Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Information On ATR 72-500 Turboprop?  
User currently offlinecaptivating From Singapore, joined Jun 2013, 17 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 4 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2565 times:

Hi fellow airliners,
I'm interested to know more about the turboprop ATR 72-500.
What do you guys think of it? Is it good value? Any immediate obsolescence risk?
Cheers!

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineraffik From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 1718 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (1 year 4 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2270 times:

I've always enjoyed flying on the ATR72. From a passenger perspective I find it very comfortable, smooth and not too noisy. Newer versions have drop down screens and airlines can broadcast movies, documentaries or a route map.

The ATR72 galleys can accomadate ovens which facilitate hot snacks and meals where offered and the galley packs in quite a lot for a small aircraft.

They are also said to be very economical when compared to the competition and feature a propeller brake which means you can leave an engine running to power the aircon etc whilst the aircraft is parked .

I've flown a few times with the Dash 8, both 300 and 400 but definitely prefer the ATR.



Happy -go- lucky kinda guy!
User currently offlinePalmyboy12 From New Zealand, joined Oct 2011, 57 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 4 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1954 times:

Quoting captivating (Thread starter):
Is it good value? Any immediate obsolescence risk?

Wow, are you planning to buy one, start an airline or something? Good luck!

Anyway, I doubt the ATR is going to be obsolete anytime soon. They are very common around the world (around 600 of the ATR 72 compared to about 500 Dash 8 Q400s), and apparently they now have enough orders to keep them busy until at least 2016, so it seems enough airlines are putting their faith in it. From what I've heard, the ATR 72 is slightly slower than the Bombardier Q400 (it's nearest competitor) though it is much more economical with fuel, as the Q400 was originally designed to compete with regional jets (speed was made a priority over fuel efficiency)

I've also heard the ATR -500 series (from a NZ source, so talking about the 72 in particular) is much smoother with less noise and vibration compared to the earlier models (the -200/-210/-300) due to the six-bladed propellers.



"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline." Frank Zappa
User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4353 posts, RR: 35
Reply 3, posted (1 year 4 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1879 times:

Quoting captivating (Thread starter):
Any immediate obsolescence risk?

Of course with the ATR-72-600 deliveries now gaining pace airlines will start selling their older 72-500s. Many -600s are going to airlines to replace -500s, like Air New Zealand, others are for fleet growth or replacing other types (Avianca, LIAT)
So I expect the value of -500s to decrease accordingly but current -500s are still popular on the second hand market.

Quoting raffik (Reply 1):
The ATR72 galleys can accomadate ovens which facilitate hot snacks and meals where offered and

Is there any airline which offers hot meals in their ATRs? Perhaps Air Tahiti or Fiji Airlines as they have flights longer then 2,5 hours? Can't imagine anyone in Europe or the America's.



nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineOllieJolly From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2012, 71 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 4 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1632 times:

The ATR 72 of GR that I flew on was very comfortable from what I remember, and I expected it to be a lot louder than it was!
I had never flown on a turboprop before, but I was very happy. Plus I got free coffee!
I also think it's very pleasing on the eye, and while I'm a fan of the Dash 8 I think it's not.. exactly.. pretty.

But what do I know!


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 25860 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (1 year 4 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1629 times:

Quoting raffik (Reply 1):
I've flown a few times with the Dash 8, both 300 and 400 but definitely prefer the ATR.

Q400 is significantly faster than the ATR.


User currently offlineBonzoLab From New Zealand, joined Jun 2012, 27 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 4 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

Air NZs 500s have ovens. Years ago a full meal service including alcohol was provided on longer routes at certain times of the day. The newer 600s (4th about to join the fleet shortly) have had the ovens removed. No need for them (apart from heating the crew's own food!)

Cheers


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Island Air New ATR 72 Ferry Tracking Today To HNL posted Sat Sep 22 2012 14:03:37 by Canflight
How Is The ATR 72-600 Doing? posted Thu Jun 14 2012 18:28:35 by LimaFoxTango
ATR-72 Crashed Near Tyumen, Russia posted Sun Apr 1 2012 19:38:12 by lh648
Lion Air Orders 27 ATR 72-600s For Wings Air posted Wed Feb 15 2012 23:56:53 by 817Dreamliiner
The Q400 Versus ATR-72 posted Tue Dec 14 2010 04:53:38 by LPSHobby
Air Tahiti: ATR 42 Or ATR 72 On Tahiti - Moorea? posted Tue Jan 12 2010 14:47:27 by Mortyman
Cockpit Video Onboard DAT ATR-72, SRP-OSL-SRP. posted Wed Nov 18 2009 07:45:39 by Thom@s
ATR 72 Vs. Fokker 100: Fuselage Width posted Sun May 3 2009 20:56:05 by Brenintw
Air Dolomiti ATR-72 Gear Catches Fire During Taxi posted Mon Aug 25 2008 12:49:04 by Qantas744ER
ASA ATR-72 Schedules posted Sat May 3 2008 19:06:12 by Leo8448