Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
787 Returns To Service, Focus Now On Other Issues  
User currently offlinesankaps From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 2252 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 10163 times:

The Wall Street Journal today printed excerpts from a detailed internal Boeing report on other 787 teething issues.

"The report's biggest take-away is that Dreamliners experienced problems most frequently when they were first powered up. These issues had the biggest impact on keeping the 787 from leaving on time. Those events were almost always unrelated to the jet's batteries, and they took "more time on average to clear than those detected during any other phase of flight.

The report says carriers should consider turning on the 787's lithium-ion batteries, computers and electrical system three hours prior to the first flight each day, and adding time between flights to give cockpit crews and mechanics adequate time to resolve any difficulties."

Overall though nothing too alarming or disconcerting, which is good news for Boeing and its 787 customers.

Perhaps someone can publish a link to the article, I cannot figure out a way to get the link to show since it is behind a paywall.

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAzure From France, joined Dec 2012, 601 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 9887 times:

Quoting sankaps (Thread starter):
carriers should consider turning on the 787's lithium-ion batteries, computers and electrical system three hours prior to the first flight each day, and adding time between flights to give cockpit crews and mechanics adequate time to resolve any difficulties.

Nothing alarming indeed although a longer turnaround would decrease the aircraft profitability, wouldn't it?



I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things - A. de Saint Exupery
User currently offlinesankaps From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 2252 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 9750 times:

Quoting Azure (Reply 1):

Nothing alarming indeed although a longer turnaround would decrease the aircraft profitability, wouldn't it?Regards from NCE

I think it is a teething / learning curve issue, which will get resolved over time.


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 29700 posts, RR: 84
Reply 3, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 9365 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sankaps (Thread starter):
Perhaps someone can publish a link to the article, I cannot figure out a way to get the link to show since it is behind a paywall.

You need to do a Google News search on the article's title, which is Dreamliner's Other Issues Draw Attention.



Quoting Azure (Reply 1):
Nothing alarming indeed although a longer turnaround would decrease the aircraft profitability, wouldn't it?

Boeing estimates that the issues cost airlines around $3 million and resulted in an overall reliability rating of 97.7% for the period of October-December 2012. This is said to be similar to the 777's numbers during it's first year of service.


User currently offlinesankaps From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 2252 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 9331 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 3):
You need to do a Google News search on the article's title, which is Dreamliner's Other Issues Draw Attention.

Thanks. Let's see if this works... http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-235750/


User currently offlineNavigator From Sweden, joined Jul 2001, 1144 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 7912 times:

Quoting sankaps (Thread starter):
The report says carriers should consider turning on the 787's lithium-ion batteries, computers and electrical system three hours prior to the first flight each day, and adding time between flights to give cockpit crews and mechanics adequate time to resolve any difficulties."

Overall though nothing too alarming or disconcerting, which is good news for Boeing and its 787 customers.

Any adding time between flights is alarming for the economics. And the need to power up such a long time in advance could also be a problem...



747-400/747-200/L1011/DC-10/DC-9/DC-8/MD-80/MD90/A340/A330/A300/A310/A321/A320/A319/767/757/737/727/HS-121/CV990/CV440/S
User currently onlineJoeCanuck From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 5322 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 7562 times:

Quoting Navigator (Reply 5):
Any adding time between flights is alarming for the economics. And the need to power up such a long time in advance could also be a problem...

One saving grace, (to a certain degree), is that these aren't being flown by LCC's demanding 25minute turn arounds.



What the...?
User currently offlinesankaps From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 2252 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 7488 times:

Quoting JoeCanuck (Reply 6):
One saving grace, (to a certain degree), is that these aren't being flown by LCC's demanding 25minute turn arounds.

But they will soon be flown by LCCs or LCC-like airlines, such as Jetstar and Thomson...


User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4651 posts, RR: 50
Reply 8, posted (11 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 6967 times:

Quoting Navigator (Reply 5):
Any adding time between flights is alarming for the economics. And the need to power up such a long time in advance could also be a problem...

But if it is only power up, then short turnarounds are not a problem as the aircraft stays powered on. The way I read it, you only need to power up the aircraft earlier if it is left for a longer period of time. As such the only real cost factor is the GPU, which is what, USD150 extra? Not really a dealbreaker.



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlineCALTECH From Poland, joined May 2007, 2013 posts, RR: 27
Reply 9, posted (11 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 5404 times:

Quoting JRadier (Reply 8):
But if it is only power up, then short turnarounds are not a problem as the aircraft stays powered on. The way I read it, you only need to power up the aircraft earlier if it is left for a longer period of time. As such the only real cost factor is the GPU, which is what, USD150 extra? Not really a dealbreaker.

   This member hit it. On initial powerups is where the problem lies. This is not to say that messages do not show up between turns or during flight.

[Edited 2013-05-21 05:15:59]


UNITED We Stand
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12444 posts, RR: 100
Reply 10, posted (11 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 4917 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

This will be addressed and is less than the issues seen with the 777. An airframe known for its smooth EIS.   

Quoting sankaps (Reply 2):
I think it is a teething / learning curve issue, which will get resolved over time.

  

Quoting sankaps (Reply 7):
But they will soon be flown by LCCs or LCC-like airlines, such as Jetstar and Thomson...

   Expect this of all mid-size and smaller airframes.

Lightsaber



I've posted how many times?!?
User currently offlinebellancacf From United States of America, joined May 2011, 147 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 2037 times:

Just out of curiosity, does it happen now and again that a new type turns out to have unexpected personality traits in service that no one saw coming during design or testing? I sympathize with the 787 -- I don't like a rushed breakfast, either, and a bit of a lie-in beforehand is welcome, too.

User currently offlineUALWN From Andorra, joined Jun 2009, 2674 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (11 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 1972 times:

Wouldn't powering up the aircraft 3 hours before the first flight mean that the crew would have to be there 3 hours before their first flight? That would imply shorter effective duty times and, hence, more personnel cost for the airlines.


AT7/111/146/Avro/CRJ/CR9/EMB/ERJ/E75/F50/100/L15/DC9/D10/M8X/717/727/737/747/757/767/777/AB6/310/319/320/321/330/340/380
User currently onlineJoeCanuck From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 5322 posts, RR: 30
Reply 13, posted (11 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 1947 times:

Quoting UALWN (Reply 12):

Mechanics power up planes all the time.



What the...?
User currently offlineUALWN From Andorra, joined Jun 2009, 2674 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (11 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 1947 times:

Quoting JoeCanuck (Reply 13):
Mechanics power up planes all the time.

Thanks. You learn something new every day...



AT7/111/146/Avro/CRJ/CR9/EMB/ERJ/E75/F50/100/L15/DC9/D10/M8X/717/727/737/747/757/767/777/AB6/310/319/320/321/330/340/380
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Another UA 744 Returns To Service posted Mon Feb 2 2004 13:41:37 by Na
1st Updated NW B744 Returns To Service Today posted Fri Nov 7 2003 15:07:55 by IndustrialPate
DL Ends 767 Service On ATL-MCO; 767 Returns To SAN posted Sun Feb 1 2009 21:14:24 by C767P
First 787-9 To Start Final Assembly On 5/30/2013 posted Tue May 14 2013 13:03:56 by NYC777
787 Grounded Aircraft: Back To Service Thread Part 1 posted Mon Apr 29 2013 04:11:31 by hkcanadaexpat
KLM MD11 On Very Final Flight - Returns To Base posted Mon Apr 15 2013 09:11:27 by factsonly
Widebody Service Returns To IAH-DEN posted Sat Jun 23 2012 09:20:40 by klwright69
B 787 Dreamliner To OSL On May 1th 2012 posted Thu Apr 12 2012 08:34:11 by Mortyman
LO Returns To TLL, Adds Other Destinations posted Thu May 13 2010 15:37:09 by Wroord
FR Returns To FUE + Other New Routes + New Airport posted Fri Dec 18 2009 01:31:57 by Pe@rson