Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Potential Sonic Cruiser Buyers  
User currently offlineB777-777X From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 918 times:

SIA, CX, BA, any more?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCathay Pacific From Australia, joined May 2000, 1864 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 888 times:

JAL, KE, TG???

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy Cathay Pacific....The Heart of Asia  Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy



cathay pacific, now you're really flying
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 871 times:

Most of the international American carriers, of course (assuming they have the money after the recent disaster).

Charles


User currently offlineUnited Airline From Hong Kong, joined Jan 2001, 9210 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 864 times:

AA, DL, UAL, JAL, SQ, CX etc etc........



User currently offlineJAL From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 5093 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 842 times:

Most US carriers plus JAL, SIA, Emirates, CX, Virgin and perhaps Qantas.



Work Hard But Play Harder
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 833 times:

Come to think of it, there are tons of airlines that could use it - the plane is to be roughly the same capacity as a 767/A330, and long range, so even airlines like Kenyan Airlines could fill it and use it on their European routes (they currently use 767s).

As long as the economics are as good as promised, there is a huge potential.

Charles


User currently offlineTeva From France, joined Jan 2001, 1875 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 821 times:

None, as it will never been built.
Nana....



Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 819 times:

Everyone currently using the 767 or 757 long range and not wanting an Airbus...
Maybe even anyone currently operating a Concorde and not caring about national pride  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
All airlines wanting to operate fast transoceanic routes for the exacting traveler rather than jampacking tourists into the largest plane there is and dumping them on some holiday island.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineSonic99 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 3 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 803 times:

I'd suppose that based on the info given below even some US carriers (UAL) might be interested in the A380 as a long-term solution for some of their routes.

Others would probably include those flying the trans-Pacific route. AC?, JAL, UAL, QA, CX, SQ

And then, of course some transcontinental routes: Asia-Europe routes in particular. among ohters mentioned BA, AF, KLM (perhaps leasing one or two?), etc...

Confirmed orders by Airbus accounts:


Air France (Groupe)= 10
International Leasing Finance Corp.= 10
Qantas= 12
Singapore Airlines = 12
Virgin Atlantic= 6

Total= 48 orders


Based on Airbus Industrie reports, here are some interesting startup appearance facts:


Likely early A380 airports in 2006/2007 are:
LHR, CDG, LGW, SIN, NRT, SYD, JFK, LAX, SFO, MIA, DXB, DOH

Likely early A380 airports in 2007-2009 are:
FRA, BKK, HKG, KIX, EWR, MEM, ORD, IND, ANC, STN, YUL



Maximum takeoff field length (MTOW [560t] at sea level, ISA +15):
less than 10,000 ft ( 3,000 m )


Stephan

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Potential Users Of The 'Sonic Cruiser' posted Wed Jun 13 2001 05:07:37 by United Airline
Sonic Cruiser - A Different Boeing posted Tue Jul 10 2007 16:49:36 by EI321
Chances Of Y3 Being A "Sonic Cruiser" posted Thu Jul 20 2006 00:31:47 by Ruscoe
Sonic Cruiser Technology posted Sun Apr 9 2006 07:53:42 by MrComet
Scaled Down Sonic Cruiser As A 737 Replacement? posted Mon Jan 9 2006 00:53:46 by OyKIE
Sonic Cruiser posted Mon Jan 2 2006 08:51:55 by NASCARAirforce
Sonic Cruiser Team Still On Payroll At Boeing. posted Wed Sep 28 2005 11:34:39 by LufthanseatLAX
Could Boeing's Sonic Cruiser Have Been A BBJ? posted Tue Jul 12 2005 09:17:23 by Lehpron
Why Was The Sonic Cruiser Aborted? posted Fri May 13 2005 12:28:39 by RootsAir
Sonic Cruiser? posted Sat Mar 19 2005 22:57:37 by NorCal