Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is This An Example Of Dangerous Flying?  
User currently offlinea320fan From Australia, joined Apr 2009, 68 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 12494 times:

I came across this video on Youtube of a Fokker 100 landing somewhere in Latin America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXUpnhj_mtc

Many of the comments are slamming the uploader for what they claim is unsafe flying. I realise that there is a thunderstorm in the vicinity, but the air they are flying through appears smooth and from this video there is no way to determine the actual severity of the storm.

Commenters are also saying the approach itself is too low. Can those with more experience in this regard comment on the sight picture present out the cockpit window for such an operation.


Airliners flowen in: 737-700, 737-800, A320, A321, 777-300ER, 777-200ER, 777-300, 787-8, A330-200
28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRussianJet From Belgium, joined Jul 2007, 7687 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (11 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 12463 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

No idea of how dangerous this was, but it was certainly a cool video - so thanks.


✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7497 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (11 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 12356 times:

Quoting a320fan (Thread starter):
Commenters are also saying the approach itself is too low.

At the end of the approach the plane might have been slightly low. I saw two red PAPI/VASI go to 3 red over the approach lights. That might have been camera angle or it might have been normal flare for that aircraft type.

The visibility on approach was fine. The tower obviously could not see the plane on approach due to the storm - but the problem with such storms is that airports are huge. This storm didn't really get strong until the plane was a couple thousand feet down the runway.

I enjoy such videos, but I also think it is armchair quarterbacking at its worst for people to make snap judgements about the 'quality' of such flights/ landings/ etc - with no real knowledge of the specifics.


User currently offlineCO777DAL From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 598 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 12267 times:

Check out the video suggestion at the end of that one.
http://youtu.be/YsZqN-uEgQU

Now that is some mad skills. Does anyone know where this is? I'm afraid there are quite a few pilots that would not be able to do that landing.



Worked Hard. Flew Right. Farewell, Continental. Thanks for the memories.
User currently offlineflymia From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7083 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (11 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 12207 times:

At first it seemed crazy at the airport was just about minumus but the closer they got you really could see the runway. Seems like wind was not a problem and there was no lightning so not sure ho pw bad that storm was to begin with. I'm not an airline pilot but seems fine to me.


"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
User currently offlinePassedV1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 12202 times:

The voice "50" happens just as they cross the threshold...which would be normal. The visibility did not go below 1/2 mile at any point as you can count 10+ runway lights throughout the roll out...I don't see anything really wrong with this.

User currently offlinePassedV1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 220 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 12105 times:

Quoting CO777DAL (Reply 3):
Check out the video suggestion at the end of that one.
http://youtu.be/YsZqN-uEgQU

Now that is some mad skills. Does anyone know where this is? I'm afraid there are quite a few pilots that would not be able to do that landing.

I think it's a demo of an RNP approach. I'm pretty sure I've seen it before.

Came across this that some a-netters may find interesting.

Captain Steve Fulton formerly of Alaska Airlines...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zulo2MP02Qw


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21421 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (11 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 11937 times:

Quoting flymia (Reply 4):
there was no lightning

There's a flash right around the airport at about 1:17 of the video (and there are more at about 1:53). That combined with the radar return (red right over the field) would make me abandon the approach and wait for things to clear up - a go-around could get quite nasty if one had to be done close to the airport.

As for the three-red PAPI, that doesn't really bother me. The approach didn't seem particularly low at any point.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinebarney captain From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 919 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (11 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 11903 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 7):
There's a flash right around the airport at about 1:17 of the video (and there are more at about 1:53). That combined with the radar return (red right over the field) would make me abandon the approach and wait for things to clear up - a go-around could get quite nasty if one had to be done close to the airport.

Exactly. Landing with a TRW on top of the airport with visible downdrafts and lighting? Poor decision imo. NO WAY would I have attempted that approach - they got lucky.



...from the Banana Republic....
User currently offlinespacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3594 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (11 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 11804 times:

Quoting flymia (Reply 4):
Seems like wind was not a problem and there was no lightning so not sure ho pw bad that storm was to begin with.

In addition to the lightning others pointed out, that sure looked like a microburst just off the right side of the end of the runway when they were about 2 or 3 miles out. It seemed to dissipate and move further off to the right as they got closer, but they would have had no surefire way of predicting that would happen.



I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
User currently offlineYYZatcboy From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1051 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 11363 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

Quoting spacecadet (Reply 9):
that sure looked like a microburst just off the right side of the end of the runway when they were about 2 or 3 miles out.

Really? Looked like rain to me... if it was the predictive Wind shear and Micro burst alerts would have gone off. (if the F100 has them which I think it does)



DHC1/3/4 MD11/88 L1011 A319/20/21/30 B727 735/6/7/8/9 762/3 E175/90 CRJ/700/705 CC150. J/S DH8D 736/7/8
User currently offlineairportugal310 From Palau, joined Apr 2004, 3556 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (11 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 11302 times:

Crew didnt seem phased in the least. Just another day of flying for them, it seems

Cool video



A,G,A...nobody rides for free
User currently offlinebennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7368 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (11 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 11280 times:

Not a pilot myself.

However, the runway was in sight continuously.

Also the aircraft did not seem to be moving about a lot.

Clearly the storm off to the right would need watching during the final approach.

It would not, IMO, be unreasonable to have gone around.

Not sure if they could see the storm visually at all points.


User currently offlinegeorgiaame From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 942 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (11 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 10074 times:

In 1975, I was in a KLM 747 ex Amsterdam, cruising above Long Island for a 3:30PM arrival at JFK. Thunderheads were building, and we were advised our approach might get bumpy. It got bumpy, but nothing out of the ordinary. We hit turbulence over Rockaway Parkway, just before the threshold of 22R. As the aircraft was floating in, port wing dropped suddenly, a lot of power came on, the wing lifted, we flaired, landed softly, and then hit a wall of rain like I had never seen before. Just like the rain the youtube plane encounters after its landing. We got to the gait, and sirens started going off in baggage claim. And people started running. The DC-8 cargo flight just behind us apparently aborted the landing, and flew around. The Eastern 727 behind him, approx. 180 seconds after we touched down crashed in windshear over Rockaway Parkway at the start of New York City rush hour, Friday afternoon. A few people walked away, very few. So if you want the opinion of this armchair quarterback, non pilot, yeah, that's an example of dangerous flying, and everyone on board was very, very lucky.


"Trust, but verify!" An old Russian proverb, quoted often by a modern American hero
User currently offlineJoeCanuck From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 5383 posts, RR: 30
Reply 14, posted (11 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 9620 times:

It seems a lot like Delta 191...but without the wind shear or down draft...so was that skill or luck? Lots of airliners have been brought down by thunderstorms. It seems silly to me to fly into one on purpose without there being an emergency involved.

Sure, they weren't too low on approach and the vis was fine, but that wasn't something as benign as fog...thunderstorms are nasty.

That very heavy rain they got hit with on the runway was very likely the bottom of some serious downdrafts...and things may have ended much differently if they hit that on short final, instead of after landing.

Regardless...I was taught that flying through thunderstorms should always be avoided. How hard is it too just go around and avoid the storm altogether?

Was the risk necessary?



What the...?
User currently offlinehivue From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 1021 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (11 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 9529 times:

Quoting CO777DAL (Reply 3):
Does anyone know where this is?

Druk Air landing at Paro, Bhutan, VQPR. Supposedly the only international airport in the country. There are a number of videos on youtube showing approaches from both ends of the runway. I believe that A319s are the largest aircraft that land there.

Quoting PassedV1 (Reply 6):
I think it's a demo of an RNP approach.

I don't think so. Landings are only allowed in VMC and daylight.

[EDIT: Which is not to say it doesn't require some pretty impressive navigational performance.  Smile ]

[Edited 2013-08-08 12:29:37]

User currently offlinehivue From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 1021 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (11 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 9328 times:

Quoting spacecadet (Reply 9):
that sure looked like a microburst
Quoting YYZatcboy (Reply 10):
Really? Looked like rain to me

Looked like the kind of weather no smart pilot would land in to me. I don't want anyone piloting a plane I'm riding on looking out the window at a thunderstorm trying to decide if it contains a microburst.

[Edited for spelling.]

[Edited 2013-08-08 12:30:52]

User currently offlinefreeze3192 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 164 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (11 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 8812 times:

Yeah, they got away with it but it was piss poor airmanship IMO. Our knowledge of gust fronts, microbursts and windshear was gained in blood. There's no need for additional bloodshed for those weather phenomena.

This video is a prime example of what us pilots call "painting yourself into a corner." By committing to the landing, they gave themselves 1 option and did not give themselves an out. What if the airport disappeared at 200 ft (like in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtlS0sxFlHk)? Now you're taking a transport category aircraft into a level 5 thunderstorm, with paying passengers in the back.

I would have held until the thunderstorm moved away from the field. No fuel? Okay, go to the alternate. No alternate? Get the plane on the ground somewhere, and quick. Better to be doing a carpet dance in the Chief Pilot's office about why you landed at a small airport that your airline doesn't serve than trying to explain how you flew into a level 5 thunderstorm and bent the airplane. Or even worse yet, be dead along with all of your passengers.

I'm all for not armchair quarterbacking, but when you post a video of you doing something stupid in an airplane, well, you kind of deserve it.



"A passenger bets his life that his pilot is a worthy heir to an ancient tradition of excellence and professionalism."
User currently offlinehivue From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 1021 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (11 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 8271 times:

Quoting freeze3192 (Reply 17):
when you post a video of you doing something stupid in an airplane

One of the stupid things was the FO shooting the video during landing. I thought that wasn't allowed even in CAVOK.


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4488 posts, RR: 22
Reply 19, posted (11 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 7910 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 7):
There's a flash right around the airport at about 1:17 of the video (and there are more at about 1:53). That combined with the radar return (red right over the field) would make me abandon the approach and wait for things to clear up - a go-around could get quite nasty if one had to be done close to the airport.

As for the three-red PAPI, that doesn't really bother me. The approach didn't seem particularly low at any point.

I agree with Mir's assessment. I've landed in heavy rain like that, but it wasn't associated with convective activity. The minute I saw lightning, I would have bugged out.

It's hard to say whether the aircraft was really "low" or not--it may have been on the electronic glideslope the entire time. "VGSI and ILS glidepath not coincident" is a common note on ILS approach plates. Weather aside, it looked like a normal approach.



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlinehivue From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 1021 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (11 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7572 times:

Quoting JBirdAV8r (Reply 19):
The minute I saw lightning, I would have bugged out.

Why wait? The tower told them "...heavy thunderstorm overhead the airport..."


User currently offlineFlightShadow From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 947 posts, RR: 6
Reply 21, posted (11 months 6 days ago) and read 5261 times:

Quoting YYZatcboy (Reply 10):
Really? Looked like rain to me... if it was the predictive Wind shear and Micro burst alerts would have gone off.

If those instruments were present in the aircraft, could they be trusted with surety?



"When the tide goes out, you can tell who was skinnydipping."
User currently offlinesoon7x7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (11 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3830 times:

While the approach was on the low side especially considering the potential of effects from the microburst on the stbd. side of the aircraft, don't see any big deal. Crew was on the power, nice and stabilized...just lower that could have been but could have been puposely done for the flick...

User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 795 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (11 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3418 times:

I am a bit curious, from those of you who fly for the airlines, what the various policies are, if any regarding attempting an approach at an airport above which your radar red weather.

As for me, I like to avoid feeling lucky after the flight is done. Those guys committed themselves to a go around, which based on the information they were provided and what they could see was a real possibility, into weather that their radar painted red and that was producing lightning. This was obviously NOT a stable air mass. What else was lurking out there?



...are we there yet?
User currently offlinemuzyck From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 47 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (11 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3242 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Somewhere in Latin America, this may be more common than in the States. Not to say that there is a higher level of risk that is acceptable, but perhaps the experience of the locals helps to deal with it. Just because it is Latin America does not mean "inferior" talent. Just my .02.

25 iMissPiedmont : Looks like a common summer storm in Havana to me. I've seen approaches made in worse weather, some even were successful.
26 DocLightning : Tangentially-related question: Right as they go to cross the threshold, all four PAPI turn red. But the computer calls "Fifty" just before the thresho
27 warden145 : I'm not one to armchair-quarterback pilots, but if there's any truth to the idea of them deliberately flying low for the purposes of making a video,
28 cubastar : "Do not attempt this approach" if you have this radar and the tower has said a Thunderstorm is on the airport! And for those which were not successfu
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is There An A380 Of Korean Air In FRA? posted Wed Oct 10 2012 03:47:51 by wilco737
Is This The Cleanest 727-100 Flying Today? posted Mon Jan 23 2012 23:03:53 by potus
Stupid Question: Is This An UltraLight Or An LSA? posted Tue Jan 4 2011 01:28:29 by KAUST
Is This Putin's Way Of Forcing Domestic Purchases? posted Sat Nov 27 2010 21:08:38 by romeokc10fe
Southwest: Breakdown Is Now An Act Of God posted Sat Jul 24 2010 15:06:25 by catiii
Is This An A320 Or A319? posted Fri Sep 4 2009 01:05:48 by RebelDJ
Is This An An-28, And Why Is It Over COS? posted Wed Aug 12 2009 23:41:22 by Rampart
Is This An A380 Wing? posted Thu Nov 20 2008 04:40:48 by Carls
What Is This Dangling Off Of TU-134's Tailcone? posted Sun Mar 16 2008 23:29:19 by Concentriq
Is This The Future Of Commercial Aviation? posted Wed Oct 10 2007 11:20:21 by Alberchico