Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Re-nationalization A Possibility?  
User currently offlineLindy field From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 14
Posted (12 years 10 months 19 hours ago) and read 891 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Here's a subject that nobody has brought up on the forum to the best of my knowledge. A friend of mine told me that she has an airline exec friend today who believes that the outlook for the US airline industry is so grim that the government may ultimately have to renationalize and reregulate the surviving US airlines in order to preserve the US aviation and transport infrastructure. In other words, the government could have to intervene in a far more expansive manner than merely providing subsidies to ailing airlines.

The thought is a bit mind-boggling. I am not saying by any means that renationalization is imminent or even necessarily likely, but I would like to read the thoughts of my more knowledgeable colleagues in the forum on this possibility. Obviously, what I am offering is third-hand speculation, but I thought I'd bring up the topic.
Please contribute your thoughts. Best to all.


2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (12 years 10 months 19 hours ago) and read 849 times:

I don't think that a move as drastic as reregulation is needed at this time. Financial support, definitely, but I think that regulation of the industry would present more problems and do more actually the hurt the industry than help it, at least in the long run.

Aaron G.


User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6277 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (12 years 10 months 12 hours ago) and read 800 times:

The US airline industry has never been nationalized. Heavily regulated, but NEVER nationalized.
I cannot foresee a time when full regulation will return. It would solve nothing. In fact, it would cause more headaches to the airlines and their customers.



Quit calling an airport ramp "Tarmac" and a taxiway "runway".
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EVA's New Re-configured 744 Going To LAX/YVR posted Thu May 3 2007 20:59:31 by Jimyvr
CO's 787's, New Routes, IAH-Asia A Possibility? posted Thu May 3 2007 19:14:30 by LAXdude1023
AirTran To Re-start MIA-BWI posted Sun Apr 29 2007 22:02:08 by MAH4546
Article Re: ABE - US Will Drop ABE-PIT posted Fri Apr 27 2007 18:46:25 by PHLBOS
RE: FedEx Says FAA Rule Could Delay Deliveries posted Thu Apr 26 2007 13:25:19 by IAHFLYR
Latest On Re-launch Of Air Paradise International posted Mon Apr 23 2007 06:01:01 by Easyas321
Question Re Singapore Airlines' New Service posted Thu Apr 19 2007 02:39:27 by Kaitak744
RE: Fuel Emergency Thread From Feb 2007 posted Wed Apr 18 2007 05:37:58 by Jc2354
FAA Issues Proposed Special Condition Re 787 posted Mon Apr 9 2007 22:03:49 by Amicus
Engine Certification/Re-Engining posted Mon Apr 2 2007 19:47:55 by Jholiiday