Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Healthy Airlines  
User currently offlinePA121 From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 98 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 8 months 13 hours ago) and read 1475 times:

There is a lot of talk about bankrupt or close to chapter 11 airlines after the sad events of 11/9.
What I wonder is: Are there any "healthy" ones around who could profit of the situation to consolidate their position (and buy the troubled ones for little money) waiting for better times to come?

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineTxAgKuwait From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1803 posts, RR: 40
Reply 1, posted (14 years 8 months 13 hours ago) and read 1369 times:

Dallas-based Southwest Airlines Co is healthy. They might find opportunities opening up when/if other carriers fold, collapse, or crubmle, but they are not apt to purchase another company.....particularly a real large one. Too much hassle to digest.

They have about 1.4 Billion in cash. Their highest loss estimates (when everything was shut down) was $13 Million/day. I think they can be safely expected to earn a profit of roughly 15 cents a share for the 3rd Quarter...the only U.S. airline to do so.

They restored their system to 100% operational status while other carriers were trying to get 80% of their flights back in operation. They have not laid anyone off nor arew they planning to. They are in fact running a couple of pilot training classes in October and at least one for FAs.

Load factor fell but has recovered to the 50s for the week ending 29 Sep and, based on comments made by their CFO....should be up to 60% or a little better now.

Yields are down but so is fuel...they can probably break even at around 63 or 64% The current load factor probably has them in a positive cash flow situation.

I am not gleeful or smug that other airlines are having a bad time. Nobody likes it when the industry is in trouble. Still, it is sort of nice to see a company that other airlines liked to sneer at...when everyone was making a profit.....continue to do their thing and do it well.

User currently offlinePlanenutz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 8 months 12 hours ago) and read 1332 times:

Ryanair is trying very hard to benefit from BA's relinquishing of slots at Gatwick, Cork, and Shannon. In fact, they have guaranteed the Irish government that they can exceed BA's load factors to Cork and Shannon and bring even more money into the local economies.

Ryanair is in a very "healthy" situation. They have more than e700 million in cash on hand, and will proceed with the purchase of up to 60 secondhand 737s, cash outright (btw, the prices for used 737s are dropping by the day). They have also hedged fuel prices through the next 12 months.

Ryanair even says that if Europe is plunged into a recession, the airline will still grow because people will become more price conscious.

I'm not sure of other European budget carriers, but it looks like Ryanair intends to come out of the current crisis unscathed.

User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13756 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (14 years 8 months 12 hours ago) and read 1314 times:

The Lo-Cost Airlines in the UK

Singapore Airlines

Queensland And Terratorial Air Service

SouthWest Airlines

China Southern Airlines

(Educated guesses, except for the first four, which are nearly definates)

Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3813 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (14 years 8 months 9 hours ago) and read 1278 times:

Alaska Airlines
Easy Jet

User currently offlineFlyinghighboy From Australia, joined Aug 2001, 749 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (14 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 1228 times:

What about QF and DJ? They seem to be doing well and running at near full capacity due to the demise of Ansett Australia.

User currently offlineBruneiAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 8 months 2 hours ago) and read 1194 times:

"Queensland And Terratorial Air Service"

Dont you mean

Queensland Ans Northern Territory Aerial Service(s)?

Guess what! they changed their name the new one is

Qantas Airways

User currently offlineNG737PSR From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 8 months 2 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

I think charter airlines in the UK should be relatively stable as they have already got most of their seats filled via tour operators for the next 6-12 months at least. The ones not tied directly in with tour operators may have problems though.

They may suffer though where they were due to lease aircraft to US/Canadian carriers during the Winter.

I'm glad to be flying for a charter company and not a scheduled one during these difficult times.

User currently offlineExcelsior767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1144 times:

This may be the first year since its inception in 1984 that YX (Midwest Express) loses money. The only two U.S. airlines to have consistently turned a profit from day one are Southwest and Midwest Express. And they are complete opposites. The severe downturn in business travel has definitely affected Midwest Express which caters mostly to high-yield business travelers. However, the carrier is in a sound financial situation, with hardly any debt at all, and owns most of their aircraft. While YX may lose money this year, I think they will still fair better than most carriers.

User currently offlineTeva From France, joined Jan 2001, 1881 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1135 times:

As surprising as it can be for some people, AF is doing quite well.
And they could benefit from the problems encountered by SR. (Reduce competion on the French domestic network, and more pax attracted to their CDG hub)

Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
User currently offlineOrdual24 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 60 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1116 times:

they have eliminated 20,000 jobs and loads are close to full with the flight reductions...union employees have yet to see a raise and UAL has the extra time and money to go into the Biz Jet "time share" buisness.....not to mention the 800 million they have already recieved from the govt. and 1.2 billion from insurance due to the events of 9/11.......can't wait to see Goodwin in cuffs!

User currently offlineAloha 737-200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1073 times:

So you're saying that the layoff of around 70,000 pilots and cutting of 10-20% of flights in major carriers actually did good for the industry? I don't mean that in a bad way.  Big grin

So if that was in fact beneficial then perhaps will the furloughed pilots have a chance at a job again in the near future, as the profits rise again and airlines cautiously begin to expand?

Hopefully.  Big grin

Aloha 737-200!!  Wink/being sarcastic

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8362 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (14 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1051 times:

Southwest will do fine because they didn't falter the last time we had an economic downturn a decade ago. Thanks to Southwest's extremely low seat-mile costs, they may actually thrive as the airline takes over business reliquished by the cutbacks to AA, CO, DL, NW, and UA.

JetBlue is another airline that will do fine. Like Southwest, JetBlue sports low seat-mile costs and has locked up some important markets like JFK-FLL.

In Europe, both EasyJet and Ryanair could become major players in the European market, especially between the British Isles and the European continent. Like Southwest and JetBlue, both these low-cost carriers have low seat-mile costs and will definitely benefit as AF, BA, IB, LH, etc. cut back their services to and from the British Isles. Indeed, with a glut of 737-300/400/500 planes suddenly becoming available, Ryanair's intent on getting more CFM56-powered 737's could end up being less expensive that Ryanair originally envisaged because of the depressed prices for these planes.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Sun Country Airlines Healthy? posted Sat Apr 5 2008 20:46:18 by Travaz
Singapore Airlines 777 (9V-SVM) posted Thu Sep 10 2009 22:55:11 by Skane340
World's Most Profitable Airlines 2009 posted Thu Sep 10 2009 16:22:05 by OD-BWH
Airlines Continue To Bleed posted Thu Sep 10 2009 10:16:54 by Khobar
Airlines' Improving Record For Season: WSJ posted Thu Sep 10 2009 09:14:41 by CAL764
Does Cameroon Airlines Operate Any B 747s Still? posted Thu Sep 10 2009 00:02:26 by United Airline
Volare Airlines LAX-SYD posted Wed Sep 9 2009 17:19:43 by Lxmd11
'Official Airlines' Of NFL Teams posted Tue Sep 8 2009 15:13:23 by ChrisNH
17 Airlines Change Terminals Tomorrow At BCN posted Tue Sep 8 2009 09:58:06 by AirCatalonia
Shenzhen Airlines Starts MNL posted Tue Sep 8 2009 08:10:43 by JetBlue777