Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing To Offer 737 Max 8 High Gross Weight?  
User currently offlinetortugamon From United States of America, joined Apr 2013, 3449 posts, RR: 10
Posted (1 year 5 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 7286 times:

There is an article in flight global about a HGW Max 8. The current Max 8 range is projected to be about 3,620nm. How much further range would be useful? Will this reignite talks about a TATL 737? The gc distance between EWR/JFK/PHL/BOS and CDG/AMS/LGW/MAN/STN/BHX/MAD/LIS/DUB is no more than 3,247nm. 752 with winglets range is 4,100.

"Another option Boeing is considering is launching a high gross weight version of the 737 Max 8, Taylor says. That means beefing up the landing gear and structure to absorb the same maximum take-off weight carried by the standard Max 9 version, he says."

"We certainly could sell it," Taylor says. "But we're still looking at what is the right product."

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...on-to-hit-bbj-range-target-386097/

tortugamon

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13260 posts, RR: 100
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6615 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The article was on a business jet version, but I think we can discuss commercial variants as the main volume market.   

A high MTOW -8MAX for the BBJ market makes sense if the market demands 7,000nm range.

Quoting tortugamon (Thread starter):
Will this reignite talks about a TATL 737?

There will be a TATL 737MAX or A321NEO. When is the question. Which will be first to the niche? 3,800nm is min TATL but 4,100nm+ is better. An early high MTOW -8MAX should be able to do 4000nm! Engine improvements will creep that range up and it would be a very competitive TATL hauler.


We already know Bombardier could make a TATL version of the CS100. Will Boeing concede that market? I think neither Boeing nor Airbus will.

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...siness-class-cseries-order-366588/

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlinesunrisevalley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 5054 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6504 times:

Quoting tortugamon (Thread starter):
The gc distance between EWR/JFK/PHL/BOS and CDG/AMS/LGW/MAN/STN/BHX/MAD/LIS/DUB is no more than 3,247nm

Typically PHL-FRA has an airways distance of about 3700nm according to FlightAware. Flight time for a typical 485K cruise is typically beween 7hr and 7.30min. Westbound is about 1 hr longer. Not sure what that would be on a 737MAX
The westbound ESAD is probably pushing 4200nm Perhaps this city pair are outside of what is possible.


User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13260 posts, RR: 100
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 6293 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 2):
The westbound ESAD is probably pushing 4200nm Perhaps this city pair are outside of what is possible.

Probably at EIS that city pair will be out of range. But CDG, MAD, LIS, and all of Britain and Ireland will be within range. Its a nice start.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlinetortugamon From United States of America, joined Apr 2013, 3449 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6098 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 1):
We already know Bombardier could make a TATL version of the CS100. Will Boeing concede that market? I think neither Boeing nor Airbus will.

Its good to see a third player pushing the big two to make changes and improvements.  
Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 2):
Typically PHL-FRA has an airways distance of about 3700nm

Right, and that is why I did not include FRA in my list of possible city pairs  . There are three direct A330/340 flights every day and once US becomes AA that may decline further to a couple narrow bodies so it definitely could be a candidate. Add OSL and BRU to the European side of the PHL/BOS/EWR/JFK equation as well.

I think its a great idea and I expect Airbus is doing something very similar. Not that any of this will stop people from speculating about a new 757 replacement.

tortugamon


User currently offlinechieft From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 357 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3987 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Beoing should take care of an B757-200 replacement. That could be a B738 or B739 HGW


Aircraft are marginal costs with wings.
User currently offline2travel2know2 From Panama, joined Apr 2010, 2656 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3872 times:

A B737max7HGW would probably be a better bet for thin TATL between North-East USA/Eastern Canada and Eire/UK/North-West Spain-Portugal.


I'm not on CM's payroll.
User currently offlinelightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13260 posts, RR: 100
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2585 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting 2travel2know2 (Reply 6):
A B737max7HGW would probably be a better bet for thin TATL between North-East USA/Eastern Canada and Eire/UK/North-West Spain-Portugal.

   and the mid-east to Europe. (excluding the regions you just noted, interestingly enough...) A HGW version would offer a plane with 3000nm to 3200nm 'still air' range. That would be interesting to see.

My rumor mill insists that Airbus/Pratt will try to make the A321NEO TATL ready. Its a question of when, not if.

So Boeing will have to act at some point. The question is when?


Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlinetortugamon From United States of America, joined Apr 2013, 3449 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2452 times:

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 7):
and the mid-east to Europe.

and maybe the middle east to Asia. Surprisingly SIN, KUL, PEK, CAN, SZX, CSX, WUH, HKG, & SGN are all between 3000-3200nm from DXB/DWC. There are probably some mountains to contend with though. Those pesky Himalayas.

Quoting 2travel2know2 (Reply 6):
A B737max7HGW

That 73GER/319ER did not sell very well, I wonder if it needs to be the size of a Max 8/320 NEO to have enough Y/Y to make it work.

Quoting lightsaber (Reply 7):
A321NEO TATL ready

A 4,100nm A321 would be a beast.

tortugamon


User currently offlineJoeCanuck From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 5476 posts, RR: 30
Reply 9, posted (1 year 5 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

Quoting tortugamon (Reply 8):

A 4,100nm A321 would be a beast.

That should drag off to the forest and bury any last 757 resurrection ideas.



What the...?
User currently offline2travel2know2 From Panama, joined Apr 2010, 2656 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (1 year 5 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2121 times:

Quoting tortugamon (Reply 8):
That 73GER/319ER did not sell very well, I wonder if it needs to be the size of a Max 8/320 NEO to have enough Y/Y to make it work.

I wasn't writing about the B737-700ER but the B737-700 - currently flown 3000nm non-stop by CM.
Be any B737, It also depends on what kind of J/Y class cabin configuration the airline wants for the aircraft and the traffic those routes are going to have.
Currently for airlines, B737-700ER, B737-700 and -600 are very niche aircraft for specific route/airport needs.



I'm not on CM's payroll.
User currently offlinePC12Fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2453 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (1 year 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1944 times:

Quoting chieft (Reply 5):
Beoing should take care of an B757-200 replacement.

Unless Boeing restarts the - eh, skip it.  



Just when I think you've said the stupidest thing ever, you keep talkin'!
User currently offlineby738 From Tonga, joined Sep 2000, 2361 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1876 times:

In no shape or form would a A321 be described as a beast. IMO it looks out of proportion, has been relatievly underpowered and with feeble looking landing gear and small looking engines. Not anything to fulfill the beast category for me.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing Outlines Some 737 MAX Specs. posted Wed Feb 8 2012 13:34:22 by LAXDESI
Long Beach Hoping To Capture 737-MAX Production posted Tue Sep 27 2011 07:56:02 by KarlB737
Is It Possible For Boeing To Offer B777-300F? posted Thu Oct 12 2006 04:02:56 by AirCanada014
Boeing To Offer 787-10? posted Tue May 23 2006 12:44:41 by Reggaebird
Boeing To Overhaul 737 Aircraft Family posted Tue Mar 1 2005 16:36:24 by NYC777
Boeing To Sell 6 737-800 To Libya's Buraq Air posted Fri Feb 4 2005 02:23:51 by BoeingBus
Boeing To Offer Longer Range, Quieter 747 Model posted Tue Feb 26 2002 08:51:04 by Singapore_Air
Boeing Grants Authority To Offer 777X? posted Wed May 1 2013 16:16:07 by tortugamon
Boeing Nears Authority To Offer 777X posted Mon Mar 11 2013 08:57:15 by sjc30l
Boeing 737 MAX Specs Released posted Wed Jul 11 2012 20:28:58 by 817Dreamliiner