Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
OZ 777 Crash At SFO Part 1  
User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1966 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 704132 times:

An OZ 777 just crashed off the end of runway 28R at SFO. Details to come

Please continue discussion at OZ 777 Crash At SFO Part 2 (by moderators Jul 6 2013 in Civil Aviation)


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ben Wang



[Edited 2013-07-06 17:21:50 by moderators]


The only valid opinions are those based in facts
245 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6285 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704946 times:

There is no OZ 777 departing this early. However it may have been on arrival. Everything at SFO is going around currently


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6285 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 705228 times:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/AAR214


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineHOONS90 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 3214 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704349 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

Aircraft should be HL7742. I'm shaking right now...


The biggest mistake made by most human beings: Listening to only half, understanding just a quarter and telling double.
User currently onlineSIA747Megatop From Singapore, joined Apr 2012, 387 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704064 times:

Was this a runway excursion or an actual "crash?"


"I do not yet know of a man who became a leader as a result of having undergone a leadership course." - Lee Kuan Yew
User currently offlineCO764 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704107 times:

Can't find the reg on Flightradar24... Since it crashed off 28R is it in the bay?

EDIT : Seems like the reg was already found... Sorry.

[Edited 2013-07-06 11:44:23]


http://flightdiary.net/CO764. Next Flights: ORY - LHR - EWR
User currently offlineHOONS90 From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 3214 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704503 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

https://mobile.twitter.com/kristaseiden/status/353583157355880448/photo/1

Looks bad...



The biggest mistake made by most human beings: Listening to only half, understanding just a quarter and telling double.
User currently offlineCaptainDoony From UK - Scotland, joined Oct 2011, 72 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 703895 times:

Looks pretty bad with thick black smoke plumes in pictures on twitter



User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6285 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 703716 times:

I just confirmed there is a crash on the approach end of the 28's. The plane is broken in multiple pieces. It appeared to the controller I spoke with that it was a hard landing and the tail is yards away from the body of the aircraft. It was possible a short landing or hard touchdown.


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 27178 posts, RR: 50
Reply 9, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 703107 times:

FAA advisory out says "DISABLED AIRCRAFT".


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineYXwatcherMKE From United States of America, joined May 2007, 1039 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 702514 times:

there is nothing on any of the SFO area tv stations. where did you get your information from?


I miss the 60's & 70's when you felt like a guest on the plane not cattle like today
User currently offlineual757 From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 702781 times:

Oh my god. I saw this on my friend's Facebook page. I hope everyone gets out okay, I'm shaking.

https://mobile.twitter.com/kristaseiden?p=s

Here's the twitter page I'm finding pics on...


User currently offlinezalemam From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 169 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 703711 times:

Two more images...from twitter






Patience is Virtue
User currently offlineas739x From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6285 posts, RR: 24
Reply 13, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 702025 times:

Quoting YXwatcherMKE (Reply 10):

I got the info from Ramp Tower I use to supervise. Crash confirmed. Tragic



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineLFutia From Netherlands, joined Dec 2002, 3406 posts, RR: 32
Reply 14, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 701138 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Wow. Hope everyone is okay.

Leo/ORD



Leo/ORD -- Groetjes uit de VS! -- Heeft u laatst nog met KLM gevlogen?
User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1966 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 701188 times:

SFO Airport is currently closed the flight was OZ214


The only valid opinions are those based in facts
User currently offlinePC12Fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2537 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 701179 times:

Current weather:

SFO 061756Z WINDS 210 @ 6, VIS 10SM, FEW016, TEMPS 18/10, ALT 29.82.

Is SFO closed?



Just when I think you've said the stupidest thing ever, you keep talkin'!
User currently offlineCaptainDoony From UK - Scotland, joined Oct 2011, 72 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 701284 times:

Looks like majority of fuselage is intact. Nose looks to have snapped off with tail nowhere to be seen. Hopefully most of pax and crew have survived but wouldn't be surprised if there are some fatalities up front.

User currently onlinekaran69 From India, joined Oct 2004, 2905 posts, RR: 17
Reply 18, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 700061 times:

That looks real bad, hope everyone is ok

Karan


User currently offlineaerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4692 posts, RR: 44
Reply 19, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 700042 times:

Wow! Wx is severe clear. What the hell happened? Hoping the best for those on board.


"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 9288 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 698716 times:

Asiana ICN (Seoul) to SFO and is allegedly a 777-200LR.

User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 28302 posts, RR: 60
Reply 21, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 699354 times:

Looks bad !!

https://www.youtube.com/embed/0dFtmSybpuw


User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2943 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 698820 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

NYCAviation is reporting fuel problems. Perhaps fuel exhaustion?
Pat



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 23, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 699321 times:

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BOgxkLYCAAALk5s.png:large

http://twitter.com/AerospaceInfo/status/353587068343025665/photo/1



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlinej8 From St. Vincent and the Grenadines, joined Mar 2013, 4 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 697527 times:

Hoping for the best for all...

User currently offlineFastphilly From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 244 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 706584 times:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dFtmSybpuw&feature=youtu.be

User currently offlinekaneporta1 From Greece, joined May 2005, 774 posts, RR: 12
Reply 26, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704144 times:

Quoting OA260 (Reply 21):
Looks bad !!

https://www.youtube.com/embed/0dFtmSybpuw
Quoting OA260 (Reply 21):
NYCAviation is reporting fuel problems. Perhaps fuel exhaustion?
Pat

Actually looks better than I thought. Fuselage seems intact although tail is missing. Kinda reminds me of the BA038 crash, but I don't know if OZ 777s are equipped with RR engines.



I'd rather die peacefully in my sleep, like my grandfather, not terrified and screaming, like his passengers
User currently offlineaerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4692 posts, RR: 44
Reply 27, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 714046 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 23):

That's a good sight to see, bad enough but could be worse.

Edit: after viewing for pictures it looks bad for rear of the aircraft. Such a shame.

[Edited 2013-07-06 12:13:56]


"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 28, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 710560 times:

Quoting kaneporta1 (Reply 26):
but I don't know if OZ 777s are equipped with RR engines.

The whole 777 fleet has PW4090 engines.



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineraggi From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 1007 posts, RR: 1
Reply 29, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 711183 times:

Looks bad, hopefully no fatalities... I fear the 777's perfect safety record has been broken.

OZ's 777 fleet are all 77E, PW engines.



Stick & Rudder
User currently offlinebluewhale18210 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 237 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 710488 times:

Airport is closed until further notice...
And yeah, looks like it's severe clear out there...

SFO ATIS INFO N 1756Z.
21006KT 10SM FEW016 18/10 A2982 (TWO NINER EIGHT TWO).
LNDG RWYS 28L.
DEPG RWYS 1L, 1R.
NOTAMS...
ARPT CLSD, UFA.
RY 28R, 28L GS OTS, RY 28R, 28L ALS OTS.
GATEHOLD PROCEDURES IN EFCT, ALL A/C CTC GH 124.25 WHEN READY FOR ENG START OR PB.
READBACK OF ALL RWY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED.
ALL ACFT ARE RQRD TO INCL ACFT CLSGN IN ALL RDBKS AND ACKMTS.
...ADVS YOU HAVE INFO N.

At least some got out it looks like. I saw escape slides deployed from doors 1L and 2L.



JPS on A300-600RF A319/320 B737-400/800 B757-200F B767-300F CRJ-200/900. Looking to add more.
User currently offlinena From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 11105 posts, RR: 9
Reply 31, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 709985 times:

Quoting kaneporta1 (Reply 26):
but I don't know if OZ 777s are equipped with RR engines.

This plane has/had Pratt & Whitneys if its a 772ER.


User currently offlineby738 From St. Vincent and the Grenadines, joined Sep 2000, 2607 posts, RR: 1
Reply 32, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 708721 times:

Quoting kaneporta1 (Reply 26):
Kinda reminds me of the BA038 crash, but I don't know if OZ 777s are equipped with RR engines.

Yes that was what I was thinking. An intact fuselage is hopefully a good sign. The 772 is certainly powered by PW
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=awmKRglUX_Zc


User currently offlineba319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8694 posts, RR: 54
Reply 33, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 708332 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

At leas there are some chutes deployed, indicated people got out.

Quoting kaneporta1 (Reply 26):
Kinda reminds me of the BA038 crash, but I don't know if OZ 777s are equipped with RR engines.

- What's that supposed to mean? - You saying only RR 777's crash?



111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,77L,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333
User currently offlinemayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 11241 posts, RR: 14
Reply 34, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 708808 times:

Here's the first media account I could find......I don't understand the part about the plane coming to a rest, "upside down".....looks right side up, to me.......


http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/local/...7-crashes-while-landing-sfo/nYfcx/



KTVU.com



A plane crashed while landing at San Francisco International Airport Saturday morning after its tail came off while it was touching down on the runway.

According to a witness, around 11:20 a.m. the plane was just about to land -- its landing gear had come down -- when the tail of the plane came off.

After wobbling for a minute, the aircraft flipped upside down, coming to a stop on runway on it's back.

The plane, reportedly a Boeing 777, was coming from South Korea, according to flight tracking information.



"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offline9lflyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 174 posts, RR: 0
Reply 35, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 706164 times:

From the video, it looks like the fire has not reached the cabin, it looks to be behind the aircraft, maybe where the tail section is. and I see slides deployed so an evacuation has occurred. Lets hope for the best. Looks awfully similar to the BA LHR incident.


My opinions do not represent the opinions of my company. They are solely the opinion of the poster.
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 36, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 706085 times:

Quoting raggi (Reply 29):
I fear the 777's perfect safety record has been broken.

This is not the first 777 crash.



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlinePolot From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 2892 posts, RR: 1
Reply 37, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 703589 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 36):
This is not the first 777 crash.

I think he meant in terms of fatalities.


User currently onlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 3152 posts, RR: 1
Reply 38, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 703561 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 36):
This is not the first 777 crash.

I'm sure he's referring to the lack of fatal 777 crashes.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineThomasCook From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 801 posts, RR: 8
Reply 39, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704065 times:

Lufthansa A380 LH454 diverting to Oakland now.


A380 Crew
User currently offlinethreeifbyair From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704156 times:

Where is the rest of the plane? Hard to see from the CNN feed but I only see part of it.

Incredibly stupid reporting by the CNN anchor right now, btw.


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 41, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 704985 times:

Update: crews report 48 patients have been rescued so far after 777 crashes on landing. Passengers still on burning plane.


Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineKiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8870 posts, RR: 14
Reply 42, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 702079 times:

How long does it take to reopen an airport after an incident like this, I'm on a flight to SFO with my family on Monday?

User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 43, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 701978 times:

CNN is just now reporting it. It's pretty bad that it took them over a half hour after it happened to first report it. Just shows you how social media breaks news in a more efficient manner than mainstream media.

User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 28302 posts, RR: 60
Reply 44, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 701363 times:

Sky News reporting it now news.sky.com but only a ticker at the bottom of the screen ''Breaking News''. I guess they are awaiting more information.

User currently offlineNeutronStar73 From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 582 posts, RR: 0
Reply 45, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 701577 times:

That is a testament to Boeing's design. The aircraft looks to be relatively intact. Hope all aboard are okay

User currently offlineCO764 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 46, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 701536 times:

Quoting ThomasCook (Reply 39):

Lufthansa A380 LH454 diverting to Oakland now.

First time an A380 lands in OAK?



http://flightdiary.net/CO764. Next Flights: ORY - LHR - EWR
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 47, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 699613 times:

Quoting threeifbyair (Reply 40):
Incredibly stupid reporting by the CNN anchor right now, btw.

Yeah:

"The 777 is a plane that normally has 3 rows."

"it's unclear whether any passengers were on board."

Facepalm :F



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineraggi From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 1007 posts, RR: 1
Reply 48, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 698815 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 36):

No fatal 777 crash yet, hopefully that is still true after today.



Stick & Rudder
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 49, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 698767 times:

Picture from the other side:

http://twitter.com/navarrobryan/status/353589030849503233/photo/1



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2044 posts, RR: 22
Reply 50, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 696185 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Watching local KTVU ch2 right now. Reporting tail strike on landing with tail section breaking off.


It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlinecuban8 From Kiribati, joined Sep 2009, 297 posts, RR: 0
Reply 51, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 696210 times:

Seems like a bad accident. In most of the time, the front of the airplane gets the worst damage, but in this case I'm wondering what happened to the whole tail section. I hope no fatalities......just worried about the passengers in the aft.

User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2943 posts, RR: 4
Reply 52, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 695404 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

I just listened to the LiveATC archive and I don't think it was fuel exhaustion. There seemed to be no indications of issues prior to the landing. Though that is just armchair crash investigation. Kudos to SFO tower for being so professional during the whole event. The Captain even came on post crash and was speaking to tower. My prayers go out to the people on board.
Pat



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlinefreeze3192 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 176 posts, RR: 0
Reply 53, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 695868 times:

LiveATC SFO:

http://archive-server.liveatc.net/ksfo/KSFO-Twr-Jul-06-2013-1800Z.mp3

They check in at 21:00. They were coming in for 28L



"A passenger bets his life that his pilot is a worthy heir to an ancient tradition of excellence and professionalism."
User currently offlinen471wn From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1705 posts, RR: 2
Reply 54, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 690464 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CO764 (Reply 46):
First time an A380 lands in OAK?

Yes it will be the first time!!


User currently offlineCaptainDoony From UK - Scotland, joined Oct 2011, 72 posts, RR: 0
Reply 55, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 691695 times:



Very positive news


User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 56, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 692765 times:

Interesting photo that a friend on Twitter just retweeted:

http://path.com/p/1lwrZb

Now if I had just survived a crash, I don't think getting on my phone would be my first thing to do once I got out of the plane.


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 57, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 694800 times:

Picture of the crash landing itself:

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BOg1QPuCEAA8spW.jpg:large

http://twitter.com/stefanielaine/status/353591123958173696/photo/1



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineNeutronStar73 From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 582 posts, RR: 0
Reply 58, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 691438 times:

Quoting threeifbyair (Reply 40):

Agreed. This woman is annoyingly stupid. Just proves ones of my professor's statement about modern news media: most are really news readers and not journalists, so if something isn't put in front of them ready to go, they will flail around completely clueless


User currently offlineYXwatcherMKE From United States of America, joined May 2007, 1039 posts, RR: 2
Reply 59, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 690062 times:

The like below has a CBS radio station live reporting on the crash... Hopefully there no lose of life. they are reporting that it is a cargo flight. two hour ground stop.
Well now they are backing out of the idea that it was a cargo flight. and a witness statement that the plane was out of control on approach to 28L.

[Edited 2013-07-06 12:31:56]


I miss the 60's & 70's when you felt like a guest on the plane not cattle like today
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 27178 posts, RR: 50
Reply 60, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 687547 times:

Yes the massive diverts commence.

KL 747, LH A380 went to OAK.
KE 77W to LAX

Tons of domestic flights to OAK, SJC and a few to MRY



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlinen782nc From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 61, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 687777 times:

Witnesses now reporting a severe tail strike causing the rear section to detach from the rest of the aircraft. They keep saying the plane flipped, but the pictures posted here show it right side up...


Stairway to Seven
User currently offlinegarpd From UK - Scotland, joined Aug 2005, 2866 posts, RR: 4
Reply 62, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 686768 times:

Anyone else thinking extreme hard landing?

[Edited 2013-07-06 12:21:36]


arpdesign.wordpress.com
User currently offlinethreeifbyair From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 63, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 687174 times:

Quoting PA110 (Reply 50):
Reporting tail strike on landing with tail section breaking off.

Yikes.

Listening to KOAK LiveATC feed - all sorts of planes diverting there. KL (744) and LH (380) have arrived. OAK has customs, at least, so maybe people can actually get off there.


User currently offlineherctech From Canada, joined Feb 2005, 61 posts, RR: 0
Reply 64, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 687280 times:

The reporting on CNN is just grating. They claim they can't identify the airline, or any other iinfo. They should be following this forum so as to provide more accurate information.

Edit: seems they are finally catching up

[Edited 2013-07-06 12:24:05]

User currently offlinenicholasjet From United Kingdom, joined May 2013, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 65, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 688087 times:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dFtmSybpuw&feature=youtu.be

video


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 66, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 687265 times:

Better pic:


http://twitter.com/Eunner

[Edited 2013-07-06 12:25:05]


Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7184 posts, RR: 35
Reply 67, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 683905 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ba319-131 (Reply 33):
You saying only RR 777's crash?

So far, yes.


User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 616 posts, RR: 0
Reply 68, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 684183 times:

Quoting j8 (Reply 24):
Hoping for the best for all...

X2!!

Quoting ThomasCook (Reply 39):
Lufthansa A380 LH454 diverting to Oakland now.

Are they going to deplane at OAK, or are they going to land at OAK, wait until SFO reopens, then fly over to SFO to deplane?

I'm scheduled to pick up clients on UA 902 FRA-SFO this afternoon. I'm guessing that they're going to do something similar (either into OAK or SJC)?



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlineby738 From St. Vincent and the Grenadines, joined Sep 2000, 2607 posts, RR: 1
Reply 69, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 680986 times:

Quoting KiwiRob (Reply 42):

Lets get the injured off and the fire out first


User currently offlineaerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4692 posts, RR: 44
Reply 70, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 681488 times:

Quoting CaptainDoony (Reply 55):

Don't forget your carry-on luggage now...Incredible



"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlinemayor From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 11241 posts, RR: 14
Reply 71, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 680811 times:

Quoting srbmod (Reply 56):
Now if I had just survived a crash, I don't think getting on my phone would be my first thing to do once I got out of the plane.

No, the first thing I would do is change my underwear (if possible).



"A committee is a group of the unprepared, appointed by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary"----Fred Allen
User currently offlineFastphilly From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 244 posts, RR: 0
Reply 72, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 680767 times:

There is a majority of white smoke at this point so the fire must be close to extinguished. According to an eyewitness the tail detached on landing and the plane flipped over.

User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 73, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 680799 times:

There were 290 people on board the airplane. No reports of injuries so far.


Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlinebtfarrwm From United States of America, joined May 2011, 62 posts, RR: 0
Reply 74, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 678917 times:

Live description from a witness sounds bad...plane cartwheeled after landing, wing broke off first, followed by tail. Did not immediately catch fire.

User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 9
Reply 75, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 678657 times:

Quoting ba319-131 (Reply 33):
What's that supposed to mean? - You saying only RR 777's crash?

You can't figure out what he meant???? He's CLEARLY making a reference to the problem BA had with it's RR engines and trying to discount it. Keep calm and grow up!



Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlinezrs70 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 3377 posts, RR: 8
Reply 76, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 678441 times:

Are the passengers leaving with their bags (as the photos indicate)?


16 year airliners.net vet! 2000-2015
User currently offlineiowaman From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4475 posts, RR: 6
Reply 77, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 677250 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 61):
Yes the massive diverts commence.

KL 747, LH A380 went to OAK.
KE 77W to LAX

Tons of domestic flights to OAK, SJC and a few to MRY

SJC diverts including ANA 788, UA 753, and many more.

SMF also getting some diverts, US A321, UA 752, AC 320

RNO picking up an AA 738, OO CR2


User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5515 posts, RR: 43
Reply 78, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 676863 times:

Quoting srbmod (Reply 56):
Now if I had just survived a crash, I don't think getting on my phone would be my first thing to do once I got out of the plane.

I think I probably would get on the phone. I'd rather my loved ones find out about the crash after I tell them I am all right.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineLanPeru From Peru, joined Jun 2001, 645 posts, RR: 9
Reply 79, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 674409 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 47):
Quoting threeifbyair (Reply 40):
Incredibly stupid reporting by the CNN anchor right now, btw.

Yeah:

"The 777 is a plane that normally has 3 rows."

"it's unclear whether any passengers were on board."

Facepalm :F

For an anchor, I believe she is doing a great job. She stated "Three rows of seats" (To me, X-X-X comes to mind), a size able aircraft...she reported that it came from "South Korea", and how SFO-ICN-SFO is a busy route

Welcome to the real-world.

I hope that people are ok, I always think of elderly and young children/infants when it comes to these crashed...they aren't always as mobile, able or aware of what to do.


User currently offlinepierrelav From Brazil, joined Mar 2011, 57 posts, RR: 0
Reply 80, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 674073 times:

The CNN guy ( Richard Quest) is nothing but Jacuzzi journalism. Useless whern it comes to real info.

User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7470 posts, RR: 56
Reply 81, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 671012 times:

AF084 from CDG diverted to SEA

User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 82, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 671091 times:

Quoting herctech (Reply 65):
The reporting on CNN is just grating. They claim they can't identify the airline, or any other iinfo. They should be following this forum so as to provide more accurate information.

The thread here had been up for over a half hour by the time CNN broke the story. The weekend anchors seem to not even be CNN's "B Team". I'm half expecting notorious news prankster Captain Janks to prank CNN, as he has done in the past because of the folks at CNN are often slow on the uptake. I ended up turning over to Fox News because they seem to be a bit more competent in their reporting.


User currently offlinetkukucka From Australia, joined Apr 2013, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 83, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 671152 times:

Man what a crash this is the 3 rd hull loss of a 777 in its history feel for the people involved

User currently offlinewarden145 From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 616 posts, RR: 0
Reply 84, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 670891 times:

Quoting pierrelav (Reply 81):
The CNN guy ( Richard Quest) is nothing but Jacuzzi journalism. Useless whern it comes to real info.

Isn't that true of most journalists?

I'm using this thread as my primary source of info for this...I trust what people post on here FAR above what a news-reader says...



ETOPS = Engine Turns Off, Passengers Swim
User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2434 posts, RR: 26
Reply 85, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 671092 times:

The last door is open as well, so that looks like people got off all the way to the back. Let's hope they were all that lucky.

[Edited 2013-07-06 12:32:17]


Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8584 posts, RR: 23
Reply 86, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 671731 times:

Quoting aerobalance (Reply 71):
Don't forget your carry-on luggage now...Incredible

Holy S no kidding. Your airplane is burning and you stroll off with your roll-aboard?! Sorry, but if you're in front of me in this situation and you're reaching for the overhead, I'm not responsible for the broken nose and pelvis that result from me "removing" you from my path.



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlinethreeifbyair From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 87, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 671072 times:

CNN video showing a ton of fire damage - burned out in most of the forward cabin. Praying that pax could escape before the fire, as impact looks survivable.

User currently offlineCO764 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 88, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 671707 times:

Already a Wikipedia page :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asiana_Airlines_Flight_214



http://flightdiary.net/CO764. Next Flights: ORY - LHR - EWR
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5388 posts, RR: 20
Reply 89, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 670939 times:

Quoting LanPeru (Reply 80):


For an anchor, I believe she is doing a great job.

Not bad really, not everyone can be an AvGeek. Of course after to listening to the broadcast for about 5 minutes I hightailed it back to A-net for quicker, more accurate info.

So glad to see people walking away from that....



Next up: STL-EWR-BTV-ORD-STL
User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 9288 posts, RR: 3
Reply 90, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 671442 times:

Quoting mayor (Reply 72):
No, the first thing I would do is change my underwear (if possible).

  


CNN reader comment suggests "everyone was evacuated." via a sibling at the scene (6 min ago)

Let's hope so~~

Edit: ac is reportedly HL 7742:

Serial number 29171 LN:553
Type 777-28EER
First flight date 25/02/2006
Plane age 7.4 years
Engines 2 x PW PW4090

[Edited 2013-07-06 12:37:45]

User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 27178 posts, RR: 50
Reply 91, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 670952 times:

CX870 744 to OAK
SQ16 77W to SMF
CA985 744 to LAX
AC757 320 to OAK

Lots of shorthaul flights turning back to points of origin.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8174 posts, RR: 4
Reply 92, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 668301 times:

I do know that SFO's crash and rescue operations responded very quickly to this accident.

Unfortunately, given the fact the plane did flip over, there is going to be a casualty count, especially if you note a very visible crack near the center of the plane. Given most of the fuselage stayed intact, let's just hope the count is low.


User currently offlinewarreng24 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 716 posts, RR: 0
Reply 93, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 666301 times:

Quoting freeze3192 (Reply 53):
LiveATC SFO:

http://archive-server.liveatc.net/ksfo/KSFO-Twr-Jul-06-2013-1800Z.mp3

They check in at 21:00. They were coming in for 28L

Absolutely amazing how calm and professional SFO Tower, the QX, and the OO pilots (who are both on short final) sound. Kudos to them.

Thoughts and prayers with those on the OZ flight.


User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 28302 posts, RR: 60
Reply 94, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 665599 times:

http://i955.photobucket.com/albums/ae40/PhilipOA260/photo-15_zps29db2697.jpg

User currently offlinethreeifbyair From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 95, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 665299 times:

Quoting FlySSC (Reply 82):
AF084 from CDG diverted to SEA

Nearest station with DL equipment to serve widebodies, I guess. AF084 was well into Oregon (and therefore beyond SEA) when it turned around but only SEA and SLC fit the bill as far as major DL stations with appropriate equipment.


User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1021 posts, RR: 1
Reply 96, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 664757 times:

Registration is HL7742.

User currently offlineCO764 From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 97, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 664975 times:

Apparently, the airport will be closed for the next "couple of hours"

http://rt.com/usa/plane-san-francisco-fire-748/



http://flightdiary.net/CO764. Next Flights: ORY - LHR - EWR
User currently offlineUK_Dispatcher From United Arab Emirates, joined Dec 2001, 2599 posts, RR: 28
Reply 98, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 665307 times:

It looks like door R2 was blocked by an engine and that doors L4/R4 were not used.

I can't believe there are people with trolley bags in the photos! I would go mad if someone stood up and opened the overhead locker in front of me instead of evacuating immediately. I guess that might suggest that there was not much panic, so let's hope everyone got out.


User currently offlineusscvr From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 72 posts, RR: 0
Reply 99, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 665723 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Foxnews just showed better images. Tail separated just aft of pressure bulkhead. Wings still attached. Fire has take out almost half of the top of the aircraft. If all made it out, they are very fortunate. Prayers to all.

User currently offlineheysfo From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 56 posts, RR: 0
Reply 100, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 666378 times:

Video

https://www.youtube.com/embed/0dFtmSybpuw


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 101, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 665440 times:

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BOg6-YrCUAAW_4C.jpg:large


Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineThomasCook From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 801 posts, RR: 8
Reply 102, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 664112 times:

From doors 3 forward the fuselage looks to have been decimated by fire. Seems like L4 has been ripped off and the left and right engines have sheared off. The tail seems to have broken away around the area of the aft pressure bulkhead.


A380 Crew
User currently offlinenycdave From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 547 posts, RR: 1
Reply 103, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 663800 times:

Could that really have flipped/cartwheeled? nose is undamaged, and initial photos show the roofline mostly intact (later photos show fire damage through the roof)...

User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 104, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 664226 times:




Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlinetimboflier215 From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 1346 posts, RR: 1
Reply 105, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 660986 times:

How often to tail strikes occur on landing? Tail strikes on take off seem far more common. Hope everyone is OK - completely shocking.

User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 106, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 660596 times:

Quoting nycdave (Reply 103):
Could that really have flipped/cartwheeled? nose is undamaged, and initial photos show the roofline mostly intact (later photos show fire damage through the roof)...

It did not flip.



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 28302 posts, RR: 60
Reply 107, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 661260 times:


.

.


User currently offlineNDiesel From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 108, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 662322 times:

Hi guys,

I work for CNN and we're watching this thread closely now. Keep the information coming should you have any.

Best,

Mike



Delta MD-11 JFK-CDG - Upon sunrise I fell in love with Aviation
User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6933 posts, RR: 21
Reply 109, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 659477 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sergey Rimsha



Here's the most recent pic on a.net.

Why does CNN's Richard Quest keep saying it is a -200 LR??

I have the right plane pictured, correct?



I feel woozy....what did you put in that Pudding Pop?
User currently offlineairbusa346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 110, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 658233 times:

Quoting RayChuang (Reply 92):
Unfortunately, given the fact the plane did flip over, there is going to be a casualty count, especially if you note a very visible crack near the center of the plane. Given most of the fuselage stayed intact, let's just hope the count is low.

Surely if it flipped and ended up back on its belly, then the wings would be detacted and more fuselarge brackages.



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 111, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 658545 times:

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BOg7KARCIAALbJS.jpg:large

Wow, it almost completely burned down.



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineby738 From St. Vincent and the Grenadines, joined Sep 2000, 2607 posts, RR: 1
Reply 112, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 657868 times:

Amazing that we are seeing these images so quickly due to the immense power of media, social media and mobile phones. Damage looks worse in the later pictures, but maybe lots of pax off before fire became intense.

User currently offlinemach2is2slowaz From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 62 posts, RR: 0
Reply 113, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 658105 times:

Sorry if it has already been posted but live feed from over head. http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...n-francisco-airport?lite&gt1=43001

Prayers to all involved and that everyone survived!


User currently offlinerichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4390 posts, RR: 6
Reply 114, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655260 times:

Second hull loss of a B777 - but this is secondary to the injured and possibly fatally injured.

Seems to me that:

- The plane obviously suffered a severely hard landing or lost control after a normal landing (maybe it bounced?)
- The tail and tail section is seperated from the main fuselage, presumably it is still on or near the runway
- The fuselage appears to be intact from nose to tail, except for missing tail cone section and rear empennage
- Fire was the big problem after landing

Hopefully everybody escaped similar to the AF Airbus A343 crash at YYZ in 2005. That's the main hope now.
Let's hope nobody was injured to the point that they could not get off the plane and that there was enough time before the fire and smoke enveloped the fuselage.

God Bless all passengers and crew, especially those sitting toward the very rear.



None shall pass!!!!
User currently offlineUSAIRWAYS321 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1851 posts, RR: 8
Reply 115, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655426 times:

I won't pretend to know much about the construction of the 777, but just looking at the pictures I'm astounded how cleanly the tail section broke off.

User currently offlineRDUDDJI From Lesotho, joined Jun 2004, 1654 posts, RR: 2
Reply 116, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655461 times:

It's amazing to me the things that CNN is reporting. They're reporting that it "cartwheeled", the "wings broke off". All of this while they are showing the wings intact on Live TV... reporting FAIL. They'd be better off quoting a.net.

What I would like to know is WTF happened to the tail section?!



Sometimes we don't realize the good times when we're in them
User currently offlinenicholasjet From United Kingdom, joined May 2013, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 117, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655622 times:

Looking at the SkyNews broadcast, and the video footage.... it looks like a wheel caught the sea wall at the start of the runway/stopway/clearway area.

User currently offlineairbusa346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 118, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655021 times:

Tail is just before the threshold.


Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 119, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 654911 times:

Quoting Thomas_Jaeger (Reply 86):
The last door is open as well, so that looks like people got off all the way to the back. Let's hope they were all that lucky.

Good thing that the aft section did not break. That would have been worse.



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineUK_Dispatcher From United Arab Emirates, joined Dec 2001, 2599 posts, RR: 28
Reply 120, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655225 times:

From the debris it looks like it landed short of the threshold, as did the BA B772 a few years ago.

[Edited 2013-07-06 12:49:08]

User currently onlinewhiteguy From Canada, joined Nov 2003, 956 posts, RR: 0
Reply 121, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655050 times:

Looks like the aircraft hit the end of the runway by the water. Landed well short!

User currently offlinethreeifbyair From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 122, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655062 times:

Quoting RayChuang (Reply 92):
given the fact the plane did flip over

Do we know it flipped?

Not a physicist or engineer, but I can't figure out how it could "flip" and then end up right side up. The wings appear to be still attached so it wasn't a "rolling pin" fuselage situation.

Looking at where the aircraft ended up, it is far left of the runway and there is a substantial debris field before the displaced threshold of 28L. Looks like it landed tail first before the threshold and skidded leftward.

Listening to the LiveATC archive right now. Scary as hell. Major A+ to the ATC controller on duty - deserves a pat on the back for that one.


User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2044 posts, RR: 22
Reply 123, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655372 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

From video being shown now on KTVU, looks like tail may have struck seawall at beginning of runway. Debris is scattered along threshold. looks like horizontal stabilizers are laying on the threshold.


It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlinenutsaboutplanes From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 513 posts, RR: 7
Reply 124, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655787 times:

They just showed the "impact point" at the runway threshhold. The horizontal stabilizers and the vertical stabilizer are on the runway with a trail of debris leading to the current resting place of the fuselage.........looks like a very hard landing that snapped the tail off........


American Airlines, US Airways, Alaska Airlines, Northwest Airlines, America West Airlines, USAFR
User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2434 posts, RR: 26
Reply 125, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655468 times:

Quoting 727LOVER (Reply 109):
Why does CNN's Richard Quest keep saying it is a -200 LR??

I have the right plane pictured, correct?

Asiana does not have any B777-200(LR)s. This is a B777-28E(ER), delivered to Asiana on March 3, 2006. One out of twelve they have in their fleet.

Maybe he got confused by the schedule displays which show "77L" in GDSs for some Asiana flights as they use this for one type of cabin configuration. They are all B777-200(ER)s though.



Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlineat777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 193 posts, RR: 0
Reply 126, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655614 times:

Looks as though the landing gear clipped the edge of the runway that mets the water. Image just from CNN.

User currently offlinepackcheer From United States of America, joined Nov 2008, 336 posts, RR: 0
Reply 127, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 655209 times:

The picture they just showed on ABC news looks like the tail hit the sea wall short of the threshold. The stabilizers are sitting on the runway still on the arrows. Lots of debris at the threshold.


Things that fly, Girls and Planes...
User currently offlineaerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4692 posts, RR: 44
Reply 128, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 652035 times:

Viewing TV, looks like the aircraft struck the sea wall before the runway, landed short? Why?


"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlinexaapb From Mexico, joined Jan 2005, 456 posts, RR: 5
Reply 129, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 652004 times:

Quoting 727LOVER (Reply 109):

Dont know but as far as I know Asiana dosent have -200LR right?

amazing people took there time to take out their stuff from the overhead bins!

Hope everyone is ok.



Jorge Meneses
User currently offlineusscvr From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 72 posts, RR: 0
Reply 130, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 651986 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Debris well before the piano keys. Looks like it landed short.

User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 28302 posts, RR: 60
Reply 131, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 652619 times:

http://i955.photobucket.com/albums/ae40/PhilipOA260/oz10_zps05947503.jpg

User currently offlineby738 From St. Vincent and the Grenadines, joined Sep 2000, 2607 posts, RR: 1
Reply 132, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 651912 times:

Looks like heavy bounce and slide damage to me

User currently offlineNorcal773 From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 1456 posts, RR: 11
Reply 133, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 652205 times:

Looking at pics on CNN, debris started way before the threshold right on the edge of the water before runway started. Speculation of course but that says a lot about what might have caused it.


If you're going through hell, keep going
User currently offlineSeeTheWorld From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1329 posts, RR: 4
Reply 134, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 652230 times:

This plane did not cartwheel.... People need to stop reporting that .... My guess is that everyone got out of this airplane with just minor injuries ... crossed fingers ...

User currently offlineconcordski From United States of America, joined Sep 2008, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 135, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 652230 times:

Looking at the live footage on CNN after the crash, it looks like the aircraft hit the ground right where the edge of the airport property meets the water which would suggest that the tail sheered off there. Looks like it just barely even made it to the airport threshold.

User currently offlinekdhurst380 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2010, 279 posts, RR: 0
Reply 136, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 652192 times:

Quoting NDiesel (Reply 108):

Hi guys,

I work for CNN and we're watching this thread closely now. Keep the information coming should you have any.

You're a news broadcaster taking information from an enthusiasts forum merely speculating on what's happened?


User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 9
Reply 137, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 652047 times:

The picture of the plane on Wikipedia has 'Extended Range' painted on the rear fuselage, just aft of L4 door. So, is it a LR or ER?


Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 138, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649564 times:

Fox News has dug up some former NTSB investigator that sounds like he last worked a crash about 30 years ago and isn't anywhere near a TV or computer.

Quoting RayChuang (Reply 93):
Unfortunately, given the fact the plane did flip over, there is going to be a casualty count, especially if you note a very visible crack near the center of the plane. Given most of the fuselage stayed intact, let's just hope the count is low.

The initial reports of the a/c flipping over seem to be incorrect since the plane ended up on its' belly and not on its' back. Eyewitness reports are also confirming that it did not flip over as early reports stated.


User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 139, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649872 times:




Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlinenutsaboutplanes From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 513 posts, RR: 7
Reply 140, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649506 times:

WHY CANT NEWS ORGANIZATIONS ACTUALLY HAVE AVIATION EXPERTS ON STAFF?

The reporting on CNN has been absolutely ridiculous. They would do much better posting a job on a.net than using the fools who have taken up position behind a camera and microphone to report on this accident.



American Airlines, US Airways, Alaska Airlines, Northwest Airlines, America West Airlines, USAFR
User currently offlineairbusa346 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 7437 posts, RR: 2
Reply 141, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649139 times:

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 137):

ER



Tom Walker '086' First Officer of a A318/A319 for Air Lambert - Hours Flown: 17 hour 05 minutes (last updated 24/12/05).
User currently offlineBirdwatching From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 3932 posts, RR: 50
Reply 142, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 650102 times:

I've always wondered: how is customs and immigration handled after a crash like this? Will the passengers be brought to immigration from the crash site and then clear and then be brought to hospitals? Sounds like a stupid question, but actually, if something goes wrong and you end up in a hospital without clearing immigration first, you'll probably get problems on future visits to the USA, including being ineligible to ever use the Visa Waiver program again.

Soren   



All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2434 posts, RR: 26
Reply 143, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649137 times:

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 137):
So, is it a LR or ER?

(ER).



Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2943 posts, RR: 4
Reply 144, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649448 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Anyone else think he got slow and just had an abnormal sink rate. It looks like the debris field starts way short of the normal touchdown zone. Hits the tail and rips it off?
Pat



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlinelppr95 From Portugal, joined Mar 2010, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 145, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649177 times:

Reminds me of BA38 a few years ago: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_38


"Cathay 018, expect very late landing clearance, 747 departing ahead", tower said.
User currently offlinebioyuki From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 156 posts, RR: 0
Reply 146, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 648956 times:

It looks like only two slides deployed...what's the evacuation rate/door for a 772?


Next flight: UA 726/84 SFO-EWR-TLV
User currently offlinenicholasjet From United Kingdom, joined May 2013, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 147, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649273 times:

I don't think it was the tail that hit the sea wall, the damage is off the centre line, it would have been the starboard nacelle, gear or trailing edge flap....

User currently offlinewarreng24 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 716 posts, RR: 0
Reply 148, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649813 times:

Quoting freeze3192 (Reply 53):
LiveATC SFO:

http://archive-server.liveatc.net/ksfo/KSFO-Twr-Jul-06-2013-1800Z.mp3

They check in at 21:00. They were coming in for 28L
Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 57):
Picture of the crash landing itself:

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BOg1QPuCE...large

From the Live ATC audio and other information, it appears that the UA 744 in the picture is UA885 waiting for 28R. It appears they witnessed it and even spotted some people on 28L.

Looking at flight aware, it appears that Ua885 actually took off and left minutes afterwards. I'm surprised the aircraft wasn't taken back to the gate to be inspected for any damage...


User currently offlineairplanebrain From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 23 posts, RR: 0
Reply 149, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649431 times:

The video of the seawall and the debris is very telling. That runway will be closed for a while as they analyze the debris field. This appears to be the crux of the investigation.

User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 150, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 648912 times:

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 137):
The picture of the plane on Wikipedia has 'Extended Range' painted on the rear fuselage, just aft of L4 door. So, is it a LR or ER?

Asiana Airlines doesn't have any LRs, only ERs. Check http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/Asiana%20Airlines-active-b777.htm



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlinexaapb From Mexico, joined Jan 2005, 456 posts, RR: 5
Reply 151, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 648783 times:

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 137):

777-200ER Asiana dosent have LR series.



Jorge Meneses
User currently offlinecaptainstefan From United States of America, joined May 2007, 440 posts, RR: 0
Reply 152, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 648982 times:

Eyewitnesses saying it flipped remind me of UA 232 at SUX. It most likely did not flip; but at one point during the loss of control a wing or the empennage may have assumed an unusual attitude, leading (inexperienced?) casual observers to believe the airplane was cartwheeling. I would imagine some kind of unusual attitude occurred after losing the tail.


Long Live the Tulip!
User currently offlineFighterPilot From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 1451 posts, RR: 21
Reply 153, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 649091 times:

Hopefully everyone is ok. I'm hoping that by the reports and pictures of passengers snapping pictures and taking their carry on while evacuating means that the crash wasn't as violent as it might seem. This crash reminds me of the AF 358 in YYZ that over ran the runway. All the post crash pictures look similar to each other.

Cal   



*Insert Sound Of GE90 Spooling Up Here*
User currently offlinemingocr83 From Costa Rica, joined Dec 2007, 70 posts, RR: 0
Reply 154, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 646071 times:

http://www.ktvu.com/videos/news/ktvu-live-news/vtSfR/?updated

Streaming Live from SFO TV Stations..



A380, A321, A320, A319, 757-200, 737-800WL, 737-700WL, E190
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8174 posts, RR: 4
Reply 155, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 645745 times:

One question that needs to be asked now: was there any wind shear warnings issued by the SFO tower any time within one hour before the crash? It looks like the plane experienced a hard impact that kind of reminded me of that unfortunate impact of a FedEx MD-11 freighter at NRT some yaers ago caused by wind shear.

User currently offlineNDiesel From United States of America, joined Mar 2011, 100 posts, RR: 0
Reply 156, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 645652 times:

Quoting kdhurst380 (Reply 136):
You're a news broadcaster taking information from an enthusiasts forum merely speculating on what's happened?

We're all speculating. We don't confirm it.



Delta MD-11 JFK-CDG - Upon sunrise I fell in love with Aviation
User currently offlineUSAIRWAYS321 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1851 posts, RR: 8
Reply 157, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 645760 times:

Can anyone link an image of the seawall impact that's being discussed? I don't have TV access right now.

User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8584 posts, RR: 23
Reply 158, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 645810 times:

If pax are toting their carry-ons off the airplane, I'd wager everyone made it off okay.

Looks like everything aft of the pressure bulkhead was deposited elsewhere. Any landing you can walk away from, huh? Yeah.



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineNorcal773 From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 1456 posts, RR: 11
Reply 159, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 645752 times:

Quoting NDiesel (Reply 108):
I work for CNN and we're watching this thread closely now. Keep the information coming should you have any.

In that case, get this presenter off the air coz she's just making it worse and making a fool of herself!

Quoting 727LOVER (Reply 109):
Why does CNN's Richard Quest keep saying it is a -200 LR??

I have the right plane pictured, correct?

He's wrong and you have the right plane. Asiana doesn't operate 777LRs. There was a thread about that earlier today but now it has disappeared, they only have 772ERs.



If you're going through hell, keep going
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 160, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 645611 times:

Quoting nutsaboutplanes (Reply 140):
WHY CANT NEWS ORGANIZATIONS ACTUALLY HAVE AVIATION EXPERTS ON STAFF?

Would you hire an aviation expert for just 2 or 3 crashes a year?



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlinewroord From United States of America, joined Mar 2009, 1017 posts, RR: 0
Reply 161, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 643268 times:

ABC News live coverage says that the plane was landing at an abnormal angle with the nose up and it hit the runway so hard that the tail broke off. No one knows if everyone onboard managed to run off before the fire, but let's hope for the best.

User currently offlineLLA001 From Turkey, joined May 2005, 147 posts, RR: 0
Reply 162, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 642940 times:

Where is the flight recorder located at 777 ? if it is near tail section that ripped off, it might be damaged beyond use?

User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 9288 posts, RR: 3
Reply 163, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 642944 times:

Quoting Thomas_Jaeger (Reply 125):
Asiana does not have any B777-200(LR)s.

Flightaware and similar systems call it an 777-200LR. However that is WRONG. My post above stating 'allegedly LR' was wrong. It is a actually a Pratt ER according to multiple sources. AFAIK that is the only Asiana 777 type.


User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 28302 posts, RR: 60
Reply 164, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 643012 times:

Passengers : 290 Infant 1 Crew : 12 onboard according to Sky News.

User currently offlineogre727 From UK - England, joined Feb 2005, 728 posts, RR: 2
Reply 165, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 642908 times:

Too early, but it does look like the london crash to me.


Sigh
User currently offlineGARUDAROD From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1537 posts, RR: 1
Reply 166, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 643206 times:

live feed ktvu.com
http://www.ktvu.com/videos/news/ktvu-live-news/vtSfR/?updated



Cargo doesn't whine, moan, or complain
User currently offlineSInGAPORE_AIR From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13752 posts, RR: 18
Reply 167, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 643161 times:

Quoting freeze3192 (Reply 53):
http://archive-server.liveatc.net/ksfo/KSFO-Twr-Jul-06-2013-1800Z.mp3

22 minutes onwards. Wow.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlinethreeifbyair From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 873 posts, RR: 0
Reply 168, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 642885 times:

Quoting nicholasjet (Reply 118):
it looks like a wheel caught the sea wall at the start of the runway/stopway/clearway area.

That would be consistent with what everything else CNN is showing. I have not seen that feed in the USA.

Where is the empennage? Awful big piece that we are not seeing on the video from CNN. Seems like it was cut off by something sharp, perhaps the seawall.

If the plane catches a wheel on the seawall, would it pitch nose-up and perhaps slam the empennage down on the seawall?

Landing lights and airfield structures are supposed to be frangible after the AA MD80 crash at LIT many years ago impacted a rigid steel light structure. Don't think landing lights would do it.

This "cartwheeling" report is perhaps actually "spinning" - cartwheeling would have destroyed the plane entirely.


User currently offlinegulfstream650 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2008, 541 posts, RR: 0
Reply 169, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 642757 times:

Reassuring that the tail broke aft of the pressure dome. Fingers crossed!!!


I don't proclaim to be the best pilot in the world but I'm safe
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5388 posts, RR: 20
Reply 170, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 640310 times:

Quoting kdhurst380 (Reply 136):


You're a news broadcaster taking information from an enthusiasts forum merely speculating on what's happened?

There are quite a few people on here who know their stuff. A valuable resource, not the ONLY resource.

Quoting nutsaboutplanes (Reply 140):
WHY CANT NEWS ORGANIZATIONS ACTUALLY HAVE AVIATION EXPERTS ON STAFF?

The reporting on CNN has been absolutely ridiculous. They would do much better posting a job on a.net than using the fools who have taken up position behind a camera and microphone to report on this accident.

It can be frustrating for the enthusiast who knows far more about this topic more than most people in a newsroom, but quite a few experts are just a phone call away. Should CNN have a resident Aviation Expert on staff for these thankfully rare occasions?



Next up: STL-EWR-BTV-ORD-STL
User currently offlineoc2dc From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 427 posts, RR: 0
Reply 171, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 640543 times:

I'm listening to San Francisco FD/EMS , they are staring a water search via boat and helicopter. I'm not sure if they are looking for additional victims or parts of the plane for an investigation...


I'm not complaining, I'm critiquing...
User currently offlineMKEdude From South Korea, joined May 2005, 1012 posts, RR: 1
Reply 172, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 640164 times:

So far no mention on the website, no contact info for families. According to OZ nothing unusual has occurred.

Someone over there needs to get their act together!

http://us.flyasiana.com/Global/US/en/index



"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline." Frank Zappa
User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2943 posts, RR: 4
Reply 173, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 639944 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting nutsaboutplanes (Reply 140):
WHY CANT NEWS ORGANIZATIONS ACTUALLY HAVE AVIATION EXPERTS ON STAFF?

It's Saturday, I doubt they have experts sitting around everyday just in the rare case a plane crashes.

Quoting RayChuang (Reply 156):
was there any wind shear warnings issued by the SFO tower any time within one hour before the crash?

I couldn't find anything to say that there was any wind shear. The METAR had light winds at the time of the report and winds all the way up to FL390 look pretty low.
Pat



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlineRDUDDJI From Lesotho, joined Jun 2004, 1654 posts, RR: 2
Reply 174, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 640513 times:

Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 161):
Would you hire an aviation expert for just 2 or 3 crashes a year?

That's why you pay a retainer and have someone on call. However, as much as American's love to complain about flying, you probably could justify a position...  



Sometimes we don't realize the good times when we're in them
User currently offlineillinicmi From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 77 posts, RR: 0
Reply 175, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 639989 times:

Quoting LLA001 (Reply 163):
Where is the flight recorder located at 777 ? if it is near tail section that ripped off, it might be damaged beyond use?

Not sure exactly, but generally towards the tail. Anything is possible, but I'm guessing this impact is "minor" compared to what it is designed to survive.


User currently offlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2434 posts, RR: 26
Reply 176, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 639937 times:

Quoting Flighty (Reply 164):

Flightaware and similar systems call it an 777-200LR. However that is WRONG. My post above stating 'allegedly LR' was wrong. It is a actually a Pratt ER according to multiple sources. AFAIK that is the only Asiana 777 type.

Yes, PW4090 according to our database.



Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 9
Reply 177, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 637137 times:

Quoting airbusa346 (Reply 141):
Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 137):

ER
Quoting Thomas_Jaeger (Reply 143):
Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 137):
So, is it a LR or ER?

(ER).

I didn't think they had LR's, but CNN kept saying LR. I was perplexed.



Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlineSeeTheWorld From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1329 posts, RR: 4
Reply 178, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 637123 times:

Definitely looks like it landed short and hit the rocks ....

User currently offlineflightsimer From United States of America, joined Aug 2009, 685 posts, RR: 1
Reply 179, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 637087 times:

I agree Karel. No way that flipped having the wings and everything in such good condition, relatively speaking.

It looks like the photos being shown and obviously the live feed is all after fire. The initial pictures I have seen were all no fire damage, which to me says more than likely all were able to get off prior to the fire as long as they were not injured or killed during the accident itself.

They showed a live feed of the banks just prior to the runway and there is debris on it and in the water. My WAG is that it landed short, hit the embankment and ripped the tail of then skidded further down the runway to its present location.



Commercial Pilot- SEL, MEL, Instrument
User currently offlinesrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 180, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 637229 times:

Quoting nutsaboutplanes (Reply 140):

WHY CANT NEWS ORGANIZATIONS ACTUALLY HAVE AVIATION EXPERTS ON STAFF?

The reporting on CNN has been absolutely ridiculous. They would do much better posting a job on a.net than using the fools who have taken up position behind a camera and microphone to report on this accident.

I bet CNN wishes that they wouldn't have disbanded their science and technology unit, as Miles O'Brien was their go-to guy for events like this and he was let go back in 2008. He covered a number of plane crashes for them over the years and even if he couldn't be in the studio, he would report via phone.


User currently offlineaerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4692 posts, RR: 44
Reply 181, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 637133 times:

You're light, favorable winds and wx, a long runway in front of you, you land short. Why? What the hell.


"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlineKarelXWB From Netherlands, joined Jul 2012, 15204 posts, RR: 44
Reply 182, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 637475 times:

"At this time, we have no fatalities, one critical already airlifted and at San Fran General."

http://twitter.com/SoCalEMSFire/status/353599674097205249



Close, but no cigar http://vine.co/v/OjqeYWWpVWK
User currently offlineWNwatcher From United States of America, joined Mar 2010, 275 posts, RR: 0
Reply 183, posted (1 year 12 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 637146 times:

Anyone else notice that Number 1 engine isn't visible on any shots?


meepmeep