Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Possibility Of Supersonic Commercial Aircraft?  
User currently offlinejetsetter1969 From Australia, joined Jul 2013, 70 posts, RR: 0
Posted (2 years 8 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3464 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Given the retirement of Concorde and the demise of the Sonic Cruiser is it viable for there to be a faster commercial aircraft even if it were lower end of supersonic speeds? I know the fuel consumption could be prohibitive but is there a possible market for such an aircraft? If so what range could it have and possible routes? If an 8 hour trip could be cut to say 6 hours would that be sufficient to justify a price premium?


[Edited 2013-09-29 09:12:40 by SA7700]

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently onlinerutankrd From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 3412 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (2 years 8 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3290 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Recurring question search the data base its been debated to the n'th degree.

Short answer NO to all your points !

Trans-sonic aviation not likely in the next twenty years simply put with current engine and fuels no way to make it pay !

There needs to be leap (Pun intended) and perhaps low orbiting technology - That's Mac5+ next time round and commercially that really is a long way off

User currently offlineA380900 From France, joined Dec 2003, 1125 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 8 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3264 times:

If economic conditions are steady for a long enough period, some supersonic business jet may be started. Dassault was studying one before 9/11 I think. Or before the financial crisis.

If a business jet is successful, maybe a larger plane will be considered. First flight not before 20 à 25 years for an airliner.

User currently offlinezippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5751 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2607 times:

Quoting A380900 (Reply 2):

Or, if like the Boeing 707 almost 60 years ago, if it's based on a successful military aircraft. One can only hope. And any super sonic/HSCT should and would be a larger plane able to haul more people as opposed to the very limited Concorde which was more an exercise of prestige and priced for the very rich and famous.

I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
User currently offlineRubberJungle From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (2 years 8 months 2 days ago) and read 2503 times:

There's virtually no need for supersonic flight.

On-board mobile communications, laptop power and Wi-Fi access have provided a way for the premium business passenger (the crucial supersonic market audience) to make use of the time on board.

If anything, subsonic flight is probably more convenient because it provides a stable window of several hours in which to both work and find time to kick back, rather than a short three-hour slot which has been book-ended by the hassle of airport travel.

User currently offlineslcdeltarumd11 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 4426 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 2 days ago) and read 2452 times:

Unless oil crashes in price the answer is NO.

There are just so many ways to stay connected and productive now. With wifi its so much harder to justify the price anymore. You can stay just as connected as on the ground.

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13606 posts, RR: 76
Reply 6, posted (2 years 8 months 2 days ago) and read 2431 times:

Quoting RubberJungle (Reply 4):
On-board mobile communications, laptop power and Wi-Fi access have provided a way for the premium business passenger (the crucial supersonic market audience) to make use of the time on board.

Oddly enough, quite a few of the business pax on BA Concorde at least in the latter years involved in the internet.
Though the wi-fi etc wasn't developed then of course.
However many of the pax just liked to be able to leave London mid morning and be in NewYork that same mid morning, it wasn't so much working on board as pure time saving, or as the late Sir David Frost put it, 'being able to be in two places at the same time'.

Technically speaking, our RR Olympus rep told us that while producing a new and viable engine for a SST was simple enough for supercruise (and they did not expect even 30-40 years later to beat the Olympus 593 for both performance and efficiency at Mach 2), building one that was also enviormentally and in terms of fuel consumption acceptable in subsonic flight was the real show stopper.
There were ideas but they tended to be very complex affairs.

So I'm not under any illusions about seeing a SST again.
Come November, it's 10 years since my own final Concorde flight, the delivery of G-BOAE to retirement in BGI.
I knew then I'd never travel that fast, that high, in that comfort again in my lifetime.

Maybe the best comment is not from the aviation world, but in an episode of the US political drama 'The West Wing'.
The Leo McGarry character laments how the space program fizzled out after Apollo, where also were the other technical promises of his younger days in the 1960's, adding 'even Concorde is not flying now'.
One of the sharp younger staffers points to personal computers as the great new technology, to which Leo snarls, 'a more efficient way of spreading gossip and porn!'

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is There Any Chance Of... posted Wed Sep 20 2000 23:45:44 by Boeing747-400
Is There Any Way To Get A Tour Of Victorville? posted Fri Jul 13 2001 21:51:01 by N509JB
Is There Any Single-Type / Wide Body Operator? posted Sun Dec 30 2012 17:51:56 by Gonzalo
Is There An Outbreak Of Runway Excursions? posted Sun Dec 2 2012 06:18:09 by Gonzalo
Why Is There An A380 Of Korean Air In FRA? posted Wed Oct 10 2012 03:47:51 by wilco737
Air Macau (NX) - Is There Any Future? posted Thu Jan 1 2009 04:51:07 by CPDC10-30
Is There A European Version Of Flightaware.com? posted Thu Sep 4 2008 21:22:29 by Alfa75
Ryanair Double Charged Me. Is There Any Hope? posted Sat Mar 15 2008 08:09:23 by GSM763
KLM: Is There Any NO NON-REVS Period? posted Tue Jun 5 2007 05:55:04 by Argentina
Is There Any EK Female Pilot? posted Sun Oct 1 2006 18:38:10 by F.pier