Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA Not The First To Blink On LAX-PDX  
User currently offlinehereandthere41 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 28 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6735 times:

For all those nay-sayers that always assume that UA will be the first to blink when a new competitor launches a route.....you're wrong. VX blinked first and it's been public knowledge for months. Effective Aug 1 they will no longer run LAX-PDX nonstop. They're adding 2 additional SFO-PDX trips for a total of 3. The planes are coming from LAX-PDX.
So PDX isn't really growing at the rate that some locals would want us to believe.
Furthermore, just because DL is launching the route doesn't mean they will own it. They still have to compete with AS and UA and their deep frequent flyer base. I flew LAX-PDX two days ago on UA and got the last seat on the 4:22pm flight. This was after NOT getting a seat on the 12:31pm flight. So I wouldn't say UA is hurting on the route. Seems like they've right-sized the market.

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25045 posts, RR: 46
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6687 times:

Yes discussed a bit back

Is VX Dropping PDX - LAX? (by cschleic Jul 5 2013 in Civil Aviation)

=



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20475 posts, RR: 62
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6655 times:

Which is too bad, really. VX had 7am and 5pm nonstops in both directions between LAX and PDX. UA flies mainly CRJs in the market, and the first southbound flight doesn't depart until nearly 10am.


International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlinehereandthere41 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 28 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6593 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 1):

Thanks, I missed the earlier thread. I was responding to some comments on a DL thread about their new LAX-PDX but couldn't reply on that thread.


User currently offlinehereandthere41 From United States of America, joined Aug 2012, 28 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6548 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 2):

They had no other flights during the day which obviously didn't help their loads. O&D traffic alone couldn't save the route and with 7am and 5pm departures, how much xfer traffic were they getting? I would imagine not much.


User currently offlinecle757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 1130 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6508 times:

I can tell you the loads in CLE-PDX have done great this summer..


Cleveland the best location in the Nation
User currently offlinechrisair From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 2092 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 4825 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 2):
VX had 7am and 5pm nonstops in both directions between LAX and PDX.

Alaska has a much better schedule....~630a, 830a, 1130a, 2p, 5p, 8p. That 5p flight is always full. I wish they'd bring back the 630a northbound LAX-PDX flight though. I liked that I could be at the office by 10a.

I honestly forgot UA flew that route. My coworker takes them occasionally, but usually routes through SFO to get more miles.

Quoting cle757 (Reply 5):
I can tell you the loads in CLE-PDX have done great this summer..

What about the other way? Who wants to go to CLE?!?  

[Edited 2013-07-26 21:09:52]

User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20475 posts, RR: 62
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4704 times:

Quoting chrisair (Reply 6):
Alaska has a much better schedule

Of course they do, AS has been the entrenched incumbent carrier on the route for a number of years now. That doesn't take away from that the VX flights were timed exactly right in both directions, yet VX still pulled out.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlinechrisair From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 2092 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4638 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 7):
That doesn't take away from that the VX flights were timed exactly right in both directions, yet VX still pulled out.

Timed right? They offered two flights a day. Not exactly a great schedule if you finish work at, say, 1p and want to get out earlier.


User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20475 posts, RR: 62
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4601 times:

Quoting chrisair (Reply 8):
Timed right?

Yup, prime time in both directions. Not every airline starts out with a full schedule in every market.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently onlineozark1 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 445 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4148 times:

And after dropping ORD-PDX a couple of years ago, AA is back with two 737's replacing the two MD80s that used to fly it. They are consistenly full with the max of 150 pax.

User currently offlineRWA380 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3179 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4115 times:

Quoting hereandthere41 (Thread starter):
They're adding 2 additional SFO-PDX trips for a total of 3. The planes are coming from LAX-PDX.
So PDX isn't really growing at the rate that some locals would want us to believe.

Yes PDX is growing as fast as we want you to believe. Your math above, suggests that VX stayed even in the PDX market, which it did, pretty good for one of their newest markets.


Quoting hereandthere41 (Thread starter):
Furthermore, just because DL is launching the route doesn't mean they will own it.

Who ever said that? AS still owns this market, and will continue to do so.


Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 2):
UA flies mainly CRJs in the market

And as UA continues to diminish non hub flying, this route will go away, it's just a matter of time. UA will also discontinue their intra-Northwest flying with OO once the last EMB-120s start retiring. The Northwest was big at one time for UA, but not any more. Just like I expect SEA-NRT will go away as DL expands their SEA gateway.


Quoting hereandthere41 (Reply 3):
Thanks, I missed the earlier thread. I was responding to some comments on a DL thread about their new LAX-PDX but couldn't reply on that thread.

Your comments made little sense without this disclaimer.


Quoting cle757 (Reply 5):
I can tell you the loads in CLE-PDX have done great this summer..

I was expecting this to do well, I like CLE as a connection point, each time I've taken CO in this market, flights have been full. Good to have my thoughts confirmed, maybe it will stay. Big grin



AA-AC-AQ-AS-BN-BD-CO-CS-DL-EA-EZ-HA-HP-KL-KN-MP-MW-NK-NW-OO-OZ-PA-PS-QX-RC-RH-RW-SA-TG-TW-UA-US-VS-WA-WC-WN
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16854 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2470 times:

I think these routes in the West, particularly North-South California-Oregon/Washington will get a big boost when the Skywest ERJ-175s start arriving. Skywest has 40, of their 100 on order, lined up to operate for UAX. Those 40 are in additional to the 35+40 options UA has on order themselves to be operated by other Regional partners.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlinecle757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 1130 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2388 times:

Quoting RWA380 (Reply 11):
I was expecting this to do well, I like CLE as a connection point, each time I've taken CO in this market, flights have been full. Good to have my thoughts confirmed, maybe it will stay. Big grin

When the schedule first came out the flight was a daily 737-700, now it's a mix with a 737-700/800 and sometimes a 757.



Cleveland the best location in the Nation
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lindbergh Was NOT The First To Cross Atlantic! posted Fri May 3 2002 12:26:39 by Erasmus
When Is The DOT Expected To Decide On LAX-SJD posted Fri Apr 4 2008 18:29:06 by Juventus
UA Sending The 738 To DSM posted Mon Jul 8 2013 18:56:40 by planespotting
May 22: UA Makes The Move To A At Sea-Tac posted Tue May 21 2013 18:30:37 by flyua
Wright Bros' Not The First In Flight - Jane's posted Fri Mar 15 2013 02:41:50 by barney captain
UA Adding Mainline Capacity To AUS-SFO/LAX? posted Sun Dec 30 2012 21:11:09 by UA735WL
Will JetBlue A321 Have The Legs To Fly JFK-LAX/SFO posted Mon Sep 24 2012 17:50:54 by doulasc
Will AA's A321 Have The Legs To Fly JFK-LAX/SFO? posted Mon Sep 24 2012 12:53:35 by mozart
BA First: You're One Of The First To Know.... posted Tue Jan 26 2010 10:56:36 by SirThomas
Need Help Finding The A/c I Use To Work On posted Thu May 15 2008 09:33:11 by Rscaife1682