Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Swiss Airbus Collides With Mobile Lounge At YUL  
User currently onlinemhkansan From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 676 posts, RR: 1
Posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 20735 times:

Ran into this picture on Reddit's r/avaition. Looks like an a330 or 340 went into a gate that was too small for its wingspan, colliding into the mobile lounge and destroying the winglet.

Anybody have more information?

http://i.imgur.com/1frBTw8.jpg

38 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineQ From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 227 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 20694 times:

Yikes!! How could be happen? They didn't measure before for the first time aircraft type into YUL. Maybe first time gate for A330. I don't know.

Q


User currently offlineQantas717 From Australia, joined Nov 2012, 7 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 20454 times:

It was an A330-300.

More Pics
http://imgur.com/a/w1391#ehFIkYS

Regards

Matt


User currently offlineDALCE From Netherlands, joined Feb 2007, 1682 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 19936 times:

And it's the newest 330 LX has....Delivery April 15th this year.
Some unfortunate events for the newer aircraft in the fleet of LX. The sharklet 320 (HB-JLT) did also recieve new sharklets already due to double lightning strike........



flown on : F50,F70,CR1,CR2,CR9,E75,143,AR8,AR1,733,735,736,73G,738,753,744,319,320,321,333,AB6.
User currently offlinepeterjohns From Germany, joined Jan 2009, 202 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 19827 times:

Somehow it seems this happening more and more often. Perhaps due to the fact that more wide bodies are in use today. It also very confusing for pilots as for controllers to know which type of a/c is allowed to use which taxiway. Alone in FRA there are several restrictions for differant a/c types where to turn and where not.

This one looks bad- i guess it isn´t going to fixed with a bit of tape?

The mobile people mover-thing seems to be parked correctly though, judging by the red markings on the ground in the first picture.

In the end it is not always quite clear who is at fault - was the pilot advised/cleared to proceed along this taxiway- was the Taxiway charted as not suitable for more than x-ft´ wingspan? Was there a follow-me ahead? Was the people mover supposed to be there? Was the a/c on the centreline?
Anyhow I´d hate to have to make the call home and tell my boss I´ve slightly scratched the paintjob on the wing...
That´s if he isn´t a A.netter and has already seen the pics!!


User currently offline3rdGen From Bahrain, joined Jul 2011, 236 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 19788 times:

Quoting peterjohns (Reply 4):
The mobile people mover-thing seems to be parked correctly though, judging by the red markings on the ground in the first picture.

Sure but you have to consider height as well. Had most any other airport vehicle been parked in the same spot it wouldn't have been an issue. Basically if the airport was setup to allow that size plane to dock at that gate and for the vehicle to be in that spot then its a big mess up on the part of the airport planners.

Perhaps the people that park that mobile lounge got it wrong and left it extended?


User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4906 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 19781 times:

Ouch!!! That bird will be out of action for a while considering the wing suffered serious damage too.

EK8413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlineMadameConcorde From San Marino, joined Feb 2007, 10893 posts, RR: 37
Reply 7, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 19716 times:

Quoting DALCE (Reply 3):
And it's the newest 330 LX has....Delivery April 15th this year.
Some unfortunate events for the newer aircraft in the fleet of LX. The sharklet 320 (HB-JLT) did also recieve new sharklets already due to double lightning strike........

Poor Swiss A330!! Such a beautiful new aircraft... the winglet looks in bad shape!
Wonder how they managed that??

I hope it will be fixed and the a/c will soon be returned to service.

     



There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
User currently offlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17065 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 19565 times:

Quoting Qantas717 (Reply 2):

From the first picture it looks like the aircraft was taxiing when it hit the mobile gate lounge.

Quoting 3rdGen (Reply 5):
Quoting peterjohns (Reply 4):
The mobile people mover-thing seems to be parked correctly though, judging by the red markings on the ground in the first picture.

Sure but you have to consider height as well. Had most any other airport vehicle been parked in the same spot it wouldn't have been an issue. Basically if the airport was setup to allow that size plane to dock at that gate and for the vehicle to be in that spot then its a big mess up on the part of the airport planners.

Perhaps the people that park that mobile lounge got it wrong and left it extended?


You can see from the pictures that the gate lounges are supposed to be docked in that area. As the airplane was taxiing I wonder if the pilots for any reason were off center or a controller sent the airplane on a restricted taxiway by mistake.



Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 6187 posts, RR: 30
Reply 9, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 19547 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting peterjohns (Reply 4):
Anyhow I´d hate to have to make the call home and tell my boss I´ve slightly scratched the paintjob on the wing...

And I would hate to be the passenger sitting in the window seat over that wing watching how the wing is just not gonna make it... not gonna make it... and then the CRUNCH sound. Scary.



MGGS
User currently offlinesandyb123 From UK - Scotland, joined Oct 2007, 1105 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 19088 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting B747forever (Reply 8):
You can see from the pictures that the gate lounges are supposed to be docked in that area. As the airplane was taxiing I wonder if the pilots for any reason were off center or a controller sent the airplane on a restricted taxiway by mistake.

It's hard to tell but I'm going to wager the aircraft shouldn't have been on that taxiway. The wingtip is well over the taxiway perimeter line (which I know is normal) but the proximity to the lounge vehicle and the protuding area of the building seems very tight. In the second pictures the taxiway looks very narrow.

Quoting EK413 (Reply 6):

Ouch!!! That bird will be out of action for a while considering the wing suffered serious damage too.

Yeah the damage to the leading edge & slats is quite bad. Will that require a structural check to the rest of the wing given the stresses and potential to have damaged internal components?

Looks like most of the debris on the ground is from the vehicle.

Sandyb123



Member of the mile high club
User currently offlineSASDC8 From Norway, joined Mar 2006, 755 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 18953 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Wow! that is some serious damage to the wing as well as the winglet. Will take some time to get fixed. Does AC have Airbus mechanics in YUL?

I guess the airport controller sent them down the wrong taxiway, as it looks like both the aircraft and mobile lounge was in their correct position.



2-3-2 is NOT a premium configuration
User currently offlineBoeing744 From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1833 posts, RR: 23
Reply 12, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 18220 times:

Which day was this? I was at YUL on Thursday the 6th and remember hearing a final boarding call for the Swiss flight to ZRH. If it was that day then this would suggest it happened on departure...

User currently offlinePW100 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2002, 2451 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 18142 times:

That does look bad. Good thing this didn't happen to an A380 . . . then by now the pilots would have been generously flamed for
• racing on taxiways through congested ramps;
• that the captain would be primarily responsible for not hitting anything;
• crew should be able to clearly see the wingtips, so really they had no idea just how wide their airplane is.
Did this happen in clear daylight?

And for the record, the above was of ironic intention, for those that did not understand that; I'm not pointing blame to the crew here whatsoever. I am curious though to the sequence of events that led to the lining up of ALL the Swiss Cheese holes.

PW100



Immigration officer: "What's the purpose of your visit to the USA?" Spotter: "Shooting airliners with my Canon!"
User currently offlineNOWINYOW From Canada, joined May 2013, 36 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 16643 times:

Would there not be wing walkers while the aircraft is in motion so close to any gate?

What are the circumstances that dictate the necessity of wing walkers? Or the circumstances that negate the need for them?


User currently offlinecaribb From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 1637 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 15976 times:

Sad seeing a new plane damaged so early in its like (or at any time in its life).. We should make more use of remotely placed cameras and proximity warning indicators I guess.. bring car technology to aircraft.

[Edited 2013-06-09 08:46:51]

User currently offlineLONGisland89 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 735 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 15511 times:

Quoting peterjohns (Reply 4):
was the pilot advised/cleared to proceed along this taxiway- was the Taxiway charted as not suitable for more than x-ft´ wingspan?
Quoting B747forever (Reply 8):
or a controller sent the airplane on a restricted taxiway by mistake.
Quoting sandyb123 (Reply 10):
It's hard to tell but I'm going to wager the aircraft shouldn't have been on that taxiway.
Quoting SASDC8 (Reply 11):
I guess the airport controller sent them down the wrong taxiway

This is not the case. This is the only taxiway leaving this particular ramp area. A330s taxi through there everyday. This "alley" has 3 taxiway centerlines, two for which 737s/A320 sized a/c can taxi past each other opposite direction. The third centerline is in the middle of the two, so widebody/heavy a/c can taxi through oneway. My guess is they followed the wrong centerline (one intended for smaller a/c).

[Edited 2013-06-09 09:12:27]

User currently offlinewidget1580 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 345 posts, RR: 14
Reply 17, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 15470 times:

Does Swiss not use wing walkers? This could have been prevented by the ground grew signaling the pilots to stop before it had gone this far. But I know policies and procedures are different for every airline.


KLM | Journeys of Inspiration
User currently offlineLONGisland89 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 735 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 15339 times:

Quoting widget1580 (Reply 17):
Does Swiss not use wing walkers? This could have been prevented by the ground grew signaling the pilots to stop before it had gone this far. But I know policies and procedures are different for every airline.

Yes Swiss uses wing walkers. The aircraft was leaving the ramp area taxiing under its own power.


User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Reply 19, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 15291 times:

Quoting widget1580 (Reply 17):
Does Swiss not use wing walkers?

What is a wing walker? Do they walk with the aircraft while taxiing? Here in Zurich this is unknown.


User currently offlineMark2fly1034 From United States of America, joined Oct 2011, 125 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 15043 times:

Quoting ZRH (Reply 19):

Wing walkers walk the tips of the wings on push back and can single to the tug driver that they might be about to hit something kind of what it sounds like. Once under own power the tug will leave and wing walkers will go with tug back to gate.


User currently offlineCrimsonNL From Netherlands, joined Dec 2007, 1861 posts, RR: 42
Reply 21, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 14332 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

Quoting ZRH (Reply 19):
What is a wing walker? Do they walk with the aircraft while taxiing? Here in Zurich this is unknown.

They arent at all common on this side of the pond, but used at nearly every flight in the USA/Canada from what I understand.

Martijn



Nothing's worse then flying the same registration twice, except flying it 4 times..
User currently offlinephofmannsair From Switzerland, joined Jan 2005, 37 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 12839 times:

Quoting Boeing744 (Reply 12):

Happened yesterday, June 8th.


How do you think SWISS will handle this incident? They're already short of long-haul a/c...
Will TLV/CAI flights be downgraded to A320/321?


User currently offlinezeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 9029 posts, RR: 75
Reply 23, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 12153 times:

Anyone know if the terminal has changed in that area ?

I have been looking at the charts from a couple of vendors around gate 60/61. The vary on what they show, and google maps shows something different again.



We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25170 posts, RR: 22
Reply 24, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 11862 times:

Quoting phofmannsair (Reply 22):
Happened yesterday, June 8th.

LX arrivals/departures show the flight departing 5 minutes late and cancelled.

Quoting zeke (Reply 23):
I have been looking at the charts from a couple of vendors around gate 60/61. The vary on what they show, and google maps shows something different again.

It was at gate B56 yesteday according to the LX website. Today's LX flight to YUL (which arrived 24 minutes early) is at gate B61.


25 MrSpock : I am thinking about this question as well. The charts end at gate 60/61, but the picture in the first link shows the sign of gate 62.
26 LX8626 : LX18 (ZRH-EWR) will be operated by A343 the next days LX 256 (ZRH-TLV) will be operated by A321 the next days LX 254 (ZRH-TLV) will be operated by ED
27 rcair1 : It is docked at a gate at the height required for ingress/egress. Just as it should be.
28 Flightplan06 : Since I have been flying up there as a pilot for delta connection. And I can tell you about December they just finished that new dock station. And I
29 LONGisland89 : See reply #16. Heavy Airbuses go through there every day.
30 Flightplan06 : What I meant to say was reply16 is correct they probably took the East line and was suppose to take the west or Center line going out.
31 coair737 : This is completely irrelevant but why are the flaps retracted slightly? Don't most pilots put these up after they land.
32 Q : Maybe pilots did on propose to leave flaps down if any in case of catch fire on wing to let passengers escape slide down over the wing. Maybe pilots
33 LONGisland89 : The aircraft was attempting to taxiing out of the ramp towards the runway. The flaps are set for takeoff.
34 katanapilot : i've flown out of YUL a dozen times and never been on/noticed they have mobile people mover gate things. Wow I must be blind.
35 zeke : I have only seen them around bay 55 before myself, this area around 60/61 I remember there being a road. I asked above if the terminal has been exten
36 aerdingus : I thought this only works on the 737 because of it's low proximity to the ground? The 330/340 is much taller...& I think has slides all the way t
37 NorthStarDC4M : Air Canada's A330 primary maintenance base is YUL, so I'm sure they can at least get it ferry flight ready to get it back to Europe, if not do a comp
38 phofmannsair : Thanks!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
United B744 Collides With QF B763 At Mel posted Thu Feb 2 2006 05:20:43 by VH-BZF
HP Collides With Fuel Truck At SEA posted Tue Nov 29 2005 17:53:37 by Clickhappy
Air France Lounge At YUL On 21-02-02 posted Sat Feb 16 2002 22:22:31 by Traveler
Plane Collides With Pelican At Airshow + Pics posted Tue May 12 2009 03:20:00 by BuyantUkhaa
IL86 Collides With Crane At Moscow Airport posted Sat May 5 2007 20:04:06 by Kaitak
BA 320 Collides With De-icing Truck At OSL posted Tue Feb 13 2007 18:57:00 by Someone83
LH Airbus 343 At YUL Tonight.... posted Wed Apr 13 2005 03:29:44 by AC330
What's The Deal With Gate 132 At LAX - Tbit West? posted Wed May 22 2013 21:19:09 by WanderlustLAX
747 With Unmarked Tail At LAS? posted Tue Apr 2 2013 10:14:33 by konradh767
Strange AA 757 With Markings Covered At BOS posted Fri Feb 1 2013 13:58:57 by bizjet