Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Unceremonial End For TWA At JFK  
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2665 times:

By early October, it is my understanding that TWA operations at JFK will cease to exist, with flights
being operated mostly by American Airlines, from
its own terminals 8-9. Terminal 5 will be closed,
with its future now more uncertain than ever. It
also seems unfair, even inappropriate that the
final TWA JFK-CDG flight did not or will not receive
a ceremonial end. This flight has historical
importance....it was the first TWA transatlantic
flight and the first to go jet, the first to receive
the 707, then the 747. And tragically, it was a
route that ended in disaster, in 1996, when
TWA 800 exploded off Long Island and crashed.

TWA's JFK operation was inefficient, unprofitable,
poorly managed, and in the end, unworkable, but
for those of us who flew them regularly knew that
TWA was a fixture at JFK....much more so than
Delta or American. It was the other Pan Am the
other anchor tenant.

Don't you think the airline deserves some kind
of farewell?



15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVarig md-11 From France, joined Jul 2000, 1605 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2524 times:

hi
being a CDG employee I'm sad to see the cheap and unceremonial end of this historical route...plus as far as I'm concerned, I first flew to the states on TW precisely on the CDG-JFK route...so it's twice historical for me!
I totally agree with you, the end should've been sweeter...but,hey, looks like money (and AA ) rules the transatlantic skies...



AF TW AA NW DL UA CO BA U2 TP UX LH SK AZ MP KL SN VY HV LS SS TK SQ PC RG IW SE
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2505 times:

Continental EWR, you are absolutely correct, the conclusion of TWA's international services out of JFK deserve a special event. I, too, remember, the many TWA 747s, L1011s and 707s lined up at their distinctive terminal at JFK bound for destinations throughout Europe (and the US), and when TWA was number one accross the Atlantic.

Their Royal Ambassabor service brings back memories when flying really had style. Do you remeber their ad campaign: "A taste of Euope flying in the USA....TWA" when airlines competed on who offered the best menus and food and in the air; now food service is a thing of the past on most domestic flights.

Up, Up and Away, TWA.....they deserve to be remembered.


User currently offlineRyanair From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 654 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2480 times:

It's very sad indeed, TWA at JFK was a nice way to fly, OK T5 didn't have enough checkin desks but TWA service picked up and they became a nice way to New York. My last flight was JFK-CDG on a 762 in Feb, now their only trans atlantic route will be LGW from STL, a sad end, I remember when TWA across the atlantic was huge and their Tristars and 747's were a common sight over here, they should get a nice send off!!

What about all the jobs? I wonder how much "all US Unionised workers jobs are safe" is worth now?


User currently offlineAaer 777 From Ireland, joined Aug 2000, 199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2483 times:

It would indeed have been nice under normal circumstances.... which is definitely not the case...
At the moment survival is the only thing that occupates people's minds... Start preparing a bash for the reopening of the route (you'd have at least 5 years preparation time...) and in the mean time you can count the dozens of other routes which are closing as we speak, all of unmatched significance for those who operated them... It is a mean mean Darwinian world out there...



Which part of "NO" do you not understand?
User currently offlineVirginA340 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2409 times:

I'm willing to say that JFK-CDG was much better suited for them than LHR. With the strict slot restrictions at LHR. CDG was the next best thing. I saw so many TWA tails there. You ask any Parisian there on what US airline is remembered the most. TWA always came up. While PAN AM had FRA. TWA is the US airline that was king of the hill CDG. I can't believe that their Euro hub is going away. I remember the connections out of CDG like FCO, Milan, Athens, AMS among others. Unfortionalty TWA's Pacific route was a failure because it didn't last more than 6-8 years but their Euro system especially with CDG in the picture was reliable.But too bad BOM couldn't be mixed in with TW's routes and have something like JFK-BOM via CDG. Sad to see it go from riches to rags. In my opinon Ichan did try to help TWA but with previous management screw ups sicne the Howard Huges era. There was only so much money that can be but it before economics dictated it's end. The one thing i'll always hate of Icahn was his selling of LHR authority. Sell the Mideast or any Euro route for all I care but TWA was always turning a profit at LHR and CDG out of JFK.


"FUIMUS"
User currently offlineDETA737 From Portugal, joined Oct 2000, 612 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2376 times:

That's sad that there is nothing to mark the end of this era at CDG. Paris was TWA's first transatlantic destination, starting February 6, 1946. When TWA was flown by celebrities in the 1950s and 1960s this was a very popular route, I recall seeing a flim reel from the early 50s with Grace Kelly boarding a Lockheed Constellation for a trip to Paris. I know at Lisbon earlier this year they commemorated TWA's last flight, since they had been flying there since 1946 as well. I think that Athens, Cairo, Lisbon, Madrid, Paris, Rome and Tel Aviv were the most significant transatlantic routes because they all started in 1946 and lasted until relatively recently. Frankfurt, London, Milan and Zurich were also pretty important because they started in 1950 (Zurich in 1949), and lasted for much of TWA's history. As for the Scandinavian routes, Amsterdam, Brussels, Istanbul, Munich and several other TWA transatlantic routes that started in the 1980s, they were relatively shortlived.

User currently offlineVirginA340 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2356 times:

TWA's destinations started in the 40s and 50s were the true money makers. After the late 60s that's when everything became screwy. They shouldn't have tried and competed in the Pacific. The instead shouldve better poured the money into strengthen their transatlatic routes For TWA MIddle East (until Sept 11) and Western and Central Europe is where the money was. There were way too many big competitors in the Pacific plus TW had no real experience. It was a risk not worth taking. I didn't care if they were round the world or not but that they spend their money and expand wisley and the Service in the Pacific except for Hawaii wasn't it. Too bad that they didn't start replacing the gass guzzling 727, 747 and the L-1011 in the mid 1980s otherwise they would've saved alot more cash in the long run on fuel efficient 757 and 767 aircraft.


"FUIMUS"
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

Time to ceremoniously string Carl Icahn by the balls and tie him to the undercarriage of a TW 767 taking off on its last flight !!!

Fitting tribute to a great airline and and its evil nemesis...


User currently offlineTranStar From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2345 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes, I will always have fond memories of TWA and flying through JFK. When I lived in Albuquerque in the 1980's, TWA flw L1011s and 767s on its morning ABQ-STL-JFK route. It was on TWA that I went to Europe with my parents and I loved the sight of its 747s lined up at the JFK terminal. I do hope they keep that terminal as it an architectural landmark (the main building, not the gate extensions).

In regards to their overexpansion, I vividly remember their brief excursion into Russia in 1992-1993. I flew them First Class (my Dad's frequent flyer miles) JFK - Brussels - Moscow Sheremetyevo in the Summer of 1992. The JFK-Brussels flight was on a L-1011 and then we changed to a 727-200 Advanced the rest of the way. Talk about low passenger loads...there were four of us on board on the Brussels-Moscow route, three in first class and one in coach (who was moved to First Class). The crew treated us great, with lobster and champagne. We landed at Moscow late, so we missed our gate at Terminal Two and had to be deplaned across the way at Terminal 1. Neat to see the TWA red against a bunch of old Aeroflot TU-154s, IL-62Ms, and a VIP IL-96-300.

Oh well.


User currently offlineVirginA340 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2311 times:

The main terminal will be kept and it'll most likely be turned into an aviation museum. The building itself is protected because it is listed on the National registry list. But it is said that flights wings 1 and 2 will be torn down and the terminal will be merged with T7 by a mini building with gates. So it looks to me that the TWA terminal will no longer be able to serve planes from there.


"FUIMUS"
User currently offlineEarly Air From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 611 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2281 times:

That is horrible..

What is going to happen to their great terminal, I have a lot of memmoires from that terminal...

Rgds,
Early Air


User currently offlineFanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2000 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2263 times:

The old TWA terminal at JFK, designed by Eero Saarinen (the same architect who conceived the main terminal at Dulles), has been designated a landmark and will be preserved. (New York City planners learned a hard lesson from the outcry that followed the demolition of the original Penn Station.) So, too, will the futuristic tunnel connecting this building with newer satellite terminals, but the latter will be razed for something "bigger and better." The old terminal will take on a new role, but I'm not sure what. I love to look at the TWA and Pan Am terminals at JFK and imagine the dawn of jet travel and remember two pioneering airlines.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Joe Pries





The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery
User currently offlineSFOintern From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 770 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2252 times:

I dunno about you guys, but as a passenger going through the TW complex at JFK in the mid-90s, I have no nostalgia for that ambience.

For the carrier, yes-- but not for the terminal. Absolutely not. Sorry, Eero and Pei...


User currently offlineVirginA340 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 15 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2205 times:

Fan o jets. The PA Terminal is going bye bye next year. Good ridance. Please don't compare the old Penn Station with this pisspoor cold design that is an insult. Penn Station was a 1,000 times better than that cramped dingy funny looking PA Terminal. I personally like T1, and the international Terminal at JFK better.


"FUIMUS"
User currently offlineJrlander From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1105 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (13 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2184 times:

Delta has delayed the reconstruction of its terminals at JFK, including the old Pan Am terminal, until the market is in better shape. Consequently, don't look for T3 to be demolished next year.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Today Its Over For TWA At JFK posted Sat Oct 6 2001 07:29:48 by N960AS
Emergency Landing For BWIA At JFK? posted Mon Sep 20 2004 16:02:13 by Jetblue15
Dates For N707JT At JFK posted Fri Aug 16 2002 18:01:00 by Setjet
Daily Routine For Concorde At JFK. posted Mon Jul 29 2002 17:21:54 by Mirrodie
Where's The Best Place For Spotting At Jfk? posted Sun Apr 14 2002 06:18:04 by Bobcat
TWA At JFK posted Fri Dec 28 2001 09:37:51 by Tsully
Delta Doing Business For Aeroflot At JFK posted Sat Aug 25 2001 04:05:04 by Airbus380
Twa At Jfk posted Sun Apr 16 2000 05:47:33 by Twa747100
TWA At JFK posted Fri Mar 3 2000 06:26:19 by Jr
My Experience With TWA At JFK posted Thu Nov 4 1999 04:57:34 by Cody