airframe.

Modern jetliners are now routinely flying at M0.86 (B747-400, MD11) to name two. Some (G-IV and Citation X) can achieve M0.90 or slightly more. Mind you, they might not be considered to be jetliners by some. I'm just using them to illustrate the discussion.

Having said all this, even when the airplane is cruising at it's fastest cruise speed, the engines are more than capable of providing more thrust. Most modern jet aircraft can easily exceed their MMO's in level flight, but at great cost and great danger.

So the best way to improve the cruising speed, i.e. obtain the highest MMO possible, is to improve the airframe design. Two noticeable means of achieving this are the incorporation of area rule (DC-10, MDll center engine nacelle design, B747-200 upper deck design) to delay onset of supersonic airflow, and drag reduction (winglets, optimum airfoil design/sweep). I say drag reduction because no operator is going to operate their jet aircraft above its best lift/drag configuration for long if they want to make any money at it.

There is a lot more to this subject, and I apologize in advance for not expounding each point in more detail. But I suspect some haven't even made it down this far...

In closing, other than the Concorde and the Russian TU-144, I would offer the two I mentioned above (747-400,MD11) as my answer to the posed question.

Hit me with your best shots!

Best Regards,

Buff


User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8912 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (15 years 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2215 times:

The fastest was the Tupolev TU-144, but the Concorde is the fastest airliner in the world, going Mach 2.04 (1336 MPH).

Jeff


User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9533 posts, RR: 42
Reply 8, posted (15 years 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2206 times:

Of course you're right about the CV-990, Buff but, from a Big Book I have, the CV-990 still managed a maximum level speed of 615 mph with the 747-200B at 602 mph and the MD-11 at 597 mph. I'm sure it depends how you measure it, though. What a pity Convair didn't get the CV-880 quite right from a marketing point of view.

I believe Convair's '880' and '990' referred loosely to their speed in feet per second though I've never bothered to check the numbers to see how well they succeded. That would make the 990 10% faster than the 880. Maybe it was just the '880' and '990' was a logical number for the follow-on.


User currently offlineBuff From Australia, joined Mar 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (15 years 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

Thanks DavidL. I'm not as big a "buff" on some of the finer points as you've posted, historically speaking. Your observation makes a lot more sense, although with those older generation airframes (CV), I doubt it was an economical cruise speed!

With regards my posting above, I was responding to the statement "The Convair 880 and 990's routinely turned 5 hour flights into 3.5 hour flights or less....They cruised at over 660mph....cruised mind you." Perhaps I overreacted to poetic license!

Interesting topic though - thanks DavidL for putting some real numbers into the discussion!

Best Regards,

Buff


User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5066 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (15 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2189 times:

Fastest airliner is a Egyptair 767 that is in a dive! So fast we're talking zero G's here.


sorry if its tastless I just had to lighten things up



Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1015 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (15 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2193 times:

I'm surprised the 777 wasn't listed along with the 747 or MD11. It really hauls ass. One of it's selling points is it is as fast or will pass other airliners in the sky.

User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11496 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (15 years 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2176 times:

yes, the 777 is pretty quick, but still is not as quick as the 747 and i guess MD11. Surprised to hear that it was so quick, but I guess since its based on the DC10, which was also designed around the time of the 747 when fuel costed less than water practically. (As an aside, fuel still cost less than Coke.   )

An interesting note is that the 767 and 757 are both rather slow in comparison to other jets. They were designed during a fuel crisis, and emphasis was put on incredible efficiency which inherently limits speed. (That's probably why 767s make such good gliders   ) I don't know if the new 764 is any faster with its new wing. I know the new wings of the 737 series made them faster and more efficient. Completely a function of the cost of fuel at the time of design...

...but, then there's the 340... slow slow slow...



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineDas Flugzeug From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 161 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (15 years 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2177 times:

I've heard numerous references to the A340's lack of speed ex. "Lufthansa 747 pilots regularly laugh at the speed of the A340" and just above, "A340 slow, slow, slow."

So, how slow is this thing? And why? Is the A330 as slow?


User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9533 posts, RR: 42
Reply 14, posted (15 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Buff, I hope I didn't come over as a know-all. I just looked it up! The reason I looked it up was because I was as surprised as you were by the 660mph figure (sorry to go on about it, DC-10 - you were right to bring up the CV-990) but thought the 990 was faster than your average airliner. Of course, it no longer enters the equation for current aircraft.

As for the economies of flying at 615 mph, the point here may be that it's a maximum speed. I have no idea what speed they were typically operated at.

But I also heard, on a documentary about the 747 on Discovery last night, a 747-400 captain from Virgin saying one of the things he liked about the 400 was that "other than Concorde, it's the fastest commercial aircraft". It was on TV so you must be right, Buff!


User currently offlineBuff From Australia, joined Mar 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (15 years 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2161 times:

If it's on TV, then it has to be right, eh?! Again, I was only referring to the original question of cruising speeds. I remember hearing a 747 call in his speed as M0.86, a G-IV M0.87, and Cessna advertises their C-X to "cruise" at M0.91.

And it is me who should apologize David L for getting so carried away with this topic!

Best Regards,

Buff


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Fastest Airliner: 747 Or 727 posted Mon Apr 2 2001 17:06:02 by DIA
Fastest Airliner? posted Wed Feb 14 2001 23:17:52 by JMJ
What Is The Fastest Airliner Apart From Concorde? posted Thu Oct 26 2000 22:14:30 by GKirk
Fastest Airliner? posted Tue Nov 16 1999 06:19:13 by Rapo
Isn't B747 The Fastest Commercial Airliner Today? posted Sun Mar 27 2005 03:30:28 by TRVYYZ
Fastest Commercial Airliner.. posted Sat May 22 2004 01:54:36 by Planespotterx
Whats The Fastest Sub-sonic Airliner? posted Tue Jan 1 2002 16:45:15 by Arsenal@LHR
Fastest None SST Airliner posted Tue Nov 27 2001 12:20:08 by VS744
Fastest Non-jet Airliner posted Thu Feb 15 2001 04:03:23 by Csavel
Which Is The Fastest, NON-supersonic Airliner ? posted Mon Jan 3 2000 06:53:55 by HP-873