Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Don't Any US Airports Have Glass Jetbridges?  
User currently offlinemiami From United States of America, joined Sep 2012, 1555 posts, RR: 51
Posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 16912 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

To me personally it's weird that none of the US Airports have glass jetways.

Does anyone know why US Airports don't have glass jetbridges?

It's weird that the new TBIT at LAX doesn't have glass jetways. Same with MIA's Concourse J and SFO's Terminal 2 for example.

Thanks for your replies!     


Aviation is proof that given, the will, we have the capacity to achieve the impossible. - Eddie Rickenbacker
58 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7757 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16848 times:

From what I heard it was to save money and for security related reasons. Not sure the specs but I'm assuming they don't want anyone breaking the glass out and jumping in the airfield  


我思うゆえに我あり。(Jap. 'I think, therefore I am.')
User currently offlinemia305 From United States of America, joined Mar 2013, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16802 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 1):

Exactly. Also it would probably be to costly to repair it every time it cracks or breaks.


User currently offlineswafa27 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 49 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16811 times:

Ontario Intl (KONT) has a few glass jetways at both Terminal 2 and 4. They are pretty cool to board with, although they do get warm in the summer


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co
User currently offlineJU068 From Vanuatu, joined Aug 2009, 2692 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16770 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 1):
Quoting mia305 (Reply 2):

Yes because in other places it occurs so often. Plus, if this reason was valid then I am sure other airports would be reluctant to introduce them.


User currently onlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17079 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16734 times:

Quoting swafa27 (Reply 3):

Must have not paid attention as I never saw any glass jetbridges at ONT when I flew out of there last month.



Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlinemia305 From United States of America, joined Mar 2013, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16720 times:

All I was saying was when and if it does happen it would "probably be to costly".
I never said it happens a lot nor did I say it was the exact reason.


User currently onlineMcoov From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 131 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16708 times:

Because no one cares. Liverys are one thing (which a number of people have been saying don't matter to the travelling public; they do), but a jetway with glass walls instead of metal is simply not a concern for most people, and is more expensive for the installer (installation, keeping it clean, repair, etc.) One only spends a minute or two in a jetway anyways unless something is significantly wrong, or you work with one.

More glass jetways will appear when terminals are fully rebuilt, as it's the current design trend (like Art Deco was during the 1920s and 1930s), but only then.


User currently offlineSWAFA27 From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 49 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16673 times:

Quoting B747forever (Reply 5):

They're the middle gates that are equipped with them at both terminals



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co
User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1893 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16662 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Per NFPA 415 Federal regulations
"There shall be no transparent or translucent walls, windows, or surfaces, other than those windows located in the ramp access service door and in the cab area for the purpose of operating the aircraft loading walkway."



The only valid opinions are those based in facts
User currently offlinesulley From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 535 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16639 times:

Amarillo (AMA) actually has a new terminal with glass jet bridges.


In thrust we trust!
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 7757 posts, RR: 18
Reply 11, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16638 times:

Quoting JU068 (Reply 4):
Yes because in other places it occurs so often. Plus, if this reason was valid then I am sure other airports would be reluctant to introduce them.

I was being sarcastic.

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 9):
"There shall be no transparent or translucent walls, windows, or surfaces, other than those windows located in the ramp access service door and in the cab area for the purpose of operating the aircraft loading walkway."

/thread



我思うゆえに我あり。(Jap. 'I think, therefore I am.')
User currently onlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17079 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16638 times:

Quoting SWAFA27 (Reply 8):

I boarded from gate 403, so that might explain why I missed them.



Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineADent From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1390 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 16521 times:

Per this thread: The US's Culture & Glass Jet Bridges (by Independence76 Oct 9 2012 in Civil Aviation) SBA a glass jetway.

User currently offlineCaspian27 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 382 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 16416 times:

The new terminal at SGF has glass jetbridges...


Meanwhile, somewhere 35,000 ft above your head...
User currently offlineAusA380 From Australia, joined Jan 2009, 310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 16337 times:

ADL airport all air bridges are glass - great views when walking off the plane. Australia has very high building safety standards so I don't see it is a real safety issue. Doesn't appear to have been a maintenance issue there either.

User currently offlinebkircher From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 215 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 16238 times:

The new SBA terminal has glass jetways.

User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9535 posts, RR: 31
Reply 17, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 16210 times:

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 9):
"There shall be no transparent or translucent walls, windows, or surfaces, other than those windows located in the ramp access service door and in the cab area for the purpose of operating the aircraft loading walkway."

sounds like the eleventh commandment.

Did anyone tell the FAA that there is glass which an ordinary person cannot break just like that?

The cost argument I can understand in a country where most airports are run by the municipalities, but security? Those who can walk through glass can walk through concrete and metal as well. But Robocop and the like would not pass the TSA screening, or would they?



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlineAA7295 From Australia, joined Aug 2007, 622 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 16131 times:

It's for fire safety reasons - both internal (say a fire breaks inside the aerobridge, less chance it spreading outside where there is fuel-loaded aircraft) and external (say a fire occurs outside, less chance penetrating inside the building.

User currently offlinePanHAM From Germany, joined May 2005, 9535 posts, RR: 31
Reply 19, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 16092 times:

Glass fills all these security requirements, otherwise it would not be used for the purpose. If fire protection would be a valid argument, there would not be any glass windows at anyairport.

As said, the only valid argument is cost.



E's passed on! That parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker!
User currently offlinereadytotaxi From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2006, 3319 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 15943 times:

Gatwick has a wopping great bridge.


Unfortunately, heat is seldom a problem in the UK.  



you don't get a second chance to make a first impression!
User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1623 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 15923 times:

It is to do with the US Fire code ..must allow for X number of mins in the event of a ramp fuel fire. so the pax can deplane and get inside the terminal....Im sure there is a way to have fireproof glass but that add Thousands per bridge, also some pax may be "scared" to walk though the jetbridge when they see the fire.. some of our US fire code experts can explain better..

User currently offline727tiger From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 271 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 15303 times:

Quoting Caspian27 (Reply 14):
The new terminal at SGF has glass jetbridges...

Partially. The SGF jet bridges are glassed in from the terminal to the ramp service towers, then standard metal from there out to the boarding threshold:



User currently offlineczbbflier From Canada, joined Jul 2006, 976 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 15175 times:

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 9):

Per NFPA 415 Federal regulations
"There shall be no transparent or translucent walls, windows, or surfaces, other than those windows located in the ramp access service door and in the cab area for the purpose of operating the aircraft loading walkway."

Wow. Clearly, the US government is waaaay too big and intrusive. What a great argument for making the government smaller. Is there really a need to be concerned about this? (It's a non-partisan comment, so no political digs. We're not in non-av.   )


User currently offlinexcoaster1 From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 14885 times:

Here's a shot of KAMA's from inside SWA 737:

Big version: Width: 2592 Height: 1936 File size: 1812kb


[Edited 2013-04-03 08:15:29]

User currently offlineckfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5273 posts, RR: 1
Reply 25, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 15636 times:

Quoting czbbflier (Reply 23):
Per NFPA 415 Federal regulations
"There shall be no transparent or translucent walls, windows, or surfaces, other than those windows located in the ramp access service door and in the cab area for the purpose of operating the aircraft loading walkway."
Wow. Clearly, the US government is waaaay too big and intrusive. What a great argument for making the government smaller. Is there really a need to be concerned about this? (It's a non-partisan comment, so no political digs. We're not in non-av. )

I see the point about fire safety. I would also imagine that with the propensity for many parts of the country to see high winds, severe thunderstorms, and tornadoes, that having no glass in the jet bridge makes for less possiblity of glass breaking, either due to wind itself or debris striking the glass.

By the same token, can you imagine how hot a glass jet bridge can get in the summer. I've been at airports, when it's 85 degrees or warmer on a sunny day. Sitting by the windows can be significatnly warmer than only a few feet away from the sunlight. A glass jet bridge, with little or no HVAC, would be roasting hot.


User currently offlinedeltairlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8906 posts, RR: 12
Reply 26, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 15513 times:

SBA has them in their new terminal.

User currently offlineflashmeister From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2900 posts, RR: 6
Reply 27, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 16088 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

See this article from the National Fire Protection Agency for more on these standards. I was surprised to learn that the metal jetbridges have to withstand fire and provide an egress path for 5 minutes in the event of a spill fire. Could be hard for glass to meet that standard.

Personally, I don't really think that glass would be any more unsafe. And it looks SO much nicer...


User currently offlineWALmsp From United States of America, joined Sep 2010, 156 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 15614 times:

Here are a couple pics of SBA's jetways being installed:
http://www.edhat.com/site/tidbit.cfm?nid=55425&showcomments=T



In memory of my Dad, Robert "Bob" Fenrich, WAL 1964-1979, MSP ONT LAX
User currently offline9lflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 167 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 15450 times:

GRK has a glass jetbridge. We used it at Colgan once when the ramp was full.


My opinions do not represent the opinions of my company. They are solely the opinion of the poster.
User currently offlinerojo From Spain, joined Sep 2000, 2468 posts, RR: 9
Reply 30, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 15380 times:

Quoting sulley (Reply 10):
Amarillo (AMA) actually has a new terminal with glass jet bridges.

Yup. I was in AMA last month and all jet bridges are glass. Beautiful terminal for an airport in the middle of nowhere... LOL


User currently offlineairbusaddict From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 415 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 15268 times:

FSD has one glass jet-bridge, and I think plans are to at some point get more. It's basically the same jet-bridge that AMA has (the one that xcoaster1 posted), but brown, as the terminal itself is brown.

They're pretty impressive, actually, but I'm sure they cost a boat load of money.



Finally F9! FSD-DEN 7-4-2011
User currently offlineUSAirALB From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 3108 posts, RR: 2
Reply 32, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 14742 times:

At ALB, WN uses a dual-jetbridge system, with one, standard jetbridge for the front of the plane, and a glass jetbridge to the rear of the plane. It's pretty cool to use the one that goes to the rear of the plane, as the jetbridge gets pretty close to the wing, and you get a nice view.


E135/E140/E145/E70/E75/E90/CR2/CR7/CR9/717/732/733/734/735/73G/738/739/752/753/762/772/319/320/321/333
User currently onlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17079 posts, RR: 10
Reply 33, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 14232 times:

Just came to think about if LAX had glass jetbridges spotters at Imperial Hill would be able to see PAX boarding the airplane. That would have been fun!


Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineAirlineCritic From Finland, joined Mar 2009, 728 posts, RR: 1
Reply 34, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 14099 times:

... the real reason is that the airport design was finished in the 1950's, and since there has not been any reason for interior, exterior, materials or any other changes.

  


User currently offlinenkops From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2673 posts, RR: 6
Reply 35, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 13796 times:

Quoting 727tiger (Reply 22):
The SGF jet bridges are glassed in from the terminal to the ramp service towers, then standard metal from there out to the boarding threshold:

ACY has the same exact set up on 2 of their gates (5 and 6)



I have no association with Spirit Airlines
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13262 posts, RR: 100
Reply 36, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 12521 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Mcoov (Reply 7):
ublic; they do), but a jetway with glass walls instead of metal is simply not a concern for most people, and is more expensive for the installer (installation, keeping it clean, repair, etc.)

That was my first concern. Cost. Fixing the seals on the windows (on a movable assembly) and the cleaning.

Quoting Caspian27 (Reply 14):

The new terminal at SGF has glass jetbridges...
Quoting PanHAM (Reply 19):
As said, the only valid argument is cost.

I concur. But dang it:

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 9):

Per NFPA 415 Federal regulations
"There shall be no transparent or translucent walls, windows, or surfaces, other than those windows located in the ramp access service door and in the cab area for the purpose of operating the aircraft loading walkway."

Our government has become too big.  
Quoting readytotaxi (Reply 20):
Unfortunately, heat is seldom a problem in the UK.

   True. But that bundles in with cost (air conditioning).

Quoting AirlineCritic (Reply 34):

... the real reason is that the airport design was finished in the 1950's, and since there has not been any reason for interior, exterior, materials or any other changes.

You are onto something there...  


Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlinejcded From Switzerland, joined Jan 2004, 213 posts, RR: 1
Reply 37, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 11924 times:

Just to clear a few things.
NFPA is not a US Government Agency, it is a private association that writes recommendations, what they write has no force of law. It is up to local fire officials, notably the fire marshall to give ok on the construction and they take into account NFPA recommendations, many of them adopt these recommendations as force of law in their own jurisdictions. Lots of communities have been able to get the fire marshalls to give an ok, I think that's a good thing. Cost also comes into play not only for installation and maintenance, but due to HVAC concerns especially in sunny climates. It becomes a greenhouse.



You breathe to do good and have fun.
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25652 posts, RR: 22
Reply 38, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 9274 times:

Answer is very simple. They cost more and require more maintenance. For example, windows require cleaning. And passengers only want to board and deplane as quickly as possible and have no interest in paying higher airport taxes to cover such needless luxuries. The airports should be spending money on things that are more meaningful to passengers.

User currently offlineBoeing717200 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 872 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 9195 times:

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 9):
Per NFPA 415 Federal regulations
"There shall be no transparent or translucent walls, windows, or surfaces, other than those windows located in the ramp access service door and in the cab area for the purpose of operating the aircraft loading walkway."

This. You can have an extension that is glass with no issues, but the unit that contacts the aircraft cannot be unless it can withstand a burn for a specified amount of time. Cant remember what the burn time is. NFPA is a recommendation, but the local fire marshal generally won't go against it.

Quoting czbbflier (Reply 23):
Wow. Clearly, the US government is waaaay too big and intrusive. What a great argument for making the government smaller. Is there really a need to be concerned about this? (It's a non-partisan comment, so no political digs. We're not in non-av. )


Has to do with burn time. A few have been approved, but they carry a nice premium for the glass.

[Edited 2013-04-03 15:21:03]

User currently offlineQatarA340 From Qatar, joined May 2006, 1866 posts, RR: 10
Reply 40, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 9059 times:

I think its a bigger fire hazard if the walls were NOT GLASS. If there's a fire and there are glass walls, at least you could smash the glass to escape. Being enclosed in a metal tube during a fire is certainly NOT SAFE.


لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 41, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 9047 times:

PAE:





[Edited 2013-04-03 15:36:04]


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineBoeing717200 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 872 posts, RR: 0
Reply 42, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 9008 times:

Quoting QatarA340 (Reply 40):
I think its a bigger fire hazard if the walls were NOT GLASS. If there's a fire and there are glass walls, at least you could smash the glass to escape. Being enclosed in a metal tube during a fire is certainly NOT SAFE.


Takes longer to heat steel than it does glass, plus you can't see the fire which makes you more likely to keep moving. These two issues are why the NFPA recommendation hasn't changed in decades.


User currently offlineczbbflier From Canada, joined Jul 2006, 976 posts, RR: 2
Reply 43, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6702 times:

Quoting jcded (Reply 37):

Just to clear a few things.
NFPA is not a US Government Agency, it is a private association that writes recommendations, what they write has no force of law.

Thank you. Learned something. It's a relief that it's not "the government" after all.

Quoting Boeing717200 (Reply 39):
You can have an extension that is glass with no issues, but the unit that contacts the aircraft cannot be unless it can withstand a burn for a specified amount of time. Cant remember what the burn time is. NFPA is a recommendation, but the local fire marshal generally won't go against it.

Another interesting factoid. Thanks.

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 38):
The airports should be spending money on things that are more meaningful to passengers.

Actually, glass jetways would be something very meaningful to passengers. I am not a claustrophobic person but I sure feel closed in walking down the longer versions of these tubes. They feel smaller than a DHC8-200!


User currently offlinetharanga From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 1865 posts, RR: 1
Reply 44, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6667 times:

Quoting czbbflier (Reply 23):
Wow. Clearly, the US government is waaaay too big and intrusive.

the NFPA is not the US government. it is the professional association of fire protection people.

Quoting jcded (Reply 37):
NFPA is not a US Government Agency

correct.

Quoting jcded (Reply 37):
what they write has no force of law. It is up to local fire officials, notably the fire marshall to give ok on the construction and they take into account NFPA recommendations, many of them adopt these recommendations as force of law in their own jurisdictions.

to be fair, the federal government can also adopt industry codes and standards. Some googling suggests that maybe the FAA does (or did) either suggest or require that NFPA 415 be followed.


User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13262 posts, RR: 100
Reply 45, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6527 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting N328KF (Reply 41):
PAE:

That is a NICE jetbridge!

Quoting jcded (Reply 37):
NFPA is not a US Government Agency, it is a private association that writes recommendations

Oops. I feel foolish. But their recommendations probably help set insurance rates...

Quoting Boeing717200 (Reply 39):
NFPA is a recommendation, but the local fire marshal generally won't go against it.

That too.   But I think insurance rates would matter just as much.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 46, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6444 times:

Quoting czbbflier (Reply 23):
Clearly, the US government is waaaay too big and intrusive.

The US government has nothing to do with the NFPA.

It is an INTERNATIONAL association to promote fire safety, though focused in the US.

It has NO REGULATORY AUTHORITY. The 'regulations' are not enforceable.

However, there is a strong economic enforcement of NFPA code - by the insurance industry.

Not complying with NFPA can make it impossible to obtain insurance, or at least very costly.


User currently offlinewingnutmn From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 645 posts, RR: 0
Reply 47, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 6099 times:

FSD has one, and it is a sauna in the summer. Unbelievably hot compared to a metal one. To me it is unnecessary. But then again, nobody asked me.

Wingnut



Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing! It's a bonus if you can fly the plane again!!
User currently offlineBeardown91737 From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 558 posts, RR: 0
Reply 48, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5140 times:

The glass jetbridges at ONT are partial. The glass section is stationary and it is over a roof on gates 205,206,207, and 405, 406, and 407. The 4xx gates are WN's.

I didn't find any photos on a.net but you can see them on google maps if you zoom in to the birdseye angle. When looking at T2, 201 is an RJ gate with no jetway all the way on the left. The gate with the OO CRJ in UA tulip scheme is 202.



135 hrs PIC (mostly PA-28) - not current. Landings at MDW, PIA, JAN.
User currently offlineAusA380 From Australia, joined Jan 2009, 310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 49, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4589 times:

See webcam from Adelaide Airport (ADL) which shows their transparent airbridges.

http://www.adelaideairport.com.au/ai...rs/south-australia#terminal-webcam



User currently offlineteneriffe77 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 470 posts, RR: 0
Reply 50, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4235 times:

Speaking of jet bridges why don't many European/asian airports use jetbridges for regional jet flights (CR7's E-145's etc). Also I can see why glass jet bridges wouldn't work in my hometown of SYR as we get the extreme ends of temperatures throughout the year.

User currently offlinenycdave From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 547 posts, RR: 1
Reply 51, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4060 times:

Two thoughts:

1) HA! Love that some posters, as usual, automatically leapt to the government bogeyman being the root of all evil. I need to start blaming "big government" for anything I don't like... would make life so much simpler.

2) Only mentioned a couple times, but greenhouse effect would seem to be a big problem for lots of US airports installing them. Can only imagine how much higher than air conditioning costs would be in a place like PHX or LAS... Anyone have examples of extensive use of glass bridges in sunny/hot climates (other than gulf, where oil money lets you spend whatever you want on anything for any reason)?


User currently offlineluckyone From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 2186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 52, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4004 times:

Quoting QatarA340 (Reply 40):
If there's a fire and there are glass walls, at least you could smash the glass to escape. Being enclosed in a metal tube during a fire is certainly NOT SAFE.

It is likely anything that is capable of breaking glass would be considered a weapon and difficult to impossible to get through security. Not to mention once it's broken you then have to jump straight down, potentially injuring oneself onto a tarmac covered with broken glass and possibly flammable and/or ignited fluids.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25652 posts, RR: 22
Reply 53, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3798 times:

Quoting teneriffe77 (Reply 50):
Speaking of jet bridges why don't many European/asian airports use jetbridges for regional jet flights (CR7's E-145's etc).

The airlines don't want to pay for the costs of the major terminal changes that would require.


User currently offlineHayseuss From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 54, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3712 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

SAN glass jetbridge being installed at Gate 51 as part of the T2 expansion:
Glass jetbridge being installed at SAN as part of T2 expansion


Hayseuss


User currently offlinebpat777 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 55, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3622 times:

At LGA, AA has 2 or 3 even numbered gates that are partially glass. They look very old however.

User currently offlineSANMAN66 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 803 posts, RR: 2
Reply 56, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3543 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Hayseuss (Reply 54):
SAN glass jetbridge being installed at Gate 51 as part of the T2 expansion


I have been looking at that picture closely, that doesn't look like a jetway,
it looks more like a bridge possibly leading out to the actual jetway itself.It don't
quite look like the glass jetways that are at the few airports that have them.
The jetbridge looks stationary,(there's no wheels beneath it or machinery on it
enabling it to swing around and connect to the planes using that gate.)



Quoting nycdave (Reply 51):
Can only imagine how much higher than air conditioning costs would be in a place like PHX or LAS...


And all the pax cooking inside those glass jetways in 100+ degree summertime heat!

[Edited 2013-04-05 18:17:21]


PSA Gives you a lift!
User currently offlineHayseuss From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 57, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3501 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting SANMAN66 (Reply 56):

I believe the reason you don't see the wheels or machinery is because the picture was taking while the bridge was actually being installed. SDIA has the picture on their Facebook page with the following text:

"Installed this week as part of The Green Build at SDIA was the glass jet bridge, which will connect Gate 51 to waiting planes. As passengers walk across the bridge to or from their flight, they'll see unobstructed views of the airfield on one side and San Diego Harbor on the other - an excellent hello or goodbye for anybody."


User currently offlinepnwtraveler From Canada, joined Jun 2007, 2249 posts, RR: 12
Reply 58, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 3493 times:

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 9):

Per NFPA 415 Federal regulations
"There shall be no transparent or translucent walls, windows, or surfaces, other than those windows located in the ramp access service door and in the cab area for the purpose of operating the aircraft loading walkway."


For the same reason Transport Canada won't allow glass windows in ships below rescue routes to inflatable life rafts. So Ferries for example that use rescue chutes and have had previous windows on car decks covered over with metal and the glass removed to give extra time for escape time. Different areas have different standards.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will Any US Metros Have Two Major Intl Airports? posted Fri Sep 5 2003 07:21:22 by Paddy
Any US Airports That Still Have 70s/80's Terminals posted Sun Jul 30 2000 23:24:58 by USAir_757
What US Airports Have The Backscatter Scanners posted Fri Nov 12 2010 20:13:24 by titanmiller
Any US Airports With Mainline-Only Service? posted Thu Aug 5 2010 12:44:02 by Soxfan
Why None Of US Airlines Have 777-3xx? posted Fri Dec 2 2005 20:32:17 by Ourboeing
Why Don't Any US Airlines Operate A340 Aircrafts? posted Fri Sep 9 2005 03:29:03 by JFK998
Any US Airports With Service To All 50 States? posted Wed Mar 30 2005 20:14:12 by Mason
Why Haven't Any US Carriers Ordered The 7E7? posted Sat Jul 31 2004 02:56:39 by Horus
Do Any US Carriers Have Turboprops On Order? posted Sun Apr 25 2004 21:36:25 by Nycfuturepilot
Why Doesn't Any Airline Fly DTW-MSP Besides NWA? posted Fri Jul 18 2003 05:08:40 by Rajivvyas