Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could / Should G4 Consider Merging/acquiring F9?  
User currently onlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16814 posts, RR: 51
Posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1846 times:

Would G4 acquiring F9 be something that might be a solution for both carriers? F9 has been headed away from the traditional services, DEN hub, and more towards the G4 mode (TTN). F9 and G4 merging would give G4 some newer aircraft to replace the MD-80s. They are starting to bump up against each other in some markets, combining would give them a leg up on their next competitor NK.

(According to Wikipedia)

G4 has 61 MD-80s, F9 has 50 Airbuses. Seems to me G4 gets a chance to totally reorganize to a younger fleet.

In addition to the existing G4 vacation markets in Arizona, Nevada, California, Hawaii and Florida G4 would be able to capitalize on F9's history in Colorado to perhaps start marketing Ski vacations. Similar to their other destinations, weekly services to Colorado ski resorts. Seems like good opportunities to further promote their vacation packages.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinejerseyguy From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1951 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1795 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I find with most of these true ULCC airlines, you think your saving money but when you add in all the services that you need, it ends up costing almost the same price as an LCC. G4 has seat-assignment at time of booking fees of up to $75!!!, credit card surcharges and a carrier usage fee (which is kind of like NKs charge, for use of the website only way to avoid is to go to the airport)

That being said, it does make sense in the business sense. F9 employees hate the outsourcing of their airport staff just wait till they work for G4)

[Edited 2013-04-02 14:42:01]


Frontier Early Returns Ascent Status| Webmaster of an unoffical TTN page see profile for details
User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1900 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1754 times:

One thing to consider is that while both G4 and F9 are ULCC's, they operate different types of business models. G4 does not offer connections, G4 does not fly international routes, and G4 focuses on selling combined travel packages as opposed to just airfare.

NK would be a better match followed by B6.


User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6708 posts, RR: 32
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1728 times:

Quoting STT757 (Thread starter):
Would G4 acquiring F9 be something that might be a solution for both carriers? F9 has been headed away from the traditional services, DEN hub, and more towards the G4 mode (TTN). F9 and G4 merging would give G4 some newer aircraft to replace the MD-80s.

In short: Not really. Using the F9 fleet to "replace the MD-80s" would imply a much, much smaller combined carrier. And G4 doesn't really need to buy F9 to acquire aircraft; there are plenty of A319's available at attractive prices for G4 to pick up on its own. In fact, G4 management said so much when they announced the addition of the Airbus to their fleet. As the NEO's start to roll off the line, values of the OEO A32X aircraft in service will decline more rapidly (as will happen with the 737NG-to-737MAX transition), so G4 will have further opportunities to acquire good-quality used Airbuses at advantageous prices.

As things currently stand, G4 would be well-served by putting their A319's into high-utilization lines of flying and using the MD-80's primarily on shorter routes and peak-flying days. The lease costs of the A319's are significantly higher than G4's ownership costs for the MD-80's, but this is counterbalanced by the A319's lower block-hour cost (also keeping in mind that there is higher revenue potential with the MD-80, since it has more seats).


User currently offlinestlgph From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 9298 posts, RR: 25
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1670 times:

Allegiant doesnt want an airline in its portfolio.
Allegiant's focus and main model is a travel company operating its own air services.



Eternal darkness we all should dread. It's hard to party when you're dead.
User currently offlinebobloblaw From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1604 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1506 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

What for???? Another a.net question.

User currently offlineDesertAir From Mexico, joined Jan 2006, 1457 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1354 times:

Both airlines seem to be very different creatures (pardon the pun). Frontier functions as a traditional airline, hub and spoke and some point to point. Allegiant functions has a scheduled (frequencies) in response to demand airline. I think with the merger and creation of mega carrier, there is and will be room for smaller nitch players and start/ups.

User currently offlinePlanesNTrains From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 5445 posts, RR: 29
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1211 times:

I see it a little differently, though I'm not sure it matters as how I see it doesn't mean it would work.  

F9 operates hub-and-spoke, point-to-point, and Apple Vacations-type scheduled/charter services. Quite a blend of operations, and a pretty decent mix of each. AFAIK, blending the vacations-oriented G4 with the more tradionally-weighted F9 might give a really nice hybrid mix for the combined system. I don't think you'd need to eliminate one or the other necessarily either - G4 could keep doing what G4 does, with F9 transitioning some of the Apple-type stuff to G4 perhaps.

I can see a lot of synergies between the two in station costs/staffing, fleet training/maintenance (Airbus), and sharing of the vacation services and expertise of G4 but morphed onto the F9 system as well.

With fleet, I'd imagine F9 taking on the 80 NEO's, with their existing CEO's (all owned anyhow) moving over to G4. This woud keep the newer, more efficient (and expensive) fleet flying higher-frequency schedules at Frontier, while the older, more maintenance driven and less efficient (but less expensive to own) fleet would fly the lower utilization schedules of G4.

The travel arm that currently sells G4 itineraries could just as easily sell Frontier itineraries. At select airports, there could be a limited option of interlining, at least as a trial. I see this as limited - perhaps a few cities would have G4 service to DEN in the winter for vacations, but offering connections to F9 onward points.

I've pondered these things before so I'm not saying anything new or original. I think one big impediment would be the $150M (or whatever it is) judgment against F9 by Republic that they have deferred due to acquiring F9. Unless Bedford wants to explain to the shareholders of Republic why he is writing that off, he will need to get at least get that plus change for Frontier, and that doesn't include any Frontier debt assumptions, repaying Republic for the NEO delivery positions or any deposits, etc. Those could be even more insurmountable obstacles than the logistical questions.

-Dave



Totes my goats!
User currently offlinemariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24999 posts, RR: 85
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1191 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PlanesNTrains (Reply 7):
I've pondered these things before so I'm not saying anything new or original. I think one big impediment would be the $150M (or whatever it is) judgment against F9 by Republic that they have deferred due to acquiring F9. Unless Bedford wants to explain to the shareholders of Republic why he is writing that off, he will need to get at least get that plus change for Frontier, and that doesn't include any Frontier debt assumptions, repaying Republic for the NEO delivery positions or any deposits, etc. Those could be even more insurmountable obstacles than the logistical questions.

I'm glad someone else understands that - especially the $150 million.  

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently onlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7189 posts, RR: 17
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1168 times:

Lets also look at who these airlines attract-
F9 seems to attract many of the general public, including business pax.

G4 is for leisure travelers, and many times travelers who have little in the way of cash.

I don't see this as a good merger either. Two very different business models.



One of the FB admins for PHX Spotters. "Zach the Expat!"
User currently offlinePlanesNTrains From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 5445 posts, RR: 29
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1150 times:

Quoting mariner (Reply 8):
I'm glad someone else understands that - especially the $150 million.

Well, to be fair, I get that line of thought from you.  

-Dave



Totes my goats!
User currently offlinemariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 24999 posts, RR: 85
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1146 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PlanesNTrains (Reply 10):
Well, to be fair, I get that line of thought from you.

Fair enough. Good memory, though.  

mariner

[Edited 2013-04-02 23:00:15]


aeternum nauta
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Could/Should AA Replace The A300's With 7E7's? posted Tue Jan 4 2005 03:21:02 by TriJetFan1
Should Delta Consider Seattle To Paris Route? posted Sat Nov 8 2003 09:23:35 by Connector4you
Should LOT Consider The 767-400? posted Fri Oct 17 2003 03:57:26 by Cancidas
Could/Should Gulfstream Be In The RJ Game? posted Sun Jan 12 2003 15:22:18 by FlagshipAZ
Should CX Consider 744D? posted Thu Dec 19 2002 09:13:39 by CX 4ever
Should CX Consider Taking Over Ansett? posted Mon Sep 17 2001 12:29:08 by United Airline
Should PIA Consider The B 747-400? posted Thu May 3 2001 08:23:58 by United Airline
Should CX Consider Narrowbodies As Well? posted Wed Apr 18 2001 06:16:03 by United Airline
Should ( And Could ) BA Cut The Link With IB? posted Sun Dec 23 2012 17:38:00 by Gonzalo
Will MDT See Additional Sevice From F9/G4? posted Fri Dec 14 2012 13:55:10 by SaabFA71