Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Two EK A380's At YYZ - 4/30  
User currently offlineStarAC17 From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3380 posts, RR: 9
Posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 10168 times:

Hey All,

I was driving near YYZ when I noticed two EK A380's parked at YYZ at around 3pm. One near where it usually parks at T1 and the other on the apron near 24R/24L.

I know that they are scheduled to fly on Monday, Wednesday and Friday so I wasn't expecting to see them at all and saw the EY 77W land while killing time at Wendy's/Country Style so I don't think it's a schedule change.

Anyone one know why they were there?? My guess is a big delay or a diversion from/to IAH as that is the only flight path that would go near YYZ I think.


Engineers Rule The World!!!!!
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineQuokkas From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 10014 times:

Apparently A6-EDY operated EK241 Dubai but it was unable to operate the return EK242 due to a technical issue.

Subsequently A6-EDO positioned New York JFK – Toronto as EK7204 after operating EK203 Dubai – New York JFK. The aircraft then operated the delayed EK242 Toronto – Dubai. EK204 New York JFK – Dubai was therefore cancelled.

Source: http://www.theeksource.com/


User currently offlinemadviking From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 9860 times:

EDY's nose gear was damaged while being pushed back as EK242. Tug driver jacknifed the towbar subsequently turning the nose wheele beyond its safe angle limits damaging the steering actuators. EDY is still parked on stand H11 being repaired or possibly awaiting parts. It took ground crews over one hour to carefully tow it off the gate around 1am in the morning after a complete off-loading of EK242 was done.

User currently offlineA346Dude From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1284 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9818 times:

Who handles the ramp for EK at YYZ?


You know the gear is up and locked when it takes full throttle to taxi to the terminal.
User currently offlinelouA340 From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 385 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9706 times:

EK hasnt had a lot of luck on the ramp at YYZ. There was the collision not so long ago with one of the service trucks, and now this.


RyEng
User currently offlineTheAviator380 From UK - England, joined Feb 2013, 401 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 9403 times:

Who pays for the losses?

User currently offlineaerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7195 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 9301 times:

Quoting TheAviator380 (Reply 5):
Who pays for the losses?

Insurance of ground handlers that caused it


User currently offlineBthebest From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 507 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 9057 times:

Quoting Quokkas (Reply 1):
EK204 New York JFK %u2013 Dubai was therefore cancelled.

Sucks a bit for those passengers but at least there's a second frequency for JFK. Would they have been allowed to operate YYZ-JFK-DXB if the loads were light enough?


User currently offlinemadviking From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 8789 times:

Today's EK241 is inbound for 1615 and there are no signs the sick 380 is going anywhere soon, so two 380s on the ground at YYZ again.

I would suspect today's 241 may be bringing in parts and EK maintenance people to fix the nose structure and sign off the C of A. Possible ferry out or reposition to JFK? Interesting that they cancelled Tuesday's EK204. Load must have been light enough to rebook pax on their other flight or interline to other carriers?


User currently onlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25374 posts, RR: 22
Reply 9, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5648 times:

Quoting Bthebest (Reply 7):
Quoting Quokkas (Reply 1):
EK204 New York JFK %u2013 Dubai was therefore cancelled.

Sucks a bit for those passengers but at least there's a second frequency for JFK. Would they have been allowed to operate YYZ-JFK-DXB if the loads were light enough?

Most non-Canadian passengers would need a U.S. transit visa if the flight stopped in the U.S. which they obviously wouldn't have.


User currently offlinejagflyer From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 3533 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5594 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 9):

Why would passengers need a transit visa? The passengers would not deplane and if they did they would go into an isolated area where they cannot mix with arriving or departing passengers. Technically the passengers should never "enter" the US if the flight was routed YYZ-JFK-DXB.



Support the beer and soda can industry, recycle old airplanes!
User currently onlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25374 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5567 times:

Quoting jagflyer (Reply 10):
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 9):

Why would passengers need a transit visa? The passengers would not deplane and if they did they would go into an isolated area where they cannot mix with arriving or departing passengers. Technically the passengers should never "enter" the US if the flight was routed YYZ-JFK-DXB.

I thought all passengers on flights landing in the U.S. and continuing beyond (even on the same flight) required a U.S. transit visa unless they have a passport from a Visa Waiver country or Canada or Mexico? Am I wrong?


User currently offlineStarAC17 From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3380 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5069 times:

Quoting Bthebest (Reply 7):
Sucks a bit for those passengers but at least there's a second frequency for JFK. Would they have been allowed to operate YYZ-JFK-DXB if the loads were light enough?

I think the cancelled flight out of JFK was ferried empty to YYZ and was used to fly the EK242 which left mid-afternoon on Tuesday or even that night. If it had any passengers they flew to YYZ first and then on to DXB where transiting means a "Customs B" check and back in to the terminal.

Quoting madviking (Reply 8):
Today's EK241 is inbound for 1615 and there are no signs the sick 380 is going anywhere soon, so two 380s on the ground at YYZ again.

Hasn't moved as of 6:15 pm today.



Engineers Rule The World!!!!!
User currently offlinemadviking From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4546 times:

Still parked on H11. Are they having difficulties with the repair?

User currently offlinecyxuk From Canada, joined Mar 2009, 111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4501 times:

Evidently they had to charter an Atlas B744 (landed on May 3rd about 1500LT) to bring in a bunch of Airbus parts and a jacking system to raise up the nose wheel to do a replacement or repair.

User currently offlinelnglive1011yyz From Canada, joined Oct 2003, 1608 posts, RR: 15
Reply 15, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4306 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 11):
I thought all passengers on flights landing in the U.S. and continuing beyond (even on the same flight) required a U.S. transit visa unless they have a passport from a Visa Waiver country or Canada or Mexico? Am I wrong?

You're right. Just simply as that.. LOL

1011



Pack your bags, we're going on a sympathy trip!
User currently offlinemadviking From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4188 times:

Lots of equipment and activity in front of the 380 right now. Any one know when it will finally depart?

User currently offlinemadviking From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3919 times:

EDY has relocated from the East Hold parking to be in front of the AC 747 hangar south side.

Is AC actually going to help them out?


User currently offlinemadviking From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3860 times:

Looks like its ready to leave in a few minutes as EK2002, ferry back home.

User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 11724 posts, RR: 33
Reply 19, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3765 times:

And gone.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/news46/8710284465/



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently onlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25374 posts, RR: 22
Reply 20, posted (1 year 4 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3628 times:

Quoting madviking (Reply 17):
Is AC actually going to help them out?

EK uses AC's T1 at YYZ as does EY. If not mistaken EK and EY (and 9W which AC codeshares with) are the only non-Star Alliance carriers at T1.


User currently offlinemadviking From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3452 times:

Meant to say was AC going to allow use of their hangar. In the past they have not given EK use of their facilities for repair. Sunwing is the only other non-Star at T1. And its the other way around, its the GTAA's T1 that AC uses as a high paying tenant, not owner. Star members have linked themselves at T1 to maintain the ease of pax transfer with code share, similar to oneWorld and Skyteam members joining forces with their partners at T3. The one-offs such as EL AL or PIA have maintained their presence at which ever Terminal can accommodate them based on gate availability. You may recall both EL AL and PIA were at T2 back in the 80s and 90s but relocated to 3 when the re-construction began.

User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 11724 posts, RR: 33
Reply 22, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3124 times:

A picture of the repairs:

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BJuY0mjCAAILc_4.jpg:large



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently offlineScipio From Belgium, joined Oct 2007, 897 posts, RR: 10
Reply 23, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3034 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 22):
A picture of the repairs:

Look mom, no wheels!  

Cool...


User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4922 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2998 times:

Quoting madviking (Reply 17):
Is AC actually going to help them out?

It's common for carriers to help other carriers. Lets not forget QF leased an A380 capable hangar from SQ to repair VH-OQA 'Nancy Bird'.

Quoting madviking (Reply 18):

Looks like its ready to leave in a few minutes as EK2002, ferry back home.
Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 22):
A picture of the repairs:

Wow pretty amazing to see a 560t aircraft resting on jacks.

I take it the aircraft has returned to home base?

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 11724 posts, RR: 33
Reply 25, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3033 times:

Quoting EK413 (Reply 24):
I take it the aircraft has returned to home base?

It did, see http://flightaware.com/live/flight/A...Y/history/20130505/1400Z/CYYZ/OMDB



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the universe.
User currently offlineatpcliff From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2995 times:

I saw this thread and thought hmmmm.....

I was on the crew that flew the parts in. We had a LOT of parts! I was surprised there were so many pallets. The tower quered us about the flight....I think because it was so rare. We landed on one of the Southern runways. I was used to coming into YYZ from the West, and always landing on the runway on the North side of the airport. We had nice vectors East of the airport and North of downtown, and the weather was great, so it was kind of like an aerial tour.

It was a VERY odd flight for us because it was only 0+51 long. We normally due our approach briefings one hour out, so it was quite a rushed flight for us....plus we only had 2 pilots, which is also quite rare. I airlined out of there to the ME to continue my pattern...



TRY. It's all you have control over, and it's what God wants.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EK A380 At JFK Today? posted Sun Nov 14 2010 12:55:14 by Pegasus01
EK A380 In YYZ Today (Tuesday) posted Tue Mar 9 2010 19:07:30 by YYZ4RADD
Two Jet A330 At YYZ posted Sun Jul 20 2008 11:07:49 by Pnwtraveler
A380 At YYZ... posted Tue May 24 2005 20:31:38 by Fubar37
QF/EK A380 Flyover At Sydney Harbour This Sunday posted Wed Mar 27 2013 23:37:06 by nickofatlanta
EK A380 Goes Tech At JFK 8/14/12 posted Sun Aug 19 2012 06:09:18 by emirates202
EK A380 Incident At HKG posted Sat Apr 7 2012 04:14:16 by flythere
New EK A380 Concourse At DXB posted Fri Dec 16 2011 20:23:16 by Emirates202
EK A380 Stuck At AKL? posted Sun Dec 12 2010 14:39:27 by kiwiandrew
How Are The Loads On EK A380 Flight To YYZ? posted Fri Jul 9 2010 14:47:48 by airplaneguy