Gonzalo From Chile, joined Aug 2005, 2013 posts, RR: 2 Posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 8359 times:
FAA said United Parcel Service must pay a $4 million civil penalty for not complying with rules on maintaining and operating its aircraft. According to FAA UPS failed to follow procedures while repairing four of its aircraft used on more than 400 flights between October 2008 and June 2009.
The planes involved were two DC-8 and two MD-11 aircraft.
q120 From Canada, joined Aug 2008, 301 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7954 times:
wow... so I am reading this post and I just read the one about UPS losing that giant contract to Fedex.
Upper management should be completely removed from every one of their positions and replaced with fresh blood.
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results
okie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3419 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7861 times:
Quoting Gonzalo (Thread starter): According to FAA UPS failed to follow procedures while repairing four of its aircraft used on more than 400 flights between October 2008 and June 2009
I caught that from the article and have no idea what the discrepancy was what I did notice this is 2013 and the FAA administrator says the planes should be immediately grounded, repaired and UPS respond in 30 days.
So the real question what were these planes doing for the last almost 4 years?
I am thinking this is a seriously miswritten or intentionally misleading article.
jetfixr757 From Jamaica, joined Jan 2006, 165 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 7675 times:
Wow, Ground them till the repairs are made!!! What a concept. Hmmm DC8 parked 4 years ago, the MD11's kinda so what....I guess if you are being told you are getting laid off and can't get paid you will shake trees for your company to survive.....
aerowrench From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 52 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3717 times:
This is just another government shakedown. I would put money on the repair problem being in the paperwork and not the work itself. Its just another move by the socialist led executive branch turning an agency whose two responsibilities are completely contradictory (promote and regulate) into another Sheriff of Nottingham.