Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Its Not All Bad News - Easyjet  
User currently offlineAndyEastMids From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 996 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 695 times:

Easyjet have just reported their September 2001 passenger carryings were 3% down on August 2001, but they were 27% up on a year ago - September 2000.

Someone seems to be weathering the storm quite well.

Andy

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineQantas744 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 246 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 677 times:

They had a seat sale a couple of weeks ago which went very well by all accounts-but it was for travel from 15 October onwards so their October figures will be interesting to see when compared with the majors.

Could their success during September be related to how much of their traffic is derived from business users and how much is from leisure travellers who book well in advance?


you can't buy time but you can sell your soul and the closest thing to heaven is to rock'n'roll
User currently offlineAndyEastMids From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 996 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 675 times:

Maybe... Of course, the other thing that they haven't admitted to is what percentage capacity increase they had between last September and this September. They've certainly acquired a few more 737s and haven't retired any, so whilst their traffic figures may be up their load factor might not show quite so rosy a picture.

ANdy

User currently offlineDavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7144 posts, RR: 14
Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 667 times:		 Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!


Their load factors compared with last year were almost identical (about 83%).

The bit easyJet appear to have omitted:

The increase in numbers is down to the extra flights and aircraft flown in September 2001 when compared to September 2000.

David/MAN: 293 and counting


User currently offlineDavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7144 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 658 times:		 Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!


Ooops...Andy's 2nd post wasn't there when I replied.

Sorry for the rehash in the latter part of my post Embarrassment

David/MAN
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why All The Bad News? posted Mon Oct 29 2001 00:56:33 by Saab340
Air Canada's Not That Bad After All. posted Tue Jun 19 2001 04:27:18 by Teej13
Not All That Bad: Museums posted Thu Mar 29 2001 17:56:56 by Caravelle
Are Not All Cockpit Controls Duplicated? posted Tue Oct 10 2006 10:31:22 by NEMA
Bad News For MH: Aug 1 Rationalisation Revised posted Sat Sep 9 2006 15:00:14 by 9MMAR
Bad News Bad Karma Boston! posted Sat Jun 10 2006 03:19:50 by Zippyjet
Bad News For BMI - Passenger Figures Down posted Mon Mar 20 2006 13:11:40 by Concorde001
More Bad News For Bmi posted Fri Jan 6 2006 18:33:37 by Concorde001
Not All Planes Of The Same Type Equal? posted Tue Nov 8 2005 13:03:45 by Jorge1812
Bad News For Mesaba...35 RJ's To Be Grounded. posted Sat Sep 24 2005 00:35:23 by Jetdeltamsy