Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ORD T5 Expansion / 380 Gates CBP T1 & T3  
User currently offlinenomorerjs From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 465 posts, RR: 0
Posted (5 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2125 times:

T5 at O'Hare is clearly in need of additional capacity during 12 pm and 6pm, or T1 and T3 need to have US CBP to relieve T5. Will T5 ever be expanded or will T1 and T3 get CBP? I know the airlines are under contract until 2018, but ORD won't make it that long at current gate capacity while the runway capacity is increasing. AA obviously has no commitment to ORD given the amount of $ they spend at MIA and JFK, while ORD doesn't get much except new RJs (but they are better than the 319). DFW is AA home, hub, and is fortunate to be on the Barnett Shale to pay for things. But given Chicago's tax & spend reputation, why are new gates at ORD and issue?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2699 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1642 times:

IMHO...gate congestion is building rapidly at ORD and something is going to give in the next 1-2 years...and I think that will be AA and UA agreeing to terminal expansions. There are lots of different plans that have been discussed recently here.

User currently offlineORD Boy 2 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 286 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1154 times:

Bring back the World Gateway expansions?? (AA gets a new T4 built around the power plant), T6 next to T5?
If you did that with FIS in every terminal, you could have:
UA/Star could have Terminals 1 and 2...
AA/oneworld/Alaska would be at Terminals 3 and 4
Delta/Skyteam, Spirit, JetBlue and Unaligned carriers at Terminals 5 and 6....


User currently offlineckfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5218 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (5 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1051 times:

Quoting nomorerjs (Thread starter):
AA obviously has no commitment to ORD given the amount of $ they spend at MIA and JFK, while ORD doesn't get much except new RJs (but they are better than the 319).

When Parker was courting the unions to get on board with merging with US, he said that ORD had been ignored by management and called it a mistake. He believed that UA and WN should both get a run for their money. What you're seeing now (i.e., more large RJs and no A319s) was the plan that was devised under Horton, and probably it was in the works, when the Airbus/Boeing order was placed in the summer of 2011, when Arpey was CEO.

Part of the issue goes back to the operations caps that the FAA imposed. That made DFW the primary east-west hub, while ORD became more focused on O&D and connections within the Midwest. DFW had room to expand, especially when Terminal D opened, which gave AA a lot more space.

Over time, I expect to see AA to be more aggressive at ORD.

Yes, AA built a nice terminal at JFK, but it's not as large as envisioned, and I don't think it will be expanded for some time

Quoting nomorerjs (Thread starter):
But given Chicago's tax & spend reputation, why are new gates at ORD and issue?

Traditionally, the cost of daily operations and all capital projects at ORD and MDW have been paid by landing fees, gate rentals, concessions, parking fees, and so on. Every mayor since Richard J. Daley has said repeatedly that no taxpayer money goes into the cost of running, expanding, and modernizing ORD and MDW.

So, you have to get AA and UA on board for further expansion, since they are the primary tenants. They have balked at paying for a western terminal, since that would be used by competitors.

Quoting ORD+Boy+2" class="quote" target="_blank">ORD Boy 2 (Reply 2):
Bring back the World Gateway expansions?? (AA gets a new T4 built around the power plant), T6 next to T5?

The original plan had T1 being UA domestic. T2 would be UA/Star international. T3 would be AA domestic. A new T4 would be AA/Oneworld international. T5 would be for international not aligned with Star or Oneworld. A new T6 would be for all non AA/US/codeshare domestic. So, at the time the plan was announced, it would have been DL, NW, TW, CO, and US. Today, it would be NK, B6, DL, VX, and anyone else who wanted to fly domestic out of ORD.

I don't think 1, 3, or 6 would have customs and immigration under the original plan. But, this makes more sense than a western terminal, since linking the terminal for Terminals 1-5 and remote parking would present issues, as well as trying to move connecting bags, cargo, and mail.


User currently offlinejayunited From United States of America, joined Jan 2013, 921 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (5 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 876 times:

Quoting United787 (Reply 1):
IMHO...gate congestion is building rapidly at ORD and something is going to give in the next 1-2 years...and I think that will be AA and UA agreeing to terminal expansions.

I agree I think both AA and UA will soon drop their objections and support new terminals at ORD. The new question is will the City of Chicago allow both of these airlines to retain the type of control they currently have over ORD. IMHO both of these airlines would have agreed years ago to support terminal expansion if they get control over the gates and not a competitor because for both AA and UA it is about keeping the competition out of ORD. But I think both these airlines now realize that their tactics are having an effect on their current and future operations at ORD. So its only a matter of time before both these airlines get on board and stop holding ORD back.


User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2699 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (5 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 771 times:

Two good recent threads on this very subject:

What's Next For ORD (by ORD2010 Sep 20 2013 in Civil Aviation)

What's Next For ORD Part 2 (by iowaman Oct 30 2013 in Civil Aviation)


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
ORD Terminal Expansion/Addition posted Wed Jun 27 2012 00:46:40 by IcelandairMSP
CRJ At ORD T5 Today posted Fri Jun 18 2010 07:02:57 by UnitedTristar
AA/LH/IB/NH/UA At ORD T5 posted Sat Apr 10 2010 11:24:35 by AmricanShamrok
BA: Date Announced For T1 - T3 Flight Switch. posted Thu Aug 21 2008 04:42:10 by BAStew
BA744 At ORD T5 Early This Morning posted Mon Jul 7 2008 10:52:46 by 22right
Are There Enough Gates At T1 YYZ? posted Wed Sep 19 2007 08:24:16 by RicardoFG
Report: MKE Discuss Terminal Expansion, 28 Gates posted Fri Apr 21 2006 21:59:19 by Vivavegas
WN Announces More ISP Expansion. 4 More Gates! posted Tue Nov 23 2004 14:04:49 by NIKV69
Gates At Heathrow T3 And T4 posted Tue Nov 26 2002 21:46:02 by B-HXB
Transfering T3 to T1 At ORD? posted Mon Jun 7 2004 13:00:16 by Delta767-400