Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JAL Plans 787 To SFO  
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25739 posts, RR: 50
Posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7051 times:

I see in GDS, JAL is switching its HND-SFO service from 777 to 787 effective September 1st.

I cant think of how much JAL has shrunk at SFO.
From being its first US mainland city in 1954, to multiple 747s, to dropping SFO-NRT completely in 2010, and now using a low capacity 787 to the Bay Area.

Yikes!


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinepsa1011 From United States of America, joined Jan 2011, 298 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 6949 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Although it will be the first 787 to fly to SFO regularly 

User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 6706 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
I cant think of how much JAL has shrunk at SFO.
From being its first US mainland city in 1954, to multiple 747s, to dropping SFO-NRT completely in 2010, and now using a low capacity 787 to the Bay Area.

Yikes!

I think your being a little mellow dramatic with your observation.

Yes, JAL was first to SFO in 1954. You could not expect them to just fly to SFO without JFK,LAX etc.

Since JAL no longer flies the 744, it is kind of moot. The most JAL ever flew to SFO was 8 weekly with an extension to LAS.

Since they are currently flying a 777-200ER into SFO with 56J/40W/149Y. I would rather fly on a new 787-8 with their Sky suite instead of their 772 that did not have them. In time, I would expect them to upgage to the 787-9.

If anything, LAX has seen the decline in JAL over the last few years. No more service to KIX,NGO and they are down to one daily flight to NRT.

Yikes!



John@SFO
User currently offlinemodesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2812 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6586 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 2):

If anything, LAX has seen the decline in JAL over the last few years. No more service to KIX,NGO and they are down to one daily flight to NRT.

Agreed, I only have data to the year 2000, but when comparing JL's SFO and LAX schedules in 2000 vs. 2013, LAX has lost far more service. In July 2000, JL served LAX with:

1x weekly GRU
7x weekly KIX
4x weekly NGO
13x weekly NRT

In July 2013, it serves LAX with just:

7x NRT

By comparison, JL served SFO in July 2000 with 8x NRT and will serve SFO in July 2013 with 7x HND.

Yes, aircraft gauge has changed and reducing SFO capacity from 1x daily 744 to 1x 788 is substantial, but LAX's frequency reduction alone far outweighs any competing gauge adjustments.

Excellent point, legacyins.


User currently offlinemercure1 From French Polynesia, joined Jul 2008, 1603 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6583 times:

I recall SFO used to be the premier station for JAL in North America, and even Americas HQ at one time. Flights were JAL001 & 002.

But yes they drop greatly from past.

Gone is much capacity. With 787 only 180 seats huge drop from 747 days. Also terminating Narita was amazing move by JAL in SFO.


User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3151 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6530 times:

Quoting mercure1 (Reply 4):
I recall SFO used to be the premier station for JAL in North America, and even Americas HQ at one time. Flights were JAL001 & 002.
Quoting mercure1 (Reply 4):
But yes they drop greatly from past.

Back in 1954 you didn't have UA, DL and NH also flying SFO-NRT, not to mention now also SJC-NRT (and PDX-NRT, SEA-NRT and multiple LAX-NRTs). While JAL has cutback SFO, there is far far more US west coast to NRT service now.


User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6530 times:

Quoting mercure1 (Reply 4):
Gone is much capacity. With 787 only 180 seats huge drop from 747 days. Also terminating Narita was amazing move by JAL in SFO.

I am thinking of this a little differently. You cannot really compare their 744 service to their current service since they no longer fly the 744. They last service to NRT was on a 777-300ER with 246 in 4 classes compares to 186 2 class 787. Yes, a decrease but the flight was also transferred over to HDN. NRT has a lot more transfer traffic within Asia than HDN does. HDN is also more convenient to Tokyo than NRT.

I am actually flying on this flight at the end of this month. The Westin Hotel in Tokyo actually has a shuttle service that I am taking advantage of. If I had flown into NRT, I would have had to taken a private/public transit service to the Hotel.



John@SFO
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25739 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 6212 times:

SkySuite product is not available on the 787.

787 is rather basic in 2-class with the shell seat (angled flat) in business class.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6172 times:

Actually, I was checking JAL's website and they will have the Shell Flat NEO seat on JL 1/2.


John@SFO
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25739 posts, RR: 50
Reply 9, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6060 times:

Yes the Shell Flat NEO is the angled biz seat.


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5932 times:

I was confused by the word "flat". It is true it is flat but on an angle. I don't really like these type of seats as I tend to slide. So I guess JL and DL will be the only carriers that do not offer full lie flat seats on the SFO-TYO run.


John@SFO
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25739 posts, RR: 50
Reply 11, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5689 times:

Actually I am quite surprised at how mediocre JAL chose to make its 787 cabins. No Y+ product either.

ANA atleast uses its latest staggered business class product on its longhaul 787s.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinemodesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2812 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5369 times:

Quoting legacyins (Reply 10):
So I guess JL and DL will be the only carriers that do not offer full lie flat seats on the SFO-TYO run.

Actually, DL now offers flat-beds on NRTSFO. DL has been installing flat-beds on its 763ER fleet and as those aircraft have entered service, NRTSFO has been receiving them. The route now has DL's high-density 767 configuration known as the "76Z," with 25 flat-bed BusinessElite seats, 29 Y+, and 171 Y. There was some time when only some of the NRTSFO flights operated with the flat-beds but now, the route has all flat-bed aircraft.


User currently offlinemikeology From United States of America, joined Mar 2012, 124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4909 times:

While a little off topic lets not forget they do have competition at SFO. At peak season you have 5 flights a day to choose from. In summer you have 2x Daily flights from UA. (Although one is to KIX) plus DL and NH. Not to mention at some point in the future NH resuming SJC service.

User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4481 times:

Quoting modesto2 (Reply 12):

Thanks for the nfo. I had been following the thread on the upgraded 767 but was not sure if every flight was using the 76Z. The last time I flew this route was Delta was a few years ago when they were still using the A332 from NW.



John@SFO
User currently offlinelegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2090 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4463 times:

On a side note, since LA changed their schedule into SFO, the JAL flight offers nice connections from SFO to TYO for them.


John@SFO
User currently offlinePHXFlyer16 From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 48 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4390 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 5):
Back in 1954 you didn't have UA, DL and NH also flying SFO-NRT, not to mention now also SJC-NRT (and PDX-NRT, SEA-NRT and multiple LAX-NRTs). While JAL has cutback SFO, there is far far more US west coast to NRT service now.

I agree completely. Does anyone have a list of US cities that now have non-stop service to NRT? I bet that list has tripled or quadrupled in the last 30 years.

Here's what I can think of in the western US:

LAX, SJC, SFO, SEA, PDX, SAN, DEN, IAH, DFW

The only remaining major cities without service I can think of in the Western US:

PHX, SLC, LAS

Did I get anything wrong/miss anything?


User currently offlineATA L1011 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1385 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3892 times:

Quoting PHXFlyer16 (Reply 16):
Here's what I can think of in the western US:

LAX, SJC, SFO, SEA, PDX, SAN, DEN, IAH, DFW

Although not a major player SMF, the Sacramento area doesn't with a metro area with over 2.5 mil. Also its hard pressed to call DFW and IAH the Western USA, they are pretty Central.

[Edited 2013-05-02 11:37:02]


Treat others as you expect to be treated!
User currently offlinecarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (1 year 5 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3850 times:

Not a total surprise at all. Throw away all the low-yielding really low bucket fares from economy.
Perhaps JL will re-instate NRT-SFO with 788 once they have more delivered. Their plan with the 787 is right on.
1) Start some thin long-haul routes (NRT-BOS/SAN/HEL). Certainly more to come in the future.
2) Increasing frequency on certain flights (NRT-DEL & TYO-SIN).
3) Replace longish 767 flights with 787s. (TYO-SIN/BKK)
4) Replace some 777 flying with 787s. (NRT-SYD & HND-SFO)
5) Upgauge Japan-HNL flights with 777 from 763.
6) Replace some int'l 738 flights with 763.
7) Replace the older domestic 763s with newer converted int'l 763.
8) Possibly put winglets on the 763 and upgrade the 763 product.

Quoting mikeology (Reply 13):
At peak season you have 5 flights a day to choose from. In summer you have 2x Daily flights from UA. (Although one is to KIX)

Unless something has changed recently, there are indeed 5 SFO-TYO flights a day. UA has two daily during the summer.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pic: 1st JAL 787 To Wear Special Colors posted Mon Apr 12 2010 09:54:00 by iad787
JAL Moving A 787 Wing Out Of SFO posted Mon Apr 2 2007 05:58:58 by Phishphan70
Kingfisher Plans First U.S. Service To SFO, NYC posted Fri Nov 24 2006 19:57:15 by Laxintl
TOM 787's To Be Delivered In June posted Sat Apr 27 2013 02:40:07 by liverpoola380
Thomson Airways 787 To MRU And PVR posted Thu Apr 18 2013 09:40:12 by fcaa321
Extra Long Flt Time From LHR To SFO posted Sun Mar 31 2013 18:25:49 by heysfo
Qatar Airways Cancels 787 To Perth, To Use 777 posted Wed Jan 16 2013 12:02:22 by QatarA340
What Airlines Fly The 787 To IAD posted Fri Dec 28 2012 13:27:37 by rjm777ual
Ethiopian To Start 787 To BOM? posted Wed Dec 19 2012 23:19:25 by gauravpai
UA 6869 SFO To SFO posted Sun Dec 9 2012 21:56:34 by heysfo