Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
First DL 737-900 On Property  
User currently offlinetlhgator From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 72 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 23045 times:

I'm really surprised this one slipped through the cracks here. DL 9939 ship 3801 left KBFI last night at 9:53 pm after being released by Boeing. It arrived here in KATL this morning at 5 am. It'll spend some time here on the ground for familiarization.

64 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently onlinedeltadawg From United States of America, joined May 2006, 743 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (6 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 22990 times:

Congrats to DL. Cant wait to see it. What is its scheduled routes?


GO Dawgs, Sic' em, woof woof woof
User currently offlineDalmd88 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2504 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (6 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 22982 times:

I think it will be at the TOC for close to two weeks. We get the next two in about a week.

User currently offlineMIflyer12 From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 790 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 22867 times:

It made its way into the planespotters.net database very quickly.

User currently onlineMesaFlyGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (6 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 22656 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting deltadawg (Reply 1):
ATL-DTW/TPA/LAX/SFO/MCO
DTW-LAX/SFO/ATL

[Edited 2013-09-28 08:23:54]


\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlinezippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5402 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (6 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 20841 times:

Quoting MesaFlyGuy (Reply 4):

Do you think this bird will see South Florida action any time soon? Such as FLL and MIA? Congratulations DL! I assume new 800 and 900's have the Sky Interior as standard OEM equipment.



I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
User currently offlinecomairguycvg From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 335 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (6 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 19445 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yeah so much for photographing the first arrival. Try again for the first rev departure.

User currently offlinerwy04lga From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3132 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (6 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 19057 times:

Quoting MIflyer12 (Reply 3):
planespotters.net

Couldn't find it



Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlinePanAm788 From United States of America, joined Sep 2008, 290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 18971 times:

Anyone know if the satellite TV has been installed yet? The pictures on the a.net database show the plane without the dish.


heroes get remembered but legends never die
User currently offlineMIflyer12 From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 790 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 18551 times:

Quoting rwy04lga (Reply 7):
Couldn't find it

There is a database entry with a reg number and EIS. I wasn't referring to a picture.

http://www.planespotters.net/Product...e=737-900&fleet=5673&fleetStatus=1


User currently offlineB757forever From United States of America, joined May 2010, 380 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (6 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 17843 times:

Quoting PanAm788 (Reply 8):

Anyone know if the satellite TV has been installed yet?

It is being installed at Delta TechOps in ATL before it goes into service.


User currently offlineDalmd88 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2504 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 13562 times:

Got a good look at it today. Nice interior. The sky interior really makes it feel larger. The seats seem ok. Kind of hard to judge because they will soften after a few month of service. The cargo areas look really long. There was a crew beginning the wifi system install.

User currently offlineSVA402 From United States of America, joined Sep 2012, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 13423 times:

Quoting Dalmd88 (Reply 11):
Got a good look at it today. Nice interior. The sky interior really makes it feel larger. The seats seem ok. Kind of hard to judge because they will soften after a few month of service. The cargo areas look really long. There was a crew beginning the wifi system install.

Hey do you know if the seats are the same as Alaska Airlines -900ERs have? I just rode on them and the seat was fairly comfortable but I felt like the pocket in front of me was pretty lame. I couldn't even get my paperback book to fit in it.


User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 13412 times:

Quoting SVA402 (Reply 12):
Hey do you know if the seats are the same as Alaska Airlines -900ERs have? I just rode on them and the seat was fairly comfortable but I felt like the pocket in front of me was pretty lame. I couldn't even get my paperback book to fit in it.

Another thread had pictures of the interior and the seats are different from the AS ones. They have the seatpocket in the normal area I guess you could call it that.



Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call
User currently offlineinfiniti329 From United States of America, joined Jul 2012, 469 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 13122 times:

Does it have the magic carpet installed?

User currently offlineFlyASAGuy2005 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 7004 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 13056 times:

Quoting Dalmd88 (Reply 11):
The cargo areas look really long.
Quoting infiniti329 (Reply 14):
Does it have the magic carpet installed?

That was going to be my question as well. Any carpet?



What gets measured gets done.
User currently offlineDalmd88 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2504 posts, RR: 14
Reply 16, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 12826 times:

Quoting infiniti329 (Reply 14):
Does it have the magic carpet installed?

Nope, just a big empty bin, front and back.


User currently offlineDL_Mech From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1908 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 12712 times:

The overhead bins on the Sky Interior don't look any bigger, but they do make the cabin look more spacious.

The forward galley is tiny. The galley unit aft of R-1 has been moved forward taking away floor space.

I'm not a fan of "e-Leather." It looks too much like vinyl.

Is it a good 757 replacement? I'll let passengers and F/As be the judge.



It's not going to the Moon.....It's just going to California
User currently offlinecokepopper From United States of America, joined May 2008, 1167 posts, RR: 10
Reply 18, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 12385 times:

Quoting DL_Mech (Reply 17):

Is it a good 757 replacement? I'll let passengers and F/As be the judge.


By not having a boarding door behind first class, it not off to a good start, however ill reserve judgment until I work it.


User currently offlinepeanuts From Netherlands, joined Dec 2009, 1411 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 12360 times:

Quoting cokepopper (Reply 18):
By not having a boarding door behind first class

Although that's a great feature/benefit I've always wondered about that particular section of real estate on the 757. The second boarding door... how much money has it cost airliners to fly that piece of real estate around for those millions of miles? Just seems inefficient to me...and that's probably why it isn't there anymore on new designs. But why was it there to begin with?



Question Conventional Wisdom. While not all commonly held beliefs are wrong…all should be questioned.
User currently offlineFlyASAGuy2005 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 7004 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (6 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 12239 times:

Quoting Dalmd88 (Reply 16):
Nope, just a big empty bin, front and back.

Nice. Our below wing team will be quite strong.

Quoting peanuts (Reply 19):
Although that's a great feature/benefit I've always wondered about that particular section of real estate on the 757. The second boarding door... how much money has it cost airliners to fly that piece of real estate around for those millions of miles? Just seems inefficient to me...and that's probably why it isn't there anymore on new designs. But why was it there to begin with?

Definately a waste of space.



What gets measured gets done.
User currently offlinecaptainstefan From United States of America, joined May 2007, 416 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 11945 times:

Quoting FlyASAGuy2005 (Reply 20):
Definately a waste of space.

I don't think it's fair to unequivocally say it's a waste of space - the time saved/overall utility of it during the boarding and deplaning processes isn't really measurable but could be pretty steep. The one time I've flown on a 739 (UA), it took a noticable amount of time to deplane the thing. While a number of frequent first class patrons may not know airplane types from one another, they definitely do notice when they don't have 160 passengers hitting them with bags and purses, and FAs trying to attend to them (jackets, drinks, etc.) pre-departure in the midst of that bumrush to the back is a nightmare. I'm not saying every aircraft should have such a boarding configuration, but ones with capacities approaching 200 need all the help they can get (two aisles, a middle boarding door, etc.).

I'm also under the impression that pilots aren't the biggest fan of it. It seems like the -800s are pigs enough, adding a 10 foot stretch makes it seem like the plane must fly itself off the ground, in a way, before the pilots can rotate in order to avoid a tailstrike.

I'm on the pessimistic side of the 739s, hopefully the fancy seat stitching and big personal TVs will distract the pax enough...



Long Live the Tulip!
User currently offlineSELMER40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 11860 times:

Quoting DL_Mech (Reply 17):
I'll let passengers...judge.

I already do not like the idea of no mid cabin lav.



Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlineDTWPurserBoy From United States of America, joined Feb 2010, 1262 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 11803 times:

Quoting peanuts (Reply 19):
...and that's probably why it isn't there anymore on new designs. But why was it there to begin with?

The 757 was a longer aircraft. DL and later the NW 5600 series had a galley at door 2R. DL always had a galley at door 2L. The main cabin was too long to efficiently serve that many passengers with only the aft galley. Remember that back in the mid 80's we served a lot of food onboard. And if you barged into the forward galley mid service to restock with sodas or coffee you got your head handed to you by the people working up there for stripping out "their" supplies.

Oddly enough, on the 5500 series NW aircraft there were only 2 seats at door 2R to hasten emergency egress and no galley at 2L. I remember one day I had this man EXPLODE at me, screeching that these seats were "insulting." I told him they were the best seats in the house and I would have no problem getting passengers to switch with them. He told me I was "stupid." So I did just that. He and his wife got switched to 17E and 18E, both center seats. They thought this was an improvement? Go figure.....I laughed all the way home. All the seats get to the destination at the same time but you could never convince some passengers of that fact.

Trust me when I tell you that is not "valuable real estate." Those doors were also needed to comply with FAA regulations regarding maximum distances from any seat to an emergency exit as many of the aircraft had no over wing exits. We would never want to see a passenger lost in a fire because they could not quickly reach an exit. Plus you had flight attendants sitting there to direct evacuations.



Qualified on Concorde/B707/B720/B727/B737/B747/B757/B767/B777/DC-8/DC-9/DC-10/A319/A320/A330/MD-88-90
User currently offlineGSPSPOT From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 2968 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 11703 times:

Does the 739 differ much (or any) visually from the winglet-equipped 738's?


Finally made it to an airline mecca!
User currently onlineMesaFlyGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 25, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 12213 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting GSPSPOT (Reply 24):
Does the 739 differ much (or any) visually from the winglet-equipped 738's?

There is an extra emergency door (plug) midway between the wing and the rear doors. And it is noticeably longer.



\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5225 posts, RR: 25
Reply 26, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 12222 times:

Quoting GSPSPOT (Reply 24):
Does the 739 differ much (or any) visually from the winglet-equipped 738's?

The only difference is that it's longer. Otherwise, it looks exactly like any other 737NG.

Quoting cokepopper (Reply 18):
By not having a boarding door behind first class, it not off to a good start, however ill reserve judgment until I work it.

A couple weeks ago I flew a UA 739 and 757 and honestly saw no huge difference between the 2 and no major advantage to boarding behind F vs at the front of the aircraft.



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineDTWPurserBoy From United States of America, joined Feb 2010, 1262 posts, RR: 6
Reply 27, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 12774 times:

Quoting MesaFlyGuy (Reply 25):
There is an extra emergency door (plug) midway between the wing and the rear doors. And it is noticeably longer.

DL opted not to have these exits installed. They are not in place and just a sealed piece of fuselage where an exit could be.



Qualified on Concorde/B707/B720/B727/B737/B747/B757/B767/B777/DC-8/DC-9/DC-10/A319/A320/A330/MD-88-90
User currently offlineUA735WL From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 145 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 12701 times:

Quoting DTWPurserBoy (Reply 27):

Exactly....a plug. I don't believe there are any US airlines who actually have 739ERs
in a dense enough configuration to warrant activating them.



A or B? I'll stick with MD...
User currently offlineFlyASAGuy2005 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 7004 posts, RR: 11
Reply 29, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 12725 times:

Quoting captainstefan (Reply 21):
I don't think it's fair to unequivocally say it's a waste of space - the time saved/overall utility of it during the boarding and deplaning processes isn't really measurable but could be pretty steep. The one time I've flown on a 739 (UA), it took a noticable amount of time to deplane the thing. While a number of frequent first class patrons may not know airplane types from one another, they definitely do notice when they don't have 160 passengers hitting them with bags and purses, and FAs trying to attend to them (jackets, drinks, etc.) pre-departure in the midst of that bumrush to the back is a nightmare. I'm not saying every aircraft should have such a boarding configuration, but ones with capacities approaching 200 need all the help they can get (two aisles, a middle boarding door, etc.).

We've ran many tests with the 757 over the years. All usually for cabin cleaning procedures in the Caribbean and stations where air stairs are an option. The diffrence was about 3-5 minutes between the two. Not "steep".

There are a couple gates at MSP where L2 cannot be used yet they only get a 50 minute turn like every other domestic 752 flight. I've had to board through L1 in MSP on a 753.

Looking at lost revenue over the pericieved savings in time; it is a waste of space.



What gets measured gets done.
User currently offlineDTWPurserBoy From United States of America, joined Feb 2010, 1262 posts, RR: 6
Reply 30, posted (6 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 12601 times:

Quoting UA735WL (Reply 28):
Exactly....a plug. I don't believe there are any US airlines who actually have 739ERs
in a dense enough configuration to warrant activating them.

Well said. If there were operators in the US like Ryanair or other LCC's that max out seating the exit would be warranted. The FAA has a formula for deciding how many exits an aircraft needs to have based on the time it take to evacuate in less than 90 seconds using only half of the available exits.

DL crews are lukewarm to this airplane so far--once it goes on the line there will be a period of time where it will be treated as the worst thing to happen in their lives. Then things will settle down once everyone gets used to it and figures out the easiest way to work the airplane. Personally, I have always disliked the 757 because I did not work it often enough to feel comfortable with making things work while on the 744 I was right at home. Depends on what you fly the most. While I was on a 757 I would seek out experienced colleagues to talk things through and make the trip successful for my passengers and fellow crew.



Qualified on Concorde/B707/B720/B727/B737/B747/B757/B767/B777/DC-8/DC-9/DC-10/A319/A320/A330/MD-88-90
User currently offlineSELMER40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (6 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 12275 times:

The second Delta 737-900 N802DN is now (Thursday) en route from BFI to ATL http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N802DN.


Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlinecaptainstefan From United States of America, joined May 2007, 416 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (6 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 11744 times:

Quoting FlyASAGuy2005 (Reply 29):
Looking at lost revenue over the pericieved savings in time; it is a waste of space.

Thanks for putting up some tangible numbers. I would stand corrected if not for this:

Quoting DTWPurserBoy (Reply 23):
Trust me when I tell you that is not "valuable real estate." Those doors were also needed to comply with FAA regulations regarding maximum distances from any seat to an emergency exit as many of the aircraft had no over wing exits.

I guess since they had to have a door there, Boeing decided to make it capable of boarding.



Long Live the Tulip!
User currently offlineOOer From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1440 posts, RR: 2
Reply 33, posted (6 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 11334 times:

The 737-800 feels crammed enough as it is. Plus the galleys really suck! I can't wait to see what they did on the -900. I have a feeling it's gonna be even worse. Not to mention 20 extra passengers and same staffing.

User currently offlineCONTACREW From United States of America, joined Feb 2012, 424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 34, posted (6 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 11374 times:

Quoting OOer (Reply 33):
Not to mention 20 extra passengers and same staffing.

Up until recently sCO staffed it's 737-900 flights with a 5th FA if the load was over 100 and there was a meal service onboard. Now that there is no meal service the 5th FA position was cut from those flights.



Flight Attendants prepare doors for departure, cross check verify straps standby for all call
User currently offlineFlyASAGuy2005 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 7004 posts, RR: 11
Reply 35, posted (6 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 10921 times:

Quoting captainstefan (Reply 32):
Thanks for putting up some tangible numbers. I would stand corrected if not for this:

Now we're talking about two different things. The door HAVING to be there vs. not is a different argument. I never said it wasn't there for a reeason. I said it was a waste of space from a revenue standpoint. There is no tangible advantage vs. just boarding out of L1. Is it quicker? Yes. Noticibly quicker? No. The revenue gain of the rows of seats that would have been there vs. saving 3-7 minutes in boarding does not match. I nmy humble opinion.

Let's ptu it like this. Had it been up the the airlines, there would be more coach seats on the 757 today with that door not even being there to begin with.



What gets measured gets done.
User currently offlineb727fa From United States of America, joined Jun 2011, 712 posts, RR: 0
Reply 36, posted (6 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 10826 times:

Getting to the lave at mid-cabin, I think it's a pretty silly argument to say that we don't want to put a lav there b/c we don't to subject our premium pax to having a lav near them. How silly. There are lavs in every cabin on every a/c.


My comments/opinions are my own and are not to be construed as the opinion(s) of my employer.
User currently offlinePassedV1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (6 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 10794 times:

Quoting captainstefan (Reply 21):
I'm also under the impression that pilots aren't the biggest fan of it. It seems like the -800s are pigs enough, adding a 10 foot stretch makes it seem like the plane must fly itself off the ground, in a way, before the pilots can rotate in order to avoid a tailstrike.

The 737-900 was an absolute ugly pig which is why Boeing dumped it so quickly. The ER on the other hand is about comparable to a standard 737-800. The 800 maxes out with a 27K bump option while the 900ER has a true 27K option. A bump option provides the 27K only on takeoff, while a straight 27K engine has the thrust available for the entire flight. Anyway, in any case they fly about the same and you can barely tell the difference.

That being said, save the 700, all NG's are pigs anyway that I wish would just go away...but a 737-900ER is no more pig-like then an 800.


User currently offlinefanoftristars From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1601 posts, RR: 5
Reply 38, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 10241 times:

So are there any official photos of the interiors? I've seen the photos when it was still with boeing all wrapped in plastic...


"FLY DELTA JETS"
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5225 posts, RR: 25
Reply 39, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 10203 times:

Quoting captainstefan (Reply 21):
Quoting PassedV1 (Reply 37):

What do you mean when you refer to an aircraft as a pig?



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlinePassedV1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 40, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 10009 times:

Quoting OA412 (Reply 39):
What do you mean when you refer to an aircraft as a pig?

A pig "feels" heavy in almost all typical loadings. A pig needs to be coaxed into the air, can't climb very high when it gets there and then coaxed back to ground.

To illustrate the pilot of a 737-700 isn't concerned about hitting the tail, can rotate smartly and almost never be "concerned" with performance. An 800/900ER require a certain touch during rotation...don't over-rotate and strike the tail but don't rotate too slow because the end of the runway is coming up pretty quick. An 800/900ER can easily chew up 8000-9000 feet of pavement on takeoff. The speeds on takeoff and approach are much higher than what is typical. On takeoff, a 900 especially, is often wheel speed limited. A heavy 800/900 in gusty/windy conditions on approach, after all the wind additives, can have trouble fitting into the flow of traffic at busier airports with their closer in-trail spacing unless you go all the way to Flaps 40 which then puts you up against the redline for Flaps 40. A 700 can pretty much go straight to FL390 or even 410 in all but the heaviest loads...and then you might have to stop at FL370. An 800/900ER can usually only make it to the mid 30's or even lower 30's. This means you are more likely to be down in the weather and it gives you less options for a smother ride.

Imagine a winding mountain road, A little sports car zips through the turns with lots of room, accelerates up the hill, and has no problems slowing down on the downhill. Take a loaded dump truck through that same road...be careful on those turns, no acceleration on the up hills, and difficult to slow down on the downhill. There is your pig.


User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5225 posts, RR: 25
Reply 41, posted (6 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 9562 times:

Quoting PassedV1 (Reply 40):

Thanks very much for the analysis and insight. Very interesting!



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 2882 posts, RR: 7
Reply 42, posted (6 months 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 9540 times:

Quoting PassedV1 (Reply 37):
That being said, save the 700, all NG's are pigs anyway that I wish would just go away..

Yeah the 737-800 is such a pig that it's one of the only mainline jets (I think the 717 is the other) that is certified to takeoff from SNA without needing to perform the noise abatement procedure.

The 737-800 is such a pig that GOL regularly flies them into shorter than 5000 foot runways in Brazil.

The 737-800 is such a pig that it easily flies trans-cons in all seasons without need an unscheduled fuel stop as the A320 sometimes does.

The 737-800 is such a pig that it is used by several airlines, especially AS, from the mainland (or even Alaska) to all the Hawaiian islands. How many A32x flights are there daily to Hawaii?

Considering the 737 is the best selling airplane, by far, all time, you'll be wishing a long time


User currently offlineRyanairGuru From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 4696 posts, RR: 4
Reply 43, posted (6 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 9259 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 42):
The 737-800 is such a pig that it easily flies trans-cons in all seasons without need an unscheduled fuel stop as the A320 sometimes does.

The 737-800 is such a pig that it is used by several airlines, especially AS, from the mainland (or even Alaska) to all the Hawaiian islands. How many A32x flights are there daily to Hawaii?

The 737-800 has superior range to the A320, nobody can deny that, but I think PassedV1 was referring to its field performance, in which I have heard similar things before.



Worked Hard, Flew Right
User currently offlineSELMER40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 44, posted (6 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 8705 times:

The third Delta 737-900ER has arrived in ATL.
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N803DN



Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 45, posted (6 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 8385 times:

Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 43):
The 737-800 has superior range to the A320, nobody can deny that, but I think PassedV1 was referring to its field performance, in which I have heard similar things before.

That's why there was an SFP package introduced for the 738 after a time - but it wasn't super well received. United does have some.

NS


User currently offlinePassedV1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2012, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 46, posted (5 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 7600 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 42):
Yeah the 737-800 is such a pig that it's one of the only mainline jets (I think the 717 is the other) that is certified to takeoff from SNA without needing to perform the noise abatement procedure.

The 737-800 is such a pig that GOL regularly flies them into shorter than 5000 foot runways in Brazil.

The 737-800 is such a pig that it easily flies trans-cons in all seasons without need an unscheduled fuel stop as the A320 sometimes does.

The 737-800 is such a pig that it is used by several airlines, especially AS, from the mainland (or even Alaska) to all the Hawaiian islands. How many A32x flights are there daily to Hawaii?

Considering the 737 is the best selling airplane, by far, all time, you'll be wishing a long time

As far as the SNA procedures, it has more to do with what kind of slots the individual flights are scheduled on as opposed to the jets themselves.

Otherwise, I would agree with you 100% when I have my accountant hat on...and accountants buy airplanes for airlines.

I had my pilot hat on when I spoke of the NG. It's cockpit is from the 50's...it's loud, cramped, narrow. The overhead panel makes you feel like you are on an Apollo mission. A few weeks ago we ended up passing a 777 on final going into IAH. Does it get the job done? Sure.

Like my analogy...sports car or dump truck...they will both get you to the bottom of the hill safely.


User currently onlineaudidudi From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 410 posts, RR: 0
Reply 47, posted (5 months 4 weeks ago) and read 7237 times:

The fourth ship (N804DN) arrived in ATL last week.

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N804DN


User currently offlineSELMER40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 48, posted (5 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 6803 times:

From what I can find in the Delta desktop e-timetable it looks like the first two Delta 739 flights will be 3 Nov--
Delta 2049 ATL-SFO 8:15 AM and Delta 201 ATL-DTW 8:50 AM



Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlineFlyASAGuy2005 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 7004 posts, RR: 11
Reply 49, posted (5 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 6486 times:

Axiously await pics of the interior. Only see a few here and there.


What gets measured gets done.
User currently offlineDTWPurserBoy From United States of America, joined Feb 2010, 1262 posts, RR: 6
Reply 50, posted (5 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 5970 times:

Quoting FlyASAGuy2005 (Reply 49):
Axiously await pics of the interior. Only see a few here and there.

Very much the same as the 737-7's and 8's. DL never gets wild and crazy with cabin interiors, especially on domestic aircraft. It is all about utilization, revenue and cost.

I wish they would try something innovative but a 737 is pretty much a 737 no matter who's paint is on the outside. At least they have AVOD, the BEST adult device created to keep people in their seats and safe during turbulence...if they leave their seat belts fastened.



Qualified on Concorde/B707/B720/B727/B737/B747/B757/B767/B777/DC-8/DC-9/DC-10/A319/A320/A330/MD-88-90
User currently offlineB757forever From United States of America, joined May 2010, 380 posts, RR: 3
Reply 51, posted (5 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 5912 times:

Quoting FlyASAGuy2005 (Reply 49):

Axiously await pics of the interior.

The 739 aircraft have the Boeing Sky interior. So they do look much newer than the 73G and 738 aircraft. The tip-out overhead bins look much better than the old style.


User currently offlineSELMER40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 52, posted (5 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5325 times:

Looks like the Delta 737-900ER started revenue service today(Friday).
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N802DN



Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlinehammer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 687 posts, RR: 2
Reply 53, posted (5 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4827 times:

N805DN enroute right now to ATL

User currently offlineSELMER40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 54, posted (5 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 4664 times:

At its 640 mph ground speed it will be over my house in just over an hour and half.

[Edited 2013-11-01 14:06:00]


Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlinecomairguycvg From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 335 posts, RR: 1
Reply 55, posted (5 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4477 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think DL690 ATL-DTW was the first revenue flight with the 900 this morning.

User currently onlineMesaFlyGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2012, 2484 posts, RR: 4
Reply 56, posted (5 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4501 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'm surprised to see it doing DTW-MIA. I thought the first routes were predominantly out of ATL, with DTW-SFO and ATL-DTW in there. Was this a last-minute thing?


\________(---)________/ :) World's most beautiful aircraft: 757-200, MD-88/90, E-190, A321
User currently offlinecomairguycvg From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 335 posts, RR: 1
Reply 57, posted (5 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4384 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MesaFlyGuy (Reply 56):
I thought the first routes were predominantly out of ATL, with DTW-SFO and ATL-DTW in there. Was this a last-minute thing?

Yeah that's what I was thinking too. The first flights were supposed to be on Sun 11-3. Just shows you how much change this industry has, whether it be gate changes and aircraft swaps, and also first revenue flights.


User currently offlineB757forever From United States of America, joined May 2010, 380 posts, RR: 3
Reply 58, posted (5 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4364 times:

First flight today operated by ship 3802. Ships 3803 and 3804 go into revenue service on Sunday.

User currently offlinenwa757boy From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 676 posts, RR: 4
Reply 59, posted (5 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4273 times:

Just a note, the wifi is not operational yet on these aircraft. I don't know if it's been installed yet or not, but the hold up is on the FAAs end and exacerbated by the recent govt shut down per our IFS VP

User currently offlineB757forever From United States of America, joined May 2010, 380 posts, RR: 3
Reply 60, posted (5 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4152 times:

Quoting nwa757boy (Reply 59):
Just a note, the wifi is not operational yet on these aircraft. I don't know if it's been installed yet or not, but the hold up is on the FAAs end and exacerbated by the recent govt shut down per our IFS VP

Only ship 3801 has WiFi. It was the prototype and is waiting STC approval from the FAA. Until that approval is granted, it will not fly. (it technically could if the WiFi system was completely deactivated). Ships 3802, 3803 and 3804 will be in service without WiFi for the moment. Once the STC is approved, all ships will be brought back into maintenance for WiFi install.


User currently offlineSELMER40 From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 94 posts, RR: 0
Reply 61, posted (5 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3189 times:

Delta's 737-900ER number six is on the way to ATL. http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N806DN


Teaching this old dog a new trick
User currently offlineAV8AJET From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1311 posts, RR: 1
Reply 62, posted (5 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2886 times:

Do these 739's have LED wingtip strobes? Saw one landing into ATL last night and looked like the wingtip ones are LED but I think the rear mounted one is still the old type strobe bulb.


"To fly or not to fly there is no question!"
User currently offlinehammer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 687 posts, RR: 2
Reply 63, posted (5 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2467 times:

Yes they are the LED lights...

User currently onlineaudidudi From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 410 posts, RR: 0
Reply 64, posted (5 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1872 times:

The seventh aircraft is en route BFI-ATL.

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N807DN


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Alaska Airlines Receives First Boeing 737-900 posted Thu May 17 2001 02:36:05 by Flight152
Production Begins On KLM'S First 737-900! posted Sat Apr 21 2001 19:58:13 by Boeing747-400
Why No Personal Seat Back Video On DL 737-800? posted Sun Jun 16 2013 07:30:00 by AVLAirlineFreq
737-900 Pilots Window Pops Open On Test posted Sat Dec 6 2008 09:33:41 by JetJeanes
Eyebrow Windows On DL 737-832s posted Wed Oct 8 2008 18:10:28 by GoDIA
First Shot Of DL 737-700 In Full Colors! posted Mon Jul 21 2008 20:17:39 by Flynavy
When Are XL Due To Get First 737-900? posted Fri Sep 28 2007 13:33:38 by Orion737
KE 737-900 Lands On Taxiway In Japan posted Sat Jan 6 2007 10:20:08 by SMOLT
Power Outlets On DL 737-800 Coach? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 16:35:34 by Eastern023
KLM 737-900: Chances On LHR Route? posted Sat Jun 11 2005 12:28:22 by Voodoo